TOWN OF CARY
REQUEST FOR REZONING/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT/ LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT
Town Council Impact Statement (July 10, 2003)
02-REZ-23, 02-LPA-12 – Riggsbee Planned Unit Development
|
PETITIONER |
PROJECT CONTACT |
PROPERTY OWNER |
|
|
Jerry Turner & Associates 905 Jones Franklin Road Raleigh, NC 27606
|
Same |
Peggy S. Riggsbee 2012 High House Road Morrisville, NC 27560 Peggy & Edward Riggsbee 2100 High House Road Merrillville, NC 27560 Jacqueline Riggsbee Woodcock 2012 High House Road Morrisville, NC 27519 Cynthia R. Hobby & Edward L. Hobby, Jr. 2112 High House Road Morrisville, NC 27560 Peggy Stone Riggsbee & Amy Riggsbee Gilber 2116 High House Road Morrisville, NC 27560 John Edgar Perry & Kimberly Gay Perry 2128 High House Road Morrisville, NC 27513 Crossroads Express Mart, Inc. PO Box 1659 Apex, NC 27502 |
|
|
LOCATION: |
Intersection of High House Road and Davis Drive |
||
|
MAPS: |
Vicinity Map - Small Vicinity Map - Large Zoning Map Land Use Plan Map Stream Buffers Master Plan Survey Utility Plan Storm Drainage Plan Road Section Hydrology Inventory Soil Inventory Slope Inventory Vegetative Inventory | ||
In Town Limits [ ] Inside Cary ETJ [ ] Outside Cary ETJ [ ] Annexation Pending [ X ]
|
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS |
|
|
TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING: |
January 23, 2003 |
|
SECOND COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING |
May 8, 2003 |
|
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD: |
March 17, 2003 tabled due to 2nd public hearing June 16, 2003 |
|
TOWN COUNCIL: |
April 10, 2003 tabled due to 2nd public hearing
|
|
PARCEL INFORMATION |
||
|
Parcel # |
Realid # |
Area |
|
0744532530 |
0206336 |
2.25 acres |
|
0744439656 |
0219798 |
5.9 acres |
|
0744337024 |
0072984 |
46.83 acres |
|
0744329641 |
0096796 |
1.23 acres |
|
0744424732 |
0222653 |
1.17 acres |
|
0744327535 |
0249852 |
1.81 acres |
|
0744228525 |
0240626 |
2.25 acres |
|
0744225423 |
0111637 |
2.18 acres |
|
0744531255 |
0150533 |
2.75 acres |
|
Total approx. 66.34 acres |
||
|
REZONING DATA |
||
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
|
Zoning: |
Residential 30 |
R-30 Planned Unit Development |
|
Overlay District: |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Land Use: |
A mixture of vacant land, farm use, commercial, and single family residences |
A mixed-use development consisting of approximately 66 acres with 230 multi-family dwelling units; 143,160 square feet of retail and 74,200 square feet of office. |
|
CONDITIONS |
|
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
N/A |
One bedroom - $500 per dwelling Two bedrooms - $1,000 per dwelling Three bedrooms - $2,000 per dwelling Four bedrooms - $3,000 per dwelling Over four bedrooms - $1,000 per bedroom Items 15 and 16 have been added since the public hearing. Items 17-25 have been added since the P&Z meeting. |
|
REZONING HISTORY |
|
None |
|
SITE DATA |
|
WATER/SEWER SERVICE |
|
This proposed development has direct access to Town of Cary public water and sewer systems. Analysis Engineering design of water and sewer serving this development will be required to comply with Town of Cary standards. The applicant is required to install a 16" waterline along Carpenter Upchurch Road and connect the 16" line to the proposed waterline along the private street in the PUD. |
|
TRANSPORTATION |
|
Traffic Impact Analysis Required: Yes [ x ] No [ ] |
|
Traffic Impact Analysis conducted by the Town of Cary traffic consultant HNTB dated September 2002. The April 15, 2003 submittal has a different development plan than the plan studied in the Impact Study. Therefore, an amended analysis dated May 2003 is provided for the new development plan. Comprehensive Transportation Plan Requirements: Davis Drive: ultimate 4 lane median divided cross section with wide outside lanes to accommodate bicycles; High House Road: ultimate 4 lane median divided cross section with wide outside lanes to accommodate bicycles The Town’s Davis Drive widening project is scheduled to begin construction in the spring of 2003. Analysis: Project meets the Town of Cary Standards provided that Table A-5 on page 7 is followed. |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – RIGSBEE PUD
HNTB – September 2002
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A new planned unit development (PUD) is being proposed for construction on the existing Riggsbee property located in the western part of Cary, NC. The proposed facilities have a mix of uses; retail, office space, apartments, and single family homes. Figure 1 shows the general location of the proposed project. The development site is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of High House Road and Davis Drive. The proposed property is anticipated to be complete with all parcels fully built out and operational by 2007. This report analyzes the full build-out scenario for the year 2007, the no-build scenario for 2007, as well as 2002 existing year traffic conditions.
The proposed preliminary site plan includes three primary access driveways for external connectivity, one accessing Davis Drive to the east, one accessing High House Road directly aligned with existing Cornerstone Circle and one accessing Carpenter Upchurch Road to the west. All three-driveway connections include no turning restrictions onto adjacent roadways. These driveways are connected internally to circulation roadways within the PUD that will service the individual land uses.
This report analyzes and presents the traffic impacts that the Riggsbee PUD site will have on the following intersections along Davis Drive (north to south):
In addition, the report analyzes the traffic impacts to five intersections along High House Road (west to east):
Finally, the report analyzes the Future West Site Driveway intersection with existing Carpenter Upchurch Road.
The significant improvements to High House Road and Davis Drive in the study area – both in terms of capacity and traffic control upgrades – will yield many benefits that, even with additional Riggsbee PUD site traffic, will allow the remaining intersections to operate under capacity in the site build out analyses. It is important to note that these improvements may adjust the trip-making patterns both of study area traffic and traffic external to the study area. Ambient growth predictions do not account for any significant redistribution of traffic once a facility is upgraded.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS – Amended Study – HNTB – May 2003
Of the 11 intersections analyzed, five will require improvements in the Rigsbee PUD build-out scenario (Condition 3). Table A-5, below, summarizes required improvements to allow acceptable delay and LOS at these intersections. Table A-5 also indicates under what condition deficiencies are first experienced and improvements necessitated. Note that there are many improvements expected to be completed in the study area between 2002 and 2007. Many of these scheduled improvements will aid in mitigation of site traffic impacts. Any item that is bulleted (· ) indicates that an improvement is necessary and is a) not included in the planned Town or NCDOT improvements or b) specifically caused by the Riggsbee PUD site development.
The intersection of Davis Drive and the East Site Driveway experiences deficient levels of service for the driveway approach in the PM peak period (see Figure A-7). This assumes that this approach has exclusive left and right-turn lanes and adequate storage in each lane. Resulting worst case queues could be as much as five vehicles in the PM peak. The estimated volume of turning PM peak traffic from the Riggsbee PUD site at this driveway, 223 vehicles, would warrant signalization based on MUTCD Peak Hour Warrant thresholds and is a cause of concern when coupled with heavy southbound flows on Davis Drive. Adding to these issues is that widening plans for Davis Drive do not include provision for a median break at this location. An expedient solution is to eliminate left-turns out of the Riggsbee PUD site at this driveway, while still allowing left-turns into the site. Site traffic wishing to travel northbound on Davis Drive would thus need to make a U-turn at the High House intersection, or use the South Site Driveway to access High House Road and then Davis Drive. Analysis of the traffic volume redistribution, coupled with the other improvements described in this section, indicates that this improvement will allow adequate transportation network operations for all intersections impacted by the changes in traffic flow. A left-turn median storage bay of at least 200 feet should be incorporated into the Davis Drive improvements for access at the East Site Driveway intersection. In addition, a southbound right-turn deceleration lane should be added on Davis Drive to safely separate turning movements into the Rigs PUD from heavy through traffic flows (see Figure A-8). No other geometric or operational mitigation will yield operational benefits that can be as effectively implemented as the recommendations above. If signalized, this intersection would operate at a LOS A for both peak periods, but would add some unnecessary delay to through travel along Davis Drive and cause conflict to the roadway widening plans that are featuring limited access to driveways along the corridor. Therefore, signalization is not desirable at the East Site Driveway.
The intersection of Davis Drive and High House Road operates poorly during both peak periods with its existing lane configurations and signal timing parameters. Realignment, widening of Davis Drive, and reconfiguration of signal operations will result in acceptable overall LOS in the 2007 without site Condition. The addition of Riggsbee site traffic leaves this intersection over capacity for the AM and PM peak hours in Condition 3. One recommended mitigation strategy, consistent with stipulations in the site plan submittal, is to add an additional westbound through travel lane along High House Road along Davis Drive to Carpenter Upchurch Road. This eliminates a "missing link" along High House Road, which would have five lane sections both to the east of Davis Drive and the west of Carpenter Upchurch Road by 2007. It is assumed that the westbound approach on High House will be converted to one exclusive left-turn lane, a through travel lane and a shared through/right-turn lane.
An additional mitigation element necessary to allow adequate traffic operations in both peak hours in Condition 3 is to include an additional southbound left-turn lane. This dual left-turn lane improvement is consistent with the Davis Drive roadway widening plans, which show a southbound dual left-turn lane at the High House Road intersection. The additional capacity provided by these will allow the intersection to operate acceptably in Condition 4 for both Peak Periods, as displayed in Figure A-8. Condition 4 traffic volumes account for redistribution of traffic from the improvement to eliminate left-turns out onto Davis Drive at the East Site Driveway and Davis Drive intersection.
The intersections of Jenks Carpenter Road and Carpenter Upchurch Road with High House Road have both operational and safety deficiencies that will be mitigated by future plans to realign the two intersections into one four-legged intersection with signal control on a five-lane High House Road cross section. This scenario was analyzed for Conditions 2 and 3. As seen in Figure A-8, even with these improvements, the combined intersection will overate at an overall intersection LOS E in the AM peak hour with the addition of site traffic. Since no potential signal timing modification is able to alleviate the deficiency, potential geometric improvements were explored. Part of the capacity problem in the AM peak hour is the large number of background westbound right-turning vehicles, both existing and projected for 2007. An auxiliary exclusive right-turn bay, providing at least 350 feet of storage, would separate this movement from through High House Road traffic and aid the efficiency of the overall intersection. In addition, since widening of the outside westbound lane on High House will be required for the Riggsbee PUD development, the right-turn bay can be readily incorporated into the design at this intersection. It is assumed that this will be feasible, since the final location of the realigned intersection is not known at this time. Assuming no infeasible or overtly costly barriers to implementation of this right-turn lane exist, it will provide a means to efficiently mitigate overall intersection delay deficiencies, as shown in Figure A-9.
Table A-5
Summary of Suggested Improvements for Study Area Intersections
|
Intersection |
Condition 1 Existing 2002 |
Condition 2 Year 2007 Without Site |
Condition 3 Year 2007 with Site |
|
Davis Drive and Hogans Valley Way – Preston Village Way |
-NA- |
Intersection signalized as part of Davis Drive Improvements |
-NA- |
|
Davis Drive and East Site Driveway |
-NA- |
-NA- |
|
|
Davis Drive and High House Road |
-NA- |
-NA- |
|
|
Davis Drive and Cornerstone Circle |
-NA- |
Intersection signalized as part of Sears Farm PUD |
-NA- |
|
Carpenter Upchurch Road and West Site Driveway |
-NA- |
-NA- |
|
|
High House Road and Jenks Carpenter Road |
Intersections signalized with High House Road Widening |
Intersections will be realigned to form one four-legged intersection with High House Road |
|
|
High House Road and Carpenter Upchurch Road |
|||
|
High House Road and Combined Carpenter Upchurch-Jenks Carpenter Rd |
-N/A- |
-N/A- |
|
|
High House Road – Green Level Road and NC 55 |
-NA- |
-NA- |
-NA- |
|
High House Road and Cornerstone Circle – South Site Driveway |
-NA- |
|
|
|
High House Road and Prestonwood Pkway - Legault Dr |
-NA- |
-NA- |
-NA- |
The intersection of High House Road and Cornerstone Circle, currently unsignalized, experiences lengthy northbound left-turn delays for both peak periods in 2007 without the Riggsbee PUD. The addition of a fourth intersection leg (the South Site Driveway) and site-related traffic will further impede turning movements out of Cornerstone Circle. The South Site Driveway traffic will also operate at deficient peak hour LOS, assuming separate left-turn and shared through/right-turn lanes are initially constructed at this location. Deficient delay and LOS values for this intersection as a result of Condition 3 are shown in Figure A-8. Adding a second through westbound travel lane on High House Road will provide more gaps in traffic that allow improved minor street operations in Condition 3. The northbound and southbound deficient left-turn movements improve but not enough to meet the LOS D threshold. Installation of a traffic signal would allow all movements to operate at a LOS A for both peak periods in Condition 3, with the tradeoff that delays would be imposed on through traffic along High House Road. Peak hour signal warrant analyses indicate that a signal would be warranted at this intersection. In 2007, there will be two signals operating upstream of the east and west approaches to this intersection, and a signal at this intersection should be coordinated with the others to allow optimal progression on High House Road. For ordered traffic separation, the Cornerstone Circle approach should be striped into separate left and right-turning lanes and one entry lane with or without the Riggsbee site in 2007.
The intersection of the West Site Driveway and Carpenter Upchurch Road experiences over capacity traffic conditions for the westbound left-turn movement in the AM Peak in 2007 with site build-out. Mitigation efforts to improve operations and safety at this intersection need to include provision for northbound and southbound exclusive turn lanes into the site on Carpenter Upchurch Road. A southbound left-turn lane with 100 feet of storage and a northbound exclusive right-turn deceleration lane of at least 150 feet will provide additional capacity and safety for traffic movements at this intersection. To eliminate the excessive left-turn delay at the site driveway, a provision for a median refuge needs to be added to Carpenter Upchurch Road. A possible way to accomplish this is to widen Carpenter Upchurch Road to include a continuous central left-turn lane from the West Site Driveway southbound to the High House Road intersection. This lane will allow orderly separation for left-turns onto High House Road also.
A general note concerning traffic patterns for this study: the highly congested arterials near Research Triangle Park have caused daily commuters to adjust their peak hour commuting patterns to avoid congestion. Changes to improve the network along the major arterials such as Davis Drive and NC 55 will likely result in some redistribution of travel patterns to minimize impedance. No attempt was made to estimate these changes for the 2007 build-out year. In any case, the improvements that have been recommended will be necessary to improve both capacity and safety at those deficient intersections, regardless of the effects of traffic redistribution.
|
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS |
|
The project will be required to address the Nitrogen Removal Ordinance of the Town of Cary. According to the information available to me there are stream buffers associated with the property. There are known drainage issues below this project in the Riggsbee Farms Subdivision and Georgetown Subdivision. Analysis: This project addresses all stormwater requirement of the Town of Cary. Due to drainage concerns from the surrounding neighbors the project attenuates the 2, 5 and 10-year storm events to pre-development runoff levels, which exceeds the 1-year 24-hour storm requirement. |
|
REGIONAL WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL ESTIMATES AND CAPACITY IMPACTS: AREA C (Western Wake County) |
||||
|
Current Enrollment Area schools: |
Building Capacity |
Percent occupied |
Projected Number of Students |
|
|
Elementary |
15,868 |
13,354 |
118.8% |
49 |
|
Middle |
7,758 |
6,789 |
114.3 |
25 |
|
High |
7,376 |
6,420 |
114.9 |
35
|
|
Total for all Area Schools |
30,840 |
26,563 |
116.1 |
109 |
|
LOCAL WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL ESTIMATES AND CAPACITY IMPACTS |
||||||
|
Current 20th Day enrollment at the current schools this parcel is zoned for: |
Building Capacity |
Percent occupied |
APF Ord. Req. |
% Over/ Under Ord. |
Projected Number of Students |
|
|
Green Hope Elementary |
752 |
712 |
105.6% |
130% |
24.4% under |
49 |
|
West Cary Middle |
1085 |
903 |
120.2% |
130% |
9.8% under |
25 |
|
Green Hope High |
2022 |
1714 |
118.0% |
130% |
12% under |
35 |
|
Total for all Zoned Schools |
114.6% |
130% |
15.4% under |
109 |
||
Current Enrollment and Building Capacity is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2002 as provided by the Wake County School System.. School assignment will be determined at the time of development. A list of individual area schools and information concerning enrollment countywide can be found for review: School Data
|
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USES |
||
|
Zoning: |
Land Use: |
|
|
North: |
Residential 10 Conditional Use (R10CU) |
Riggsbee Farms Subdivision, single family residences |
|
South: |
Across High House Road Business 2 Conditional Use (B2CU) Office/Institutional (OI) Residential Multi-Family 12 Conditional Use (RMF12CU) |
Across High House Road Cornerstone Shopping Center Offices, fire station Cornerstone Apartments |
|
East: |
Across Davis Drive Residential 30 (R30) |
Across Davis Drive Single-family residential |
|
West: |
Residential 30 (R30) |
Single-family residential |
|
TOWN OF CARY FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DATA |
||
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
|
Activity Center: |
NAC (Neighborhood Activity Center) |
CAC (Community Activity Center) |
|
Underlying Detailed Plan Designation: |
|
|
|
Alternate Designation: |
None |
None |
|
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS |
|
Land Use Plan Element Land Use Plan Amendment History: Since adoption of the Land Use Plan in November 1996, no plan amendments have occurred for the northwest quadrant of this activity center, in the area covered by this rezoning request. However, the southeast quadrant of this activity center (i.e., the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Davis Drive and High House Road) was amended on March 14, 2002, in conjunction with the rezoning of the Sears Farm PUD, to reflect the detailed internal uses of that PUD. Background: The subject parcels are located within an area designated on the Land Use Plan as a neighborhood activity center (NAC) focused around the intersection of Davis Drive and High House Road. Within the activity center, the Land Use Plan suggests medium-density residential uses for most of the subject tract, plus a couple acres of commercial uses at the northwest corner of Davis Drive and High House Road. This request for rezoning is accompanied by a request to amend the Land Use Plan to change the NAC to a Community Activity Center (CAC) in order to accommodate the additional nonresidential development proposed by the rezoning application. Note: As part of the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) rewrite, there is a companion revision to the activity center guidelines contained in Chapter 6 of the Land Use Plan. The proposed revision keeps intact the vision and purpose of the NAC but modifies some of the guidelines. Likewise, the proposed Land Use Plan revision that accompanies the LDO update keeps intact the vision and purpose of the CAC but modifies some of its guidelines. Below summarizes some of the new guidelines for partially built community activity centers (CACs). General Guideline Category Guideline Description Applicant’s Proposal Consistency with Guideline Land Uses Mix of commercial, office, and high to medium density residential in the center The proposal provides three land uses (office, commercial, and high density residential). While the uses are not vertically mixed, there are significant design requirements that support integration of the uses. Consistent with the guideline. Design Provide significant design elements such as internal sidewalks, plazas and focal points, pedestrian and bicycle connections to adjoining neighborhoods. Shared parking, public outdoor space, inclusion of transit opportunity, and consistency with Town-wide design guidelines. The applicant has provided design criteria and architectural illustrations that demonstrate how design can tie an activity center together. Consistent with the guideline Size Around 500,000 square feet of non-residential use in the center. The center, including the Sears Farm PUD and Cornerstone shopping center, would have over 600,000 commercial square feet. This does not include any non-residential development on the vacant tract at the northeast corner of the center. Not consistent with the guideline.
Analysis: While the existing Land Use Plan identifies this area as a Neighborhood Activity Center, existing development as well as the amount of vacant land in the activity center boundaries supports the change to Community Activity Center (CAC) for this partially built center. This designation is consistent with the newly adopted land use amendment for activity center designations. The applicant’s proposal, when added to the existing development (Sears farm and Cornerstone), will exceed the amount of commercial space typically suggested for Community Activity Centers. The applicant’s basis for this deviation is that the project has the following ingredients:
|
|
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING |
|
Transit: The applicant has provided a rezoning condition that will allow the integration of bus transit into the site development. This condition would incorporate a bus shelter and stop into the project. Pedestrian: The applicant is proposing "at least one sidewalk on each drive and that all buildings will connect to the public sidewalk system. " The applicant is also proposing a sidewalk on the south side of the private collector street linking Davis Drive with Carpenter Upchurch Road. The applicant is not proposing sidewalk on the north side; rather, they are providing a 30-foot easement to allow a greenway through the linear park area. Pedestrian crossings would occur at the proposed full access point along High House Road and at the Davis Drive/High House Road intersection. Bicycle: The private collector street will be designed to have wide outside lanes to accommodate bicycles. In addition, the future greenway would also provide for bicycle movement. Transportation Plan Element: Both Davis Dr. and High House Rd. will be under construction beginning in the Summer/Fall of 2003 for road widening projects. Each road will be four-lane, median divided upon completion of the project. The applicant is proposing to phase the construction of High House Road along their frontage and the construction of the private collector street. The applicant is proposing to widen High House Road and the private collector street in three phases, starting with widening from the Davis Drive intersection to Cornerstone Drive prior to the first certificate of occupancy (C0) for the commercial parcels. Widening from Cornerstone Drive to parcel M-5 would occur in the 2nd phase, and the remaining High House Road widening would occur in the last phase of the project. In addition, all phases of the High House Road widening will be completed prior to September 2005 or upon completion of the Town’s project should it extend beyond September of 2005.
Analysis: Staff supports the transportation related conditions offered by the applicant. |
|
OPEN SPACE CONSIDERATIONS |
|
The Peggy Stone Riggsbee parcel (RealID# 0072984) contains significant resources as identified in the Open Space and Historic Resources Plan (OSHRP). These consist of mixed upland hardwood forest in the northwestern corner of the tract. There are also smaller areas of bottomland hardwood forest within the stream buffers of the pond on the eastern half of the parcel. Analysis: The applicant’s proposal to create a 19.87 acre open space/linear park protects the significant resources on the site. |
|
PARKS, GREENWAYS AND BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN |
|
If the development includes single family homes, a land dedication or payment-in-lieu will be necessary. |
|
Analysis:
|
|
Staff Recommendation |
|
Changes since Public Hearing:
Protest Petition Information: Valid [ x ] Not Enough Signatures with 100 feet[ ] None Filed [ ] Analysis: This development was first heard as a public hearing before the Town Council on January 23, 2003. At that time the development consisted of 230 multi-family dwelling units; 87,000 square feet of retail space; and 116, 400 square feet of office space. Due to public concern and concerns raised by the Council, the developer revised the plan and a second public hearing was held May 8, 2003. The new plan proposes a maximum of 230 multi-family dwelling units; an increase to 143,160 square feet of retail space; and a decrease to 74,200 square feet of office space. Also through discussions with staff, the applicant has increased open space by 20 acres; attenuated the stormwater retention to the 2, 5 and 10 year storm events; redesigned the site to follow the Towns’ design review guidelines; and provided concept plans and renderings. This rezoning application is accompanied by a request to change the land use plan from a Neighborhood Activity Center (NAC) to a Community Activity Center (CAC). The activity center as it is today is more closely aligned with a CAC than with a NAC because the amount of land included in the activity center exceeds the guidelines for a NAC. Therefore, existing development in this partially built activity center and the amount of vacant land remaining support a change from NAC to CAC. Commercial space is exceeded for this CAC activity center by 100,000 square feet. However the applicant is mitigating this excess square footage by doing the following: enhancing design elements; adding additional open/linear park space; providing a stormwater management plan in excess of Town requirements; and constructing a private collector road. A list of the pros and cons associated with this request is listed below. Pros:
Cons:
|
|
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: |
|
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request and corresponding land use plan amendment. |
|
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION : |
|
Mr. Dawson moved to approve the rezoning request and land use plan amendment with the following recommendations: the developer dedicate the easement and build the 30 foot greenway on the north side of the collector road; that the developer work with staff to limit uses in the GC areas; that building heights in the non-residential areas be limited to 4 stories (this includes underground or first floor parking); that recreation facilities be limited to a facility serving the residential area of this PUD; and that resolution to the Riggsbee Farm subdivision stormwater run-off issue be resolved prior to this PUD being built. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hyatt and approved by a vote of 8-1 with Mr. Yerha voting in the negative and Mr. Zaccardo excused. |
|
CHANGES SINCE P&Z BOARD MEETING : |
|
|
TOWN COUNCIL DECISION : |
|
Approved. |
|
Information regarding this rezoning case will be on the Internet one week prior to the public hearing. Our Internet address for this case is http://www.townofcary.org/depts/dsdept/P&Z/rezonings/2002cases/2002index.htm |