05-REZ-41
Herndon
Property
Staff
Report to Town Council
1.
Background Information
Requested Zoning: Residential
8 Conditional Use (R-8 CU)
Existing Zoning: Residential
40 (R-40)
Acreage:
Approximately
4.60
Location: 6828 Turner Creek Road Vicinity Map
South of Chesney Glenn Subdivision; East of Proposed Harmony Subdivision; North of Turner Creek Road Elementary School
Cary
Land Use Plan Designation: Medium
Density residential (MDR)
Requested Land Use Plan Designation:
No change requested/required
Owner/Representative:
Leon and Shirley Herndon
6828 Turner Creek Road
Cary, N.C. 27519
(919)367-0389
FAX: (919)367-0906
E-mail: Herndony2k@aol.com
Town
of Cary Case Manager
Debra Grannan, Senior Planner
919/460-4980
debra.grannan@townofcary.org
2. Summary
of Requested Rezoning
The applicant has submitted the following proposed zoning conditions:
1.
A reservation of 50 feet of right of
way and necessary construction easements will be made along the northern portion
of this property outside of the required 20-foot landscape easement between the
property line of this site and the Chesney Glen subdivision. The
western most portion of this right of way shall align with the planned road stub
from the adjacent Harmony subdivision.
2.
The minimum lot size contained in this 4.6 acre tract will be 18,000
square feet.
A.
Transportation
Roadway: Turner Creek Road is not a major thoroughfare or collector on the Town’s Plan
Sidewalk
Requirements: sidewalk required on at least one side of Turner Creek
Bicycle
Requirements: proposed striped bike lane on Turner Creek
Transit
Requirements: N/A
B.
Traffic Impact Analysis
The
proposed zoning would not generate the required 20 dwelling unit trips for a
traffic impact study.
3.
Feedback
at Town Council Public Hearing
Other than the applicant, no one spoke in
favor of or opposed to the request. Concerns
were expressed by Council members regarding the configuration of the lots and
their relationship with the proposed right-of-way and road stub from the
proposed Harmony Subdivision. Based
on staff review, the combination of the right of way and a 20’ landscape
easement required, the future lots could be no closer than 70 feet south of the
Chesney Glen development.
Concerns were expressed by a Council member
about the width of the road and whether it could be narrower through the
rezoning case. Based on staff’s
review, a condition to narrow the roadway could not be accepted because it would
be less restrictive than our zoning ordinance requirements.
A Council member had a concern about the
stormwater drainage and requested staff review this.
Another Council member wanted to ensure that proposed road across the
property be provided in the future. There was also a request that the applicant
meet with the adjacent property owners prior to the Planning and Zoning Board
meeting.
4.
Staff Observation
The
requested R-8 zoning district is consistent with the current Land Use Plan
designation for medium density residential.
The
proposed condition of a minimum lot size of 18,000 square feet limits the number
of lots that could ever be places on this property to 11.
Any subdivision of lots beyond the three additional lots allowed through
the gift lot process would require a subdivision plan and would obligate the
property owner to make required road improvements. Creating one additional lot
or three gift lots on this property would exempt the property owner from road
improvements and buffer requirements. With a gifting subdivision, the applicant
would be required to reserve the right of way, temporary construction easements
and the landscape easement. Even
with the current R40 zoning on the property, staff advised the applicant that a
reservation of right of way was required, so that placement of homes would not
preclude the need for future connectivity.
The
location of future lots on the Herndon property has not been determined. In
order for new lots to be subdivided, they would be required to meet the minimum
lot width requirements stated in the Land Development Ordinance.
The R-8 zoning district allows for a minimum lot width of 60 feet.
5.
Planning
and Zoning Board Recommendation (April 17, 2006):
At
its April 17, 2006 meeting, the Board voted 10-0 to recommend the adoption of
the ordinance to approve the rezoning request as
presented for the following reasons:
·
the
request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
·
the
condition on the lot size proposed
lessens the impact on adjacent property and sets a physical limit on the number
of lots that can be created
Changes since the
Planning and Zoning Board meeting:
6.
Town Council Motion Options:
(Ordinances
are at the end of this report)
Rezoning 05-REZ-41
TO ADOPT
Motion #1
(Required Council Statement for adopting any zoning amendment)
This proposed map amendment is consistent with the recommendations and other
elements of the Comprehensive Plan and is reasonable and in the public interest
based upon the information contained in the staff reports and P&Z
recommendation.
[vote]
Motion #2
(To amend zoning map)
To
adopt the ordinance amending the zoning map by rezoning the area described in
the Ordinance from Residential 40 (R-40) to Residential 8 Conditional Use (R-8
CU), with the conditions set forth in the Ordinance.
[vote]
TO DENY
Motion #1
(Required Council Statement for rejecting any zoning amendment)
This
proposed map amendment is/is not consistent with the recommendations and other
elements of the Comprehensive Plan and is/is not reasonable and in the public
interest because ________________.
[vote]
Motion #2
(To Deny Amendment to Zoning Map)
To
deny the ordinance amending the zoning map.
[vote]
7. Reference Information
Meeting
Schedule
Town
Council Public Hearing
Date: February 9, 2006
Action: Forwarded to the April 17,
2006 Planning and Zoning Board Meeting.
Planning
& Zoning Board:
Date: April 17, 2006
Action: Forward to Town Council with a recommendation for approval (10-0).
Town
Council Action:
Date: May 11, 2006
PARCEL & OWNER INFORMATION |
|||
|
Property
Owner(s) |
County Parcel Number(s) |
Real Estate ID(s) |
Area (Acres) |
|
Leon and Shirley Herndon |
0733678511 |
0252757 |
4.60 |
|
Total
Acreage |
|
|
4.60 |
APPLICANT’S
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT (December
27, 2005)
Please note that the following statement is that of the applicant and does not
necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town:
At this time we are proposing the division of this property into three residential lots with each having access from Turner Creek Road. At this time and in the future all lot sizes will be a minimum of 18,000 square feet. Finally, if required for development of adjacent properties, permission is granted for the reservation of right-of-way for this east-west connectivity on the northern boundary of the property described in this rezoning request as long as all expenses associated with this connectivity is borne by the developers and/or the Town of Cary.
Schools
The school information is being provided for your review; however, the Wake
County Board of Education controls capital projects for school capacities.
|
School
Information |
||||
|
|
Enrollment |
Permanent |
Average Percent Occupied |
Projected
Number of Additional Students |
|
Elementary |
16,886 |
17,002 |
99.32% |
1 |
|
Middle |
7,937 |
8,365 |
94.88% |
1 |
|
High |
8,438 |
8,578 |
98.37% |
1 |
|
Assigned
Schools |
||||
|
Salem
Elementary |
757 |
816 |
92.77% |
1 |
|
Salem
Middle |
656 |
903 |
72.65% |
1 |
|
Apex
High School
|
2,161 |
2,119 |
101.98% |
1 |
Current
Enrollment and Building Capacity
is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2004 as supplied by
the Wake County Public School System. School
assignment will be determined at the time of development.
Development
Plan Issues
The purpose of a rezoning is to evaluate the appropriateness of this land use for these parcels of land. Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not considered during the rezoning process. However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance with existing requirements spelled out in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) when the site or subdivision plan is submitted. All such requirements can be found at http:vic.townofcary.org.
8.
Ordinances for Consideration:
05-REZ-40
Conditional
Use Rezoning
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF CARY TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY
4.60 ACRES located south of Chesney Glenn Subdivision; east of proposed Harmony
Subdivision; north of Turner Creek Road Elementary School
BE
IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF CARY:
Section 1. The Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning from Residential 40 (R-40) to Residential 8 Conditional Use (R-8 CU) (subject to those conditions set forth in Sections 2, 3 and 4 of this ordinance) the area described as follows:
PARCEL
& OWNER INFORMATION
|
|||
|
Property
Owner(s) |
County Parcel Number(s) |
Real Estate ID(s) |
Area (Acres) |
|
Leon and Shirley Herndon |
0733678511 |
0252757 |
4.60 |
|
Total
Acreage |
|
|
4.60 |
Section
2. That the rezoning from Residential 40 (R-40) to Residential 8 Conditional Use
(R-8 CU) is hereby authorized subject to the following conditions:
1.
A reservation of 50 feet of right of way and necessary construction
easements will be made along the northern portion of this property outside of
the required 20-foot landscape easement between the property line of this site
and the Chesney Glen subdivision. The
western most portion of this right of way shall align with the planned road stub
from the adjacent Harmony subdivision.
2.
The minimum lot size contained in this 4.6 acre tract will be 18,000
square feet.
Section 3. This property will be perpetually bound to the uses authorized
and subject to such conditions imposed, unless subsequently changed or amended
as provided for in the Cary Land Development Ordinances.
Section
4. Any violations or failure to accept and abide by any conditions and use
limitations imposed herein shall be subject to the remedies provided in the Cary
LDO.
Section
5. This ordinance shall be effective on the date of adoption.
(Signed)