Rezoning Staff Report to the Town
Council
07-REZ-18 Copperleaf Planned Development
District (PDD) Amendment
Request
The applicant is requesting
Council approve an Ordinance to amend the official zoning map of the Town of
Cary for approximately 3.99 acres located at
9837 Green Level Church Road,
from Residential-40 Wake County (R-40 W) to
Copperleaf Planned Development District (PDD) Amendment.
The purpose of a rezoning is to evaluate the
appropriateness of a proposed land use for the subject parcel(s) of land.
Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of
land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements,
utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not
considered during the rezoning process.
However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance
with existing requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO)
when the site or subdivision plan is submitted.
All such requirements can be found at
http:vic.townofcary.org.
Background
Information
|
Applicant |
|
||
|
Agent |
Kurt Pfeifer Withers &
Ravenel |
||
|
Acreage |
3.99 ± |
||
|
General
Location |
East of
Green Level Church Road, North of Green Hope School Road, and West
of Mentmore Place |
||
|
Hearings /
Meetings |
Public Hearing |
Planning & Zoning |
Town Council |
|
Land Use
Designation |
Very Low
Density Residential (VLDR) with Conservation Residential Overlay
within the Southwest Area Plan |
||
|
Town Limits |
The subject
site is located outside of the ETJ.
|
||
|
Annexation |
A voluntary
annexation petition, 07-A-24, has been submitted in conjunction with
this rezoning request
|
||
|
Valid Protest |
Protest petitions are not applicable
to a map amendment (rezoning) that initially zones property that is
being added to the Town’s jurisdiction by annexation |
||
|
P&Z
Recommendation |
Forwarded to
Town Council with a recommendation for approval 8-0 |
||
|
Existing Use |
Vacant |
||
|
Proposed Use |
Detached
single-family residences |
||
|
Final Council
Action |
Council voted 7-0 to approve this request |
||
|
Case Manager &
Contact Information |
Jennifer
Currin, Planner II
Email:
jennifer.currin@townofcary.org
Phone: (919)
469-4342 Mailing
Address: |
||
Public Notification:
On
Feedback at the Town Council Public Hearing:
One citizen questioned whether or not
this was a satellite annexation issue, and a Council member requested that Staff
respond to this inquiry. Staff responded that the subject parcel is contiguous
to the town limits. Staff also responded to a Council question regarding whether
the proposal was compatible with the original planned development density. Staff
responded that the density originally approved in the Copperleaf PDD was
remaining the same (1 du/acre) in the PDD amendment request.
Changes since the Town Council Public Hearing:
None
summary
The applicant proposes to add approximately 4
acres and permit an additional 4 detached dwelling units to the SF-1 portion of
the previously approved Copperleaf PDD. The proposed amendment would allow a
maximum of 141 dwelling units on approximately 141 acres. The overall density is
1 dwelling unit per acre in the approved Copperleaf PDD and the proposed
amendment does not increase the overall density.
Staff has reviewed the application and
information provided prior to this meeting, and the analysis of Staff is
that the proposal is consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan, the Land Development Ordinance and is reasonable and in the
public interest.
The applicant has submitted the following
proposed zoning conditions: The
applicant is not proposing any conditions except what is contained within the
proposed PDD document.
PLANNING AND
ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION
As required by
G.S. 160A-328, a P&Z recommendation addressing plan consistency and other
matters as deemed appropriate by the Board follows:
The Planning and Zoning Board
met on November 19, 2007 and voted 8-0 to forward this case to the Town Council
with a recommendation of approval
because the proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and is
reasonable and in the public interest as indicated in the staff report.
Changes since the Planning and Zoning Board
Meeting:
None
Consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan
A. Land Use Plan:
This rezoning request conforms
to the adopted Land Use Plan. The
land use plan designation is Very Low Residential (VLDR) within the Southwest
Area Plan which permits 0.5 units per acre.
The proposed density at 1.0 unit per acre for the project is in
conformance with those permitted in VLDR land use designation as modified by the
Conservation Residential Overlay.
Additional open space will need to be preserved in order to achieve this
density. The applicant has proposed
9.20 acres of primary open space, sufficient to achieve the density bonus.
B.
Growth Management Plan:
The Growth Management Plan includes
the following six (6) Guiding Principles which are relevant to this case:
1.
R1 Guiding
Principle: Ensure that adequate infrastructure and services are available
concurrently with new development.
2.
L1 Guiding
Principle: Concentrate growth near existing and planned employment centers and
available and planned infrastructure to minimize costly service-area extensions.
3.
L2 Guiding
Principle: Ensure that future growth protects sensitive natural resources and
protects open space.
4.
A1 Guiding
Principle: Increase permitted densities in preferred growth areas to encourage
desired forms of development.
5.
A2 Guiding
Principle: Ensure that the overall amount of development in
6.
Q1 Guiding
Principle: Continue
C.
Affordable Housing Plan:
This proposal does not include the
provision for any affordable housing.
D.
Comprehensive Transportation Plan:
Existing Section:
2-lane road, 60’ Right-of-Way
Future Section: 4-lane median-divided rural
thoroughfare (Southwest Area Plan)
Road Improvements: None scheduled
Sidewalks Requirements:
N/A
Bicycle Requirements:
Included in future rural typical section
Transit Requirements:
None
Traffic
Analysis:
A traffic study is not required since
this proposal generates less than 20 peak hour trips.
E.
Parks & Greenways Master Plan:
Greenways Map
According to the approved Parks,
Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan there are no issues
related to the PDD addition. A
recreation payment-in-lieu will be required for any additional subdivided
residential units. According to the
Open Space and Historic Resources Plan (OSHRP) this site was not identified as
significant/proposed open space.
Consistency with the
Land Development Ordinance
F.
Environmental:
According to the Town of
G.
Buffers:
Perimeter buffers are not impacted by
this PDD amendment, and will be provided in accordance with the requirements of
the PDD and LDO.
H.
Streetscape:
According to Chapter 7(LDO), the
applicant will be required to provide a 50’ Streetscape along
Requested Zoning District Information:
The Copperleaf PDD was
originally approved for a maximum of 137 dwelling units on approximately 137
acres. Therefore, the overall density was 1 dwelling unit per acre. The proposed
Copperleaf PDD amendment meets the overall density of 1 dwelling unit per acre.
The applicant proposes to add approximately 4 acres and permit an additional 4
detached dwelling units to the SF-1 portion of the Copperleaf PDD. The proposed
amendment would allow a maximum of 141 dwelling units on approximately 141
acres. The applicant is providing
more open space than what is required per the LDO requirement. The LDO only
requires a 141 acre PDD to provide 17.67 acres if open space. The current PDD
provides 37.41 acres of open space, which is comprised of 8.36 acres of primary
open space and the PDD amendment provides an additional 0.84 acres of primary
open space bringing the total to 9.20 acres of primary open space and the total
amount of overall open space to 37.81 acres. The applicant is not proposing any
changes to specific development standards within the SF-1 portion. In SF-1, the
PDD requires a 20,000 square feet lot size minimums, minimum 80’ average lot
width, 30’ minimum setback to rear wall, 30’ minimum front building setback,
minimum 10’ side setback, minimum of 20’ corner side setback, and a minimum 35’
corner side setback along a collector.
Town Council Criteria for Consideration in Reviewing Rezonings
Section 3.4.1(E) of the
Land Development Ordinance sets forth the following criteria that the Town
Council should consider in reviewing rezonings:
1.
The proposed
rezoning corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing condition,
trend or fact;
2.
The proposed
rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan set forth in Section 1.3
(LDO);
3.
The Town and
other service providers will be able to provide sufficient public safety,
educational, recreational, transportation and utility facilities and services to
the subject property while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing
development;
4.
The proposed
rezoning is unlikely to have significant adverse impacts on the natural
environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and
vegetation;
5.
The proposed
rezoning will not have significant adverse impacts on property in the vicinity
of the subject tract;
6.
The proposed
zoning classification is suitable for the subject property;
7.
The PDD
designation is necessary to address a unique situation or represents a
substantial benefit to the Town, compared to what could have been accomplished
through strict application of otherwise applicable zoning district standards;
and
8.
The request
complies with the standards and intent of a PDD, as outlined is Section 4.2.3
(LDO).
Other Reference
Information
Schools
The school information is
being provided for your review; however, the Wake County Board of Education
controls capital projects for school capacities.
|
School Information |
||||
|
Assigned Schools |
20th Day Enrollment* |
Permanent
Seat |
Average |
Projected Range of Additional |
|
|
862 |
747 |
115% |
2 |
|
|
1050 |
955 |
110% |
1 |
|
Panther Creek
High (G
9-11)*** |
893 |
1663 |
54% |
1*** |
|
Green Hope High
(G 12)*** |
2085 |
1843 |
113% |
|
|
Total Projected
range of additional students |
4 |
|||
* Current Enrollment and Building Capacity is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2006-2007 as
supplied by the Wake County Public School System.
School assignment will be determined at the time of development.
** The
Projected Number of Additional Students is only a rough
approximation. The actual number of students will vary depending on several
variables, such as dwelling unit type, number of bedrooms, dwelling size, and
other factors. The basis for making this calculation is based on multipliers
provide from Wake County Schools Office of Student Assignment. At rezoning,
student yield can not be accurately determined due to unknown variables.
***
Applicant’s Justification Statement Submitted (
The following statements
are provided by the applicant (shown below in italics) in response to the
criteria established in the application (shown below in bold) and does not
necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town of
1.
Any issues with the size of the tract?
Please see the attached Justification
Statement.
2.
How is the request compatible with the comprehensive plan (i.e. Land Use,
Transportation, Open Space and Historic Resources)?
Please see the attached Justification
Statement.
3.
What are the benefits and detriments to the owner, neighbors and the
community? Please see the attached
Justification Statement.
4.
How are all the allowable uses with the proposed rezoning compatible
with, or how do they relate to, the uses currently present on adjacent tracts?
Please see the attached Justification
Statement.
5.
PDD/new or amended: What
reductions/amendments and/or modifications to the development standards of the
LDO are being requested and how are they justified?
Applicants must list these items and/or clearly highlight them within the
Planned Development document.
Please see the attached Justification
Statement.
Justification Statement
The Copperleaf PDD currently consists of 137
acres, combining a mix of very low density residential units with a variety of
open space. As approved in April 2005, this PDD did not contain a 4 acre tract
that is mainly land-locked inside of Copperleaf. This request adds that parcel
in an attempt to unify the original Copperleaf PDD into a more continuous
parcel. Adding this tract will assure the remainder of improvements to
Ordinance for Consideration
07-REZ-18 Copperleaf Planned Development
District (PDD) Amendment
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF CARY TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY
3.99 ACRES LOCATED AT
9837 GREEN LEVEL CHURCH ROAD OWNED
BY DERBY DOWNS, LLC FROM RESIDENTIAL-40 WAKE COUNTY (R-40 W) TO COPPERLEAF
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PDD) AMENDMENT.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN
COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
Section 1:
The Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning the area described
as follows:
|
PARCEL & OWNER INFORMATION |
|||
|
Property Owner(s) |
|
Real Estate ID(s) |
(Acres) |
|
|
0724445622 |
0247276 |
3.99 ± |
|
Total Acres |
3.99 ± |
||
Section 2:
That this Property is rezoned from Residential-40 Wake County (R-40 W) to
Copperleaf PDD Amendment subject to the individualized development conditions
set forth within the Copperleaf PDD amendment, and all the requirements of the
Cary Land Development Ordinance (LDO) and other applicable laws, standards,
polices and guidelines.
Section 3:
The conditions mutually approved by the Town and the applicant for
promoting public health, safety and the general welfare are set forth within the
Copperleaf PDD Amendment. These conditions address conformance of the
development and use of the Property to ordinances and officially adopted plans
and address impacts reasonably expected to be generated by the development and
use of the Property.
Section 4:
This ordinance shall be effective on the date of adoption.
Adopted and effective:
|
|
|
|
|
Harold Weinbrecht |
|
Date |