Rezoning Datasheet
Request
The applicant is
requesting Council approve an Ordinance to amend the official zoning map of the
Town of Cary for approximately 13.29 acres
located southwest of the Morrisville Parkway and Davis Drive intersection, to
change the zoning from Residential-40 (R-40)
and Office & Institutional Conditional Use (O&ICU) to
Davis Drive PDD to allow single-family
detached and attached residential dwelling units.
The purpose of a rezoning is to evaluate the
appropriateness of a proposed land use for the subject parcel(s) of land.
Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of
land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements,
utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not
considered during the rezoning process.
However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance
with existing requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO)
when the site or subdivision plan is submitted.
All such requirements can be found at
http:vic.townofcary.org.
Background
Information
|
Applicant |
Jerry Turner
and Associates, Inc (Glenda Toppe) |
||
|
Agent |
Glenda Toppe Jerry Turner
and Associates, Inc |
||
|
Acreage |
13.29 ± |
||
|
General
Location |
Southwest of
the |
||
|
Hearings /
Meetings |
Public Hearing |
Planning & Zoning
|
Town Council
June 12 or 26, 2008* |
|
Land Use
Designation |
Medium Density
Residential (MDR) on the northern parcel and Low Density Residential
(LDR) on the southern parcel |
||
|
Town Limits |
In the Town of
|
||
|
Annexation |
Not required
since it is already within the Town Limits |
||
|
Valid Protest |
To be
determined by time of Public Hearing |
||
|
P&Z
Recommendation |
To be provided
after the Planning and Zoning Board
Meeting |
||
|
Existing Use |
Vacant |
||
|
Proposed Use |
Single-family
detached and attached residential dwelling units |
||
|
Final Council
Action |
To be provided
after the Town Council meeting |
||
|
Case Manager &
Contact Information |
Jennifer Currin
Email:
jennifer.currin@townofcary.org Phone: (919)
469-4342 Mailing
Address: |
||
*The date of this meeting will be determined
after the P&Z Board recommendation.
If a unanimous recommendation is made, it will go to the first meeting of the
month on consent; if not on consent, it will go to the second meeting.
Furthermore, if the case has a valid protest petition, it will go to the second
meeting of the month as a discussion item, even if there is a unanimous
recommendation for approval.
The applicant is proposing
to remove the existing zoning conditions for the O&ICU zoned property. The
applicant is not proposing any conditions outside the proposed PDD document.
|
Proposed Conditions |
Existing Conditions (98-REZ-30) |
Existing Conditions (99-REZ-05) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan
A. Land
Use Plan:
A Comprehensive Plan Amendment was approved by
Town Council on
B.
Growth Management Plan:
The
Growth Management Plan includes the following two Guiding Principles which
are relevant to this case:
1.
Guiding
Principle: Ensure that adequate infrastructure and services are available
concurrently
with new development.
2.
Guiding
Principle: Concentrate growth near existing and planned employment centers and
available and planned infrastructure to minimize costly service-area extensions.
C.
Affordable Housing Plan:
The Town of
1.
Provide for a
full range of housing choices for all income groups, families of various sizes,
seniors, and persons with special challenges.
2.
Facilitate the
creation of a reasonable proportion of the Town of
3.
Strive for
innovation and partnerships in the creation of model ordinances, policies, and
programs in the area of providing expanding housing opportunities for low- and
moderate-income persons.
4.
Facilitate the
affordable housing activities of other entities within the Town of
5.
Encourage the
location of high density housing within walking and convenient commuting
distance of employment, shopping, and other activities, or within a short walk
of a bus or transit stop, through "mixed use" developments, residences created
on the upper floors of nonresidential downtown buildings, and other creative
strategies.
6.
Assure a quality
living environment and access to public amenities for all residents, present and
future, of the Town of
D.
Comprehensive Transportation Plan:
Existing Section:
110’ Right-of-way, 4-lane median divided
Future Section:
4-lane median divided
Road Improvements:
N/A
Sidewalks Requirements:
Sidewalk on east side, multi-use path on west side
Bicycle Requirements:
14’ Wide outside lanes
Existing Section:
N/A
Future Section:
100’ Right-of-way, 4-lane median divided
Road Improvements:
Construction scheduled Fall 2007
Sidewalks Requirements:
Sidewalks on both sides
Bicycle Requirements:
14’ Wide outside lanes
Transit
Requirements:
None
Traffic
Analysis:
Based on our most recent analysis with the data shown below, a TIA will not be
required for rezoning but will most likely be required at site plan based on the
current LDO 20 peak hour trip threshold.
Current Zoning
6 +
acres of O&ICU (northern property)
6 +
acres of R-40 (southern property)
Current Trips (highest peak hour)
Northern property - assume office use at 10,000sf/acre for a total of 60,000 sf.
AM trip generation is 1.55/1000sf = 93 AM trips
Southern property - assume 6 single family houses.
PM peak hour is 1.01/du =
TOTAL
trips currently - 99.06 peak hour trips
Proposed zoning
6 +
acres of TR (townhouse) (northern property)
6 +
acres of R-40 (single family homes) (southern property)
Proposed trips (highest peak hour)
Northern property - 67 units x .52 trips/du = 34.8 PM trips
Southern property - 7 single family homes x 1.01trips/du =
TOTAL
trips proposed 41.9 peak hour trips.
The
combination of both parcels does not generate additional trips over what is
approved there now and therefore no TIA is required at rezoning.
As noted above, a TIA will most likely be needed at the time of
site/subdivision plan.
E.
Parks & Greenways Master Plan:
According to the approved
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan there is an
existing multi-use trail along the west side of Davis Drive.
A recreation payment-in-lieu will be required for residential development
in accordance with the Land Development Ordinance.
According to the Open Space and Historic Resources Plan (OSHRP) this site
was not identified as significant open space.
Consistency with the
Land Development Ordinance
F.
Environmental:
According to the Town of
G.
Buffers:
Rezoning case 98-REZ-30 required a
70’ Type A buffer along the west boundary of the property. The applicant is
requesting to remove this condition with this rezoning request. There is
currently vacant open space along the western boundary, owned by the Preston
Village Community Association. If it can be shown that this adjacent property
has been recorded as permanent open space, no buffer will be required if the
open space is wide enough and contains sufficient vegetation. If the width is
not enough or there is insufficient vegetation, the applicant will have to
provide additional buffer area and/or vegetation to meet the requirements. Since
the applicant is proposing 12,000 sq. ft. minimum lots adjacent to
H.
Streetscape:
According to Section 7.2.4 (C)
(LDO), the applicant will be required to provide a 50’ Type “A” buffer along
The proposed project is in
the rezoning stage and therefore preliminary engineering of the site has not
been provided to Staff for review.
Prior to Site Plan or Subdivision Plan approval, the application will be
required to demonstrate consistency with the Land Development Ordinance with
respect to specific development requirements, such as access, stormwater
management, road improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and
landscape plantings.
Existing and Requested Zoning District
Comparison:
|
District Regulations |
Existing Zoning
(O&ICU) |
Existing Zoning
(R-40) |
Requested Zoning
(PDD- Tract 1, Attached) |
Requested Zoning
(PDD- Tract 2, Detached) |
|
Maximum Gross Density (du/ac) |
N/A |
1.08 |
7.87 (Max. of 51 dwelling units) |
2.95 (Max. of 20 dwelling units) |
|
Minimum |
Property limited to no more than 57,500
square feet. All buildings on the parcel are limited to a maximum of
45,000 square feet of gross floor area. |
40,000 |
--- |
Adjacent to
Other: 5,000 |
|
Minimum Width at Building Line (ft.) |
N/A |
125 (135 for corner lot) |
--- |
Adjacent to
Other: 50 |
|
Side Yard Setback (ft.) |
No minimum side setbacks in most
non-residential districts |
15 |
Building to building separation will be
16 minimum |
Adjacent to
Other: 3 min. (There will be no
encroachment into the side yard with accessory structures) |
|
Roadway Setback (ft.) |
30 |