Town of Cary
06-REZ-32 Oxxford Hunt Planned Development
District Amendment
Staff Report to the Town Council
Background Information
Existing
Zoning:
Zoning map
Requested
Zoning: Proposed
zoning map
PDD Amendment to allow a nursing home or assisted living facility
Land
Use Plan Designation: Land
use map
The subject parcel is designated commercial in the Land Use Plan.
Nursing home and Assisted Living facilities are considered consistent with the
Commercial category in the Land Use Plan. .
Acreage:
3.68±
Location: Vicinity map
1206 W. Chatham Street
Applicant:
Frank
Rockwood
Sunrise Senior Living
3064 Cypress Creek Drive N.
Ponta Verdra Beach, Florida
Applicant’s Contact:
Chris
Bostic
Kimley-Horn Associates
3001 Weston Parkway
Cary, NC 27513
(919) 653-2927
chris.bostic@kimley-horn.com
Town
of Cary
Case Manager:
Debra Grannan, Senior Planner
316 North Academy Street, Cary, NC 27513
(919) 460-4980
debra.grannan@townofcary.org
Summary of Requested Rezoning
The applicant requests
approval of an Ordinance to amend the existing Oxxford Hunt PDD to allow a
nursing home or assisted living facility on Tract D.
This 3.68 acre tract was previously designated on the PDD Master Plan for
commercial use. If approved, the
request would permit a maximum 80-bed nursing home or assisted living facility.
The applicant is also requesting a reduction in the perimeter buffers
from 50’ to 20’ on the western and northern property lines.
The plan would add a 20’ buffer between this site and the adjacent
commercial site to the east where no buffer currently exists.
No change is proposed to the 30’ wide streetscape. Proposed
amendment map. Oxxford Hunt PDD
document pdf; html
A. Transportation
West Chatham
:
Existing
Roadway Section: 2 lanes, 80’
right of way (ROW)
Future Roadway Section: 2-lane with
median, 67’ROW
Schedule: N/A
Sidewalk Requirements: required on
both sides
Bicycle Requirements: 14’ wide
outside lane required
Transit Requirements: No transit
requirements
B.
Traffic Impact Analysis:
A Traffic Impact Study is not required. The proposed use will generate a
significant decrease in traffic, based on ITE, 7th Edition traffic
data.
C.
Parks & Greenways: Greenways and trails
map
According to the approved Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities
Master Plan there are no issues related to this site.
Reference
Information
Meeting
Schedule:
Town Council Public Hearing
Date: January 11, 2007
Action: Forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board
Planning & Zoning Board:
Date: March 19, 2007
Town Council Action:
Date: April 12, 2007
|
Parcel
and Owner Information |
|||
|
Property Owners |
|
Real Estate ID’s |
Acres
± |
|
Duke University Affiliated Physicians, Inc. |
0753656867 |
0179207 |
3.68 ± |
|
Total |
|
|
3.68
± |
|
Master
Land Use Plan Changes |
|||
|
|
Existing |
Proposed
|
Net
Change |
|
PDD Equivalent Zoning |
General Commercial |
Office
& Institutional (Limited to Nursing Home or |
|
|
USE |
All general commercial uses including but not limited to Assembly, Financial Institution, Food and Beverage, Retail and Office |
Use Limited to Nursing
Home or Assisted Living Facility with a maximum of 80 rooms. |
Limited to Nursing Home
or Assisted Living Facility. |
|
Perimeter Buffer on
eastern property line |
0 |
20’ Type “A” Opaque |
Exceeds the Type “B”
requirement under the LDO |
|
Perimeter Buffer on
western property line |
50’ Undisturbed |
20’ Type “A” Opaque |
Reduction of 30’ from
existing PDD requirement; (Under the current LDO proposed use would
require a 40’ Type A Buffer.) |
|
Perimeter Buffer |
50’ Undisturbed |
20’ Type “A” Opaque
Buffer |
Reduction of 30’, but
required to meet type “A” standards |
Applicant’s
Justification Statement Submitted 11/27/2006
Please note that the following
statement is that of the applicant and does not necessarily represent the views
or opinions of the Town of Cary:
1. Any
issues with the size of the tract?
The Size of the Parcel is
appropriate for the intended use. The
parcel provides sufficient area to site the building, associated parking,
passive open space, stormwater facilities and perimeter landscape buffers.
2. How
is the request compatible with the Comprehensive Plan?
The Plan complies with all applicable elements of the comprehensive plan.
3. What are the benefits and
detriments to the owners, neighborhood and the community?
The amendment to the PUD of
this parcel from high intensity office/retail to Nursing Home or Assisted Living
provides a logical land use transition from the existing single family to the
west and the commercial use to the east. The
proposed Nursing Home or Assisted Living facility will be an upscale facility
that will compliment the adjacent single family homes.
The proposed use would generate less traffic than that of the current
land use designation.
4.
How are all the allowable uses with the proposed rezoning compatible with, or
how do they relate to, the uses currently present on adjacent tracts?
The existing land use to the
west is single family residential. The
proposed nursing home or assisted living use would be compatible with the single
family use because of the residential nature of the development and the
generally low level of impact (noise, pollution, traffic) on the adjacent
neighborhood.
5.
What reductions/amendments and or modifications to the development
standards of the LDO are being requested and how are they justified? (PDD, new
or amended) Applicants must list these items and/or clearly highlight them
within the Planned Development document.
This amendment proposes changes
to:
1.
Gross Unit Density from 15 du/acre to 22 du/acre (Nursing Home or
Assisted Living Facility use only.)
2.
Modifying the Western, Eastern and Northern perimeter buffer widths from
50’ to 20’.
School
Impact
Schools
will not be impacted by this rezoning request since the site will be limited
to Office and Institutional Use for a nursing home or assisted living facility
only.
Development
Plan Issues
The purpose of a rezoning is to
evaluate the appropriateness of this land use for these parcels of land.
Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of
land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements,
utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not
considered during the rezoning process. However,
all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance with existing
requirements spelled out in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) when the site
or subdivision plan is submitted. All
such requirements can be found at http:vic.townofcary.org.
Feedback
at Public Hearing
Staff presented the case and
Jeremy Anderson of Kimley Horn spoke on behalf of the applicant. One citizen
expressed concern about loss of privacy if the buffer on the western side for
the subject property is reduced, but stated no opposition to the use proposed.
Council asked if the adjacent residential property had a buffer.
Staff reported that the lots bordering the western side of the subject
property did indeed have a 25’ undisturbed buffer.
This buffer area, however, was part of the individual lots and not within
common open space.
Changes
since Public Hearing
The applicant reported to Staff
that there had been an additional meeting with neighbors on the proposal.
All protest petitions have been removed.
There have been no changes to the applicant’s request.
Staff
Observations
The request is consistent with
the Cary Comprehensive Plan, and fosters a compatible relationship with adjacent
land uses. Reductions to perimeter buffers may be considered within Planned
Development Districts, but what has been requested still falls within Land
Development Ordinance requirements. When
the site was originally designated for commercial use, a 50’ buffer was
appropriate adjacent to single family residential. In
1990 the PDD was amended to require a 25’ undisturbed buffer on the
residential lots adjacent to the western property line.
This is shown on the recorded plat for these lots.
Because of the residential
nature of the proposed use, and the existing recorded undisturbed buffer, staff
believes that the 20’ Type “A” buffer proposed creates a sufficient
barrier between the uses.
Since the property to the north
is undeveloped, the Land Development Ordinance would require that property to
provide half of a 40’ type “A” buffer.
Staff recommends Council to
adopt an ordinance to approve the PDD Amendment.
Planning
and Zoning Board
Staff presented the PDD
Amendment and reported that all previously filed protest petitions had been
withdrawn. Staff presented a slide
to show that the residential properties east of the site were recorded with a
25’ Undisturbed Buffer as part of an earlier PDD amendment. There
was some discussion as to why the buffer reduction was needed.
Staff explained that the applicant was working with a site plan that
needed the space that would be provided by the buffer reduction in order to
accommodate parking and stormwater management devices on the site.
Staff also noted that the proposed reduction was consistent with buffer
standards in the Land Development Ordinance. Planning and Zoning Board voted
unanimously to approve the request for an amendment.
Ordinance
for Consideration 06-REZ-32
AN
ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF CARY TO CHANGE THE
ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 3.68 ACRES LOCATED AT 1206 W. CHATHAM STREET, OWNED BY
DUKE UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED PHYSICIANS, INC. FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT. THE
AMENDMENT WOULD ALLOW A CHANGE IN USE FROM COMMERCIAL TO OFFICE AND
INSTITUTIONAL WITH THE USE TYPE LIMITED TO NURSING HOME OR ASSISTED LIVING
FACILITY WITH A MAXIMUM OF 22 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
THE AMENDMENT WOULD ALSO CALL FOR 20’ WIDE TYPE “A” PERIMETER
BUFFERS ON THE SITE.
BE
IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF CARY :
Section
1: The official Zoning map is hereby
amended by rezoning the area described as follows (“Property”):
Parcel and Owner Information
|
|||
|
Property
Owner(s) |
|
Real
Estate ID(s) |
Area/Acres |
|
Duke University Affiliated Physicians, Inc. |
0753656867 |
|
3.68 ± |
|
Total
Acreage |
|
|
3.68 ± |
Summary of Requested Rezoning
Amendments
to existing Oxxford Hunt PDD
Section
2: That the Property is rezoned from
PDD to PDD Amendment subject to the conditions set forth herein and in the
Master Plan dated August 19, 1990 (and
all supporting plans), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, and all the requirements of the Cary Land Development Ordinance (LDO)
and other applicable laws, standards, policies and guidelines.
OPT
(to reflect changes made at council):
Section 3: The Master Plan
shall incorporate the following: ________________
Section
3: This ordinance shall be effective
upon adoption but the PDD and Master Plan shall not become effective until
applicant has submitted to the Planning Department of a copy of the Master Plan
and all supporting plans incorporating all changes, if any that were required as
conditions of approval and such additional information as the Town Council may
have required as a condition of approval.
|
To
be signed by the Mayor Upon Council Approval |
|
|
|
Mayor
McAllister |
|
Date |