Rezoning Data Sheet
Jennifer Currin, Case Manager
The applicant is requesting
Council approve an Ordinance to amend the official zoning map of the Town of
Cary to change the zoning of approximately 3.1 acres located on the southeast
corner of the intersection of Chapel Hill and Trinity Roads from Industiral (I)
and Planned Development Distict (PDD) to Planned Development District (PDD)
Amendment.
The
purpose of a rezoning is to evaluate the appropriateness of a proposed land use
for the subject parcel(s) of land. Specific
development requirements related to the technical aspects of land development,
such as access, stormwater management, road improvements, utility line
placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not considered during
the rezoning process. However, all
of these development issues must be addressed for compliance with existing
requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) when the site or
subdivision plan is submitted. All
such requirements can be found at http:vic.townofcary.org.
|
Applicant |
Quality Oil Company LLC
(Ernie Rhymer) |
||||
|
Agent |
Terry Boylan |
||||
|
Acreage |
3.1 ± |
||||
|
General Location |
Southeast corner of
Chapel Hill and Trinity Roads |
||||
|
Hearings / Meetings |
Public
Hearing |
Planning
& Zoning |
Town
Council |
||
|
Land Use Designation |
The current land use plan
designation is Office and Industrial (OFC/IND), Office and Institutional (OFC/INS)
and Commercial (COM). Through 07-CPA-02, the applicant is requesting a
modified arrangement of Commercial (COM) and Office/Industrial (OFC/IND) |
||||
|
Town Limits |
Corporate
Limits X |
ETJ |
Outside
ETJ |
||
|
Annexation |
Not
Required X |
With
Site Plan |
With
rezoning |
||
|
Valid Protest |
To be determined by time
of Public Hearing |
||||
|
P&Z Recommendation |
To be provided
after the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting |
||||
|
Existing Use |
|
||||
|
Proposed Use |
General Commercial and
Industrial uses allowed per the LDO |
||||
The
applicant has submitted the following proposed zoning conditions: The
applicant is not proposing any conditions outside the PDD document.
Consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan
A.
Land Use Plan:
This
request does not conform to the adopted Land Use Plan.
The current Land Use Plan designation is Office/Industrial (OFC/IND),
Office/Institutional (OFC/INS), and Commercial (COM).
The requested Land Use Plan designation is Office/Industrial (OFC/IND)
and Commercial (COM). A
Comprehensive Plan Amendment case, 07-CPA-02, is also scheduled for Town Council
Public Hearing April 12, 2007. If Town Council approves the proposed
Comprehensive Plan amendment (07-CPA-02), the requested rezoning will be
consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
B.
Transportation
Existing
Section:
150 ROW on Chapel Hill Rd.
currently 4 lanes/70 ROW on Trinity currently 2 lanes
Future
Section:
6-lane median divided on Chapel Hill
Rd. and Trinity
Rd.
Road
Improvements:
N/A
Sidewalks
Requirements: Sidewalk required on both
sides of both roads
Bicycle
Requirements: 14 wide outside lanes
required on both roads
Transit
Requirements: None
Traffic
Analysis: A Traffic Impact
Analysis is not required since trip generation shall remain similar.
C.
Parks & Greenways: Greenways
Map
According
to the approved Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities there are no
issues related to this site. According
to the Open Space and Historical Resources Plan (OSHRP) there are no issues
related to this site.
D.
Environmental:
According
to the Town of Cary GIS maps, there is no impact to these parcels from stream
buffers. Should a field
determination identify a stream buffer, the project will be required to comply
with all buffer requirements of the Land Development Ordinance during the site
plan approval process.
E. Buffers:
During the rezoning process, the
applicant is only applying for general zoning districts, not specific uses
within those districts. With regard to buffers, the LDO determines buffer size
and type by specific uses, not general districts. Therefore, specific buffer
types and widths will be determined at time of site plan submittal. No
reductions/modifications are being requested to the required buffers with this
application.
F.
Streetscape:
According
to Chapter 7.2.4 (LDO), the applicant will be required to provide a minimum
30 Type C buffer along thoroughfares and major collectors designated on
the Cary Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Chapel Hill and Trinity Roads are
classified on the Comprehensive Transportation Plan as thoroughfares.
Consistency
with the Land Development Ordinance
The proposed project is in the
rezoning stage and therefore preliminary engineering of the site has not been
done. Prior to Site Plan or
Subdivision Plan approval, the application will be required to demonstrate
consistency with the Land Development Ordinance with respect to specific
development requirements, such as access, stormwater management, road
improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings.
Existing
and Requested Zoning District Comparison:
|
District Regulations |
Existing
Zoning (I
& PDD) |
Requested
Zoning (PDD
Amendment) |
|
Maximum
Gross Density (du/ac) |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Minimum
Lot Size |
No minimum lot size
requirements for most non-residential districts |
No minimum lot size
requirements for most non-residential districts |
|
Minimum
Width at Building Line |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Side
Yard Setback |
No minimum side setbacks
in most non-residential districts |
No minimum side setbacks
in most non-residential districts |
|
Roadway
Setback |
30 |
30 |
|
Rear
Yard Setback |
No minimum rear setbacks
in most non-residential districts |
No minimum rear setbacks
in most non-residential districts |
|
|
35 if structure is
within 100 of a residential zoning district boundary; 50 if
structure is more than 100 from a residential zoning district |
35 if structure is
within 100 of a residential zoning district boundary; 50 if
structure is more than 100 from a residential zoning district |
Town
Council Criteria for Consideration in Reviewing Rezonings and PDDs:
Section 3.4.1(E) of the Land
Development Ordinance sets forth the following criteria that Council should
consider in reviewing rezonings:
1.
The proposed rezoning corrects an error or meets the challenge of
some changing condition, trend or fact;
2.
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
set forth in Section 1.3 (LDO);
3.
The Town and other service providers will be able to provide
sufficient public safety, educational, recreational, transportation and utility
facilities and services to the subject property while maintaining sufficient
levels of service to existing development;
4.
The proposed rezoning is unlikely to have significant adverse
impacts on the natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater
management, wildlife and vegetation;
5.
The proposed rezoning will not have significant adverse impacts on
property in the vicinity of the subject tract;
6.
The proposed zoning classification is suitable for the subject
property;
7.
The PDD designation is necessary to address a unique situation or
represents a substantial benefit to the Town, compared to what could have been
accomplished through strict application of otherwise applicable zoning district
standards; and
8.
The request complies with the standards and intent of a PDD, as
outlined is Section 4.2.3 (LDO).
Other
Reference Information
Applicants
Justification Statement Submitted February 22, 2007
The following statements are
provided by the applicant in response to the criteria established in the
application and does not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town
of Cary. Any statements as to the
type, quality or physical features are at the direction of the applicant and may
be formulated into a condition)
1. Any issues with the size of the tract? No.
Additional tract added to the original PUD is 0.64 acres.
2. How is the request compatible with the
Comprehensive Plan (i.e. Land Use, Transportation, Open Space and Historic
Resources)? This request is
compatible with the Comprehensive Plan in that we propose to move an existing
industrial use from the southeast corner of the Trinity Road and Chapel Hill
Road to a location farther south in the PUD adjacent to other industrial uses
along Trinity Road. The applicant proposes a commercial use at the southeast
corner of Trinity Road and Chapel Hill Road to complement the existing adjacent
hotel and convenience store fronting Chapel Hill Road in the existing PUD.
3. What are the benefits and detriments to
the owner, neighbors and the community? The
benefit to the owner, the neighbors and the community is that the corner
property in the existing PUD can be re-developed for a commercial use that will
provide services for the future office (O&I) uses located across Chapel Hill
Road from the current PUD as well as the existing OFC/IND uses across Trinity
Road from the current PUD. The current industrial use on the 0.64 acre tract to
be added to the PUD will be moved away from the intersection and placed adjacent
to neighboring industrial uses along Trinity Road. There are no known detriments
to the owner, neighbors and the community with this request.
4. How are all of the allowable uses with
the proposed rezoning compatible with, or how do they relate to, the uses
currently present on adjacent tracts? The
proposed commercial use at the southeast corner of Trinity Road and Chapel Hill
Road will be more compatible with adjacent commercial uses along Chapel Hill
Road. The proposed relocation of the industrial use to the south side of the
existing PUD will be more compatible with industrial uses on adjacent properties
along Trinity Road.
5. What reductions/amendments and/or
modifications to the development standards of the LDO are being requested and
how are they justified? Applicants must list these items and/or clearly
highlight them with the Planned Development document. (PDD, new or amended)
Applicants must list these items and/or clearly highlight them within the
Planned Development document.
No
reductions/amendments and/or modifications to the development standards of the
LDO are being requested as part of this PDD Amendment.
AN
ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF CARY TO CHANGE THE
ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 3.1 ACRES LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHAPEL
HILL AND TRINITY ROADS OWNED BY
QUALITY OIL COMPANY LLC AND N&B LLC FROM INDUSTRIAL (I) AND PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PDD) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PDD) AMENDMENT.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN
COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF CARY:
Section 1:
The Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning the area described
as follows:
|
Parcel
and Owner Information |
|||
|
Property Owners |
|
Real Estate IDs |
Acres
|
|
Quality Oil Company LLC |
0774430810 portion |
0224358 |
2.46 ± |
|
N&B LLC |
0774349046 |
0001280 |
0.64 ± |
|
Total |
|
|
3.1 ± |
Section
2: That the Property is rezoned from
Industrial and PDD to PDD Amendment subject to the conditions set forth herein
and in the Master Plan dated September 12, 1996 (and all supporting plans), and
all the requirements of the Cary Land Development Ordinance (LDO) and other
applicable laws, standards, policies and guidelines.
Section 3/4:
This ordinance shall be effective upon adoption but the PDD Amendment
shall not become effective until a copy of the Master Plan Amendment and all
supporting plans and/or documents dated September 27, 2007 have been approved by
the Planning Department as consistent with this Council action.
|
To be signed by the Mayor Upon Council
Approval |
|
|
|
Mayor
McAllister |
|
Date |