Rezoning Staff Report to the Town
Council
07-REZ-09 Batchelor Property/Prentiss
Creek
Request
The applicant is requesting
Council approve an Ordinance to amend the official zoning map of the Town of
The purpose of a rezoning is to evaluate the
appropriateness of a proposed land use for the subject parcel(s) of land.
Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of
land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements,
utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not
considered during the rezoning process.
However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance
with existing requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO)
when the site or subdivision plan is submitted.
All such requirements can be found at
http:vic.townofcary.org.
Background
Information
|
Applicant |
Jerry Turner and
Associates, Inc. (Jerry Turner) |
|||||
|
Agent |
Glenda Toppe Jerry Turner and
Associates, Inc. |
|||||
|
Acreage |
54.36 ± |
|||||
|
General Location |
West of Highcroft
PDD and south of |
|||||
|
Hearings / Meetings |
Public Hearing |
Planning & Zoning |
Town Council |
|||
|
Land Use
Designation |
Medium Density
Residential (MDR) |
|||||
|
Town Limits |
Corporate Limits |
ETJ
X |
Outside ETJ |
|||
|
Annexation |
Not Required
|
With Site Plan
X |
With rezoning |
|||
|
Valid Protest |
One protest was
received regarding this case; however, it was determined to be invalid;
therefore, no supermajority vote is required. |
|||||
|
P&Z Recommendation |
Forwarded to Town
Council with a recommendation for approval 9-0 |
|||||
|
Existing Use |
Single Family
Residence |
|||||
|
Proposed Use |
Single Family
Residences and Townhouses |
|||||
|
Final Council
Action |
Council voted 7-0 to approve this request |
|||||
|
Case Manager &
Contact Information |
Jennifer Currin,
Planner II Email:
jennifer.currin@townofcary.org Phone: (919)
469-4342 Mailing Address:
|
|||||
Public Notification:
On
Feedback at the Town Council Public Hearing:
No citizens spoke at the public
hearing. There was one question from a Council member regarding the type and
width of the buffer adjacent to the proposed
Changes since the Town Council Public Hearing:
The applicant has provided a
condition to assure consistency with the Comprehensive Land Use plan. The
voluntary condition states that the gross density of the entire tract will not
be less than 3 units per acre.
summary
The applicant has proposed detached,
single-family residences adjacent to the detached single-family residences in
the Highcroft PDD to the east. The lots proposed in the R-12 CU portion of this
request will have a minimum lot size of 12,000 square feet, which is larger than
the Residential-8 (R-8) equivalent lots adjacent to this request in the
Highcroft PDD. Between the detached
single-family houses and townhouses being proposed in this request is a stream
buffer that will separate the two housing products and provide a transition.
Townhouses are proposed between the stream buffer and the proposed
Staff has reviewed the application and
information provided prior to this meeting, and the analysis of Staff is
that it is consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the Comprehensive
Plan, the Land Development Ordinance and is reasonable and in the public
interest.
The applicant has submitted the following
voluntary zoning conditions:
1.
The applicant
shall limit the R-12 CU portion of the property to single-family detached units
with a maximum of 10 units.
2.
The applicant
shall limit the TR CU portion of the property to Townhomes with a maximum of 200
units.
3.
The gross density
of the total tract shall be a minimum of 3 units per acre.
Planning and Zoning
Board Recommendation
As required by
G.S. 160A-328, a P&Z recommendation addressing plan consistency and other
matters as deemed appropriate by the Board follows:
The Planning and Zoning Board
met on August 20, 2007 and voted 9-0 to forward this case to the Town Council
with a recommendation of approval
because the proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and is
reasonable and in the public interest as indicated in the staff report.
Changes since the Planning and Zoning Board
Meeting:
None
Consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan
A. Land Use Plan:
The Land Use Plan designates
this parcel as Medium Density Residential (MDR), which is defined as including
single family attached or detached housing, 3 to 8 units per acre.
This rezoning request conforms to that land use designation.
B.
Growth Management Plan:
Three guiding principles of
the Growth Management Plan are relevant to this case:
1.
Ensure that
adequate infrastructure and services are available concurrently with new
development,
2.
Increase
permitted densities in preferred growth areas to encourage desired forms of
development, and
3.
Concentrate
growth near existing and planned employment centers and available and planned
infrastructure to minimize costly service-area extensions.
Upon completion, this
project will provide housing adjacent to the planned Western Wake Expressway
(I-540), a commuter route to the
C.
Affordable Housing Plan:
Affordable
housing
is defined as dwelling units that cost no more than 30% of the income of
families and individuals earning 80% (for buyers) of the area median income of
$71,600, adjusted for family size (2006 HUD Data).
1.
Provide for a
full range of housing choices for all income groups, families of various sizes,
seniors, and persons with special challenges.
2.
Facilitate the
creation of a reasonable proportion of the Town of
3.
Facilitate the
affordable housing activities of other entities within the Town of
4.
Encourage the
location of high density housing within walking and convenient commuting
distance of employment, shopping, and other activities, or within a short walk
of a bus or transit stop.
5.
Assure a quality
living environment and access to public amenities for all residents, present and
future, of the Town of
D. Transportation
Existing Section:
Green Hope School Rd. 60’ Right-of-way, 2-lanes
Future Section:
2-lane road with paved median
Road Improvements:
N/A
Sidewalks Requirements:
Sidewalk required on both sides
Bicycle Requirements:
14’ wide outside lane required
Transit Requirements:
None
Traffic
Analysis:
A traffic study (07-TAR-241) was required and was conducted by MAB.
The study indicates that the following mitigations would be required to
meet APFO:
1.
Widen
2.
Construct a north
bound (NB) to provide one egress and two egress lanes that provides a continuous
right-turn lane and left turn lane with at least 100 ft. of storage.
3.
Widen the
4.
The other two
access locations at
E.
Parks & Greenways:
Greenways Map
According to the approved Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities
Master Plan a public greenway trail will cross the property in a north/south
direction, running along the stream buffer and connecting to the greenway trail
in
F.
Environmental:
According to the Town of
G.
Buffers:
According to Chapter 4 (LDO), the applicant will
be required to provide a 100’ Type “A” buffer parallel to the right-of-way
boundary of the
H.
Streetscape: According to Chapter 7.2.4 (LDO), the applicant will be required to
provide a minimum 50’ Type “A” buffer along thoroughfares, which includes
Consistency with the
Land Development Ordinance
The proposed project is in
the rezoning stage and therefore preliminary engineering of the site has not
been provided to Staff for review.
Prior to Site Plan or Subdivision Plan approval, the application will be
required to demonstrate consistency with the Land Development Ordinance with
respect to specific development requirements, such as access, stormwater
management, road improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and
landscape plantings.
Existing and Requested Zoning District
Comparison:
|
District Regulations |
Existing Zoning
(R-40) |
Requested Zoning |
|
|
(R-12 CU) |
(TR CU) |
||
|
Maximum Gross
Density (du/ac) |
1.08 |
3.63 |
6 |
|
Maximum Number of
Lots |
58 |
10 |
200 units |
|
Minimum |
40,000 Sq. Ft. |
12,000 |
N/A |
|
Minimum Width at
Building Line |
125’ (135’ for corner lot) |
80’ (90’ for corner lot) |
20 per dwelling unit |
|
Side Yard Setback |
15’ |
10’ |
See [1] below |
|
Roadway Setback |
Thoroughfare: 50’ Collector: 30’ Other Streets: 20’ |
Thoroughfare: 50’ Collector: 30’ Other Streets: 20’ |
Thoroughfare: 50’ Collector: 30’ Other Streets: See
[2] below |
|
Rear Yard Setback |
30’ |
25’ |
See [3] below |
|
|
35’ |
35’ |
35 |
[1]
Firewalls must be provided in accordance with all applicable building
code standards when exterior walls of individual dwelling units on individual
parcels are placed within three feet of one another.
[2]
From all other streets, the roadway setback between the front of the
dwelling and the roadway shall be no less than 18’ when parking is provided
between the dwelling and the roadway, or 10’ when parking is not provided
between the dwelling and the roadway.
[3]
The width of the roadway or front and rear setbacks combined shall equal
at least 20’.
Town Council Criteria for Consideration in Reviewing Rezonings:
Section 3.4.1(E) of the
Land Development Ordinance sets forth the following criteria that the Town
Council should consider in reviewing rezonings:
1.
The proposed
rezoning corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing condition,
trend or fact;
2.
The proposed
rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan set forth in Section 1.3
(LDO);
3.
The Town and
other service providers will be able to provide sufficient public safety,
educational, recreational, transportation and utility facilities and services to
the subject property while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing
development;
4.
The proposed
rezoning is unlikely to have significant adverse impacts on the natural
environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and
vegetation;
5.
The proposed
rezoning will not have significant adverse impacts on property in the vicinity
of the subject tract;
6.
The proposed
zoning classification is suitable for the subject property;
Other Reference
Information
Schools
The school information is
being provided for your review; however, the Wake County
Board of Education controls capital projects for school capacities.
|
School Information |
||||
|
Assigned Schools |
20th Day Enrollment* |
Permanent
Seat |
Average |
Projected Range of Additional |
|
|
862 |
747 |
115% |
7-75 |
|
|
1050 |
955 |
110% |
1-47 |
|
|
893 |
1663 |
54% |
1-39*** |
|
|
2085 |
1843 |
113% |
|
|
Total Projected
range of additional students |
9-161 |
|||
* Current Enrollment and Building Capacity
is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2006-2007 as supplied
by the Wake County Public School System.
School assignment will be determined at the time of development.
** The
Projected Number of Additional Students is only a rough
approximation. The actual number of
students will vary depending on several variables, such as dwelling unit type,
number of bedrooms, dwelling size, and other factors. The basis for making this
calculation is based on multipliers provide from Wake County Schools Office of
Student Assignment. At Rezoning,
student yield can not be accurately determined due to unknown variables.
***
Ordinance for Consideration
07-REZ-09 Batchelor Property/Prentiss
Creek Rezoning
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF CARY TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY
54.36 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF GREEN HOPE SCHOOL ROAD AND WEST OF HIGHCROFT PDD
OWNED BY EULA M. BATCHELOR FROM RESIDENTIAL-40 (R-40) TO RESIDENTIAL-12
CONDITIONAL USE (R-12 CU) AND TRANSITIONAL RESIDENTIAL CONDITIONAL USE (TR CU).
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN
COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
Section 1:
The Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning the area described
as follows:
|
PARCEL & OWNER INFORMATION |
|||
|
Property Owner(s) |
|
Real Estate ID(s) |
(Acres) |
|
Eula M.
Batchelor |
0734360638 portion |
0203271 portion |
53.92 ± |
|
Eula M.
Batchelor James Glen
Batchelor |
0734263518 portion |
0328202 portion |
0.44 ± |
|
Total Acres |
54.36
± |
||
Section 2:
That this Property is rezoned from Residential-40 (R-40) to
Residential-12 Conditional Use (R-12 CU) and Transitional Residential
Conditional Use (TR CU) subject to the individualized development conditions set
forth herein, and all the requirements of the Cary Land Development Ordinance
(LDO) and other applicable laws, standards, polices and guidelines.
Section 3:
The conditions mutually approved by the Town and the applicant for
promoting public health, safety and the general welfare are:
1.
The applicant
shall limit the R-12 CU portion of the property to single-family detached units
with a maximum of 10 units.
2.
The applicant
shall limit the TR CU portion of the property to Townhomes with a maximum of 200
units.
3.
The gross density
of the total tract shall be a minimum of 3 units per acre.
These conditions address conformance of the
development and use of the Property to ordinances and officially adopted plans
and address impacts reasonably expected to be generated by the development and
use of the Property.
Section 4:
This ordinance shall be effective on the date of adoption.
Adopted and effective:
|
|
|
|
|
Ernest F. McAlister |
|
Date |