TOWN OF CARY REQUEST FOR REZONING
TOWN COUNCIL IMPACT STATEMENT (January 9, 2003)
02-REZ-16 - 205 N. DIXON AVENUE
|
PETITIONER |
PROPERTY OWNER |
|
Hugh J. Gilleece |
George & Dorothy Clayton |
|
LOCATION: |
205 N. Dixon Avenue |
|
MAPS: |
Vicinity Map -
Small Vicinity Map - Large Zoning Map Land Use Plan Map Open Space Stream Buffers Town Council Vicinity Map |
In Town Limits [X] Inside Cary ETJ [ ] Outside Cary ETJ [ ] Annexation Pending [ ]
|
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS |
|
|
TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING: |
October 24, 2002 |
|
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD: |
December 16, 2002 |
|
TOWN COUNCIL: |
January 9, 2003 |
|
PARCEL INFORMATION |
||
|
Parcel # |
Realid # |
Area |
|
0764213704 |
0013452 |
4.06 acres |
|
REZONING DATA |
||
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
|
Zoning: |
Downtown Residential (DR) |
Residential Multi-Family 12 Conditional Use |
|
Overlay District: |
Town Center |
Same |
|
Land Use: |
Site currently contains one single-family residence. |
Residential (Multi-family). Based on this rezoning a
total of |
|
REZONING CONDITIONS |
|
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
N/A |
Product limited to townhomes and/or condominiums Conditions Added Since Public Hearing: 1. Allowed uses: Multifamily homes and townhomes with minimum overall site density of 10 units per acre. 2. Residential units adjacent to Madison Avenue or North Dixon will face the street. 3. A minimum of one parking space per unit will be provided as a garage integrated into each unit. 4. A minimum of two of the three large trees will be saved unless the Town horticulturist determines that the conditions of the trees is such that saving the trees would be undesirable for safety reasons. 5. Sound attention adjacent to the seaboard railroad right of way:
|
|
|
|
|
REZONING HISTORY |
|
N/A |
|
SITE DATA |
|
WATER/SEWER SERVICE |
|
ANALYSIS: The proposed rezoning meets all utility policies and standards of the Town of Cary. |
|
TRANSPORTATION |
|
Traffic Impact Analysis Required: Yes [ ] No [ x ] |
|
Residential Community of 49 DU’s during the AM peak hour will generate 37 trips and the PM peak hour will generate 49 trips. The ADT volume is 469 trips per day. ANALYSIS: ___________________________________________________________________________________ Listed below are community concerns that were brought up at the public hearing. The Engineering Department is addressing these concerns as separate issues from the rezoning case.
|
|
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS |
|
ANALYSIS : The proposed rezoning meets the requirements of the Stormwater Section of the Town of Cary. |
|
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN |
|
Land Use Plan Element LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT HISTORY: Project is within Town Center Area Plan, which was adopted in 2001. No land use amendments have been submitted for the site in the past. ANALYSIS: The Town Center Area Plan recommends "Mixed Density Residential" (MXDR) uses for this site, as well as for the parcel immediately west of the site (the CompuChem tract). Mixed Density Residential is a land use category that calls for a mix of housing types, including medium-density single family detached and attached (e.g., small-lot patio homes, townhomes, duplexes) as well as high-density multifamily (e.g., apartments and condominiums). In addition, over the entire MXDR area there should be an overall density of at least 15 units per acre, and there should also be a reasonable balance between single family and multifamily uses, with neither use completely dominating the area. This rezoning proposal covers 4.07 acres of a 14.9-acre contiguous MXDR area on the Town Center Area Plan (i.e., the 4.07-acre subject parcel, plus the 10.84-acre CompuChem parcel). The intent of the Town Center Area Plan is to eventually achieve an overall density of at least 15 units per acre, with a mix of single family and multifamily dwellings, over the entire contiguous 14.9-acre area. Evaluation of conformance with the recommended mix of housing types: This rezoning case includes conditions allowing either townhome or multifamily housing on this 4.07-acre parcel. While there is no condition on the rezoning that a mix of both single family and multifamily units (as recommended under MXDR) are to be provided on the site, staff feels that such a condition would be impractical to expect or require on a tract of this size. The CompuChem site will be expected to fill out the balance of residential types not provided on this site, when and if it redevelops. Evaluation of conformance with the recommended minimum overall density: This rezoning case includes conditions stipulating a minimum overall density of 10 units per acre. While this is less than the MXDR-recommended minimum density of 15 units per acre, the intent is to achieve a minimum of 15 units per acre over the entire contiguous 14.9-acre MXDR area, not just this 4.07-acre parcel. The CompuChem site will be expected to provide a minimum density that raises the overall 14.9-acre MXDR area to at least 15 units per acre, when and if it redevelops. If the subject parcel develops as townhomes, the stipulated minimum density of 10 units per acre is reasonable for that housing type. If the site develops as multifamily housing, a minimum density closer to 15 units per acre should be attempted. Railroad noise: The southern boundary of the subject parcel is immediately adjacent to the CSX Railroad corridor. The applicant has added conditions to address potential noise issues. Parking: The Town Center Area Plan recommends under-unit or structured parking whenever possible in order to increase downtown densities, avoid a "sea of parking" on sites, and to provide a walkable, compact pedestrian environment. The applicant has provided a condition that at least one parking space per dwelling unit will be integrated into or under the building. Staff feels this is adequate to meet the intent of the plan in this part of the downtown. Building orientation: The Town Center Area Plan generally recommends that buildings should face the street. The applicants have provided a condition to this effect. |
|
REGIONAL WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL ESTIMATES AND CAPACITY IMPACTS: AREA C (Western Wake County) |
||||
|
Current Enrollment |
Building Capacity |
Percent occupied |
Projected Number of Students |
|
|
Elementary |
15,868 |
13,354 |
118.8% |
8 |
|
Middle |
7,758 |
6,789 |
114.3 |
4 |
|
High |
7,376 |
6,420 |
114.9 |
6 |
|
Total for all Area Schools |
30,840 |
26,563 |
116.1 |
18 |
|
LOCAL WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL ESTIMATES AND CAPACITY IMPACTS |
||||||
|
Current 20th Day Enrollment at the current schools this parcel is zoned for: |
Building Capacity |
Percent occupied |
APF Ord. |
% |
Projected Number of Students |
|
|
Kingswood Elementary |
329 |
7 |
4,7000% |
130% |
4,570% |
8 |
|
West Cary Middle |
1085 |
903 |
120.2% |
130% |
9.8% |
4 |
|
Cary High |
1921 |
1657 |
115.9% |
130% |
14.1% |
6 |
|
Total for all Zoned Schools |
18 |
|||||
Current Enrollment and Building Capacity is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2002 as provided by the Wake County School System. School assignment will be determined at the time of development. A list of individual area schools and information concerning school enrollment countywide can be found for review:
School Data|
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USES |
||
|
Zoning: |
Land Use: |
|
|
North: |
Residential-12 (R-12) |
Residential |
|
South: |
Industrial-2 (I-2) |
Vacant Land, Commercial |
|
East: |
Downtown Residential (DR) |
Residential |
|
West: |
Industrial-2 (I-2) |
Vacant Land, Commercial |
|
TOWN OF CARY FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DATA |
||
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
|
Plan Designation: |
MXDR (Mixed Density Residential) - A mix of housing types (patio homes, duplexes and town houses to apartments and condos) ranging from medium density 4 to 8 units per acre to high density mid-rise 18-50 units per acre with an overall density of not less than 15 units per acre). |
Same |
|
Alternate Designation: |
NONE |
Same |
|
Activity Center: |
Town Center |
Same |
|
OPEN SPACE CONSIDERATIONS |
|
While no significant natural resource areas are identified for this parcel under the Open Space and Historic Resources Plan, it should be noted that several large, signature specimen hardwood trees dominate the center of the site. The applicant has offered a condition to protect 2-3 specimen trees. |
|
PARKS, GREENWAYS AND BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN |
|
ANALYSIS: With the condition that single family attached (e.g., townhomes, etc) will be a part of this rezoning, a payment-in-lieu (P.I.L.) will be required. This P.I.L. will be determined at the time of site plan approval. |
|
STAFF ANALYSIS |
|
Changes Since Public Hearing: The following conditions have been added since the public hearing: 1. Allowed uses: Multifamily homes and townhomes with minimum overall site density of 10 units per acre. 2. Residential units adjacent to Madison Avenue or North Dixon will face the street. 3. A minimum of one parking space per unit will be provided as a garage integrated into each unit. 4. A minimum of two of the three large trees will be saved unless the Town horticulturist determines that the conditions of the trees is such that saving the trees would be undesirable for safety reasons. 5. Sound attention adjacent to the seaboard railroad right of way: a. Developer will provide a combination of evergreen trees minimum 8’ ht at planting shrubs minimum 3’ ht at planting to provide a solid landscape buffer within four years of planting. b. Provide additional wall sound insulation for all outer walls in all buildings and not just the south walls of the buildings immediately adjacent to the railroad right-of-way. c. Provide sound-insulating windows in all buildings, and not just in the south walls of the building immediately adjacent to the railroad corridor. Protest Petition Information: Valid [ ] Invalid [ ] None Filed [x] Analysis: At the public hearing, concerns were raised with respect to: neighborhood traffic, the need for sidewalks on Madison Avenue and speeding on Madison Avenue. The Town of Cary Engineering Department will address these concerns as separate issues from the rezoning case. A detailed response to these issues is listed above under the transportation section. Meetings were held with the applicant to also address issues raised by the staff. In response to those meetings the above conditions were added to this case. With the evaluation of the above issues staff has identified a list of pros and cons with respect to this request. Pros:
Cons
|
|
STAFF RECOMMENDATION : |
|
Staff recommends approval. |
|
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION: |
| Mr. Broderick made a motion to forward to Council for approval, which was seconded by Mr. Hyatt, and the Board voted (10-0). |
|
TOWN COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION |
| Town Council voted to approve. |
|
Information regarding this rezoning case will be on the Internet one week prior to the public hearing. Our Internet address for this case is http://www.townofcary.org/depts/dsdept/P&Z/rezonings/2002cases/2002index.htm |