TOWN OF CARY
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REPORT
Upchurch Pond Subdivision
Subdivision Plan Approval
04-SB-001

APPLICANT

OWNER

Hugh J. Gilleece and Associates

 

W & W Partners

 

Location:

Map:

The site is located east of Somerset Subdivision, north of Berkeley Subdivision, west of CSX Railroad, approximately 1,460’ north of High House Road at the current end of Sir Walker Lane.  The site would also be accessed by Connemara Lane located in Somerset Subdivision.

 

Development Review Committee Recommendation:

At the Planning and Zoning Board meeting staff recommended denial of the plan due to the applicant’s request to reduce the eastern 50’ opaque buffer to a 10’ common open space buffer and a 15’ landscape easement. 

Following the Planning and Zoning Board meeting, staff met with the applicant to discuss the proposed reduction of the eastern 50’ buffer.  The applicant informed the staff that the requested buffer reduction was based upon trying to address the residents' request for larger overall lot sizes, the triangular shape of the parcel and the extra land needed to install a street design to minimize cut-through traffic.  Based on the need to address the staff and P&Z Board's concerns with the buffer reduction, the applicant has revised their request.

The applicant has proposed to increase the common area buffer width from 10’ to 15’ and to utilize a 10’ landscape easement along the interior side of the 15’ wide common buffer, thus providing a combined 25’ wide buffer.  Within the 15’ common buffer area, the applicant has agreed to install a 4’ high berm, a double offset row of evergreen trees and a 6’ high board-on-board fence to be located along the eastern property line (railroad right-of-way line).  The combination of berm, fencing and plantings within the 15’ common buffer areas would provide an opaque screen as required.  A row of evergreen shrubs would be placed in the interior 10’ landscape easement.

In consideration of private agreements reached between the applicant and residents of Somerset and Berkeley Subdivisions, the applicant has agreed to install two right-angle turning movements and a cul-de-sac to lessen cut-through traffic, and to increase the size of proposed lots which has decreased the number of lots that can be placed on the property and the amount of area available to provide an eastern buffer with no lot encroachment.  If the objective is to obtain larger lots, then the new eastern buffer configuration should be considered.  Staff would prefer the eastern 25’ buffer be placed in common open space as opposed to allowing a portion of the buffer to be on the adjoining lots. However, the proposed buffer changes can be supported by staff if Council wants lot sizes to be larger to address residents' concerns.

Also in consideration of private agreements, the applicant has requested that a development restriction be placed on the Upchurch Pond Subdivision to delay the roadway opening between the Berkeley Subdivision and Upchurch Pond Subdivisions until such time as 50% of all certificates of occupancy have been issued within the Upchurch Pond Subdivision.

Staff recommends approval of limiting access to the Berkeley Subdivision until 50% of the certificates of occupancy have been issued.

Planning and Zoning Board Recommendation:

The Planning and Zoning Board unanimously (8-0) recommended denial of the plan, as recommended by the staff.

The Planning and Zoning Board’s recommendation includes only consideration of staff’s original recommendation as presented at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting of April 19, 2004 .

 

PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS

    Planning and Zoning Board

April 19, 2004

    Town Council

May 13, 2004

 

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

 

The applicant, Hugh J. Gilleece and Associates, representing the owner, W &W Partners, Inc., has requested approval of a subdivision plan containing 20 single-family lots on 10.44 acres.  The proposed minimum lot size would be 10,800 square feet with a proposed average lot size of 15,832 square feet.

 

 

PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Continued)

 

The plans also include a request to reduce a required 50’ opaque buffer to ten feet along the CSX Railroad boundary, and to provide a 15’ landscape easement adjacent to the proposed ten foot buffer.

 

 


PARCEL INFORMATION

Parcel #

Realid #

Area

0744.01-05-6561 (portion of)

0072382

10.44 acres

 

ZONING AND LAND USE PLAN COMPLIANCE

 

Current Zoning:  Residential-8 Conditional Use (R-8 CU)

Town Limits: The property is inside Cary’s town limits.

Zoning Compliance:  Excluding the proposal to reduce the eastern 50’ opaque buffer to ten feet and to provide a 15’ landscape easement adjacent to the proposed ten foot buffer, the plan complies with all zoning requirements

Land Use Compliance:  The Land Use Plan allows for low density residential development (1 to 3 u\a) to medium density residential development (3 to 8 u\a).

 

 

ZONING AND LAND USE PLAN COMPLIANCE (Continued)

 

Adequate Public School Facilities:  The Wake County Public School System has issued a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities for Schools for this subdivision.  The Certificate indicates that adequate seats will be available at designated schools (TBA) at the time of occupancy.

 

 

LANDSCAPE

 

Excluding the proposal to reduce the eastern 50’ opaque buffer to a ten foot buffer and a15’ landscape easement, the plan complies with all landscape requirements.  The proposed ten foot buffer would be treated as common open space, with no lot encroachment.  However, the 15’ landscape easement would be located on each adjoining lot.  The required buffer should be treated as common open space, with no lot encroachment.  It is staff’s opinion that in order to provide an opaque buffer, the buffer width should be at least 25’ wide with, no lot encroachment into the buffer area.

 

Staff therefore, does not support allowing the required 50’ buffer to be reduced to a ten foot buffer and a 15’ landscape easement.

 

 

TRAFFIC

 

A Traffic Impact study was not required.

 

Staff Contact:  Dick Moore, 462-3937, Email:  dick.moore@townofcary.org

 

ROADWAY DESIGN

 

The plans propose extending Sir Walker Lane from the Berkeley Subdivision and extending Connemara Drive from Somerset Subdivision into the proposed subdivision.  No thoroughfare improvements are required or proposed as part of this plan.

 

The Town’s Land Development Ordinance requires interconnection between compatible adjacent land uses.  The subdivision plan as submitted proposes to meet this requirement.

 

Staff has received petitions signed by homeowners of 76 of the 83 homes in the Berkeley subdivision against the connection between Somerset and Berkeley Subdivisions.  Their concerns are “increased traffic resulting in increased safety hazards to the subdivision children and pets, as well as increased noise and chemical pollution due to the connection”.

 

In addition, staff has received emails from a Somerset resident, “speaking on behalf of himself and various neighbors”, requesting that the connection between Somerset and Berkeley take place, stating that the connection would benefit both neighborhoods by providing two entrance/exit choices and better emergency response times.  He further states that entering the NC 55 traffic flow from Connemara is currently difficult and will only get more difficult with NC 55 widening construction and anticipated higher speeds due to the wider road.

 

Please also refer to the attached “Connectivity Summary” memo which was originally sent to Town Council and the Planning and Zoning Board in July 2003 by our Planning Department in conjunction with the rezoning request for this property.  This report provides technical information regarding the benefits of interconnectivity as required by Town Ordinance.

 

Staff Contact:  Tammy Spivey, 462-3933, Email:  tammy.spivey@townofcary.org

 

UTILITIES

 

This development has access to Cary water and sewer and complies with Town utility policies and standards.

 

Staff Contact:  Shuyan Tian, 469-4381, Email: shuyan.tian@townofcary.org

 

STORM WATER

 

The plan complies with all storm drainage requirements.

 

Staff Contact:  Tom Horstman, 469-4347, Email:  tom.horstman@townofcary.org

 

PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION AND CONCERNS

 

Adjoining property owners were notified during staff's initial review of this plan.  The staff received comments regarding the location and screening of a storm water retention pond and access from Upchurch Pond to the adjoining subdivisions.

 

The storm water retention pond was relocated to the northern area of the subdivision and out of a landscape easement separating Somerset Subdivision from Upchurch Pond Subdivision.  The Upchurch Pond Subdivision plans propose opaque screening along the common property line between the two subdivisions and evergreen screening along the top of the slope of the retention pond.

.

 

PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION AND CONCERNS (Continued)

 

The pond would be effectively screened from off-site views.

 

Somerset Subdivision and Berkeley Subdivision were approved providing future access to the Upchurch Pond Subdivision area.  Cary ’s connectivity ordinance requires internal connections between adjoining subdivisions.  The proposed Upchurch Pond Subdivision complies with Cary ’s connectivity requirements.


  

Memo

To:        Town Council
Cc:        Planning & Zoning Board

From:    Jeff Ulma, AICP, Planning Director
Date:     July 24, 2003

Re:                Connectivity Summary                                                                                                                  

Recently, during the Upchurch Rezoning (03-REZ-05) public hearing, one of the Town Council members requested a summary of the Town’s connectivity requirements.  This memorandum describes the requirements, the rationale for them, and some information from other communities addressing connectivity.  Staff has used this pending rezoning case to illustrate the impacts and benefits of the requirements.

What are the Town’s Connectivity Requirements?

The Land Development Ordinance requires any new subdivision to be designed to have a connectivity index of 1.2.  The index is calculated by dividing the number of street links (street sections between intersections, including cul-de-sacs) by the number of street nodes (intersections and cul-de-sacs).  A grid street network would yield an index of 2.0.  The ordinance also requires connections to compatible adjacent land uses spaced no more than 1,250 to 1,500 feet apart in each direction, a requirement that ensures a minimum level of external connectivity.  It should be noted that these standards can be waived if meeting them “is impractical due to topography or other natural features.”

The ordinance has been in place since 1999 and was adopted following an extensive public involvement process.  It was also included in the recently adopted Land Development Ordinance update.  From 1999 to the present, the Town has applied this ordinance to all new developments.

What is the Purpose of the Connectivity Requirements?

The purposes of the ordinances are to:

How are other Communities Addressing Connectivity?

Last month, the American Planning Association published a report on “Planning for Street Connectivity.  The Town of Cary is one of the communities highlighted in the report along with eleven other communities.  As the table below indicates, communities are using one of two approaches to improve connectivity in their cities, block length limits or connectivity indices. Based on the sampling shown in the table, Cary ’s connectivity standards are not as restrictive as in other communities and allow for more cul-de-sacs than are permitted in the other sampled jurisdictions.  The following table summarizes the different requirements.

Table 1: Connectivity Requirements

Community

Max. local street intersection spacing

Are street stubs required?

Are cul-de-sacs allowed?

Max. cul-de-sac length

Metro, Oregon

530

No

No (with exceptions)

200

Portland , Oregon

530

Yes

No (with exceptions)

200

Beaverton , Oregon

530

Yes

No (with exceptions)

200

Eugene , Oregon

600

Yes

No (with exceptions)

400

Fort Collins , CO

Uses max. block size acreage

Yes

Yes, limited

660

Boulder , CO

Not regulated, practice is 300-350 feet

Yes

Yes, limited

600

Huntersville , NC

250-500

Yes

No (with exceptions)

350

Cornelius , NC

200-1,200

Yes

No (with exceptions)

250

Conover , NC

400-1,200

Yes

yes

500

Raleigh , NC

1,500

Yes

yes

400 ft. for residential, 800 ft. for commercial

Orlando , FL

Uses 1.4 connectivity index

Yes

yes

700 ft. or max. 30 units

Middletown , DE

Uses 1.4 connectivity index

Yes

yes

1,000

Cary , NC

Uses 1.2 connectivity index

Yes

yes

900

An Example of the Application of Cary ’s Connectivity Requirements:

To illustrate the connectivity ordinance in practice, staff conducted an analysis of the pending rezoning for Mr. Upchurch’s property between the existing Berkeley and Somerset subdivisions.  Staff’s review of the connectivity for this case includes a quantitative analysis that illustrates the value of connectivity from a traffic, accident information, service delivery and public safety perspective. 

  1. Traffic

The Town’s traffic engineer performed an analysis of the implications of making a street connection between the Berkeley and Somerset subdivisions via the property subject to the rezoning.  The conclusions reached by the technical analysis include the following:

  1. Accident Information

One of the concerns expressed by some residents was that the connection could increase the number of accidents with pedestrians.  Based on existing town-wide data from 1998-2002, residential streets have experienced considerably less pedestrian and bicycle accidents than thoroughfares or parking lots.  The following table summarizes this information:

Accident Type

Thoroughfares

Parking Lots

Residential Streets

Totals

# of pedestrian accidents

33

47

21

101

# of bicycle accidents

37

8

8

53

Totals

70 ( 45% of total)

55 (36% of total)

29 ( 19% of total)

154

3.  Service Delivery

An important reason for the Town’s connectivity ordinance is efficiency benefits for solid waste, recycling and yard waste delivery to Cary residents.  Based on an analysis conducted by the Public Works Department, savings in time and money are achieved by a well-connected street system. 

In the sample case, staff has estimated that it will take approximately 10 less minutes per service pick-up for the Berkeley and Somerset subdivisions if the street system were connected.  The time savings equates to 26 hours over the course of the year.  The reduced travel distance savings for the three service deliveries is over 550 miles per year.  The reduced distance also provides the Town with cost savings from fuel purchases and from lifecycle costs for the service delivery equipment.

Based on an analysis conducted by the Public Works Department, connectivity also has positive impacts to public water quality in two specific areas (hydrant flushing program and customer service calls).  From a customer service perspective, over 30% of the residential water quality complaints come from households on dead end lines (cul-de-sacs).  On average, it takes about 12 minutes to handle the complaint and substantially more time if a crew needs to be dispatched to determine the problem and correct it.  One way that the Town has responded to some of the water quality issues on dead ends has been to institute a hydrant flushing program.  Based on the review of the case example, the dead ending of the subdivisions will add almost 50 hours of additional hydrant flushing time per year.

  1. Public Safety Response

In discussing the case project with the Cary Police Department, connection of the two subdivisions ( Berkeley and Somerset ) could reduce response times for the police in responding to emergencies in these areas.  While the reduction is difficult to quantify since the response time is dependent on where the police vehicle is coming from, a reduction in response time by up to 1 minute could be realized if the police vehicle had to respond to a call at one end of the subdivision.  

From a Cary Fire Department perspective, response times are also reduced with well-connected street systems.  According to the Fire Department analysis of the case project, connectivity for Sir Walker Lane and Connemara Drive and the other streets in Somerset and Berkeley subdivisions will improve response time from the fire station on High House Road by 2-3 minutes for the Somerset subdivision.

5.  Case Study Conclusions

Based on the analysis performed by the Fire, Public Works and Utilities, Police, Engineering and Planning Departments, providing a connection between the Somerset , Berkeley and the future adjacent subdivision will be beneficial from an overall traffic, public safety, service delivery, and environmental perspective. 

While the analysis yields the conclusion that connectivity is beneficial, the design of the connection will be important in ensuring that connectivity is made in a manner that reduces convenience for non-neighborhood related traffic.  There are numerous ways to address the design of the linkage including some of the options that consultant Walter Kulash discussed at this year’s retreat.  Staff is working with the applicant to address the design during the rezoning and subdivision processes.

Please feel free to contact me if you need further information.

JU/jp