REQUEST FOR REZONING / LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT
TOWN COUNCIL IMPACT STATEMENT (May 8, 2003)
02-REZ-19/02-LPA-11 Lowe’s Home Center
| Staff Contact: |
Suzanne Prince, Senior Planner (919) 462-3944 sprince@ci.cary.nc.us |
|
PETITIONER |
PROJECT CONTACT |
PROPERTY OWNER |
|
Lowe’s Home Center, Inc. Hwy 268 East, East Dock North Wilkesboro, NC 28659 Phone: (336) 658-4463 Fax: (336) 658-2616 |
McGuire Woods, LLC/Pat Shelley 7 St. Paul Street, Suite 1000 Baltimore, MD 21202 Phone: (410) 659-4413 Fax: (410) 659-4413 |
Harry Stephenson 104 Prestwick Place Cary, NC 27511 AND George H. Jordan, III 155 West Chatham Street Cary, NC 27511 |
|
LOCATION: |
Southeast corner of Maynard Road and Chapel Hill Road |
|
MAPS: |
Vicinity Map - Small Vicinity Map - Large Zoning Map Land Use Plan Map Stream Buffers Open Space Town Council Vicinity Master Land Use Hydrology Concept Master Plan Rendering 031703 |
In Town Limits [ X ] Inside Cary ETJ [ ] Outside Cary ETJ [ ] Annexation Pending [ ]
|
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS |
|
|
TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING: |
December 12, 2002 (continued to January 23) January 23, 2003 (and continued to March 17 P&Z Board due to inclement weather) |
|
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD: |
March 17, 2003 (additional public hearing) April 21, 2003 |
|
TOWN COUNCIL: |
May 8, 2003 |
|
PARCEL INFORMATION |
||
|
Parcel # |
Realid # |
Area |
|
Part of 076409151613 |
0067448 |
18.352 Acres |
|
Part of 076419157590 |
0037854 |
6.545 Acres |
|
Total |
24.897 Acres |
|
|
REZONING DATA |
|||
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
||
|
Zoning: |
Business-2 Conditional Use (B2-CU) and Residential 12 Planned Unit Development (R-12 PUD) |
Business – 2 Planned Unit Development (B2-PUD) and Residential 12 Planned Unit Development (R-12 PUD) Amendment |
|
|
Land Use: |
Vacant |
Lowe’s Home Improvement Center, and restaurant |
|
|
REZONING CONDITIONS CURRENT Conditional use by excluding the following: Billboards Bottling Works Nursing Homes Tire recapping Manufacturing Bus stations Satellite dish antennas Radio and television transmission towers Proposed Use Description:
All of the retail center’s exterior features and outparcel buildings shall conform to the same architectural style. This architecture shall be in keeping with Cary’s emphasis of the community town.
|
REZONING CONDITIONS PROPOSED To be developed as Lowe’s Home Improvement Center and sit-down restaurant. Conditions Added 3/14/03
|
||
|
REZONING HISTORY |
|
PIN 0764091511613 was rezoned from R30 to B2CU in Case Z-391-86-1. Conditions were imposed. PIN 076419157590 was rezoned from R30, R12, R6, and B3 to PUD in Case Z188-82 PUD. |
|
SITE DATA |
|
WATER/SEWER SERVICE |
|
This proposed development has adequate access to existing Town water and sewer systems. |
|
TRANSPORTATION |
|
Traffic Impact Analysis Required: Yes [ X ] No [ ] |
|
A Traffic Impact Study was prepared by the Town of Cary traffic consultant Sear-Brown dated October 2002.
Analysis: Traffic Impact Analysis The overall conclusion of this study as summarized below is that "…this development will not degrade operations at the NW Maynard Road traffic signal controlled intersections of James Jackson Road, Chapel Hill Road, and Evans Road assuming the completion of the NW Maynard Road improvements. Overall, Level of Service ‘C’ or better is anticipated at these intersections." |
Traffic Impact Study Executive Summary – Sear-Brown - October 2002
This traffic assessment was conducted to evaluate the effects the proposed Lowe’s Shopping Center will have on the adjacent transportation network. The development will be located on the north side of Chapel Hill Road east of NW Maynard Road in the Town of Cary, North Carolina.
The proposed Lowe’s Shopping Center will consist of approximately 134,754 gross square feet of a home improvement store and 5,600 square feet of restaurant. Full Build out of this development is anticipated by the year 2004. An assessment has been conducted for existing conditions (2002), as well as background and future conditions by the year 2004. Approved developments as provided by the Town were incorporated as part of background conditions. Additionally, a 3% per year general growth rate was applied to existing traffic volumes to account for traffic volume growth originating outside of the study area. Roadway improvements planned for the widening of NW Maynard Road were also included.
The proposed Lowe’s Shopping Center is anticipated to generate approximately 422 and 839 new vehicular trips during the weekday Friday and Saturday peak hours, respectively. Pass-By credit was taken on the restaurant trips based on data published by ITE for the Friday period. No pass-by credit was available for a restaurant on a Saturday. Table 1 shows the trip generation breakdown.
Table 1
Trip Generation
134,574 Square Foot Home Improvement Store
5,600 Square Foot Restaurant
Friday Peak Hour
|
Total |
Enter |
Exit |
|
|
Home Improvement Store |
387 |
182 |
205 |
|
Restaurant |
61 |
37 |
24 |
|
Restaurant – Pass By Credit |
-26 |
-13 |
-13 |
|
Total New Trips = |
422 |
206 |
216 |
Saturday Peak Hour
|
Total |
Enter |
Exit |
|
|
Home Improvement Store |
727 |
385 |
342 |
|
Restaurant |
112 |
71 |
41 |
|
Total New Trips = |
839 |
456 |
383 |
The proposed development is located in the Town’s "Central Transportation Zone" with the overall Level of Service ‘F’ and v/c ratio not to exceed 1.25 considered acceptable. Where background conditions have an overall Level of Service below ‘F’ and v/c exceeds 1.25, no drop in overall delay is acceptable for signalized intersections. For unsignalized intersections, the approach should not drop below a Level of Service ‘f’ with a v/c ratio of 1.25 or decrease in delay where the approach is already below the acceptable threshold under background conditions.
Based on these parameters, this development will not degrade operations at the NW Maynard Road traffic signal controlled intersections of James Jackson Road, Chapel Hill Road, and Evans Road assuming the completion of the NW Maynard Road improvements. Overall, Level of Service ‘C’ or better is anticipated at these intersections. Table 2 shows the Level of Service projected at each of the study intersections.
The analysis for the stop sign controlled intersection of NW Maynard Road and Northwood Drive indicates that the side street is experiencing long delays and will continue to do so under background and future conditions. Under future conditions, the accepted threshold of a v/c ratio 1.25 will be exceeded. Signal warrants were reviewed and indicate that a signal might be warranted under existing conditions as well as under background and future conditions. Currently, the side street traffic is relatively low with almost half of that traffic making right turning movements. These right-turning movements would not greatly benefit from the installation of a traffic signal. The proposed development is not expected to add a notable amount of traffic to the minor streets. Therefore, it is recommended this intersection be monitored and evaluated after the reconstruction of NW Maynard Road and when and if projected traffic volumes materialize.
This development will be served by three access points: one on NW Maynard Road forming the fourth leg to the Evans Road intersection, and two access points on Chapel Hill Road (see site plan provided in the appendix). These access points are anticipated to operate at acceptable levels provided the following geometric characteristics are constructed:
Evans Road/Site Access
Chapel Hill Rd/Westerly Site Access
Due to the proximity of this access point to the NW Maynard Road intersection, the geometric cross section of Chapel Hill Road approaching the intersection, the high probability of queuing from the traffic signal, it is recommended that this access point be restricted to permit right-in/right-out operations only. This access point should be constructed with:
Chapel Hill Rd/Easterly Site Access
This access should be constructed to provide full access from Chapel Hill Road. Due to the Lowe’s customer loading area being located in close proximity to this access, it is of preference that a full access point be provide at this easterly driveway. This will provide alternative access point for larger vehicles into the facility. The following geometry should be provided at the access point:
Table 2
Level of Service
|
Intersection |
Existing 2002 |
Background 2004 |
Projected 2004 |
|||
|
Friday |
Saturday |
Friday |
Saturday |
Friday |
Saturday |
|
|
NW Maynard Road / Evans Road Overall |
F v/c = 0.72 |
B |
B |
A |
B |
B |
|
EB Approach |
F |
E |
D |
C |
D |
C |
|
WB Approach |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
C |
C |
|
NB Approach |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
|
SB Approach |
B |
A |
C |
A |
C |
B |
|
NW Maynard Road / Chapel Hill Road Overall |
F v/c = 1.14 |
C |
C |
B |
|
|
|
EB Approach |
D |
C |
C |
C |
C |
C |
|
WB Approach |
F |
D |
C |
B |
C |
B |
|
NB Approach |
C |
C |
C |
B |
C |
B |
|
SB Approach |
E |
D |
C |
B |
C |
B |
|
NW Maynard Road / James Jackson Avenue Overall |
B |
A |
B |
A |
|
|
|
EB Approach |
C |
C |
B |
B |
C |
B |
|
WB Approach |
B |
C |
B |
B |
B |
B |
|
NB Approach |
A |
A |
B |
A |
B |
A |
|
SB Approach |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
|
NW Maynard Road / Northwood Drive |
||||||
|
EB Approach |
f v/c = 0.94 |
d |
f v/c = 1.21 |
d |
f v/c = 1.54 |
f v/c = 0.75 |
|
WB Approach |
d |
c |
d |
c |
f v/c = 0.38 |
d |
|
NB Approach |
a |
a |
a |
a |
b |
a |
|
SB Approach |
a |
a |
a |
a |
a |
a |
|
Chapel Hill Road / Westerly Access |
||||||
|
SB Approach |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
b |
b |
|
Chapel Hill Road / Easterly Access |
||||||
|
SB Approach |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
c |
b |
|
EB Approach |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
a |
a |
‘D’ – Level of Service at traffic signal controlled intersection
‘a’ – Level of Service at stop sign controlled intersection
|
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION |
|
Special Pedestrian Study Regardless of the use located on this particular property, the safe movement of pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists in this general vicinity must be considered due to the mix of uses in this area, including parks, two schools, several churches, greenways, and other uses. This issue has been raised during public debate on this rezoning request. Thus, the Town’s transportation consultant, Sear-Brown, has been commissioned to conduct a special study to assess pedestrian links. In response to the key question of at-grade vs. grade-separated road crossing(s), this study recommends use of an at-grade, uncontrolled pedestrian crossing (with a staggered crosswalk configuration) on NW Maynard instead of a grade-separated bridge or tunnel connection.
Other key findings include the following: NW Maynard Road Corridor
Chapel Hill Road Corridor
General Considerations
|
|
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS |
|
The project will be required to address the Nitrogen Removal Ordinance of the Town of Cary. According to available information, there are stream buffers associated with the property. Analysis: This project meets all the requirements of the Stormwater Section of the Engineering Department. |
|
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USES |
||
|
Zoning: |
Land Use: |
|
|
North: |
B-2, R-12PUD |
Vacant land, Town of Cary Park |
|
South: |
B-2CU, PEC, R-30, RM |
Credit Union, church, single and multifamily residential, vacant land |
|
East: |
R-12PUD, R 30 |
Vacant, part of Buckhurst West-Phase 2 subdivision, residence |
|
West: |
RMCU, B-2CU, OI, R-30 |
Residence, Wake County Public School, vacant land |
|
TOWN OF CARY FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DATA |
||
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
|
Plan Designation: |
Commercial portion of Neighborhood Activity Center (part), and Medium Density Residential support for the NAC (part) |
Re-designate some of the Medium Density Residential support as Commercial. |
|
Activity Center: |
Neighborhood Activity Center (NAC) |
Community Activity Center (CAC) |
|
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS |
|
Land Use Plan Element 1996 LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT HISTORY: None. Background: Current Plan Guidelines for Neighborhood Centers The subject parcels are located within an area designated on the Land Use Plan as a neighborhood activity center (NAC) focused around the intersection of Chapel Hill Road and NW Maynard Road. The Land Use Plan offers guidelines as to what constitutes an appropriate amount of retail space within an NAC, and which types of retailers are envisioned. The key recommendations include:
Proposed Plan Guidelines for Neighborhood Centers As part of the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) rewrite, there is a companion revision to the activity center guidelines contained in Chapter 6 of the Land Use Plan. The proposed revision keeps intact the vision and purpose of the NAC but modifies some of the guidelines. The proposed guidelines would accommodate "big box" retailers within NAC’s, provided that the NAC still contains a supermarket/grocery anchor, and that the total nonresidential space is "plus or minus 200,000 sq. ft.," with "roughly equal parts of commercial and office/institutional uses." Maximum building sizes are not given for supermarkets or big box retailers, as long as they meet the overall criteria. Current Plan Guidelines for Community Centers This request for rezoning is accompanied by a Land Use Plan amendment for a Community Activity Center (CAC) in order to accommodate this proposed home improvement retailer. Like for NAC’s, the Land Use Plan offers guidelines as to what constitutes an appropriate amount of retail space within a CAC, and the types of retailers contemplated. For this next level of activity center, the key recommendations include:
Proposed Plan Guidelines for Community Centers The proposed Land Use Plan revision that accompanies the LDO update modifies some of these guidelines. The proposed guidelines accommodate "big box" retailers within CAC’s, provided that the CAC still contains a supermarket/grocery anchor, and that the total nonresidential space is "plus or minus 500,000 sq. ft.," with "roughly equal parts of commercial and office/institutional uses." Again, maximum building sizes are not given for grocery stores or big box retailers, as long as they meet the overall criteria. Analysis: Under either the existing Land Use Plan or the proposed revisions to the Plan, the proposed rezoning is not consistent with the recommendations for a neighborhood activity center (NAC). Under the proposed Land Use Plan revisions, a big box tenant is feasible, but only if the activity center can still: (a) include a supermarket/grocery anchor elsewhere within the activity center, and (b) limit the total nonresidential space to "plus or minus 200,000 sq. ft.", while still providing roughly equal amounts of commercial/retail and office space. These conditions likely cannot be met under this rezoning proposal since the square footage of this proposal accounts for nearly 170,000 sq. ft. of this target amount of floor space.Therefore, in order for the subject rezoning to conform with the Land Use Plan, there are three possible alternatives that staff has evaluated:
The staff’s preferred approach is to change the NAC to a CAC. This will increase the ability of the town to control future "big box" development in this area, and to encourage the eventual provision of the other components of an activity center – such as higher-density housing, office/employment space, and a neighborhood grocery.
Further, to ensure plan compliance, staff recommends that such a Land Use Plan amendment also include a map note containing the following specific recommendations for the remaining quadrants of the activity center: (a) that no additional big box retailers of over 40,000-50,000 square feet should be included on the remaining quadrants; (b) that at least half the total floor space of the northwest and southwest quadrants (taken as a whole) should be for residential uses, and (c) that at least 25-50% of the total nonresidential space on the northwest and southwest quadrants (taken as a whole) should be office/institutional. This option would restrict the uses and scale of the other properties in the remainder of the activity center. While these other property owners have not necessarily been involved with this rezoning case or this plan change, and may have concerns about the ramifications of such recommendations, such a designation would allow more development and a greater variety of land uses than would be permitted under today’s NAC designation for these properties. Therefore, these property owners’ investment-backed expectations have not necessarily been negatively impacted.
Strengths of Rezoning Proposal
Weaknesses of Rezoning Proposal
|
|
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING |
|
Transit: The Town operates a demand responsive transit service that can serve the subject property.Pedestrian: Sidewalks are required along both the Maynard Road and Chapel Hill Road frontages. Bicycle: The Town’s Transportation Plan designates Chapel Hill Road and Maynard Road to have wide outside lanes to facilitate bicycle travel. Transportation Plan Element: Chapel Hill Road and Maynard Road are designated as thoroughfares on the Town's Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Chapel Hill Road is planned as a 4-lane roadway with landscaped median. Maynard Road, along the applicant's frontage, is planned for 6 lanes with a landscaped median. Analysis: Staff is in agreement with the conceptual locations of access points. Specific design of the drives, including ensuring adequate sight distance, will be reviewed in detail at time of development plan submittal. Any additional roadway improvements to Maynard Road and Chapel Hill Road, as required by the Traffic Impact Analysis and the Town’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan, will be reviewed in detail at time of development plan submittal. |
|
OPEN SPACE CONSIDERATIONS |
|
The Stephenson parcel (Real ID 0067448) is identified as a high-priority infill open space because of the importance of obtaining a greenway easement for connectivity of the Black Creek Greenway and its adjacency to Godbold Park. Analysis: Applicant's proposal to locate and construct a public greenway through the site addresses the objective of greenway connectivity. |
|
PARKS, GREENWAYS AND BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN |
|
Analysis: Staff supports the applicant's proposal to locate and construct the public greenway through the site. |
|
Staff Recommendation |
|
Changes Since Public Hearing: Two public hearings were held by Town Council and an additional hearing was conducted by the Planning & Zoning Board. Some of the issues raised during the public hearings and in other contacts from interested citizens include:
The applicant has continued to work with surrounding property owners and staff to address a variety of concerns regarding this 5,600 square foot restaurant and 160,000 square foot home improvement store proposal. In response, numerous conditions that deal with such issues as lighting, outdoor storage, architectural features, noise, landscaping buffers, and streetscapes have been added since the Council’s public hearings. In addition, the building orientation has been altered to locate the home improvement store close to and parallel to Chapel Hill Road instead of to the rear of the site as originally submitted (where the majority of parking would be located in front of the building). Protest Petition Information: Valid [ ] Invalid [ ] None Filed [ X ] Overall Analysis: Transportation Road improvements under construction and planned for this area can accommodate the traffic generated from this site as evidenced by the traffic impact study results. In response to the concern about the size of this primary use (approx. 160,000 sq. ft., including about 25,000 sq. ft. in the covered garden center), the applicant provided recent traffic counts at several of its prototypical stores throughout the state that illustrated no significant difference in total traffic in the 120,000 sq. ft. sales floor facility vs. 135,000 sq. ft. sales floors. The safety of pedestrian and other non-motorized movement will also be taken into account. The applicant is willing to participate in a cost-sharing arrangement to facilitate improved pedestrian crossings near this site, and will locate the on-site greenway in a tunnel under this development’s main access drive off Maynard Road. Peak traffic generation for this type of use will occur on Saturdays when the nearby middle and elementary schools are not in session. Location of a home improvement retailer in this part of Town will help relieve some traffic pressure on the Crossroads area where two home improvement stores are now located. Land Use While the proposal does not conform to the current Land Use Plan designation for this vicinity as a Neighborhood Activity Center (NAC), changing the plan designation to a CAC (Community Activity Center) and adding plan language to limit the type of development on the other quadrants of the intersection will effectively render this activity center as a special or hybrid center (somewhere between an NAC and a CAC). Doing so will provide this type of retail land use in another part of Cary, a need that has been expressed by many residents; recognize the nature of the existing conditions in this vicinity; and provide safeguards that the remainder of the area will not develop exclusively in retail or "big box" fashion. To support this position, staff notes that the area already has features and land uses more akin to a CAC, with over 25 acres of land already zoned commercial with no guarantee that it will develop in mixed-use fasion, two existing churches and another one under construction, a middle school (normally expected in community-scale centers), major roadways, railroad & industrial land uses to southwest, and a public park that includes special features like tennis courts and the Town’s only skateboard park (that are extensively lighted after dark). Open Space Open space will be provided on the northern and eastern portions of this site in conjunction with the stream buffers that form the boundaries of this property. The primary reason for this site’s open space resource designation is the important greenway connection that will be provided across this property. Utilities All utility issues have been adequately addressed. Environmental Considerations The Engineering Department is satisfied that this proposal will be able to meet stormwater and water quality requirements of the Town. Parks, Greenways, and Recreation The dedication of an easement and construction of a greenway through this property adjacent to Maynard Road has been agreed to by the applicant. This will form a key component of the Black Creek greenway system that will ultimately connect Godbold Park to Bond Park. Design A significant change to the location of the building on the site as well as the architectural features such as arcades, façade articulation, varying heights, and a variety of materials and colors agreed to by the applicant go a long way to achieve the type of development envisioned in the Town’s Design Guidelines Manual. Notwithstanding these improvements, staff believes that additional work is still needed to achieve the highest level of design compliance if this use is placed in this location. In this regard, the applicant has agreed to the following:
Buffers and Streetscapes Extensive stream buffers, supplemental evergreen plantings adjacent to the Buckhurst neighborhood on the east, and protection of pockets of natural tree cover as part of the streetscapes for this project will help minimize external impacts of this proposed development. Safety The Police Department has researched incidents of crime for similar facilities within the Town of Cary and other surrounding communities, as well as motor vehicle accidents in proximity to such land uses. This indicates that the number of police calls anticipated to occur at a home improvement facility is similar to other commercial centers in town. Available information on reported crimes at a Lowe’s, Home Depot, Target, Kmart and Wal-Mart in Cary show that discount department stores (Target, Kmart, Wal-Mart) had 30 to 70 reported crimes per year, about four times higher than home improvement stores. On average, 10 to 15 reported crimes per year occur at home improvement stores. These reported crimes typically fall in the categories of credit card/ATM fraud, motor vehicle larceny, or shoplifting. The number of motor vehicle accidents that have occurred around these store locations range from 1 to 2 accidents per 1000 population at "big box" sites with almost 3.5/1000 at Cary Towne Center. Outdoor Display of Goods Except for the outdoor display of goods for sale in designated areas as shown on the concept plan, outdoor storage is prohibited; this has been an issue at other similar businesses in Town and the applicant has agreed to limit such activities in response to staff concerns. |
|
STAFF RECOMMENDATION : |
|
Evaluation After an extensive evaluation of numerous planning, transportation, design, and other considerations, staff offers the following pros and cons concerning this rezoning and plan amendment request: Pros:
Cons:
In conclusion, staff recommends approval of this PUD amendment (02-REZ-19) with modifications to Condition #9 to ensure that a public art easement is dedicated to the Town, and addition of improved site and architectural treatments agreed to by the applicant as follows:
Staff also recommends approval of the land use plan amendment (02-LPA-11) with the inclusion of the following plan amendment language for this activity center:
|
|
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION: |
|
Final motion (two previous motions failed): Motion by Paul Broderick to forward to Council for denial. Second by Steve Goodridge. Motion passed 5 to 4. Dissenting were Ervin Portman, Carla sadler, Wally Dawson and Don Hyatt. Brief summary of dissenting comments: Ramifications of changing the land use plan from a NAC to a CAC; neighborhood impact; overall traffic congestion in this area. |
|
TOWN COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: |
|
Town Council voted to approve the rezoning. Motion was made for the staff to study the land use change on the adjoining properties & develop a modified NAC proposal to ensure weekly vehicle trips do not exceed existing NAC designation trips; directed that modified NAC proposal be subject to public comment/public hearing; staff will bring recommendation back to Council in 60-90 days. |
|
Information regarding this rezoning case will be on the Internet one week prior to the public hearing. Our Internet address for this case is http://www.townofcary.org/depts/dsdept/P&Z/rezonings/2002cases/2002index.htm |