Rezoning Staff Report to the Planning
and Zoning Board
07-REZ-20 Del Salto Property
Request
The applicant is requesting
Town Council approve an Ordinance to amend the official zoning map of the Town
of
The purpose of a rezoning is to evaluate the
appropriateness of a proposed land use for the subject parcel(s) of land.
Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of land
development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements, utility
line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not considered
during the rezoning process. However, all of these development issues must be
addressed for compliance with existing requirements specified in the Land
Development Ordinance (LDO) when the site or subdivision plan is submitted. All
such requirements can be found at
http:vic.townofcary.org.
Background
Information
|
Applicant |
Hector Del Salto, Janeth Pearl, and Raul Del Salto |
||
|
Agent |
Stephanie L.
Norris, PE |
||
|
Acreage |
4.04 ± |
||
|
General
Location |
Northwest of the
Optimist Farm and |
||
|
Hearings /
Meetings |
Public Hearing |
Planning & Zoning |
Town Council |
|
Land Use
Designation |
Low Density
Residential ( |
||
|
Town Limits |
The subject
site is located outside of the ETJ. |
||
|
Annexation |
A
citizen-initiated annexation petition, 07-A-26, has been submitted
by the property owner in conjunction with this rezoning request |
||
|
Valid Protest |
Protest
petitions are not applicable to a map amendment (rezoning) that
initially zones property that is being added to the Town’s
jurisdiction by annexation |
||
|
P&Z
Recommendation |
To be provided
after the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting |
||
|
Existing Use |
Single-family
Residential |
||
|
Proposed Use |
Single-family
Residential |
||
|
Final Council
Action |
To be provided
after the Town Council Meeting |
||
|
Staff Contact |
Jennifer
Currin, Planner II
Email:
jennifer.currin@townofcary.org Phone: (919)
469-4342 Mailing
Address: |
||
Public Notification:
On
Feedback at the Town Council Public Hearing:
The applicant’s representative,
Stephanie Norris, stated the proposed R-8 zoning is compatible with surrounding
developments and they are limiting the density. They paid for traffic impact
analysis, which showed that no improvements are necessary. They met with
neighbors and she understands their concerns to be about compatibility, lot
sizes and questions about the locations of the stormwater ponds.
Two citizens raised
concerns about the proposed lot sizes along the northern property line, adjacent
to the West Lake Subdivision. A citizen, representing the residents on
Council members encouraged
the applicant to work with the adjacent property owners to determine if
additional conditions could be added to appease the concerns raised at the
public hearing.
Changes since the Town Council Public Hearing:
The applicant proposed an
additional condition restricting the proposed single-family lots along the
northern property line, and adjacent to Phase 2 of West Lake Subdivision, will
be a minimum of 12,000 square feet.
The applicant has submitted the following
proposed zoning conditions:
1.
The overall
residential density shall not exceed 3 units per acre, and
2.
The proposed
single-family lots along the northern property line, and adjacent to Phase 2 of
West Lake Subdivision, will be a minimum of 12,000 SF.
SUMMARY
As described below in the Consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan and Consistency with the Land Development Ordinance sections,
Staff has reviewed the application and information provided prior to this
meeting, and the analysis by Staff is that the application is consistent with the Goals and Objectives
of the Comprehensive Plan, the Land Development Ordinance, and is reasonable and
in the public interest.
Consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan
A. Land Use Plan:
The requested zoning for the
subject parcels is R-8 Conditional Use.
R-8 is a residential single-family zoning district with a minimum lot
area of 8,000 square feet and a maximum allowed density of 5.44 units per acre,
but the applicant is placing a condition on the zoning that restricts the
overall density of the project to three units per acre.
The
B.
Growth Management Plan:
The
Growth Management Plan includes the
following Guiding Principle which is relevant to this case:
1.
R1 Guiding
Principle: Ensure that adequate infrastructure and services are available
concurrently with new development.
C.
Affordable Housing Plan:
Based upon the proposed use, the
Affordable Plan is not applicable.
D.
Comprehensive Transportation Plan:
Existing Section: Local residential street
Future Section:
Local residential street
Road Improvements:
None planned by the Town
Sidewalks Requirements:
Sidewalk required on one side of the road
Bicycle Requirements:
None
Transit Requirements:
None
Traffic Analysis: A traffic study (07-TAR-265) was prepared by Sepi which analyzed 12
single family homes which met our previous threshold density requirement for a
traffic study. It was determined
that no on or off-site mitigations are required of this development to meet our
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance.
E.
Parks & Greenways Master Plan:
Greenways Map
According to the approved Parks,
Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan there are no issues
related to this site. A recreation
payment-in-lieu will be required for residential development in accordance with
the Land Development Ordinance.
These comments were reviewed and approved by the Parks, Recreation and Cultural
Resources Advisory Board at its March 2008 meeting.
According to the Open Space and Historic Resources Plan (OSHRP) there are
no issues related to this site.
Consistency with the
Land Development Ordinance
F.
Environmental:
According to the Town of
G.
Buffers:
Along
H.
Streetscape:
According to Section 7.2.4 (LDO), the
LDO requires streetscapes along thoroughfares and collectors. Since
Existing and Requested Zoning District
Comparison:
The proposed project is in
the rezoning stage and therefore preliminary engineering of the site has not
been provided for Staff to review. Prior to site plan or subdivision plan
approval, the application will be required to demonstrate consistency with the
Land Development Ordinance with respect to specific development requirements,
such as access, stormwater management, road improvements, utility line
placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings.
|
District Regulations |
Existing Zoning
(R-30 |
Requested Zoning
(R-8 CU) |
|
Maximum Gross Density (du/ac) |
1.45 |
3.0 |
|
Minimum |
30,000 sq. ft. |
Along northern property line, adjacent
to the West Lake Subdivision: 12,000 sq. ft.
All other: 8,000 sq. ft. |
|
Minimum Width at Building Line |
95’ |
60’ (70’ for corner lot) |
|
Side Yard Setback |
10’ |
10’ |
|
Roadway Setback |
30’ (Front and corner) |
From thoroughfare: 50’
From collector: 30’
From other: 20’ |
|
Rear Yard Setback |
30’ |
20’ |
|
|
35’ |
35’ |
Planning and zoning
board Criteria for Consideration in Reviewing Rezonings:
Section 3.4.1(E) of the
Land Development Ordinance sets forth the following criteria that the Planning
and Zoning Board should consider in reviewing rezonings:
1.
The proposed
rezoning corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing condition,
trend or fact;
2.
The proposed
rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan set forth in Section 1.3
(LDO);
3.
The Town and
other service providers will be able to provide sufficient public safety,
educational, recreational, transportation and utility facilities and services to
the subject property while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing
development;
4.
The proposed
rezoning is unlikely to have significant adverse impacts on the natural
environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and
vegetation;
5.
The proposed
rezoning will not have significant adverse impacts on property in the vicinity
of the subject tract;
6.
The proposed
zoning classification is suitable for the subject property;
Other Reference
Information
Schools
The school information is
being provided for your review; however, the Wake County Board of Education
controls capital projects for school capacities.
|
School Information |
||||
|
Assigned Schools |
20th Day Enrollment* |
Permanent
Seat |
Average |
Projected Range of Additional |
|
West Lake
Elementary |
1031 |
928 |
111% |
4-5 |
|
West Lake
Middle |
1362 |
1380 |
99% |
1-2 |
|
Middle Creek
High |
1781 |
2053 |
87% |
1-3 |
|
Total Projected
range of additional students |
6-10 |
|||
* Current Enrollment and Building Capacity is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2007-2008 as
supplied by the Wake County Public School System.
School assignment will be determined at the time of development.
** The
Projected Number of Additional Students is only a rough
approximation. The actual number of
students will vary depending on several variables, such as dwelling unit type,
number of bedrooms, dwelling size, and other factors. The basis for making this
calculation is based on multipliers provide from Wake County Schools Office of
Student Assignment. At rezoning,
student yield can not be accurately determined due to unknown variables.
Applicant’s Justification Statement Submitted
(August 30, 2007)
The following statements
(shown below in italics) are provided by the applicant in response to the
criteria established in the application (shown below in bold) and do not
necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town of Cary.
Any statements as to the type, quality or physical features are at the
direction of the applicant and may be formulated into a condition:
1. Any issues with the size of the tract?
The total project is comprised of two
parcels, which are similar in size and shape. The geometry of the tract will
allow for an efficient layout and use of the property while meeting the intent
of the R-8 (Conditional Use) requirements of the Land Development Ordinance and
the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. However, the uniformity of the geometry and the
size of the tract does limit the creativity of the layout. Further, the proposed
zoning of R-8 (Conditional Use) will be similar to the zoning and use of the
adjacent parcels. Therefore, there are no prevalent issues with the size of the
tract.
2. How is the request compatible with the
comprehensive plan (i.e. Land Use, Transportation, Open Space and Historic
Resources)?
The proposed zoning of the new parcel to the R-8
(Conditional Use) designation will result in an overall density of approximately
2.97 units per acre, which is consistent with the Low-Density Residential use in
the Town’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan for this area. Vehicular access to the
property will be provided from Henderson Road to the east. Due to the size of
the proposed development and the existing infrastructure, the Town’s traffic
report indicates that no offsite improvements will be required. Sufficient Open
Space is planned to fully meet the requirements of the LDO. The size of the
parcel does not warrant the need for greenway easements or trails through the
property. However, a sidewalk within the public street right-of-way will be
provided for pedestrian circulation. Finally, there are no Historic Resources
designated for this site.
3. What are the benefits and detriments to the
owner, neighbors and the community?
The proposed zoning is similar in
character to the adjoining neighborhoods. The proximity of the existing schools
provides the ability for residents to walk from the subdivision.
4. How are the allowable uses with the proposed
rezoning compatible with, or how do they relate to, the uses currently present
on adjacent tracts?
Based on the proposed zoning of R-8
(Conditional Use), the project will be a detached single-family development. The
homes will be a similar size and price-point as the single-family homes
currently under construction in the area. The proposed density is consistent
with the existing subdivisions adjacent to the project and falls within the LDR
designation of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
5. PDD (new or amended): What reductions/amendments and/or modifications to the development standards of the LDO are being requested and how are they justified? Applicants must list these items and/or clearly highlight them with the Planned Development document. The Del Salto property is surrounded by West Lake PDD on three sides (north, west and south). Since the West Lake PDD was approved prior to this rezoning request, the 20’ perimeter buffers will be provided as part of the West Lake development and will not be required fro the Del Salto development. The Del Salto development will dedicate a minimum of 5% of the property area for Open Space to the homeowners association that will be established for the project. There are no requested reductions or modifications to the R-8 (Conditional Use) zoning standards outlined in the LDO.
Ordinance for Consideration
07-REZ-20 Del Salto Property
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF CARY FOR
APPROXIMATELY 4.04 ACRES LOCATED AT 8328 AND 8324 HENDERSON ROAD OWNED BY
HECTOR DEL SALTO, JANETH PEARL AND RAUL DEL SALTO
FROM RESIDENTIAL-30 WAKE (R-30 W) TO
RESIDENTIAL-8 CONDITIONAL USE (R-8 CU).
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN
COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF CARY:
Section 1:
The Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning the area described
as follows:
|
PARCEL & OWNER INFORMATION |
|||
|
Property Owner(s) |
County Parcel |
Real Estate ID(s) |
(Acres) |
|
Hector Del Salto and
Janeth Pearl
113 Cooper Hill Drive
Cary, NC
27518 |
0679374281 |
0197505 |
2.02 ± |
|
Janeth Pearl Del Salto and Raul Del Salto
2861 US 401 South
Lillington, NC
27546 |
0679375031 |
0086516 |
2.02 ± |
|
Total Acres |
4.04 ± |
||
Section 2: That these
Properties are rezoned from Residential-30 Wake (R-30 W) to
Residential-8 Conditional Use (R-8 CU) subject to the individualized
development conditions set forth herein, and all the requirements of the Cary
Land Development Ordinance (LDO) and other applicable laws, standards, polices
and guidelines.
Section 3:
The conditions mutually approved by the Town and the applicant for
promoting public health, safety and the general welfare are:
1.
The overall
residential density shall not exceed 3 units per acre, and
2.
The proposed
single-family lots along the northern property line, and adjacent to Phase 2 of
West Lake Subdivision, will be a minimum of 12,000 SF.
These conditions address
conformance of the development and use of the Properties to ordinances and
officially adopted plans and address impacts reasonably expected to be generated
by the development and use of the Properties.
Section 4:
This ordinance shall be effective on the date of adoption.
Adopted and effective: May
29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Harold Weinbrecht, Jr. |
|
Date |