Rezoning Staff Report to the Planning
and Zoning Board
08-REZ-03 Highcroft Village PDD (Planned
Development District) and Fryar PDD Amendments
Request
The applicant is
requesting Town Council approve an Ordinance to amend the official zoning map of
the Town of Cary for approximately 49.38 acres, located north of Green Hope
School Road, east of Fryars Frontier Trail and west of NC 55 Highway, by
amending the previously approved Highcroft Village and Fryar PDDs (Planned
Development Districts) by removing approximately 4.28 acres from the Fryar PDD
and including it in the Highcroft Village PDD, density increases in Tracts 4 and
decreases in Tract 5 of the Highcroft Village PDD, and revising the number of
dwelling units in Tract 4 and 5 of the Highcroft Village PDD.
The purpose of a rezoning is to evaluate the
appropriateness of a proposed land use for the subject parcel(s) of land.
Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of
land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements,
utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not
considered during the rezoning process.
However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance
with existing requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO)
when the site or subdivision plan is submitted.
All such requirements can be found at
http:vic.townofcary.org.
Background
Information
|
Applicant |
Jerry Turner and Associates, Inc. |
||
|
Agent |
Glenda Toppe
Jerry Turner and Associates, Inc. |
||
|
Acreage |
49.38
± |
||
|
General
Location |
North of Green Hope School Road,
east of Fryars Frontier Trail and west of NC 55 Highway |
||
|
Hearings /
Meetings |
Public Hearing |
Planning & Zoning |
Town Council
June 12 or 26, 2008* |
|
Land Use
Designation |
Medium Density Residential (MDR) |
||
|
Town Limits |
In the Town of |
||
|
Annexation |
Not required since it is already
within the Town Limits |
||
|
Valid Protest |
No
protests were received regarding this case; therefore, no
supermajority vote is required. |
||
|
P&Z
Recommendation |
To be provided after the Planning
and Zoning Board Meeting |
||
|
Existing Use |
Vacant |
||
|
Proposed Use |
Residential |
||
|
Final Council
Action |
To be provided after the Town
Council Meeting |
||
|
Staff Contact |
Debra
Grannan, Senior Planner Email: debra.grannan@townofcary.org Phone: (919)
460-4980 |
||
*The date of this meeting will be determined
after the P&Z Board recommendation.
If a unanimous recommendation is made, it will go to the first meeting of the
month on consent; if not on consent, it will go to the second meeting.
Furthermore, if the case has a valid protest petition, it will go to the second
meeting of the month as a discussion item, even if there is a unanimous
recommendation for approval.
The applicant has proposed
to remove approximately 4.28 acres from the Fryar PDD and including it in the
Highcroft Village PDD, reducing streetscape widths, density increases in Tract 4
and density decreases in Tract 5 of the Highcroft Village PDD, and revising the
number of dwelling units in Tract 4 and 5 of the Highcroft Village PDD. The
applicant is not proposing any conditions outside the proposed
Public
Notification:
On February 26, 2008
, notices were mailed to property owners within
400 feet of the subject property. In
addition, notification consistent with General Statutes was present in the Cary
News on February 27 and March 5, 2008
.
summary
As
described below in the Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and Consistency
with the Land Development Ordinance sections, Staff has reviewed the application
and information provided prior to this meeting, and the analysis by Staff is that the application is generally consistent with the Goals and
Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, the Land Development Ordinance, and is
reasonable and in the public interest, except for the environmental issue, which
can be found in Item F under Consistency with the Land Development Ordinance.
Feedback
at the Town Council Public Hearing: The
applicant, Mrs. Glenda Toppe of Jerry Turner and Associates, stated the request
is to remove 4.2 acres from the Fryar PDD and include it in the Highcroft
Village PDD, and this swap is proposed to utilize an existing stream buffer as a
physical boundary between the two approved PDDs. She stated the parcel in
question is best suited for development within
Highcroft
Village, and it is cut-off from the
majority of the R-2 tract in the Fryar PDD due to an existing stream buffer,
which makes it difficult to access the property. The applicant stated by
locating this parcel in the Highcroft PDD, the property can be integrated into
Tract 4 of that PDD, and the existing stream buffer can serve as the buffer
between the two PDDs and that there is no impact to the stream. Mrs. Toppe
stated Tract R-2 is the only part of the Fryar PDD impacted by this request, and
there is no unit change in the Fryar PDD. She stated Tracts 4 and 5 are impacted
in the Highcroft PDD with density increased in one tract and lowered in the
other for no net increase in the overall number of units. They are requesting a
reduction to the required 50 foot streetscape along Morrisville Parkway. She stated there is a 30
foot streetscape on the Fryar PDD, and they request that the streetscape
adjacent to the Fryar PDD be 30 feet as well. The applicant stated they are
willing to add additional plant material over and above code requirements. Mrs.
Toppe pointed out that no homes will front onto Morrisville Parkway, and access will be off
Morrisville Parkway. She stated they notified
property owners within 400 feet, and they did not hear any opposition to this
request at the meetings they conducted.
No
one spoke at the public hearing.
A
Council member stated the particular area in the Fryar PDD with a 30 foot
streetscape was due to the fairly low density and that there is a higher density
in the area where they propose to reduce the streetscape to 30 feet. The Council
member stated that a higher density calls for a larger streetscape. Council also
wanted to make sure that both neighborhoods have access to the greenway trail.
Clarification as to the net effect on the open space calculations between the
two projects was requested before the issues comes back to Council.
Changes
Since the Town Council Public Hearing:
The applicant has increased the proposed streetscape along Morrisville Parkway
in the Highcroft Village
PDD from 30’ to 50’. The applicant has also agreed to add a note to the PDD
document stating that there will be uniform street tree plantings adjacent to
the residential collector running through Tracts 3 and 4 in Highcroft
Village. Also, the initial PDD
submittal proposed BMPs to be located within open space. The applicant has
revised the PDD text to state that BMPs are permitted in open space if they
become a feature that will enhance the development as an amenity.
The Highcroft Village PDD
master plan in the PDD amendment application only proposed a total of 32.34
acres of open space. Since the public hearing, the applicant has increased the
total acreage of open space provided to 33.87 acres through removing the request
to reduce the streetscape buffer and increasing the amount of open space
provided.
|
|
||||
|
|
Current
PDD |
PDD
Amendment Application |
April
Revised PDD Amendment |
Net
Gain/Loss From Current PDD |
|
Streetscape |
3.04
± |
2.72
± |
3.49
± |
+0.45
± |
|
Stream Buffer |
21.25
± |
21.06
± |
21.06
± |
-0.19
± |
|
Open Space |
2.97
± |
3.65
± |
4.44
± |
+1.47
± |
|
Buffers |
5.08
± |
4.91
± |
4.88
± |
-0.20
± |
|
Total |
32.34
± |
32.34
± |
33.87±
|
+1.53
± |
*
Also, there are 2.73 acres of Urban Transition Buffers not included in the
overall total open space acreage. This 2.73 acres of UTB is located within the
Highcroft Village PDD, but was recently used as land for off-site mitigation in
associate with the Parkside Variance approval.
The open space in the
Fryar PDD amendment has also been increases since the public hearing from 22.86
acres to 23.86 acres.
|
Fryar
PDD Total Open Space Acreage Calculations* |
||||
|
|
Current
PDD |
PDD
Amendment Application |
April
Revised PDD Amendment |
Net
Gain/Loss From Current PDD |
|
Pond & Stream
Buffer |
21.41
± |
18.88
± |
19.88
± |
-1.53
± |
|
Streetscape &
Landscape Strips |
3.98
± |
3.98
± |
3.98
± |
0 |
|
Total |
25.39
± |
22.86
± |
23.86
± |
-1.53
± |
Since the public hearing,
there are now no net gains or losses in open space totals between the original
Fryar and Highcroft Village PDD approvals and what is currently being proposed
by the applicants.
Consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan
A.
Land Use Plan: This
rezoning request conforms to the adopted Land Use Plan.
This rezoning request involves the
swap of land between the Fryar PDD
and the Highcroft Village PDD to utilize an existing stream buffer as the
physical boundary between the two planned developments.
The designated land use on the portion of land being swapped is mostly
Medium Density Residential (MDR) with some High Density Residential (HDR), and
the proposed use of the parcels matches the existing land use.
Thus, the proposal is in conformance with the Land Use Plan.
B.
Growth Management Plan:
The Growth Management Plan includes
the following Guiding Principles which are relevant to this case:
1.
L2 Guiding Principle: Ensure that
future growth protects sensitive natural resources and protects open space.
The transfer of land between the Fryar PDD and the Highcroft Village PDD
allows better utilization of this land with less impact to an intervening stream
buffer.
C.
Affordable Housing Plan:
The Affordable Housing
Plan includes the following Guiding Principles which are relevant to this case:
1.
Provide for a full range of
housing choices for all income groups, families of various sizes, seniors, and
persons with special challenges.
2.
Encourage the location of high
density housing within walking and convenient commuting distance of employment,
shopping, and other activities, or within a short walk of a bus or transit stop,
through "mixed use" developments, residences created on the upper
floors of nonresidential downtown buildings, and other creative strategies.
3.
Assure a quality living
environment and access to public amenities for all residents, present and
future, of the Town of Cary, regardless of income.
D.
Comprehensive
Transportation Plan:
Existing
Section: Not built
Future Section:
100’ right-of-way 4-lane median divided
Road Improvements:
Design completed by the Town
Sidewalks
Requirements: Required on both sides
of the road
Bicycle
Requirements: 14’ wide outside lane
required
Transit
Requirements:
None
E.
Parks & Greenways Master Plan:
According to the approved Parks,
Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan there are no issues
associated with the proposed relocation of the approximately 4.28 acres from the
Fryar PDD to the Highcroft Village PDD. All
PRCR conditions previously approved for each of these PDDs shall remain in
place. According to the Open Space
and Historic Resources Plan (OSHRP) these 4.28 ± acres were originally proposed
for conservation as part of a larger parcel due to the riparian buffers on site.
Consistency
with the Land Development Ordinance
The proposed project is in
the rezoning stage and therefore preliminary engineering of the site has not
been provided to Staff for review. Prior
to site plan or subdivision plan approval, the application will be required to
demonstrate consistency with the Land Development Ordinance with respect to
specific development requirements, such as access, stormwater management, road
improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings.
G.
Buffers:
The approximate 4.28 acres, proposed
to be removed from the Fryar PDD and added to the Highcroft Village PDD,
utilizes an existing stream buffer as the physical boundary between the two
planned developments. In Highcroft Village Tract 4, a 30’ buffer is proposed to
the east and a stream buffer provides separation with Tract 3 to the south and
with Tract 5 to the north. Highcroft Village Tract 5 is divided by Morrisville Parkway.
The southern portion of Tract 5 proposes a 30’ buffer to the north and has a
stream buffer to the east and south, providing separation to the adjacent Tracts
or parcels. The northern portion of Tract 5 proposed a 30’ buffer to the east
and is surrounded by stream buffers to the north and west. These proposed
buffers are similar to buffers approved for the original Fryar and Highcroft
Village PDDs.
H.
Streetscape:
According to Chapter 7 (LDO), a
50’ Streetscape would be required along the future portion of Morrisville Parkway, which is designated as a thoroughfare. The
Fryar PDD was originally approved with a 30’ streetscape along this future
extension of Morrisville Parkway. All other streetscapes will be in accordance
with the LDO requirements.
I.
Traffic Analysis:
Originally, for the
Highcroft Village Property residential portion, a traffic study (05-TAR-182) was
conducted by HNTB which analyzed 350 single family homes and 80,000 SF of
office. This development generated 391 AM and 477 PM Peak hour trips.
At a later time, the office portion of the development was dropped and
the single family home units were increased to 427 units. For the Highcroft
Village PDD amendment, the only two tracts affected are Tracts 4 and 5. Both
Tract 4 and Tract 5 are approved for mixed-residential. Tract 4 currently is
approved for 97 units. The amendment proposes 116 units.
Tract 5 is currently approved for 80 units. The amendment proposes 61
units. So, in theory, 19 units are being shifted from Tract 5 to Tract 4 which
would not yield an increase in traffic. The built out year for this traffic
study is 2009.
The
Fryar PUD traffic study (06-TAR-202) was completed by HNTB and analyzed 332
single family homes and 30,000 SF of retail. This proposal simply decreases the
acreage of 268 of the single family homes of the 332 single family homes by 4
acres. The built out year for this traffic study is 2010.
Therefore,
neither of the Highcroft Village PDD or Fryar PDD traffic studies will need to
be updated at this time to reflect these changes.
Existing
PDD and Requested PDD Amendment Comparison:
The applicant is requesting
to amend the previously approved Highcroft
Village
and Fryar PDDs (Planned Development Districts) by removing approximately
4.28 acres from the Fryar PDD and including it in the Highcroft Village PDD.
The approximately 65.4 acre
R-2 Tract in the Fryar PDD was previously approved for 268 dwelling units with a
maximum density of 8.0 units per acre and a minimum density of 3.0 units per
acre. In the approved Fryar PDD, 25.39 acres of open space was provided. The
applicant is not proposing to amend the maximum number of units or minimum and
maximum densities. The approved open space consisted of a pond, stream buffer,
streetscapes and landscape strips. With the proposed removal of the 4.28 acres,
which includes a portion of a stream buffer, the total open space provided will
be reduced to 23.86 acres with the amendment.
In
the Highcroft Village PDD Amendment request, the applicant is proposing to
permit BMPs in open space if they become a feature that will enhance the
development as an amenity. Tracts 4 and 5 in the Highcroft Village PDD were
previously approved for Mixed Residential. Tract 5 (3.86 acres) was approved for
a maximum of 80 dwelling units, which is a density of 20.73 dwelling units per
acre. The proposed amendment increases the acreage of Tract 5 to 4.81 acres, and
reduces the number of units permitted to 61. Therefore, the overall density in
Tract 5 will be reduced to 12.68 dwelling units per acre. In Tract 4 (22.42
acres), a density of 4.33 dwelling units per acre and a maximum of 97 dwelling
units were previously approved. The applicant is requesting to increase the size
of Tract 4 to 22.59 acres, increasing the number of units to a maximum of 116.
This proposed increase in the number of maximum units permitted slightly
increases the overall density of Tract 4 to 5.13 dwelling units per acre.
With the proposed
amendments, Tract 5 of the Highcroft Village PDD is being reduced by 19 dwelling
units and the maximum unit count for Tract 4 is increasing by 19 units. Overall,
the proposed increases and decreases in unit counts between Tract 4 and 5 result
in no net increase in the total maximum number of units within these Tracts.
A total of 32.34 acres of
open space were approved in the Highcroft Village PDD. The Highcroft Village PDD
Amendment proposes 33.87 acres of open space as well. Although the acreage of
streetscapes, perimeter buffers and stream buffers decreases slightly with the
amendment, the non-regulatory open space acreage increases from 2.97 acres in
the approved Highcroft Village PDD to 4.44 acres in the proposed amendment.
Also, there are 2.73 acres of Urban Transition Buffers not included in the
overall total open space acreage. This 2.73 acres of UTB is located within the
Highcroft Village PDD, but was recently used as land for off-site mitigation in
associate with the Parkside Variance approval.
Planning
and zoning board
Criteria for Consideration in Reviewing Rezonings and PDD’s:
Section 3.4.1(E) of the
Land Development Ordinance sets forth the following criteria that the Planning
and Zoning Board should consider in reviewing rezonings:
1.
The proposed
rezoning corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing condition,
trend or fact;
2.
The proposed
rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan set forth in Section 1.3
(LDO);
3.
The Town and
other service providers will be able to provide sufficient public safety,
educational, recreational, transportation and utility facilities and services to
the subject property while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing
development;
4.
The proposed
rezoning is unlikely to have significant adverse impacts on the natural
environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and
vegetation;
5.
The proposed
rezoning will not have significant adverse impacts on property in the vicinity
of the subject tract;
6.
The proposed
zoning classification is suitable for the subject property;
7.
The PDD
designation is necessary to address a unique situation or represents a
substantial benefit to the Town, compared to what could have been accomplished
through strict application of otherwise applicable zoning district standards;
and
8.
The request
complies with the standards and intent of a PDD, as outlined is Section 4.2.3
(LDO).
Other Reference
Information
Schools
The proposed
PDD amendments for Fryar and Highcroft
Village
do not increase the total number of previously approved dwelling units. The
projected number of children potentially attending Wake County Public Schools
does not increase with the proposed amendments. The school information is being
provided for your reference only and includes the projected number of children
potentially attending the schools for both the Highcroft Village
(Tracts 4 and 5) and Fryar (R-2) PDDs; however, the Wake County Board of
Education controls capital projects for school capacities.
|
School Information |
||||
|
Assigned Schools |
20th Day
Enrollment* |
Permanent
Seat |
Average |
Projected Range of
Additional |
|
|
964 |
1072 |
90% |
128-185
9-155 |
|
|
1101 |
1206 |
91% |
25-69
0-100 |
|
|
1496 |
1663 |
90% |
32-82
0-82 |
|
Total Projected range of additional students |
185-336
9-337 |
|||
* Current Enrollment and Building Capacity
is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2007-2008 as supplied
by the Wake County Public School System.
School assignment will be determined at the time of development.
** The
Projected Number of Additional Students
is only a rough approximation. The
actual number of students will vary depending on several variables, such as
dwelling unit type, number of bedrooms, dwelling size, and other factors. The
basis for making this calculation is based on multipliers provide from Wake
County Schools Office of Student Assignment.
At rezoning, student yield can not be accurately determined due to
unknown variables.
*** The first numerical
range listed is if the maximum number of units permitted in Highcroft Village
Tracts 4 and 5 and Fryar Tract R-2 developed solely as single-family. The second
numerical range provided is if the maximum number of units permitted in
Highcroft Village Tracts 4 and 5 and Fryar Tract R-2 developed completely as
Townhouses, etc.
Applicant’s Justification Statement Submitted (January
24, 2008)
Part 6A:
The following
statements are provided by the applicant (shown below in italics) in response to
the criteria established in the application (shown below in bold) and does not
necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town of Cary.
Any statements as to the type, quality or physical features are at the
direction of the applicant and may be formulated into a condition:
1. Any issues with the size of the tract?
Response from Highcroft
Village
PDD Amendment Application:
The size of the tract is conducive to the use
being proposed.
Response from Fryar PDD Amendment Application:
The size of the tract is conducive to the use
being proposed.
2. How is the request compatible with the
comprehensive plan (i.e. Land Use, Transportation, Open Space and Historic
Resources)?
Response from Highcroft
Village
PDD Amendment Application:
The proposed PDD amendments are compatible with the comprehensive plan.
Tract 4 in Highcroft
Village
where the additional acreage is being added is also designated for
MDR
and will remain MDR.
Tract 5 in Highcroft
Village
is
HDR
and with proposed change will remain HDR.
Response from Fryar PDD Amendment Application:
The proposed PDD amendment is compatible with
the comprehensive plan. The Fryar
PDD identified the R-2 parcel for medium density residential.
With the removal of the acreage the parcel will still be MDR.
3. What are the benefits and detriments to the
owner, neighbors and the community?
Response from Highcroft Village PDD Amendment
Application:
Given the location of the parcel within the
Fryar PDD, the parcel is best suited to be located within the Highcroft Village
PDD. The parcel is cut off from the
majority of the R-2 Tract in the Fryar PDD because of the existing stream buffer
thereby making it difficult to access the property.
BY locating the parcel in the Highcroft Village PDD, the property can be
integrated into Tract 4 of Highcroft Village and the existing stream buffer can
act as the buffer between the Fryar PDD and Highcroft Village PDD.
We do not see any detriments to the owners, neighbors or community since
the uses are not changing. The
center of the stream becomes the boundary between the two PDDs.
Additional units are being added to tract 4 in Highcroft
Village
however units are being taken away from Tract 5 in Highcroft
Village,
thus causing no net increase in units for Highcroft
Village.
Response from Fryar PDD Amendment Application:
Given the locations of the parcel within the
Fryar PDD, the parcel is best suited to be located within the Highcroft Village
PDD. The parcel is cut off from the
majority of the R-2 Tract in the Fryar PDD because of the existing stream buffer
thereby making it difficult to access the property.
By locating the parcel in the Highcroft Village PDD, the property can be
integrated into the Tract 4 of Highcroft Village and the existing stream buffer
can act as the buffer between the Fryar PDD and Highcroft Village PDD.
We do not see any detriments to the owners, neighbors or community since
the uses are not changing. The
center of the stream becomes the boundary between the two PDDs.
4. How are the allowable uses with the proposed
rezoning compatible with, or how do they relate to, the uses currently present
on adjacent tracts?
Response from Highcroft Village PDD Amendment
Application:
All uses are compatible with the proposed
zoning and can be found currently on neighboring parcels.
Response from Fryar PDD Amendment Application:
All uses are compatible with the proposed
zoning and can be found currently on neighboring parcels.
5. What reductions/amendments and/or
modifications to the development standards of the LDO are being requested and
how are they justified? (PDD, new
or amended) Applicants must list these items and/or clearly highlight them
within the Planned Development document.
Response from ighcroft
VillagePDD Amendment Application:
30-foot streetscape Morrisville Parkway.
This is consistent with the Fryar PDD.
No homes will front onto
Morrisville Parkway.
The 30-foot streetscape will give adequate protection to any development
that might occur adjacent to Morrisville Parkway.
The streetscape will be planted the same as a 50-foot streetscape.
Response from Fryar PDD Amendment Application:
None listed.
Ordinance for Consideration
08-REZ-03 Highcroft
Village
Planned Development District (PDD) and Fryar PDD Amendments
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF CARY TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY
49.38 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF GREEN HOPE SCHOOL ROAD, EAST OF FRYARS FRONTIER
TRAIL AND WEST OF NC 55 HIGHWAY OWNED BY D ROSCOE FRYAR AND HIGHCROFT INVESTORS
LLC BY BY AMENDING THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED HIGHCROFT VILLAGE AND FRYAR PDDS
(PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS) BY REMOVING APPROXIMATELY 4.28 ACRES FROM THE
FRYAR PDD AND INCLUDING IT IN THE HIGHCROFT VILLAGE PDD, REDUCING STREETSCAPE
WIDTHS, DENSITY INCREASES IN TRACT 4 AND DENSITY DECREASES IN TRACT 5 OF THE
HIGHCROFT VILLAGE PDD, AND REVISING THE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS IN TRACT 4 AND
5 OF THE HIGHCROFT VILLAGE PDD.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN
COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF CARY:
Section 1:
The Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning the area described
as follows:
|
PARCEL & OWNER INFORMATION |
|||
|
Property Owner(s) |
|
Real Estate ID(s) |
(Acres) |
|
Highcroft
Investors LLC
PO Box
3557
Cary, NC
27519-3557 |
0735501486 (portion)
0734681762 (portion) |
0084273 (portion)
0185234 (portion) |
12.70 ± (portion)
32.40 ± (portion) |
|
D Roscoe Fryar 7210 Green Hope School Road
Cary,
NC 27519-8890 |
0734497294 (portion) |
0030966 (portion) |
4.28 ± (portion) |
|
Total Acres |
49.38 ± |
||
Section 2: That this Property is rezoned from Highcroft Village and Fryar PDDs to Highcroft Village and Fryar PDD Amendments subject to the individualized development conditions set forth within the Highcroft Village and Fryar PDD Amendments, and all the requirements of the Cary Land Development Ordi