Rezoning Staff Report for the Planning
and Zoning Board
Request
The applicant is requesting
Council approve an Ordinance to amend the official zoning map of the Town of
The purpose of a rezoning is to evaluate the
appropriateness of a proposed land use for the subject parcel(s) of land.
Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of
land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements,
utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not
considered during the rezoning process.
However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance
with existing requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO)
when the site or subdivision plan is submitted.
All such requirements can be found at
http:vic.townofcary.org.
Background
Information
|
Applicant |
Stacey Anfindson
AB Properties of NC, LLC |
||
|
Agent |
Stuart Jones
Jones, Cnossen & Dolle Engineering s |
||
|
Acreage |
6.32 +/- |
||
|
General
Location |
|
||
|
Hearings /
Meetings |
Public Hearing |
Planning & Zoning |
Town Council
* March 13 or 27, 2008 |
|
Land Use
Designation |
Low Density Residential |
||
|
Town Limits |
Located outside the Town’s corporate
limits but inside |
||
|
Annexation |
Will be required at time of site
plan |
||
|
Valid Protest |
No |
||
|
P&Z
Recommendation |
To be provided after the Planning
and Zoning Board Meeting |
||
|
Existing Use |
Residential |
||
|
Proposed Use |
Residential |
||
|
Final Council
Action |
To be provided after Town Council
Meeting |
||
|
Case Manager |
Debra Grannan, Senior Planner
Town of
(919) 460-4980 |
||
*The date of this meeting will
be determined after the P&Z Board recommendation.
If a unanimous recommendation is made, it will go to the first public
hearing of the month on consent; if not on consent, it will go to the second
public hearing. Furthermore, if the case has a valid protest petition,
it will go to the second public hearing of the month as a discussion
item, even if there is a unanimous recommendation for approval.
Public Notification
On
Feedback at the Public Hearing
Staff presented case and
noted that there were no protest petitions. The
applicant added that the proposed single family detached use and the associated
proposed zoning conditions provided a good transitions to the existing
neighborhoods Two property owners who
resided on Jenks Carpenter Road spoke against the rezoning and asked that the
current Residential 40 zoning remain in place.
The property owner immediately adjacent to the site expressed concern
about how road connectivity would impact his property and quality of life.
Council recommended that the applicant work with this property owner as
the plans to develop the property move forward. A resident of the Upchurch Farms
subdivision spoke in favor of the proposed change noting that the request was
compatible with the Upchurch Farm neighborhood and provided an opportunity for
completion of
Changes since the Public Hearing
The applicant has advised
Staff that when plans are submitted to the town for review, the road connection
will not be located on the adjacent
property to the north unless a mutual agreement is reached with that property
owner. Their preliminary layout sketches proposed having a road on both the
subject property and the adjacent property. Since
they have not reached an agreement with the property owner to the north, the
full responsibility for road construction will rest on the applicant.
Since it is a
thoroughfare, the Staff Report was revised to note that a 50’ opaque streetscape
is required along
The applicant has submitted the following
proposed zoning conditions:
Consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan
A. Land Use Plan:
This rezoning request conforms
to the adopted Land Use Plan that designates this property as Low Density
Residential (LDR).
B.
Growth Management Plan:
The Growth Management Plan includes
the following four Guiding Principles which are relevant to this case:
C.
Affordable Housing Plan:
Based upon the proposed use and rezoning
request, the Affordable Housing Plan is not applicable.
D. Comprehensive Transportation Plan:
Existing Section: 2-lane Rd. approx., 60’ ROW
Future Section:
2-lane with paved median, approx. 67’ ROW
Road Improvements:
N/A
Sidewalks Requirements:
required on both sides
Bicycle Requirements:
14’ wide outside lanes
Transit Requirements:
none
Traffic Analysis: Under the current R-40
zoning, using single family homes (LU Code 210), the site would generate
E.
Parks & Greenways Master Plan:
Greenways Map
PRCR requests that developer work
with the Town to construct a 10’ wide asphalt trail connection between
F.
Environmental:
According to the Town of
G.
Buffers:
According to Chapter 7 of the LDO,
the applicant will be required to provide a 20- foot wide landscape area between
the subject property and adjacent residential properties that are greater than
8,000 square feet. In areas where adjacent residential properties have lots less
than 8,000 square feet, the subject property will be required to provide half of
a 30’ Type “B” buffer.
I.
Streetscape:
According to Chapter 7 of the LDO,
the applicant will be required to provide a 50’ opaque streetscape along
Consistency with the
Land Development Ordinance
The proposed project is in
the rezoning stage and therefore preliminary engineering of the site has not
been done. Prior to Site Plan or
Subdivision Plan approval, the application will be required to demonstrate
consistency with the Land Development Ordinance with respect to specific
development requirements, such as access, stormwater management, road
improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings.
Existing and Requested Zoning District
Comparison:
|
District Regulations |
Existing Zoning
(R40) |
Requested Zoning
(R8 CU) |
|
Maximum Gross Density (du/ac) |
1.06 |
2 |
|
Minimum |
40,000 square feet |
10,000 square feet * |
|
Minimum Width |
150’ with septic tank
125’ with public sewer |
60’ (70’ for corner lot) |
|
Side Yard Setback |
20’ with septic tank
15’ with public sewer |
10’ |
|
Front Yard Setback |
30’ from a collector
20’ all other streets |
30’ from a collector
20’ all other streets |
|
Rear Yard Setback |
30’ |
20’ |
|
|
35’ |
35’ |
*Per zoning condition proposed by applicant
Planning and zoning
Board Criteria
for Consideration in Reviewing Rezonings:
Section 3.4.1(E) of the
Land Development Ordinance sets forth the following criteria that the Planning
and Zoning Board should consider in reviewing rezonings:
1.
The proposed
rezoning corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing condition,
trend or fact;
2.
The proposed
rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan set forth in Section 1.3
(LDO);
3.
The Town and
other service providers will be able to provide sufficient public safety,
educational, recreational, transportation and utility facilities and services to
the subject property while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing
development;
4.
The proposed
rezoning is unlikely to have significant adverse impacts on the natural
environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and
vegetation;
5.
The proposed
rezoning will not have significant adverse impacts on property in the vicinity
of the subject tract;
6.
The proposed
zoning classification is suitable for the subject property;
Other Reference
Information
Schools
The school
information is being provided for your review; however, the Wake County
Board of Education controls capital projects for school capacities.
|
School Information |
||||
|
Assigned Schools |
20th Day Enrollment |
Permanent
Seat |
Average |
Projected Range of Additional |
|
|
1035 |
920 |
113% |
8 to 12 |
|
|
1210 |
1084 |
112% |
2 to 4 |
|
|
2085 |
1843 |
111% |
2 to 5 |
|
Total Projected range of additional students |
12 to 21 |
|||
* Current Enrollment and Building Capacity is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2007-2008
supplied by the Wake County Public School System.
School assignment will be determined at the time of development.
* The
Projected Number of Additional Students is only a rough
approximation. The actual number of
students will vary depending on several variables, such as dwelling unit type,
number of bedrooms, dwelling size, and other factors. For example a site with
three-bedroom homes could yield 12 additional students, while 27 homes with more
than three bedrooms could yield 21.
The basis for making this calculation is based on multipliers provide from Wake
County Schools Office of Student Assignment.
At Rezoning, student yield can not be accurately determined due to
unknown variables.
Applicant’s Justification Statement Submitted
The following statements
are provided by the applicant (shown below in italics) in response to the
criteria established in the application and does not necessarily represent the
views or opinions of the Town of
The parcel is of adequate size and dimension to
support a small residential subdivision.
The proposed zoning is compatible with the
comprehensive plan by supporting low density residential options
One benefit to the neighbors and community will
be the connection of Luke Meadow lane to
Ordinance for Consideration
07-REZ-29 AB Properties of NC at
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE
OFFICIAL ZONING
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN
COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
Section 1:
The Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning the area described
as follows:
|
PARCEL & OWNER INFORMATION |
|||
|
Property Owner(s) |
|
Real Estate ID(s) |
Acres |
|
Stacey
Anfindson |
0743179924 |
0038941 |
6.32± |
|
Total Acres |
6.32± |
||
Section 2:
That this Property is rezoned from Residential 40 to Residential 8
Conditional Use subject to the individualized development conditions set forth
herein, and all the requirements of the Cary
Land Development Ordinance (LDO) and other applicable laws, standards, polices
and guidelines.
Section 3: The conditions mutually
approved by the Town and the applicant for promoting public health, safety and
the general welfare are:
1. Minimum lot size shall be 10,000 square feet.
2. Maximum density shall be 2.0 dwelling units
per acre.
3. The following uses are prohibited:
Boarding House, Cemetery, Day Care
Center, governmental office, Public safety station, public utility facility,
utility facility (major), Utility substation (minor)
These conditions address conformance of the development and use of the Property
to ordinances and officially adopted plans and address impacts reasonably
expected to be generated by the development and use of the Property.
Section 4: This ordinance shall be
effective on the date of adoption.
Adopted and effective:
|
|
|
|
|
Harold Weinbrect, Jr. |
|
Date |