TOWN OF CARY, NORTH CAROLINA
STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO 
 TOWN COUNCIL

REZONING PETITION:   05-REZ-34 Twin Lakes Planned Development District (PDD) Amendment 

This request is to redistribute the number of residential units allowed within the Twin Lakes development based upon reconfigurations of the various subdistricts in the project.  Amendments affect the number of units and/or the size of individual subdistricts, with the density of such subdistricts changing to reflect the revisions. The overall dwelling unit cap of 1,044 total units and the overall gross density of 5.0 dwelling units per acre will remain. 

LOCATION OF PROPERTY:  Vicinity Map

East of Davis Drive and west of Town Hall Drive between Morrisville-Carpenter Road and McCrimmon Parkway  

APPLICANT: 

John Myers
Sandler at
Twin Lakes, LC

3209 Gresham Lake Road, Suite 160

Raleigh
, NC 27615

(919) 256-3041
FAX (919) 556-0690

john@wakedev.com

APPLICANT’S CONTACT PERSON:

J. Adam Ashbaugh
Withers & Ravenel, Inc.
111 MacKenan Drive

Cary
, NC 27511

(919) 469-3340
FAX (919) 467-6008

aashbaugh@withersravenel.com

PARCEL & OWNER INFORMATION  PDD MAP

Property Owner(s)

County Parcel Number(s) 

Real Estate ID(s)

Area (Acres)

Sandler at Twin Lakes, LLC
4448 Viking Dr., Ste 220
Virginia Beach, VA 23452

0745484496
0745467300
0745655438

0082432
0029320
0043159

110.0
64.9
110.09

Davis Partners, LLC
1000 Darrington Dr., Ste 105
Cary, NC 27513

0745368793

0270791

5.06

NC DOT

Existing Town Hall Drive & McCrimmon Pkwy rights-of-way

 

 

Total Acreage

 

 

300.86

TOWN OF CARY
CASE MANAGER: 

Jeff Ulma, Director
Phone:  (919) 469-4082

E-mail: jeff.ulma@townofcary.org

MEETING SCHEDULE:  
TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING –
September 8, 2005

Town Council referred this case to the October 24 meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board. 

   PLANNING & ZONING BOARD – October 24, 2005

Staff recommended approval.  The Planning & Zoning Board voted 10-0 to recommend approval of this rezoning request.

   TOWN COUNCIL ACTION – November 10, 2005

PUBLIC COMMENTS AT TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING:  No comments were directed at the redistribution of dwelling units as requested in this rezoning petition.  However, concerns were expressed by several speakers about the grading activity and drainage issues caused by construction already occurring on portions of this site.  The applicant responded that the site was not yet to final grade; he agreed to coordinate and work with the Town and the adjoining property owners to address these existing issues as construction continues. 

CHANGES SINCE THE TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING:  There have been no changes to this rezoning petition since the original hearing conducted by Town Council on September 8, 2005

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:  Considering the minor nature of these changes, staff believes that this request meets the rezoning criteria set forth in Section (3.4.1 (E)) of the Land Development Ordinance.  Staff recommends APPROVAL of this rezoning petition as requested by the applicant.

RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD: At the regular meeting of October 24, 2005, the Planning & Zoning Board reviewed this request.  After a few minor questions regarding the nature of the request and the reason for changes to the various subdistricts within Twin Lakes PDD, the Board voted 10-0 to recommend approval by the Town Council.

ZONING:  Zoning

    Current:  Planned Development District (PDD) – Twin Lakes

    Proposed:  No change.  Planned Development District (PDD) – Twin Lakes

APPLICANT’S JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT (July 25, 2005):  Requested modification is for a reallocation of dwelling units within the residential subdistricts based upon final engineering design and environmental permitting.  This modification does not propose any changes to mixed use subdistricts, open space areas, or other land uses within the approved PDD.”

PROPOSED CHANGES TO SUBDISTRICTS IN TWIN LAKES PDD:

Subdistrict

Proposed

Existing Approval

 

Acreage

Units

Change in Number of Units

Gross Density

(Units/Acre)

Acreage

Units

Gross Density
(Units/Acre)

MF

18.1

233

0

12.9

18.1

233

12.9

A

21.03

188

+20

8.9

21.03

168

8.0

B

16.61

153

+21

9.2

16.48

132

8.0

C

50.58

224

-28

4.4

50.3

252

5.0

D

8.67

34

-11

3.9

9.02

45

5.0

E

1.55

5

-2

3.2

1.48

7

4.7

F

6.7

34

-6

5.1

6.69

40

6.0

G

5.53

29

0

5.2

5.83

29

5.0

H

39.68

144

+6

3.6

39.47

138

3.5

MU-I

0.98

0

0

 

1.03

0

 

MU-II

22.31

~25

0

 

22.3

~25

 

MU-III

11.85

~25

0

 

11.73

~25

 

MU-IV

1.77

~0

0

 

1.77

~0

 

MU-V

1.48

~0

0

 

1.45

~0

 

TOTAL

206.84

1044

0

5.0

206.68

1044

5.0

  TOWN OF CARY LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: 

Current:  Mixed Use (MXD), High Density Residential (HDR), Medium Density Residential (MDR), Office and Industrial (OFC/IND)

Proposed:  No changes proposed. Mixed Use (MXD), High Density Residential (HDR), Medium Density Residential (MDR), Office and Industrial (OFC/IND) 

ADJACENT ZONING & LAND USES:  Land Use Plan Map

North: 

Existing Use: Apartments, single family residences, vacant land

Existing Zoning:  RM, AD, R-6 and RMF (Morrisville)

Existing Land Use Plan Designation:  High Density Residential, Office/Institutional, Mixed Use, Low Density Residential (From the Morrisville Land Use Plan)

East:

Existing Use: Single family residences, vacant land

Existing Zoning: R-6 and RMF-CU (Morrisville)

Existing Land Use Plan Designation:  Mixed Use, Low Density Residential (From the Morrisville Land Use Plan)

South:

     Existing Use: Single family residences, vacant land

     Existing Zoning: R-8 and R-10 (Morrisville)

     Existing Land Use Plan Designation:  Mixed Use, Low Density Residential (From the Morrisville Land Use Plan)

West:

     Existing Use: Recreation facility, self-storage, and vacant land

     Existing Zoning: Cary: Office, Research & Development (ORD); Morrisville: AD

     Existing Land Use Plan Designation:  Office and Institutional (OFC/INS), Office and Industrial (OFC/IND) (Town of Cary); Mixed Use, Low Density Residential (From the Morrisville Land Use Plan)

Parks & Greenways:  There are no additional parks or greenways comments related to this amendment according to the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan.  Parks and Greenways Map

Traffic Impact Analysis:  The changes proposed do not change the results of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Town Traffic consultant - Stantec dated February 2004.

Reference Information:

Schools: NA.  Since there is no change in the total number of dwelling units proposed, schools impact data is not provided for this case.

Development Plan Issues: 

The purpose of a rezoning is to evaluate the appropriateness of this land use for these parcels of land.  Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not considered during the rezoning process.  However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance with existing requirements spelled out in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) when the site or subdivision plan is submitted.  All such requirements can be found at http:vic.townofcary.org.