TOWN OF CARY
REQUEST FOR REZONING/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
TOWN COUNCIL IMPACT STATEMENT (April 10, 2003)
02-REZ-28 Powell Rezoning
| Staff Contact: |
Suzanne Prince, Senior Planner (919) 462-3944 sprince@ci.cary.nc.us |
|
PETITIONER |
PROJECT CONTACT |
PROPERTY OWNER |
|
Jerry Turner & Associates 905 Jones Franklin Road Raleigh, NC 27606 Phone: 851-7150 Fax: 851-7547 |
Same as Petitioner |
James Lewis Powell 3724 Ten Ten Road Apex, NC 27502 |
|
LOCATION: |
East of the intersection of Kildaire Farm Road and SR 1010 |
|
MAPS: |
Vicinity Map - Small Vicinity Map - Large Zoning Map Land Use Plan Map Stream Buffers Open Space Landscape Map Land Use 030703 |
In Town Limits [ ] Inside Cary ETJ [ ] Outside Cary ETJ [ X ] Annexation Pending [ X ]
|
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS |
|
|
TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING: |
January 9, 2003 |
|
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD: |
February 24, 2003 March 17, 2003 |
|
TOWN COUNCIL: |
April 10, 2003 |
|
PARCEL INFORMATION |
||
|
Parcel # |
Realid # |
Area |
|
0761318924 |
0056939 |
33.7 Acres |
|
REZONING DATA |
||
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
|
Zoning: |
Residential 40 Wake County |
Residential 12 Conditional Use (R12 CU) |
|
Overlay District: |
Swift Creek Watershed |
Swift Creek Watershed |
|
Land Use: |
Vacant land/undeveloped |
Detached single family residences |
|
REZONING CONDITIONS |
|
|
CURRENT
None |
PROPOSED (as updated 4/9/03)
Bold indicates changes since application submission. |
|
None |
|
|
REZONING HISTORY |
|
None, currently in Wake County’s jurisdiction. |
|
SITE DATA |
|
WATER/SEWER SERVICE |
|
Analysis: The proposed development has adequate access to Town of Cary’s water and sewer systems. The development will be required to comply with all Town utility polices and standards. |
|
TRANSPORTATION |
|||
|
Traffic Impact Analysis Required: Yes [ ] No [ x ] |
|||
|
Existing traffic conditions: Northbound backups on Kildaire Farm Road from Penny Road traffic signal (0.5 miles) to Autumngate Drive. 7:45-8:00am, 8:45-9:00am. Congestion should be eliminated by Town of Cary widening project for Kildaire Farm Road. No PM peak congestion on Kildaire Farm Road. Left turning vehicles on Autumngate Drive @ Kildaire Farm Road have difficulty. Glenridge & Powell Property have better access to Ten Ten Road for this movement. Connectivity needed to Plumtree Way from the Powell property. Both Plumtree Way & Powell Drive may not have full access to Ten Ten Road in the future. No AM or PM peak hour congestion exist on Ten Ten Road at the Plumtree Way or Powell Property. As part of site development, Ten Ten Road widening will be required. The Town’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan designates Ten Ten Road to have an ultimate 78’ back-to-back cross-section (2 lanes in each direction with a center-landscaped median). Continuation of Felspar Way (currently a dead-end street within Glenridge Subdivision) will be required as part of subdivision development. The Town’s connectivity index ratio of 1.2 or greater must be met. |
|||
|
Land Use |
ADT |
AM Peak |
PM Peak |
|
33 Single Family DU’s (current) |
316 |
25 |
33 |
|
69 Single Family DU’s (proposed) |
660 |
52 |
70 |
|
Increased trips |
344 |
27 |
37 |
The following chart indicates traffic volume estimates for street locations today and with Powell property developed.
|
Future Peak Hour Volumes |
Glenridge Traffic Existing |
Powell Traffic 69 Units |
Total PM Future Traffic |
Average Daily Traffic |
|
Autumn Gate @ Kildaire Farm Road |
195 |
14 14-12 trips |
197 |
1970 |
|
Plumtree @ Glenridge Property |
49 |
0 |
49 |
490 |
|
Felspar @ Powell Property |
0 |
14 14+ 12 trips |
26 |
260 |
|
Powell Drive @ Ten Ten Road |
0 |
56 |
68 |
680 |
|
PM Peak |
244 |
70 |
314 |
14 trips from Powell property to Glenridge
12 trips from Glenridge to Powell
Analysis:
The applicant agrees to the connection/extension of Felspar Way and has included this as a condition of zoning. The applicant understands that the widening of Ten Ten Road, per the Town’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan, is a requirement of site development. Per Staff’s request, the applicant has shown a street stub to the western property (Falter property - pin 0761.0330-3789). The proposed rezoning conforms with the Town of Cary Transportation Plan and connectivity requirements.
|
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS |
|
The project is located in the Swift Creek Watershed and will be required to meet the reservoir watershed protection requirements of the Town of Cary. The project will be required to meet the nitrogen removal requirements of the Town of Cary. According to the available information, there are riparian buffers associated with this property. Analysis: There were many environmental concerns that were raised at the public hearing relative to this project. Most, if not all, of those concerns are addressed in the requirements that the Town of Cary has under its current Unified Development Ordinance. Flood plains, wetland concerns and riparian buffers and limits of impervious surfaces, are all issues that have been raised and are all issues that the Town of Cary requires to be protected. All Federal, State and Town of Cary environmental issues will be addressed before this property develops. The Town of Cary does not monitor pesticides or fertilizer use on active farms. The applicant has indicated that the proposed use will actually reduce the chance of well contamination by eliminating active farm use with the proposed subdivision. To protect the downstream ponds, the applicant has proposed runoff protection for the 5 and 10 year storm. The applicant will be required to attenuate the 1-year storm event by current Town of Cary stormwater requirements. The applicant has also proposed to protect the existing ponds from excessive sedimentation during construction with the use of innovative erosion control devices. With the applicant's responses to the environmental concerns, this project meets all the requirements of the Stormwater section of the Engineering Department. |
|
REGIONAL WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL ESTIMATES AND CAPACITY IMPACTS: AREA C (Western Wake County) |
||||
|
Current Enrollment Area Schools |
Building Capacity |
Percent occupied |
Projected Number of Students |
|
|
Elementary |
15,868 |
13,354 |
118.8% |
10 |
|
Middle |
7,758 |
6,789 |
114.3% |
5 |
|
High |
7,376 |
6,420 |
114.9% |
7
|
|
Total for all Area Schools |
30,840 |
26,563 |
116.1% |
22 |
|
LOCAL WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL ESTIMATES AND CAPACITY IMPACTS |
||||||
|
Current 20th Day Enrollment at the current schools this parcel is zoned for: |
Building Capacity |
Percent occupied |
APF Ord. Req. |
% Over/ Under Ord. |
Projected Number of Students |
|
|
Penny Road Elementary |
703 |
577 |
121.8% |
130% |
8.2% under |
10 |
|
Dillard Drive Middle |
1043 |
923 |
113.0% |
130% |
7.0% under |
5 |
|
Athens High* |
1746 |
1762 |
93.9% |
130% |
36.1% under |
7 |
|
Total for all Zoned Schools |
22 |
|||||
*Athens Drive High School is not an Area C school.
Current Enrollment and Building Capacity is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2002 as provided by the Wake County School System. School assignment will be determined at the time of development. A list of individual area schools and information concerning enrollment countywide can be found for review:
School Data
|
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USES |
||
|
Zoning: |
Land Use: |
|
|
North: |
Wake County jurisdiction |
Single family homes, Dutchman Downs Subdivision |
|
South: |
Wake County jurisdiction |
Single family homes |
|
East: |
Wake County jurisdiction |
Single family homes, Dutchman Downs Subdivision |
|
West: |
Residential 8 Conditional Use (R8CU) |
Single family homes, Glenridge Subdivision |
|
TOWN OF CARY FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DATA |
||
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
|
Plan Designation: |
Low Density Residential |
Low Density Residential |
|
Alternate Designation: |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Activity Center: |
N/A |
N/A |
|
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS |
|
Land Use Plan Element LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT HISTORY: None. The Cary Land Use Plan recommends that the subject parcel be developed as "Low Density Residential" – a land use classification that calls for densities of between 1-3 dwellings per acre, with an average minimum lot size of at least 12,000 square feet (unless cluster subdivision design is used). Analysis: The project proposes a maximum of 56 single family lots over 33.7 acres, giving an overall density of 1.66 dwelling units per acre – well within the range of 1-3 dwellings per acre recommended for Low Density Residential by the Cary Land Use Plan. The proposed lot sizes are a minimum of 13,000 sq. ft. adjacent to Glenridge Subdivision, and 18,000 sq. ft. adjacent to Dutchman Downs Subdivision – both above the average minimum lot size of 12,000 sq. ft. recommended by the Land Use Plan. The proposed rezoning conforms with the Town of Cary Land Use Plan. |
|
OPEN SPACE CONSIDERATIONS |
|
The Powell tract has been identified as a ‘high interest’ open space parcel because of the presence of bottomland hardwood forests along Dutchman’s Branch at the northern end of the property and the desire to make a greenway connection across this entire property from Ten Ten Road to Dutchman’s Branch. However, the parcel is mostly cleared (having been used for farming purposes) and devoid of tree cover, except near Dutchman’s Branch at the northern end of the property. Analysis: The parcel presents few opportunities for preservation of existing mature forest stands, except adjacent to Dutchman’s Branch, due to its former agricultural use and lack of forest cover. The parcel’s primary contribution towards open space is its accommodation of the proposed greenway connection to the future Dutchman’s Branch Greenway, as described below under the analysis for the Parks, Greenways, and Bikeways Master Plan. |
|
PARKS, GREENWAYS AND BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN |
|
Analysis: Staff has recommended the dedication of a greenway through the proposed development as well as along Dutchman's Branch, to the north of the site. The applicant has agreed to this dedication and has also agreed to construct the greenway. PRCR staff accepts these conditions. The location of this parcel represents an important link for the Town's proposed greenway system, providing a connection between the proposed Rocky Branch and Dutchman's Branch Greenways. The developer will receive credit for the cost of the construction of the greenway and the value of the greenway easement toward the payment-in-lieu for the Powell Tract. The Town of Cary will determine the value of the greenway easement. The greenway will be constructed to Town of Cary standards. PRCR staff will have to approve the design and location of the greenway prior to construction. The Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Advisory Board reviewed the Powell rezoning during its February meeting and voted unanimously to accept staff recommendations. |
|
Staff Recommendation |
|
Changes since Public Hearing: The public hearing on this case was conducted on January 9, 2003. General concerns expressed by speakers at the hearing included:
Since the public hearing, the applicant has made the following changes to the Powell rezoning request as evidenced by several changes to the rezoning conditions:
Protest Petition Information: Valid [] Invalid [X, not subject to protest per State law] None Filed [ ] Analysis: Land Use This rezoning request fully complies with the adopted Land Use in terms of density and type of residential development. The plan calls for low-density residential (LDR) development at 1 to 3 dwelling units per acre, with single-family lots at 12,000 square feet or above. With a limit of 56 dwellings, the overall gross density for this property will be no more than 1.66 units/acre. For comparison, the overall gross density of Glenridge subdivision to the west is 2.58 units/acre (243 lots on 94.13 acres). Transportation Connections from this new subdivision to Glenridge subdivision via Felspar Way (currently a stub street within Glenridge to this site’s western property boundary) and a future linkage to the property to the southwest of the Powell tract will be made. These road connections will distribute traffic and meet Town of Cary development requirements for future connectivity. Open Space Open space will be provided at the northern end of the parcel in conjunction with the protected 100’ stream buffer along the south side of Dutchman’s Branch creek. Perimeter buffers will also be maintained as outlined in the zoning conditions. Schools Conformity with the Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance will be required at the time of subdivision plan review. Based on the current situation, all schools that serve this development site currently have available capacity. Utilities All utility issues have been adequately addressed. Environmental Considerations The Engineering Department is satisfied that this proposal meets stormwater and water quality requirements. Parks, Greenways, and Recreation The dedication of an easement and construction of a greenway through the entire length of this property has been agreed to by the applicant. This will form a key north/south link in the greenway system in the southern portion of Cary. Evaluation Pros:
Cons:
|
|
STAFF RECOMMENDATION : |
|
Staff recommends approval of the Powell rezoning as submitted by the applicant. |
|
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION: |
|
Mr. Dawson made a motion to forward to Council for approval with the following conditions: 1. Runoff protection for the 5 and 10 year storms be attenuated in order to protect the downstream ponds, and 2. A connection to the greenway from Felspar be added. In addition to the above conditions, a recommendation was made to limit development as much as possible to the area north of Felspar at time of site plan submittal, which was seconded by Mr. Broderick, and the Board voted (7-1) with Ms. Sadtler having the dissenting vote. |
|
TOWN COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: |
|
Council voted to approve, including all new conditions and expanding the condition regarding speed humps to include all forms of traffic calming measures of comparable cost to the developer and the site plan will go to Council for approval. |
|
Information regarding this rezoning case will be on the Internet one week prior to the public hearing. Our Internet address for this case is http://www.townofcary.org/depts/dsdept/P&Z/rezonings/2002cases/2002index.htm |