Rezoning Staff Report to Town Council
07-REZ-19 Old Apex Rezoning
Request
The applicant is requesting
Council approve an Ordinance to amend the official zoning map of the Town of
The purpose of a rezoning is to evaluate the
appropriateness of a proposed land use for the subject parcel(s) of land.
Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of land
development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements, utility
line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not considered
during the rezoning process. However, all
of these development issues must be addressed for compliance with existing
requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) when the site or
subdivision plan is submitted. All
such requirements can be found at
http:vic.townofcary.org.
Background
Information
|
Applicant |
ETD (J.W.
Shearin) |
||
|
Agent |
JW Shearin ETD |
||
|
Acreage |
2.87 ± |
||
|
General
Location |
1517 and 1521
Old Apex Road |
||
|
Hearings /
Meetings |
Public Hearing |
Planning & Zoning |
Town Council |
|
Land Use
Designation |
Office/Industrial (OFC/IND) |
||
|
Town Limits |
In the Town of
|
||
|
Annexation |
Not required
since it is already within the Town Limits |
||
|
Valid Protest |
No protests
were received regarding this case; therefore, no supermajority vote
is required. |
||
|
P&Z
Recommendation |
Forwarded to
Town Council with a recommendation for approval 6-0 |
||
|
Existing Use |
Office &
Warehousing Building |
||
|
Proposed Use |
Personal
Service, Office & Warehousing Building |
||
|
Final Council
Action |
Council voted 6-0 to approve this request |
||
|
Case Manager &
Contact Information |
Jennifer
Currin, Planner II Email:
jennifer.currin@townofcary.org Phone: (919)
469-4342 Mailing
Address: |
||
Public Notification:
On
Feedback at the Town Council Public
Hearing:
The applicant stated the ORD district
does not allow personal service uses, but the Industrial district allows these
types of uses. The only way the applicant could achieve the addition of personal
service uses was to request the rezoning to Industrial use and eliminate all the
heavy (more intense) uses that would be allowed in the Industrial district. The
applicant stated they want to maintain all the use rights that they currently
have in the ORD district and only add personal service uses. No citizens spoke
at the public hearing.
Council members were informed of the uses that
would be permitted in the Industrial zoning district, excluding the uses the
applicant proposed to prohibit. A Council member expressed concerns with antenna
towers being a permissible use in the Industrial zoning district.
Changes since the Town Council Public Hearing:
The applicant proposed the
additional conditions. The applicant has proposed that Veterinary
hospital/office, with outdoor kennel; Towing & Vehicle Storage; Vehicle repair,
heavy; mini-storage; and Vehicle service, light will require special uses. The
applicant has also proposed to prohibit antenna co-location on existing towers
and concealed (stealth) antennae and towers. The applicant has also added the
condition that personal service uses shall not exceed 5,850 square feet of the
total building size.
The applicant has submitted the following
proposed zoning conditions:
|
Existing Conditions |
Proposed Conditions |
|
Prohibited Uses: Hospital Outdoor
Amphitheater, Commercial Outdoor
Amphitheater, Private Parking Structures Sexually Orientated
Businesses |
Prohibited Uses: Airport/landing
strip Car wash Commercial outdoor
recreational facility Farming, general General industrial
service Heavy equipment
sales/rental Heliport Manufacturing,
heavy Motor vehicle
raceway Outdoor
amphitheater, commercial Outdoor
amphitheater, public Outdoor storage Railroad stations
and yards Recycling and
salvage yards Resource extraction Trade school Vehicle filling
station Antenna co-location
on existing towers Concealed (stealth)
antennae and towers Uses Requiring
Special Uses: Veterinary
hospital/office, with outdoor kennel Towing & Vehicle
Storage Vehicle repair,
heavy Mini-storage Vehicle service,
light Personal Service
uses shall not exceed 5,850 square feet. |
summary
During the rezoning application review process,
Staff suggested that the applicant wait to proceed with this rezoning request
until Council takes action on the next round of LDO amendments. Staff’s
intention is to include a proposed amendment to the Table of Permitted Uses and
the use specific standards as it relates to personal service uses. Staff’s
rationale for inquiring if the applicant would wait is so that a comprehensive
approach could be evaluated and similar types of requests would not have to be
reviewed on a case by case basis. The applicant opted not to wait and to proceed
with the subject request citing contractual obligations.
Since the applicant is
proceeding, the applicant has proposed to either prohibit uses not permitted
within the ORD zoning district or require special use approval by Council for
uses that required a special use in the ORD zoning district, but are permitted
by right in the Industrial zoning district.
During the public hearing
and conversations with Planning Staff, the applicant indicated that the only
reason they were pursuing an ICU zoning designation was for personal services to
be permissible uses. Therefore, Staff suggested that the applicant add the
condition that a special use permit was required for the veterinary
hospital/office, with outdoor kennel, towing & vehicle storage, vehicle repair,
heavy, mini-storage, and vehicle service, light. The applicant proposed this
requirement as a condition in response. In addition, due to the concern raised
at Council regarding cell towers, the applicant proposed a condition to prohibit
antenna co-location on existing towers and concealed (stealth) antennae and
towers.
Also, Staff raised concerns
during the review about the potential parking impact personal services might
have on the existing parking. The site plan for the subject property was
approved for 19,000 square feet of office use parked at a ratio of 1 space per
300 square feet, and for 5,000 square feet of warehousing which is parked at a
ratio of 1 space per 500 square feet. The site plan was approved to provide 75
parking spaces. In response to Staff’s concern, the applicant proposed a
condition that personal service uses shall not exceed 5,850 square feet. Since
the request proposed a change in uses from the previously approved site plan, a
revised site plan will be required to be submitted so Staff can review and
ensure that the site plan with the change in uses (proposed by the rezoning)
meet the LDO requirements, including parking.
Staff has reviewed the application and
information provided prior to this meeting, and the analysis of Staff is
that it is consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the Comprehensive
Plan, the Land Development Ordinance and is reasonable and in the public
interest.
Planning and Zoning
Board Recommendation
As required by
G.S. 160A-328, a P&Z recommendation addressing plan consistency and other
matters as deemed appropriate by the Board follows:
The Planning and Zoning Board
met on December 17, 2007 and voted 6-0 to forward this case to the Town Council
with a recommendation of approval
because the proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and is
reasonable and in the public interest as indicated in the staff report.
Changes since the Planning and Zoning Board
Meeting:
None
Consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan
A. Land Use Plan:
This rezoning request conforms
to the adopted Land Use Plan which calls for Industrial or Office zoning for
these parcels.
B.
Growth Management Plan:
The Growth Management Plan includes
the following three Guiding Principles which are relevant to this case:
1.
R1 Guiding
Principle: Ensure that adequate infrastructure and services are available
concurrently with new development.
2.
L1 Guiding
Principle: Concentrate growth near existing and planned employment centers and
available and planned infrastructure to minimize costly service-area extensions.
3.
A2 Guiding
Principle: Ensure that the overall amount of development in
C.
Comprehensive Transportation Plan:
Existing Section:
Approx. 70’ Right-of-Way, 2-lane road
Future Section: 91’ Right-of-way, 4-lane
road with paved median
Road Improvements: None scheduled
Sidewalks Requirements:
Sidewalk required on both sides
Bicycle Requirements:
14’ Wide outside lanes
Transit Requirements:
None
Traffic Analysis:
Current zoning - ORD for 24,000 square feet (sf)
building using Land Use code 710 - the site would generate 35.76 trips in the pm
peak hour.
Original proposed zoning - Industrial for 24,000
sf building using
Land Use code 110 - the site would generate 23.53 trips in the pm peak hour.
Revised proposed zoning - Industrial for 12,000 sf of building and
Personal Service for 12,000 sf of building
using Land Use
code 110 for 12,000 sf and 814 for 12,000 sf, the site would generate 44.28
trips in the pm peak hour.
Therefore, based on the analysis, the revised proposed zoning would not require
a TIA because it does not generate an additional 20 peak hour trips over the
current zoning.
D.
Open Space and Historic Resources Plan:
Based on the Open Space and Historic
Resources Plan (OSHRP) this site was not designated as priority open space.
E.
Parks & Greenways Master Plan:
Greenways Map
According to the approved Parks,
Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan there are no issues
related to this site.
Consistency with the
Land Development Ordinance
F.
Environmental:
According to the Town of
G.
Buffers:
On the site plan approved on November
20, 2006 for the subject request, a 10’ Type “C” buffer was required along the
western property line, a 20’ Type “B” buffer was provided along the southern
property line of this subject request, except where the sewer easement is
located, and a 20’ Type “B” buffer was provided along the eastern property line
of the subject request.
H.
Streetscape:
According to Chapter 7 (LDO), the
applicant will be required to provide a minimum 30’ streetscape along
thoroughfares and major collectors designated on the Cary Comprehensive
Transportation Plan. Old
The proposed project is in the rezoning stage
and therefore preliminary engineering of the site has not been provided to Staff
for review. Prior to Site Plan or
Subdivision Plan approval, the application will be required to demonstrate
consistency with the Land Development Ordinance with respect to specific
development requirements, such as access, stormwater management, road
improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings.
Existing and Requested Zoning District
Comparison:
|
District Regulations |
Existing Zoning
(ORD CU) |
Requested Zoning
(I CU) |
|
Maximum Gross Density (du/ac) |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Minimum |
No minimum lot size requirements for
most non-residential districts |
No minimum lot size requirements for
most non-residential districts |
|
Minimum Width at Building Line |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Side Yard Setback |
No minimum side setbacks in most
non-residential districts |
No minimum side setbacks in most
non-residential districts |
|
Roadway Setback |
30’ |
30’ |
|
Rear Yard Setback |
No minimum rear setbacks in most
non-residential districts |
No minimum rear setbacks in most
non-residential districts |
|
|
35’ if structure is within 100’ of a
residential zoning district boundary; 50’ if structure is more than 100’
from a residential zoning district |
35’ if structure is within 100’ of a
residential zoning district boundary; 50’ if structure is more than 100’
from a residential zoning district |
Town Council Criteria for Consideration in Reviewing Rezonings:
Section 3.4.1(E) of the
Land Development Ordinance sets forth the following criteria that Town Council
should consider in reviewing rezonings:
1.
The proposed
rezoning corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing condition,
trend or fact;
2.
The proposed
rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan set forth in Section 1.3
(LDO);
3.
The Town and
other service providers will be able to provide sufficient public safety,
educational, recreational, transportation and utility facilities and services to
the subject property while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing
development;
4.
The proposed
rezoning is unlikely to have significant adverse impacts on the natural
environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and
vegetation;
5.
The proposed
rezoning will not have significant adverse impacts on property in the vicinity
of the subject tract;
6.
The proposed
zoning classification is suitable for the subject property;
Applicant’s Justification Statement Submitted (
The following statements
are provided by the applicant (shown below in italics) in response to the
criteria established in the application (shown below in bold) and does not
necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town of
1.
Any issues with the size of the tract?
None.
2.
How is the request compatible with the comprehensive plan (i.e. Land Use,
Transportation, Open Space and Historic Resources)?
The Town of
3.
What are the benefits and detriments to the owner, neighbors and the community?
The request will add personal service use
to the building, which will provide viable services to local residents, i.e.
drop-off drycleaners, tailors, hair stylist, dance and martial arts studios.
4.
How are all the allowable uses with the proposed rezoning compatible with, or
how do they relate to, the uses currently present on adjacent tracts?
Personal service is the only type of use that
will be added to the site, while seventeen uses will no longer be available
(e.g. day care center, farm market, nursing home etc.). The southern adjacent
property is zoned General Commercial which allows personal service, and the
northern adjacent property is zoned Office and Institutional. In conclusion, we
feel the additional use will be complimentary to the surrounding properties.
5.
PDD/new or amended: What
reductions/amendments and/or modifications to the development standards of the
LDO are being requested and how are they justified?
Applicants must list these items and/or clearly highlight them within the
Planned Development document.
Ordinance for Consideration
07-REZ-19 Old Apex Rezoning
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF CARY TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY
2.87 ACRES LOCATED AT 1517 AND 1521 OLD APEX ROAD
OWNED BY CRESTVIEW ASSOC. OF NC, LLC FROM
OFFICE, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE (ORD CU) TO
INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONAL USE (I CU).
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN
COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
Section 1:
The Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning the area described
as follows:
|
PARCEL & OWNER INFORMATION |
|||
|
Property Owner(s) |
|
Real Estate ID(s) |
(Acres) |
|
Crestview
Assoc. of NC, LLC |
0753439212
0753437100 |
0101279
0101282 |
1.85 ±
1.02 ± |
|
Total Acres |
2.87 ± |
||
Section 2:
That this Property is rezoned from Office, Research and Development
Conditional Use (ORD CU) to Industrial Conditional Use (I CU) subject to the
individualized development conditions set forth herein, and all the requirements
of the Cary Land Development Ordinance (LDO) and other applicable laws,
standards, polices and guidelines.
Section 3:
The conditions mutually approved by the Town and the applicant for
promoting public health, safety and the general welfare are:
Airport/landing strips, car washes, commercial outdoor recreational
facilities, farming, general, general industrial services, heavy equipment
sales/rentals, heliports, manufacturing, heavy, motor vehicle raceways, outdoor
amphitheaters, commercial, outdoor amphitheaters, public, outdoor storage,
railroad stations and yards, recycling and salvage operations, resource
extractions, trade schools, vehicle filling stations, antenna co-location on
existing towers, and
Concealed (stealth)
antennae and towers shall be prohibited uses; veterinary hospital/office, with
outdoor kennel; towing & vehicle storage; vehicle repair, heavy; mini-storage;
and vehicle service, light will require special uses; and personal service uses
shall not exceed 5,850 square feet. These conditions address conformance of the
development and use of the Property to ordinances and officially adopted plans
and address impacts reasonably expected to be generated by the development and
use of the Property.
Section 4:
This ordinance shall be effective on the date of adoption.
Adopted and effective:
|
|
|
|
|
Harold Weinbrecht, Jr. |
|
Date |