Rezoning Datasheet
07-REZ-28 Trenton Towns
Request
The applicant is requesting
Council approve an Ordinance to amend the official zoning map of the Town of
Cary to change the zoning of approximately 11.30 ± acres, located at 2506
Trenton Road, from Office and Institutional (OI)
to Residential Multi Family Conditional
Use (RMF-CU). There is an associated
request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to change the Land Use
Designation from Office/Institutional to Residential Multi-Family. (07-CPA-12)
The purpose of a rezoning is to evaluate the
appropriateness of a proposed land use for the subject parcel(s) of land.
Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of
land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements,
utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not
considered during the rezoning process.
However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance
with existing requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO)
when the site or subdivision plan is submitted.
All such requirements can be found at
http:vic.townofcary.org.
Background
Information
|
Applicant |
Tom Sewitsky,
Beazer Homes |
||
|
Agent |
Luke Hutzell GC Development
Group, LLC (919) 571-7555
lhutzell@gcraleigh.com |
||
|
Acreage |
11.30+/- |
||
|
General
Location |
|
||
|
Hearings /
Meetings |
Public Hearing |
Planning & Zoning |
Town Council
May 8 or 22, 2008* |
|
Land Use
Designation |
Office/Institutional |
||
|
Town Limits |
Subject
property is located outside |
||
|
Annexation |
Will be
required at time of site plan |
||
|
Valid Protest |
To be
determined at time of Public Hearing |
||
|
P&Z
Recommendation |
to be
provided after the Planning
and Zoning Board meeting |
||
|
Existing Use |
Vacant |
||
|
Proposed Use |
Attached
residential |
||
|
Final Council
Action |
to be
provided after town council meeting |
||
|
Case Manager |
Debra Grannan,
Senior Planner (919) 460-4980 |
||
*The date of this meeting will be determined
after the P&Z Board recommendation.
If a unanimous recommendation is made, it will go to the first meeting of the
month on consent; if not on consent, it will go to the second meeting.
Furthermore, if the case has a valid protest petition, it will go to the second
meeting of the month as a discussion item, even if there is a unanimous
recommendation for approval.
The applicant has submitted the following
proposed zoning conditions:
1. The Maximum Density shall not exceed 9
dwelling units per acre
2. Prohibited Uses shall include multi-family
dwellings
Consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan
A. Land Use Plan:
The adopted town-wide
Land Use Plan designates the subject parcel as Office/Institutional
(OFC/INS). This rezoning request for Residential Multi-Family Conditional Use
(RMF-CU) does not conform to the adopted Land Use Plan, therefore a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment is also being requested (see case 07-CPA-12).
B.
Growth Management Plan:
The
Growth Management Plan includes the following Guiding Principles which are
relevant to this case:
C.
Affordable Housing Plan:
The Town of
D. Comprehensive
Transportation Plan:
Existing Section: Approx. 60’ ROW
2-lane road
Future Section:
Approx. 67’ ROW 2-lane road with paved median and wide outside lanes
Road Improvements:
N/A
Sidewalk Requirements:
sidewalk required on both sides
Bicycle Requirements:
14’ wide outside lane required
Transit Requirements:
None
Traffic Analysis: Under
the current O&I Zoning, an office use on 11.83 acres would have generated 184 AM
peak hour trips and 177 PM peak hour trips (ITE Land Use Code 710 – 1.55 AM
trips/1000 square feet and 1.49 PM
trips/1000 square feet ) assuming approximately 10,000 square feet of office per
acre. The proposed rezoning to RMFCU
of 9 DU/acre for a maximum of 106 townhouses would generate 47 AM peak hour
trips and 55 PM peak hour trips (ITE Land Use Code 230 - .44 AM trips/DU and .52
PM trips/DU). Therefore, this is a
down zoning and a Traffic Analysis Report (TAR) is not needed at this time.
However, a TAR would most likely be needed at site plan.
E.
Open Space and Historic Resources Plan:
According to the Open
Space and Historic Resources Plan (OSHRP) this site was identified as
significant open space due to the mixed upland hardwoods located on the eastern
end of the site.
F.
Parks & Greenways Master Plan:
Greenways Map
According to the Parks, Recreation &
Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan there are no issues related to this
site. A recreation payment-in-lieu
may be required in accordance with the Land Development Ordinance.
G.
Environmental:
According to the Town of
H.
Buffers:
According to Chapter 7 of the LDO,
the applicant will be required to provide half of a 20’ Type “B” Semi-opaque
buffer between the subject property and the O&I properties to the north and
south. A 40’ Type “A” Opaque buffer
would be required between the subject property and the single family lot that is
surrounded by the subject parcel. A 100 foot Thoroughfare Overlay
buffer along the eastern property line
adjacent to Interstate 40 will also be required.
I.
Streetscape:
According to Chapter 7 of the LDO,
the applicant will be required to provide a 30’ streetscape along
Consistency with the
Land Development Ordinance
The proposed project is in
the rezoning stage and therefore preliminary engineering of the site has not
been done. Prior to Site Plan or
Subdivision Plan approval, the application will be required to demonstrate
consistency with the Land Development Ordinance with respect to specific
development requirements, such as access, stormwater management, road
improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings.
Existing and Requested Zoning District
Comparison:
|
District Regulations |
Existing Zoning
(O&I) |
Requested Zoning
(RMF CU) |
|
Maximum Gross Density (du/ac) |
N/A |
9 * |
|
Minimum
|
N/A |
10,000 square
feet for non-residential uses |
|
Minimum
|
N/A |
20 Feet for Residential Uses
60 feet for Non Residential Uses |
|
Side Yard Setback
|
N/A |
Minimum building separation is 16’ |
|
Front & Rear Setbacks
|
Front: 0’ then 1’ for every 5’ above 30’
of building height |
The width of the roadway or front and
rear setbacks combined shall equal at least 20 feet. |
|
Streetscape Requirement |
30’ Streetscape |
30’ Opaque Streetscape |
|
|
35’ when structure is within 100 feet of
a residential zoning boundary |
35’ |
*Per zoning condition
proposed by applicant.
Permitted Uses in RMF CU:
Public Safety Station, Public Utility Station, Public Athletic Field,
Uses in RMF Requiring a Special Use:
Cemetery, Cultural Facilities, Day Care Centers, Large Day Care Home,
Outdoor Public Amphitheater,
Religious Assembly, School, pre-School, Major Utility facility, Transportation
Facility, Private Neighborhood Recreation Center (Indoor/outdoor), Concealed
(stealth) antennae and towers
Allowed by Right as an Accessory Use:
Home Occupation, Satellite Dish Antenna, Swimming Pool, Hot Tub or Spa,
Recycling Drop-Off Station.
Town Council Criteria
for Consideration in Reviewing Rezonings
Section 3.4.1(E) of the
Land Development Ordinance sets forth the following criteria that Council should
consider in reviewing rezonings:
1.
The proposed
rezoning corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing condition,
trend or fact;
2.
The proposed
rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan set forth in Section 1.3
(LDO);
3.
The Town and
other service providers will be able to provide sufficient public safety,
educational, recreational, transportation and utility facilities and services to
the subject property while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing
development;
4.
The proposed
rezoning is unlikely to have significant adverse impacts on the natural
environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and
vegetation;
5.
The proposed
rezoning will not have significant adverse impacts on property in the vicinity
of the subject tract;
6.
The proposed
zoning classification is suitable for the subject property;
Other Reference
Information
Schools
The school
information is being provided for your review; however, the Wake County
Board of Education controls capital projects for school capacities.
|
School Information |
||||
|
Assigned Schools |
20th Day Enrollment* |
Permanent
Seat |
Average |
Projected Range of Additional |
|
Reedy Creek Elementary |
682 |
816 |
84% |
10 to 35 |
|
Reedy Creek Middle |
778 |
885 |
88% |
6 to 23 |
|
|
1909 |
1747 |
109% |
3 to 19 |
|
Total Projected range of additional students |
19 to 77 |
|||
* Current Enrollment and Building Capacity is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2007-2008 as
supplied by the Wake County Public School System.
School assignment will be determined at the time of development.
** The
Projected Number of Additional Students is only a rough
approximation. The actual number of
students will vary depending on several variables, such as dwelling unit type,
number of bedrooms, dwelling size, and other factors. For example a site with
102 two-bedroom units could yield 19 additional students, while 102 three
bedroom units could yield 77 new students.
The basis for making this calculation is based on multipliers provide
from Wake County Schools Office of Student Assignment.
At rezoning, student yield can not be accurately determined due to
unknown variables.
Applicant’s Justification Statement, Submitted
October 2007
The following statements
are provided by the applicant(shown below in italics)
in response to the criteria established
in the application (shown below in bold) and
does not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town of
Ordinance for Consideration
07-REZ-28 Trenton Towns
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF CARY TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY
11.30 ACRES LOCATED ALONG TRENTON
ROAD OWNED BY THE HEIRS OF LUCILLE A.
GRISSOM FROM OFFICE AND INSTITUTIONAL TO RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY CONDTIONAL USE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN
COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
Section 1:
The Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning the area described
as follows:
|
PARCEL & OWNER INFORMATION |
|||
|
Property Owner(s) |
|
Real Estate ID(s) |
Acres |
|
Lucille A.
Grissom Heirs |
0775610860 |
0068055 |
11.30 |
|
Total Acres |
11.30 |
||
Section 2:
That this Property is rezoned from Office and Institutional to
Residential Multi-family conditional Use subject to the individualized
development conditions set forth herein, and all the requirements of the
Cary Land Development Ordinance (LDO) and other applicable laws,
standards, polices and guidelines.
Section 3:
The conditions mutually approved by the Town and the applicant for
promoting public health, safety and the general welfare are:
1. The Maximum Density shall not exceed 9 dwelling units per acre and 2.
Prohibited Uses shall include multi-family dwellings
These conditions address conformance of
the development and use of the Property to ordinances and officially adopted
plans and address impacts reasonably expected to be generated by the development
and use of the Property.
Section 4: This ordinance shall be
effective on the date of adoption.
Adopted and effective:
|
|
|
|
|
Harold Weinbrect
Mayor |
|
Date |