Rezoning Datasheet
Request
The
applicant is requesting Council approve an Ordinance to amend the official
zoning map of the Town of
The purpose of a rezoning is to
evaluate the appropriateness of a proposed land use for the subject parcel(s) of
land. Specific development
requirements related to the technical aspects of land development, such as
access, storm water management, road improvements, utility line placement, road
connectivity and landscape plantings, are not considered during the rezoning
process. However, all of these
development issues must be addressed for compliance with existing requirements
specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) when the site or subdivision
plan is submitted. All such
requirements can be found at
http:vic.townofcary.org.
|
Applicant
|
Dan LeClair, DHS Investment Group, LLC
248-921-3942 |
||
|
Agent |
Brad Rhinehalt ,
ANC Engineering
919-677-7996 |
||
|
Acreage |
5.74 +/- |
||
|
General Location |
|
||
|
Hearings / Meetings
|
Public Hearing
|
Planning & Zoning |
Town Council N/A |
|
Land Use
Designation |
High Density
Residential |
||
|
Town Limits |
Located inside
|
||
|
Annexation |
Not required
|
||
|
Valid Protest |
To be determined at
the Town Council Meeting |
||
|
P&Z Recommendation |
To be provided
after the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting |
||
|
Existing Use |
Vacant |
||
|
Proposed Use |
Office |
||
|
Final Council
Action |
To be provided
after final Town Council Meeting |
||
|
Case Manager
|
Debra Grannan,
Senior Planner
Mailing Address:
|
||
*The date of this meeting will
be determined after the P&Z Board recommendation.
If a unanimous recommendation is made, it will go to the first meeting of
the month on consent; if not on consent, it will go to the second meeting.
Furthermore, if the case has a valid protest petition, it will go to the second
meeting of the month as a discussion item, even if there is a unanimous
recommendation for approval.
Background Information
The applicant has submitted the
following proposed zoning conditions:
|
Existing Zoning
Conditions: |
Proposed Zoning
Conditions |
|
This tract shall be limited to 10 units per acre.
A pedestrian access bridge will
be provided across Crabtree Creek.
All perimeter and stream buffers to this tract shall be maintained at
the width required by the unified development ordinance and shall be
Type A.
Pedestrian access will be provided to the |
All perimeter and
stream buffers on this tract shall be maintained at the width required
by the Land Development Ordinance
and shall be type A.
Pedestrian access will
be provided to the
boundary from the
proposed office development.
An easement and
construction of a public greenway path shall be provided from
of the stream within
the outer edge of zone three of the stream
buffer. Construction of said path will be built in conjunction
with the commercial development.
|
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
A. Land Use Plan:
This rezoning request does not currently conform to the Town
of
B.
Growth Management Plan:
The Growth
Management Plan includes the following four Guiding Principles which are
relevant to this case:
C.
Affordable Housing Plan:
Applicable goals of
the Affordable Housing Plan will be reviewed after the Town Council Public
Hearing.
D.
Comprehensive Transportation Plan:
Existing Section:
110’ Right-of-way, 4-lane median divided
Future
Section:
4-lane median divided
Road
Improvements: N/A
Sidewalks
Requirements:
Sidewalk on east side, multi-use path on west side
Bicycle
Requirements:
14’ Wide outside lanes
Transit Requirements:
Traffic Analysis:
A traffic study was completed by MAB (08-TAR-280) and the following
mitigations are required to meet our Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance:
1.
At the intersection of Davis Drive and Morrisville Parkway, the south bound (SB)
SB left turn lane needs to be extended to at least 750 feet of storage, a SB
right turn lane needs to be constructed with at least 200 feet of storage, and
the WB approach needs to be widened to provide a left turn lane with at least
250 feet of storage, a through lane with at least 425 feet of storage and a
continuous through and right turn lane.
2.
At
3.
At
4.
5.
At the intersection of
The Town
of
E.
Open Space and Historic Resources Plan:
The Open Space Plan and its priority open space
inventory does identify portions of the case area as having some significant
natural resources associated with
the two stream buffers located on the northern half of the property.
F.
Parks & Greenways Master Plan:
Greenways Map
The Town of
G.
Environmental:
According
to the Town of
H.
Buffers:
According to Chapter
7 of the Land Use Plan, the applicant will be required to provide half of a 20’
wide type “B” buffer between the office uses and the adjacent multi-family
residential uses. Half of a 20’ Type “B” Buffer is required next to adjacent to
the Class 4 Office & Institutional uses to the south.
I.
Streetscape:
According to Chapter
7 of the Land Development Ordinance, the applicant will be required to provide a
30’ streetscape along
Consistency with the Land Development Ordinance
The
proposed project is in the rezoning stage and therefore preliminary engineering
of the site has not been done. Prior
to Site Plan or Subdivision Plan approval, the application will be required to
demonstrate consistency with the Land Development Ordinance with respect to
specific development requirements, such as access, storm water management, road
improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings.
Existing and Requested Zoning
District Comparison:
|
District Regulations |
Existing Zoning
(RMF CU) |
Requested Zoning
(O&I and GC CU) |
|
Maximum Gross Density (du/ac) |
10 |
N/A |
|
Minimum |
Not Specified |
Not Specified |
|
Minimum Width at
Building Line |
20’ |
N/A |
|
Streetscape |
30’ Opaque |
30’ |
|
Front
Setback |
50’ from a thoroughfare |
N/A |
|
Side
Setback |
16’ between building groupings |
N/A |
|
Rear Yard Setback |
20’ front and rear yard combined |
N/A |
|
|
35’ |
35’/50’ * |
*If a
non-residential structure is within 100 feet of a residential zoning district
boundary, the maximum building height is 35 feet.
If the structure is more than 100 feet from the residential zoning
district boundary the maximum height is 50 feet.
Town
Council Criteria for Consideration in Reviewing RezoningS:
Section
3.4.1(E) of the Land Development Ordinance sets forth the following criteria
that Council should consider in reviewing rezonings:
1.
The proposed rezoning corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing
condition, trend or fact;
2.
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan set forth in
Section 1.3 (LDO);
3.
The Town and other service providers will be able to provide sufficient public
safety, educational, recreational, transportation and utility facilities and
services to the subject property while maintaining sufficient levels of service
to existing development;
4.
The proposed rezoning is unlikely to have significant adverse impacts on the
natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water management,
wildlife and vegetation;
5.
The proposed rezoning will not have significant adverse impacts on property in
the vicinity of the subject tract;
6.
The proposed zoning classification is suitable for the subject property;
Other
Reference Information
Schools:
No residential use is proposed on the subject property
therefore school enrollment will not be increased.
Applicant’s Justification
Statement Submitted (
The
following statements (shown below in bold below) are provided by the applicant
in response to the criteria established in the application (shown in italics)
and does not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town of
1. Are
there any issues with the size of the tract?
At this
time, we do not feel there are any issues with the size of the tract that will
effect our proposed use. We are
aware of the two streams with associated buffers and floodplain, and have
incorporated these issues into our development plan.
2.
How is the request compatible with the comprehensive plan (i.e. Land Use,
Transportation, Open Space and Historic Resources)?
The
request is not compatible with the current comprehensive plan. The Town of
3.
What are the benefits and detriments to the owner, neighbors and the
community?
The benefits to the owner, neighbors, and
community include the addition of dedicated pathways and/or easements
from the existing Morrisville town park to
many previous request to convert
office area to residential zoned properties.
We feel that community office and neighborhood commercial at this
location will serve a much growing market and will provide the community with
additional jobs and tax revenue.
There will be minimal
additional traffic generated from
this development compared to what would be allowed under the current high
density residential zoning.
4. How are all the allowable uses with the proposed rezoning compatible with,
or how do they relate to, the uses currently present on adjacent tracts?
The
office portion of the project is consistent with the existing commercial uses
(currently zoned O&I) along the southern boundary line. The proposed retail area
is consistent with existing shopping center development directly to the north.
The additional width and continuous roadway median of
Ordinance for
Consideration
AN
ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING
BE IT
ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
Section 1:
The Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning the area described
as follows:
|
PARCEL & OWNER INFORMATION |
|||
|
Property Owner(s) |
|
Real Estate ID(s) |
Acres |
|
Hubert and Sidney
Hatcher
1609 Morrisville
Carpenter |
0745513970 |
0029355 |
5.74 |
|
Total Acres |
5.74 |
||
Section 2:
That this property is rezoned from Residential Multi-family Conditional
Use to Office and Institutional Conditional Use and General Commercial
Conditional Use subject to the individualized
development conditions set forth herein, and all the requirements of the Cary
Land Development Ordinance (LDO) and other applicable laws, standards, polices
and guidelines.
Section 3: The
conditions mutually approved by the Town and the applicant for promoting public
health, safety and the general welfare are:
1.
All perimeter and stream buffers on this tract shall be maintained at the
width required by the Land Development Ordinance and shall be type A.
2. Pedestrian access will be
provided to the
3. An easement and construction
of a public greenway path shall be provided from
These conditions address conformance of the development and
use of the property to ordinances and officially adopted plans and address
impacts reasonably expected to be generated by the development and use of the
Property.
Section 4: This
ordinance shall be effective on the date of adoption.
Adopted and effective:
April 10, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Harold Weinbrecht |
|
Date |