TOWN OF CARY
,
REQUEST FOR REZONING
STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
|
Rezoning
Petition: |
03-REZ-17
(Twin Lakes PDD) |
|||
|
Land
Use Plan Amendment: |
03-LPA-09
|
|||
|
Request: |
Change
the zoning from R-40 and ORD to PDD Major. |
|||
|
Meeting |
Date |
Recommendation |
Action |
|
|
Town
Council Public Hearing |
December
11, 2003 |
Table
to January 22, 2004 Town Council Meeting |
Tabled
until January 22, 2004 Town Council Meeting |
|
|
January
22, 2004 |
Forward
to March 15, 2004 Planning and Zoning Board
meeting |
Forwarded
to March 15, 2004 Planning and Zoning Board Meeting |
||
|
Planning
and Zoning Board |
March
15, 2004 |
Table
to April 19, 2004 Planning and Zoning Board |
Tabled
case to April 19, 2004 Planning and Zoning Board |
|
|
April
19, 2004 |
Staff
recommends approval on condition of removal of the street cross sections |
|
||
|
Town
Council |
May
13, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION |
||||
|
Staff
recommends approval with the road cross-sections on the plans being
deleted. Staff has determined that cross-sections are not necessary on PDD
applications given their conceptual nature. Cross-sections will only be
required if the applicant is asking for a variance from Town standards.
Staff is requesting the removal of the applicant’s cross-sections given
they meet current Town standards. |
||||
|
APPLICANT |
OWNERS |
|
John
Myers Contact:
Barbara
Todd Elam
Todd d’Ambrosi
Phone
919-678-1071 btodd@etdpa.com |
Elmer
B. Nutt, ETAL William
T. Hatch, ETAL James
F. & Sara B. Fulp |
|
LOCATION |
MAPS |
|
·
Property is located on the east side of ·
Within the Town Limits of Cary |
|
|
PROJECT
COMPARISON AND DESCRIPTION |
|
|
Protest
Petition Information: Valid
[ ] Not Enough
Signatures with 100 feet [X]
None Filed [ ] |
|
|
Open
Space |
Original
Proposal |
|
Current
Proposal |
||||||||
|
No
Town Park proposed |
A
10 acre land dedication for a Town Park |
||||||||||
|
Neuse
River Buffer adjacent to Town Hall Drive was dedicated as open space |
This
Neuse River Buffer is now part of the private open space |
||||||||||
|
5.59
acres of project recreation was located in the NE corner of the
development |
4.55
acres of project recreation has been moved to the SW corner of the
development |
||||||||||
|
Greenway
paths were to be built by the developer |
Greenway
paths to be built by the Town |
||||||||||
|
Dedicated
open space 30.85 acres |
Dedicated
open space 52.93 acres |
||||||||||
|
Private
open space 24.81 acres |
Private
open space 19.67 acres |
||||||||||
|
Total
open space 55.66 acres |
Total
open space 72.60 acres |
||||||||||
|
Density/Residential
Unit Counts All
lots sizes average 4500-8000 sq ft depending on product type |
|
|
|||||||||
|
Parcel |
Acres |
#
Units |
Density |
Parcel |
Acres |
#
Units |
Density |
||||
|
MF |
16.98 |
204 |
12 |
MF |
16.70 |
218 |
13 |
||||
|
A |
24.14 |
169 |
7 |
A |
21.03 |
168 |
8 |
||||
|
B |
17.88 |
143 |
8 |
B |
16.48 |
132 |
8 |
||||
|
C |
47.24 |
236 |
5 |
C |
50.30 |
277 |
5.5 |
||||
|
D |
8.09 |
40 |
5 |
D |
9.02 |
45 |
5 |
||||
|
E |
1.3 |
7 |
5 |
E |
1.48 |
7 |
5 |
||||
|
F |
6.68 |
33 |
5 |
F |
6.69 |
40 |
6 |
||||
|
G |
6.92 |
35 |
5 |
G |
5.83 |
29 |
5 |
||||
|
H |
50.55 |
177 |
3.5 |
H |
39.47 |
118 |
3 |
||||
|
TOTAL |
179.78 |
1044 |
|
TOTAL |
167 |
1034 |
|
||||
|
Mixed
Use |
Parcel |
Acres |
Maximum
Square Footage |
Parcel |
Acres |
Maximum
Square Footage |
|||||
|
MU |
41.61 |
·
Retail – 100,000 ·
Office – 180,000 ·
4 Restaurants ·
60 Apartments/ Condos, Assisted Living (±150
Rooms) |
MU-I |
1.23 |
·
Retail – 250,000 ·
Office – 110,000 ·
4 Restaurants – 25,000 ·
60 Apartments/ Condos, Assisted Living (±150
Rooms) |
||||||
|
MU-II |
22.80 |
||||||||||
|
MU-III |
12.81 |
||||||||||
|
MU-IV |
2.11 |
||||||||||
|
MU-V |
1.65 |
||||||||||
|
TOTAL |
41.61 |
TOTAL |
40.6 |
||||||||
|
APPLICANT’S
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
CURRENT
USE & ZONING
|
|
|||||||||
|
Current
Zoning: |
Proposed
Zoning: |
|
||||||||
|
Residential
40 and Office Research and Development |
PDD
Major |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Current
Land Use: |
Proposed
Land Use: |
|
||||||||
|
MDR,
Medium Density Residential and OFC/INS, Office and Institutional, and MXD
Mixed Use |
MDR,
Medium Density Residential and OFC/INS, Office and Institutional |
|
||||||||
|
ADJACENT
ZONING & LAND USES |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Existing
Use |
Existing
Land Use Designation |
|
|||||||
|
North |
Apartments,
single family residences, vacant land |
In
Morrisville |
Portion
in Morrisville, portion MDR, Medium Density Residential |
|
||||||
|
South |
Single
family residences, vacant land |
In
Morrisville |
In
Morrisville, noted as “shopping center” |
|
||||||
|
East |
Single
family residences, vacant land |
Portion
in Morrisville, portion ORD |
Portion
in Morrisville, portion MDR, Medium Density Residential |
|
||||||
|
West |
Sportsplex,
mini-storage, and vacant land |
Portion
in Morrisville, portion ORD |
Portion
in Morrisville, portion OFC/IND, Office and Industrial or MDR, Medium
Density Residential |
|
||||||
PLANNING
|
||||||||||
|
Comprehensive
Plan Analysis |
The
Northwest Area Plan identifies this area for a mixture of housing and
office and institutional uses. The
applicant’s proposal suggests a mixed use land use classification for
the area currently designated as O-I use on Staff
supports the land use plan amendment for the following reasons:
|
|||||||||
|
Open
Space Considerations |
The
area covered by the proposed PUD includes significant open space
resources, including wetland areas associated with the ponds.
According to 2002 aerial photography, the Fulp tract is
predominately in mixed upland hardwood forest. The applicant’s proposal
protects the majority of the significant open spaces and the lake.
Therefore, the proposal is consistent with the Town’s Open Space
and Historic Resources Plan. |
|||||||||
|
Parks
and Greenways |
The
applicant’s proposal is consistent with the Parks,
Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan, including a 42
acre park dedication and greenway easements north of the Airport Boulevard
extension, along the eastern edge of the development as well as a greenway
connection with Downing Village. The applicant has furthered agreed to
construct a multi-use trail along the south side of the Airport Boulevard
extension that will link with Davis Drive. The Parks, Recreation and
Advisory Board reviewed the applicant’s proposal during its January 2003
Board Meeting and approved staff’s recommendations for acceptance of the
park dedication and greenway easement locations. |
|||||||||
|
Transportation
Planning |
Based
on the Twin Lakes traffic assessment results estimating an ADT volume of
over 5,000 cars along the northern section of the collector road, staff is
recommending limited driveway access along this section down to Airport
Boulevard Extension. The southern section is projected to have less than
3,000 ADT so staff will consider limited driveway access along this
section during the site plan review process.
In addition, staff recommends restricting on-street parking along
the entire collector road to better facilitate bicycle travel. These
recommendations will ensure that the collector street functions as
intended and is consistent with the Town’s Comprehensive Transportation
Plan. The
applicant has shown road cross-sections on the plans. Staff has determined
that cross-sections are not necessary on PDD applications given their
conceptual nature. Cross-sections will only be required if the applicant
is asking for a variance from Town standards. Staff is requesting the
removal of the applicant’s cross-sections given they meet current Town
standards. |
|||||||||
|
School
Information |
||||||||||