Rezoning Staff Report to the Town Council
08-REZ-03
Request
The applicant is
requesting Town Council approve an Ordinance to amend the official zoning map of
the Town of
The purpose of a rezoning
is to evaluate the appropriateness of a proposed land use for the subject
parcel(s) of land. Specific
development requirements related to the technical aspects of land development,
such as access, stormwater management, road improvements, utility line
placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not considered during
the rezoning process. However, all
of these development issues must be addressed for compliance with existing
requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) when the site or
subdivision plan is submitted. All
such requirements can be found at
http:vic.townofcary.org.
Background
Information
|
Applicant |
Jerry Turner and Associates, Inc. |
||
|
Agent |
Glenda Toppe
Jerry Turner and Associates, Inc. |
||
|
Acreage |
49.38
± |
||
|
General
Location |
North of Green Hope School Road,
east of Fryars Frontier Trail and west of NC 55 Highway |
||
|
Hearings /
Meetings |
Public
Hearing |
Planning
& Zoning |
Town Council |
|
Land Use
Designation |
Medium Density Residential (MDR) |
||
|
Town Limits |
In the Town of |
||
|
Annexation |
Not required since it is already
within the Town Limits |
||
|
Valid Protest |
No protests were received regarding
this case; therefore, no supermajority vote is required. |
||
|
P&Z
Recommendation |
Recommended 9-0 for approval. |
||
|
Existing Use |
Vacant |
||
|
Proposed Use |
Residential |
||
|
Final Council
Action |
To be provided after the Town
Council Meeting |
||
|
Staff Contact |
Debra Grannan, Senior Planner
E-mail: debra.grannan@townofcary.org
Phone: (919) 460-4980
Mailing Address:
|
||
The applicant has proposed to remove approximately 4.28 acres from the Fryar PDD
and add it to the Highcroft Village PDD.
This request increases the density
in Tract 4 and
reduces the density in Tract 5 of the Highcroft Village PDD.
There would be a reduction of
dwelling units in Tract R-2 of the Fryar PDD from 268 dwelling units to 251
dwelling units so that the density of that tract will remain as previously
approved. The applicant is not proposing any conditions outside the proposed
Public Notification:
On
Feedback at the
Town Council Public Hearing:
The applicant, Mrs. Glenda Toppe
of Jerry Turner and Associates, stated the request is to remove 4.2 acres from
the Fryar PDD and include it in the Highcroft Village PDD, and this swap is
proposed to utilize an existing stream buffer as a physical boundary between the
two approved PDDs. She stated the parcel in question is best suited for
development within
No one spoke at the public hearing.
A Council member stated the
particular area in the Fryar PDD with a 30 foot streetscape was due to the
fairly low density and that there is a higher density in the area where they
propose to reduce the streetscape to 30 feet. The Council member stated that a
higher density calls for a larger streetscape. Council also wanted to make sure
that both neighborhoods have access to the greenway trail. Clarification as to
the net effect on the open space calculations between the two projects was
requested before the issues comes back to Council.
Changes Since the
Town Council Public Hearing: The applicant has
increased the proposed streetscape along
The Highcroft Village PDD master plan in the PDD amendment application only
proposed a total of 32.34 acres of open space. Since the public hearing, the
applicant has increased the total acreage of open space provided to 33.87 acres
through removing the request to reduce the streetscape buffer and increasing the
amount of open space provided.
|
|
||||
|
|
Current PDD |
PDD Amendment Application |
April Revised PDD Amendment |
Net Gain/Loss From Current PDD |
|
Streetscape |
3.04 ± |
2.72 ± |
3.49 ± |
+0.45 ± |
|
Stream Buffer |
21.25 ± |
21.06 ± |
21.06 ± |
-0.19 ± |
|
Open Space |
2.97 ± |
3.65 ± |
4.44 ± |
+1.47 ± |
|
Buffers |
5.08 ± |
4.91 ± |
4.88 ± |
-0.20 ± |
|
Total |
32.34 ± |
32.34 ± |
33.87± |
+1.53 ± |
*
Also, there are 2.73 acres of Urban Transition Buffers not included in the
overall total open space acreage. This 2.73 acres of UTB is located within the
Highcroft Village PDD, but was recently used as land for off-site mitigation in
associate with the Parkside Variance approval.
The open space in the Fryar PDD amendment has also been increased since the
public hearing from 22.86 acres to 23.86 acres.
|
Fryar PDD Total Open Space Acreage
Calculations* |
||||
|
|
Current PDD |
PDD Amendment Application |
April Revised PDD Amendment |
Net Gain/Loss From Current PDD |
|
Pond & Stream Buffer |
21.41 ± |
18.88 ± |
19.88 ± |
-1.53 ± |
|
Streetscape & Landscape Strips |
3.98 ± |
3.98 ± |
3.98 ± |
0 |
|
Total |
25.39 ± |
22.86 ± |
23.86 ± |
-1.53 ± |
Since the public hearing, there are now no net gains or losses in open space
totals between the original Fryar and Highcroft Village PDD approvals and what
is currently being proposed by the applicants.
Feedback at the Planning and Zoning Board
The Board confirmed with the applicant that the total amount of open space was
not being reduced.
Changes
Since the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting
The Fryar PDD Document has been amended to show a reduction in the number of
dwelling units proposed in Tract R-2 from 268 to 251, so that the density of
this tract is consistent with the previously approved limit of 4.1 dwelling
units per acre. The use table in
the Highcroft Village PDD was modified to require a Special Use Permit for Large
Day Care Homes and Religious Assembly which is consistent with current LDO
standards. The Highcroft Village PDD document has been amended to reflect that
Tracts 4 and 5 will comply with current LDO standards for Urban Transition
Buffers.
Planning and Zoning Board Recommendation
The Planning and Zoning Board recommended the PDD Amendment unanimously for
approval, with the understanding that the amended documents be revised prior to
Town Council action to reflect current Urban Transition Buffer regulations for
the portions of the PDDs that are proposed to be modified.
summary
As described below in the Consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan and Consistency with the Land Development Ordinance sections,
Staff has reviewed the application and information provided prior to this
meeting, and the analysis by Staff is
that the application is generally consistent with the Goals and
Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, the Land Development Ordinance, and is
reasonable and in the public interest.
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
A.
Land Use Plan:
This rezoning request conforms to the adopted
Land Use Plan.
This rezoning request
involves the swap of land
between the Fryar PDD and the Highcroft Village PDD to utilize an existing
stream buffer as the physical boundary between the two planned developments.
The designated land use on the portion of land being swapped is mostly
Medium Density Residential (MDR) with some High Density Residential (HDR), and
the proposed use of the parcels matches the existing land use.
Thus, the proposal is in conformance with the Land Use Plan.
B.
Growth Management Plan:
The Growth Management Plan includes the
following Guiding
Principles which are
relevant to this case:
1.
L2 Guiding Principle: Ensure that future growth protects sensitive natural
resources and protects open space.
The transfer of land between the Fryar PDD and the Highcroft Village PDD allows
better utilization of this land with less impact to an intervening stream
buffer.
C.
Affordable Housing Plan:
The Affordable Housing Plan includes the following Guiding Principles which are
relevant to this case:
1.
Provide for a full range of housing choices for all income groups, families of
various sizes, seniors, and persons with special challenges.
2.
Encourage the location of high density housing within walking and convenient
commuting distance of employment, shopping, and other activities, or within a
short walk of a bus or transit stop, through "mixed use" developments,
residences created on the upper floors of nonresidential downtown buildings, and
other creative strategies.
3.
Assure
a quality living environment and access to public amenities for all residents,
present and future, of the Town of
D.
Comprehensive Transportation
Plan:
Existing Section:
Not built
Future Section:
100’ right-of-way 4-lane median divided
Road Improvements:
Design completed by the Town
Sidewalks
Requirements: Required on both sides
of the road
Bicycle Requirements:
14’ wide outside lane required
Transit Requirements:
None
E.
Parks & Greenways Master Plan:
Greenways Map
According to the approved Parks,
Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan there are no issues
associated with the proposed relocation of the approximately 4.28 acres from the
Fryar PDD to the Highcroft Village PDD.
All PRCR conditions previously approved for each of these PDDs shall
remain in place. According to the
Open Space and Historic Resources Plan (OSHRP) these 4.28 ± acres were
originally proposed for conservation as part of a larger parcel due to the
riparian buffers on site.
Consistency with the
Land Development Ordinance
The proposed project is in the rezoning stage and therefore preliminary
engineering of the site has not been provided to Staff for review.
Prior to site plan or subdivision plan approval, the application will be
required to demonstrate consistency with the Land Development Ordinance with
respect to specific development requirements, such as access, stormwater
management, road improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and
landscape plantings.
F.
Environmental:
According to the Town of
G.
Buffers:
The approximate 4.28 acres, proposed
to be removed from the Fryar PDD and added to the Highcroft Village PDD,
utilizes an existing stream buffer as the physical boundary between the two
planned developments. In Highcroft Village Tract 4, a 30-foot buffer is proposed
to the east and a stream buffer provides separation with Tract 3 to the south
and with Tract 5 to the north. Highcroft Village Tract 5 is divided by
H.
Streetscape:
According to Chapter 7 (LDO), a 50’ Streetscape
would be required along the future portion of
I.
Traffic Analysis:
Originally, for the Highcroft Village Property residential portion, a traffic
study (05-TAR-182) was conducted by HNTB which analyzed 350 single-family homes
and 80,000 SF of office. This development generated 391 AM and 477 PM Peak hour
trips. At a later time, the office
portion of the development was dropped and the single-family home units were
increased to 427 units. For the Highcroft Village PDD amendment, the only two
tracts affected are Tracts 4 and 5. Both Tract 4 and Tract 5 are approved for
mixed-residential. Tract 4 currently is approved for 97 units. The amendment
proposes 116 units. Tract 5 is
currently approved for 80 units. The amendment proposes 61 units. So, in theory,
19 units are being shifted from Tract 5 to Tract 4 which would not yield an
increase in traffic. The built out year for this traffic study is 2009.
The Fryar PUD traffic study (06-TAR-202) was
completed by HNTB and analyzed 332 single-family homes and 30,000 SF of retail.
This proposal simply decreases the acreage of 268 of the single-family homes of
the 332 single-family homes by 4 acres. The built out year for this traffic
study is 2010.
Therefore, neither of the Highcroft Village PDD
or Fryar PDD traffic studies will need to be updated at this time to reflect
these changes.
Existing PDD and Requested PDD Amendment Comparison:
The applicant is requesting to amend the previously
approved
The R-2 Tract in the Fryar PDD was previously approved for 268 dwelling units
with a maximum overall density of 4.1 dwelling units per acre.
The applicant is proposing to reduce the
maximum number of units from 268 to 251 so that the overall density will remain
as previously approved.
The approved open space consisted of a pond, stream buffer, streetscapes and
landscape strips. With the proposed removal of the 4.28 acres, which includes a
portion of a stream buffer, the total open space provided will be reduced to
23.86 acres with the amendment.
The request proposes changes to
the densities and unit counts in the Highcroft Village PDD as indicated in the
chart below. There is no proposed
overall increase in unit count. In the Highcroft Village PDD Amendment request,
the applicant is
proposing to permit
BMPs in open space if they become a feature that will enhance the development as
an amenity.
A
total of 32.34 acres of open space were approved in the Highcroft Village PDD.
The Highcroft Village PDD Amendment proposes
33.87
acres of open space as well. Although the acreage of streetscapes, perimeter
buffers and stream buffers decreases slightly with the amendment, the
non-regulatory open space acreage increases from 2.97 acres in the approved
Highcroft Village PDD to
4.44
acres in the proposed amendment. Also, there are 2.73 acres of Urban Transition
Buffers not included in the overall total open space acreage. This 2.73 acres of
UTB is located within the Highcroft Village PDD, but was recently used as land
for off-site mitigation in associate with the Parkside Variance approval.
|
Fryar PDD Proposed Amendment |
||||
|
|
Approved PDD |
Proposed at Public Hearing |
Current Proposal |
Net Gain/Loss |
|
Tract R-2 Maximum Dwelling Units |
268 |
268 |
251 |
-17 dwelling units |
|
Tract R-2 Area (Acres) |
65.4± |
61.12± |
61.12 |
-4.28 |
|
Tract R-2 Density |
4.1 du/ac |
4.4 du/ac |
4.1 du/ac |
No change |
|
Overall PDD Open Space |
25.39± |
22.86± |
23.86± |
-1.53 |
|
|
||||
|
|
Approved PDD |
Proposed at Public Hearing |
Current Proposal |
Net Gain/Loss |
|
Tract 4 Maximum Dwelling Units |
97 |
116 |
116 |
+19 |
|
Tract 4 Area (Acres) |
22.42 |
23.63 |
23.63 |
-1.21 |
|
Tract 4 Density |
4.33 du/ac |
4.91 du/ac |
4.91 |
+0.58 |
|
Tract 5 Dwelling Units |
80 |
61 |
61 |
-19 |
|
Tract 5 Area (Acres) |
3.86 ± |
5.30± |
5.30± |
+1.44 |
|
Tract 5 Density |
20.72 |
11.51 |
12.68 |
-8.04 |
|
Overall PDD Open Space |
32.34 |
33.87 |
33.87 |
+1.53 |
Town council
Criteria for Consideration in Reviewing Rezonings and PDD’s:
Section 3.4.1(E) of the Land Development Ordinance sets forth the following
criteria that the Town Council shall consider in reviewing rezonings:
1.
The proposed rezoning corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing
condition, trend or fact;
2.
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan set forth in
Section 1.3 (LDO);
3.
The Town and other service providers will be able to provide sufficient public
safety, educational, recreational, transportation and utility facilities and
services to the subject property while maintaining sufficient levels of service
to existing development;
4.
The proposed rezoning is unlikely to have significant adverse impacts on the
natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management,
wildlife and vegetation;
5.
The proposed rezoning will not have significant adverse impacts on property in
the vicinity of the subject tract;
6.
The proposed zoning classification is suitable for the subject property;
7.
The PDD designation is necessary to address a unique situation or represents a
substantial benefit to the Town, compared to what could have been accomplished
through strict application of otherwise applicable zoning district standards;
and
8.
The request complies with the standards and intent of a PDD, as outlined is
Section 4.2.3 (LDO).
Other Reference
Information
Schools
The proposed
PDD amendments for Fryar and
|
School Information |
||||
|
Assigned Schools |
20th Day Enrollment* |
Permanent
Seat |
Average |
|