TOWN OF CARY
REQUEST FOR REZONING/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
TOWN COUNCIL IMPACT STATEMENT (April 10, 2003)
02-REZ-26 Huggins Glen Planned Unit Development
|
PETITIONER |
PROJECT CONTACT |
PROPERTY OWNER |
|
|
Jerry Turner & Associates 905 Jones Franklin Road Raleigh, NC 27606 Phone: 851-7150 Fax: 851-7547
|
Same as Petitioner |
Amy E. Huggins Pike 519 High House Road Cary, NC 27513 Phyllis Gayle Dickerson 529 High House Road Cary, NC 27513 Thomas E. & Sandra C. Stammely 525 High House Road Cary, NC 27513 Robert A. & Dianne M. Nelson 515 High House Road Cary, NC 27513 |
|
|
LOCATION: |
South of High House Road the vicinity of Wood Hollow and Stone Hollow Court |
||
|
MAPS: |
Land Use Map Large Vicinity Open Space Stream Buffers Small Vicinity Zoning | ||
In Town Limits [ ] Inside Cary ETJ [ X ] Outside Cary ETJ [ ] Annexation Pending [ ]
|
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS |
|
|
TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING: |
January 9, 2003 |
|
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD: |
February 24, 2003 March 17, 2003 |
|
TOWN COUNCIL: |
April 10, 2003 |
|
PARCEL INFORMATION |
||
|
Parcel # |
Realid # |
Area |
|
0753498939 |
0095263 |
7.23 |
|
0753590244 |
0184007 |
5.41 |
|
0753496217 |
0184006 |
3.11 |
|
0753498652 |
0111091 |
2.51 |
|
0753592772 |
0097678 |
4.31 |
|
Total: Approximately 22.57 Acres |
||
|
REZONING DATA |
||
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
|
Zoning: |
Residential 30 (R30) |
R-30 Planned Unit Development (R30 PUD) |
|
Overlay District: |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Land Use: |
Four single family homes |
65 single-family homes, including detached homes, cluster homes, patio homes, and zero lot line homes. |
|
CURRENT REZONING CONDITIONS |
PROPOSED REZONING CONDITIONS |
|
None |
Huggins Glen is a 22.57 acre planned community There are a total of 65 single-family lots as proposed. Residential housing types may include single-family detached, cluster homes, patio homes, and zero lot line homes. Setbacks:
Minimum lot size, 5,000 square feet. Buffers/Open space:
Greenway
Additional Land Use Notes:
|
|
Items in bold have been added since the public hearing . Items with a strike through indicate changes and/or deletions since the public hearing. |
|
REZONING HISTORY |
|
None |
|
SITE DATA |
|
WATER/SEWER SERVICE |
|
Analysis: The proposed development has adequate access to the Town’s existing public water and sewer systems. The project will be required to comply with all Town of Cary’s utility policies and design standards. |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS |
|
Staff Remarks: The project will be required to address the nitrogen removal requirements of the Town of Cary. According to the information available to me there are riparian buffers shown on this property. Analysis: The Huggins Glen PUD would like to show greenway encroaching into the 100-foot riparian buffer which would be an allowed use providing there is no practical alternative to this. Engineering staff would support this encroachment only under the following conditions:
North Side Encroachment. This area encroachment could be supported because of the additional riparian buffer easement that would be preserved to the North that could be considered land banking to offset the proposed impervious impacts of the greenway. The porous pavement would allow some infiltration from the impervious surface of the greenway and could be viewed as a Best Management Practice. This encroachment would render the riparian buffer ineffective as a nitrogen reduction tool and the developer would need to agree to this reduction. The benefit of this leg of greenway would be to connect the cul-de-sacs to the greenway system. South Side Encroachment This area of proposed encroachment would be viewed as not allowed due to the fact there is a connection that could be easily made along the proposed roadway. This connection could be accomplished with a sidewalk/pedestrian trial and would prevent encroachment in the riparian buffer. Staff is still working together to arrive at an acceptable solution and will have an answer at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting.
The project meets all other requirements of the Stormwater section of the Engineering Department. |
|
TRANSPORTATION |
|||
|
Traffic Impact Analysis Required: Yes [ ] No [ x ] |
|||
|
Land Use |
ADT |
AM Peak |
PM Peak |
|
4 Single Family DU |
38 |
3 |
4 |
|
65 Single Family DU |
622 |
48 |
65 |
|
Increased trips |
574 |
45 |
61 |
|
REGIONAL WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL ESTIMATES AND CAPACITY IMPACTS: AREA C (Western Wake County) |
||||
|
Current Enrollment Area Schools |
Building Capacity |
Percent occupied |
Projected Number of Students |
|
|
Elementary |
15,868 |
13,354 |
118.8% |
11 |
|
Middle |
7,758 |
6,789 |
114.3 |
6 |
|
High |
7,376 |
6,420 |
114.9 |
8 |
|
Total for all Area Schools |
30,840 |
26,563 |
116.1 |
25 |
|
LOCAL WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL ESTIMATES AND CAPACITY IMPACTS |
||||||
|
Current 20th Day Enrollment at the current schools this parcel is zoned for: |
Building Capacity |
Percent occupied |
APF Ord. Req. |
% Over/ Under Ord. |
Projected Number of Students |
|
|
Cary Elementary |
758 |
792 |
95.7% |
130% |
34.3% under |
11 |
|
West Cary Middle |
1085 |
903 |
120.2% |
130% |
9.8% under |
6 |
|
Cary High |
1921 |
1657 |
115.9% |
130% |
14.1% under |
8 |
|
Total for all Zoned Schools |
25 |
|||||
Current Enrollment and Building Capacity is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2002 as provided by the Wake County School System. School assignment will be determined at the time of development. A list of individual area schools and information concerning enrollment countywide can be found for review:
School Data
|
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USES |
||||
|
Zoning: |
Land Use: |
|||
|
North: |
Across High House Road B2CU, Business 2 Conditional Use R30, Residential 30 R30, Residential 30 |
Across High House Road Maynard Crossing Shopping Center Single family homes Forest land |
||
|
South: |
R12, Residential 12 |
Trapper’s Haven Subdivision Single-family homes |
||
|
East: |
R12, Residential 12 |
Hampstead Park Subdivision Single-family homes |
||
|
West: |
R8CU, Residential 30 |
Holloway Subdivision Single-family homes |
||
|
TOWN OF CARY FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DATA |
||||
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|||
|
Plan Designation: |
Low Density Residential |
Low Density Residential (although clustered) |
||
|
Alternate Designation: |
N/A |
N/A |
||
|
Activity Center: |
N/A |
N/A |
||
|
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS |
|
Land Use Plan Element LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT HISTORY: None. Analysis: The Cary Land Use Plan (LUP) designates this area for Low-Density Residential (LDR) uses. LDR is defined as between 1 and 3 dwellings per acre, with a minimum average lot size of about 12,000 square feet. The Plan, however, allows the minimum lot size to be reduced if a cluster subdivision design is used. Land Use Plan criteria for a cluster subdivision include the following:
The proposal is for 65 single-family lots clustered on 22.57 ac (equating to 2.88 du/ac), with a minimum lot size of 5,000 sq. ft. In the applicant's response to staff comments (dated Feb 5, 2003), they have committed to protecting a total of "9.66 acres of open space (or approximately 43.6% of the site)", including the pond, stream buffers, perimeter buffers and other open space. Staff feels the rezoning proposal conforms with the Land Use Plan (LUP) criteria for a cluster subdivision, and is therefore consistent with the LUP. |
|
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING |
|
Analysis: Section 15.1.7 (g) of the Unified Development Ordinance states that "any residential development shall be required to achieve a connectivity index of 1.2 or greater unless the Director of Development Services determines that this requirement is impractical due to topography and/or natural features. In the event that this requirement is waived, a six (6) foot pedestrian trail shall be provided to link any cul-de-sacs within a residential development in which the required connectivity index has been waived."In order to meet this requirement, it is expected that access points to the greenway system be provided directly to the cul-de-sac on the left and to the sidewalk just north of the right cul-de-sac. |
|
OPEN SPACE CONSIDERATIONS |
|
Analysis: The site is predominately wooded in mixed hardwood-conifer forest. Although the property itself contains no significant natural resources, according to OSHRP (Open Space & Historic Resources Plan) data, two high-interest open space parcels (the Langley and Pannkuk Tracts) lie immediately to the south. The proposed PUD will protect a significant amount of open space nearest the high-interest parcels (as discussed further in the Land Use section above). Where development is planned along the south-eastern edge of the site, a 30-foot undisturbed buffer located outside of platted lots is also planned. This will assist in further separating the proposed lots and the significant resources to the south. Further, the PUD application includes preservation of the existing pond as an amenity for residents, as wildlife habitat, as well as assisting with water quality protection and prevention of downstream flooding.Through the preservation of the pond, as well as the 100-foot buffer around the pond, and preservation of a significant amount of the most sensitive vegetative resources on the southern and southwestern edges of the site (nearest the OSHRP-identified high priority parcels to the south), staff feels that the PUD application meets the spirit and intent of the Open Space Plan. |
|
PARKS, GREENWAYS AND BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN |
|
Analysis: Staff has requested, and the applicant has agreed to the following conditions:
These dedications meet the goals and recommendations of the Parks, Greenways and Bikeways Master Plan. The Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Advisory Board reviewed the Huggins Glen PUD during its March meeting and voted unanimously to accept these recommendations. |
|
Staff Recommendation |
|
Changes since Public Hearing: At the public hearing a number of concerns were raised concerning this development. Among those concerns: lot size, damage to existing environment, additional traffic, decreased property values. The applicant met with staff on several occasions in order to address outstanding issues. The following is a list of changes that have been made since the public hearing. Please refer to the entire list of conditions listed above in this document.
There was a valid protest on this case, which has been removed. Protest Petition Information: Valid [ ] Invalid [ ] None Filed [ ] No longer valid (removed) [x] Analysis: Huggins Glen is a 22.57 acre planned community. There are a total of 65 single-family lots as proposed for a maximum density of 2.88 dwelling units per acre. Residential housing types may include single-family detached, cluster homes, patio homes, and zero lot line homes. The minimum lot size is 5,000 square feet. The site is surrounded by existing residential development – Hampstead Subdivision to the east, Holloway Subdivision to the west, and Trappers Run to the south. The Land Use Plan designates this area for low-density residential (LDR) which calls for 1 to 3 dwelling units per acre with a minimum average lot size of approximately 12,000 square feet. The Plan however allows minimum lot size to be reduced if a cluster design is used. The rezoning request is consistent with the provisions of the LDR criteria and the criteria for a cluster subdivision, therefore conforming to the Land Use Plan. The proposed master plan incorporates a cluster design to maximize open space. The proposed Huggins Glen has 9.66 acres of open space, including stream buffers, perimeter buffers and the pond. This constitutes 43.6 percent of the entire site. The required open space dedication is 1.13 acres. Pedestrian access has been addressed with adding of greenways and/or greenway easements and sidewalks on one side of all streets. However the staff is still working to resolve the greenway issue around the pond. This northern area encroachment could be supported because of the additional riparian buffer easement that would be preserved to the North that could be considered land banking to offset the proposed impervious impacts of the greenway. The porous pavement would allow some infiltration from the impervious surface of the greenway and could be viewed as a Best management Practice. This encroachment would render the riparian buffer ineffective as a nitrogen reduction tool and the developer would need to agree to this reduction. The benefit of this leg of greenway would be to connect the cul-de-sacs to the greenway system. The southern area of proposed encroachment would be viewed as not allowed due to the fact there is a connection that could be easily made along the proposed roadway. This connection could be accomplished with a sidewalk/pedestrian trial and would prevent encroachment in the riparian buffer. Staff is still working together to arrive at an acceptable solution and will have an answer at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting.
A list of the pros and cons for this case are listed below for your review. Pros:
No : Cons: None noted.
|
|
STAFF RECOMMENDATION : |
|
Staff recommends approval. Staff is working to resolve the issue concerning the greenway trail around the pond. Staff has agreed that the northern portion of the greenway is acceptable. A decision concerning staff’s position on the southern portion of the greenway will be given at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. |
|
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION: |
|
Mr. Portman made a motion to forward to Council for approval, which was seconded by Mr. Goodridge, and the Board voted (5-4) with Ms. Sadtler, Mr. Zaccardo, Mr. Broderick and Mr. Dawson having the dissenting votes. |
|
TOWN COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: |
|
Council voted to approve with greenway on north and south sides. |
|
Information regarding this rezoning case will be on the Internet one week prior to the public hearing. Our Internet address for this case is http://www.townofcary.org/depts/dsdept/P&Z/rezonings/2002cases/2002index.htm |