TOWN OF CARY
REQUEST FOR REZONING
TOWN COUNCIL IMPACT STATEMENT (3/14/02)
01-REZ-22a (Highcroft PUD)
|
PETITIONER |
PROPERTY OWNER |
| Jerry
Turner & Associates, Inc. Attn: Jerry Turner 905 Jones Franklin Road Raleigh, NC 27606 (919) 851-7150 Fax: (919) 851-7547 |
Eula W.
Batchelor William B. and Doris Yates Upchurch Donald Neil Coble Donald N. and Pamela Ann Coble James K. and Madelyn Dodson Donald G. and Sharon D. Dodson Dodson Investment Company Morris C. and Jean O. Reed Marjorie B. Hodges and Marjorie Byham Ratchford Neil C. and Ann P. Evans |
|
LOCATION: |
The properties are located south of Green Hope School Road and west of Sears Farm Road. |
|
MAPS: |
Vicinity
Map - Small Vicinity Map - Large Zoning Map Aerial Map Land Use Plan Map Stream Buffers Master Land Use Plan Conceptual Plan Town Council Vicinity |
In Town Limits [ X] Cary Planning
Jurisdiction (ETJ) Only [ ] Annexation Pending [ ]
|
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS |
|
|
TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING: |
January 10, 2002 |
|
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD: |
February 18, 2002 |
|
TOWN COUNCIL: |
March 14, 2002 |
|
PARCEL INFORMATION |
||
|
Parcel # |
Realid # |
Area |
|
0734331901 |
0081686 |
60.57 acres (A portion of) |
|
0734454023 |
0192269 |
1.08 acres |
|
0734450155 |
0130537 |
2.11 acres |
|
0734376459 |
0119891 |
2.31 acres |
|
0734366853 |
0192227 |
5.17 acres |
|
0734356957 |
0004946 |
7.56 acres |
|
0734469408 |
0072379 |
13.30 acres |
|
0734462555 |
0010688 |
47.42 acres |
|
0734370689 (A portion of) |
0203271 (A portion of) |
69.00 acres (A portion of) |
|
0734376971 |
0119892 |
2.00 acres |
|
0734341205 |
0149104 |
2.48 acres |
|
REZONING DATA |
||
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
|
Zoning: |
Residential 40 (R-40), Residential 8 Conditional Use (R-8CU), Residential 12 Conditional Use (R-12CU) |
R-40 (PUD); R-8 (PUD); R-12(PUD) |
|
Overlay District: |
Jordan Lake Watershed |
Jordan Lake Watershed |
|
Land Use: |
Residential |
A mixed development site composed of a variety of residential housing types, a 22.25 acre Wake County School site, and a 11 acre dedicated park site. The residential component is as follows: SF-1 parcel is proposed as a single-family residential tract composed of cluster-homes. This 20.75 acre parcel proposes a maximum of 103 units. SF-2 parcel is proposed for single-family detached units. A maximum of 25 units is proposed on this 6 acre parcel. SF-3 parcel is proposed for single-family detached units. This 40.5 acre tract proposes a maximum of 110 units. MR 1 has been deleted. SF-4 parcel has replaced the MR-1 parcel. This parcel is proposed for detached cluster homes, patio homes and zero lot line homes. This 5.5 acre tract proposes a maximum of 23 units. |
|
Bolded areas indicate change since the public hearing. |
||
|
REZONING CONDITIONS |
|
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
None |
Development with a mix of residential and nonresidential uses, including a school site and a dedicated park site. See Master Plan for details |
|
REZONING HISTORY |
|
N/A |
|
SITE DATA |
|
WATER/SEWER SERVICE |
|
Staff Remarks: According to Cary GIS information, the PUD will have access to public water via water mains on Green Hope School Road, Sears Farm Road, and Briardale Avenue. Water line along Sears Farm Road shall be extended to Green Hope School Road. Public sanitary sewer service will be available based on the execution of a proposed agreement by the developer to provide his share of funding for Fieldstone Pump Station upgrades. |
|
TRANSPORTATION |
|
Traffic Impact Analysis Required: Yes [ X ] No [ ] |
|
A Traffic Impact Study, dated January 2002, has been prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study has been conducted to assess the traffic impacts and evaluate the access and egress requirements for the proposed Highcroft PUD. The project site is to be located on the south side Green Hope School Road and to the east of Sears Farm Road in Cary, North Carolina. This report identifies the impact of traffic generated by the proposed development and evaluates it with regard to capacity, safety, and roadway requirements. The following provides a brief summary of this study’s findings. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located within the Base Transportation Zone as defined by the Towns Adequate Public Facilities for Roads (APFR) and is specifically located to the south side Green Hope School Road and to the east of Sears Farm Road. The project as proposed is to construct a new elementary school for 600 students, and 289 single-family residences. As proposed, this development is anticipated to be constructed and fully operational in 2004. As planned, direct access to/from the site will be provided via new roadways that will be constructed as part of the development. The key link accessing the development will be a new section of roadway currently referred to as the "Reserve Connector" that will traverse through the site in primarily a north/south direction. This roadway will connect the existing Reserve development (at Briardale Avenue) to Green Hope School Road. Sears Farm Road will be extended from its current termini to intersect with the new Reserve Connector. Local roadways will be provided off of the Reserve Connector to provide access to residences within the PUD. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing conditions have been gathered for the following three intersections, which make up the project study area as directed by Town of Cary staff:
This study area is located within the Base Transportation Zone which requires that peak-hour volumes utilize a 90-minute average peak in accordance with the Towns APFR Ordinance 01-012. Traffic volume data within the study area has been obtained for the weekday AM (6:30 - 9:30 AM) and PM (3:30 - 6:30 PM) peak periods. From this data, peak-hour multipliers of 0.937 and 0.838 were developed for the AM and PM peaks, respectively, which have been utilized within this report as required by the ordinance. PROBABLE IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT No-Build Traffic Volumes To represent Future 2004 traffic volume conditions within the study area, the Existing traffic flow volumes were upwardly adjusted to account for normal traffic growth and any other currently approved projects within the study area. Discussions with Town of Cary staff indicate that an annual growth rate of 3˝ percent per year is to be used within the study area. This growth rate was applied to the Existing peak-hour traffic volumes to estimate Future 2004 conditions without the proposed development. It should be noted that, in addition to the normal annual growth in traffic, a portion of the residential traffic anticipated with the Cary Park development was included in the 2004 No-Build traffic volumes. Planned Roadway Improvements While there will be new roads constructed internal to this project to provide access to the new residences and school, discussions with Town of Cary staff indicate that at this time, no roadway/intersection improvements are planned within or adjacent to the study area that would be completed prior to or concurrent with the opening year of this project. It should be noted that the potential widening of NC 55 has been investigated. Although not planned to be completed before 2004, this widening is on the "draft" TIP. As proposed, a 13-mile segment from US 64 (Wake County) to SR 1121 (Durham County) is scheduled to be widened to a 5-lane cross-section with construction anticipated to begin in 2004. This improvement when implemented should help to alleviate operational constraints along NC 55 within the study area. Site-Generated Traffic For this project, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual was utilized to estimate project trips generated by the proposed facility. Based on this information, the proposed development can be expected to generate a total of 3,370 (two-way) vehicle trips on a weekday daily basis (1,685 entering, 1,685 exiting), of which a total of 360 trips (143 entering, 217 exiting) are expected during the weekday AM peak-hour. During the PM peak-hour, 279 trips (179 entering, 100 exiting) can be expected. Traffic generated by the site will be primarily
distributed to and from NC 55 and Green Level Church Road. As a result of this project, traffic volume increases at the study area intersections are anticipated to be no greater than approximately 10 percent as compared to 2004 Future conditions without (No-Build) the proposed development. The projected growth reflects the maximum increase at a time period when the project as a whole is at its highest activity. Smaller/less significant increases can be expected during other non-peak hours of the day. TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS The Base Transportation Zone requires a minimum Level-of-Service standard of a D based on the 90-minute average peak. Under Existing conditions, all study area intersections presently operate acceptably during both the weekday AM and PM peak hours with the exception of the intersection of NC 55 at Green Hope School Road, which operates poorly during the AM peak hour. Under 2004 No-Build conditions, with the addition of normal traffic growth and anticipated traffic associated with the Cary Park development, all intersections are still anticipated to operated acceptably during both the weekday AM and PM peak hours with the exception of the intersection of NC 55 at Green Hope School Road which continues to operate poorly during the AM peak hour as it did under Existing conditions. The delay at the intersection of NC 55 at Green Hope School Road more than doubles during the AM peak hour. With the addition of project related traffic, operations at the intersection of NC 55 at Green Hope School Road deteriorate even further in the AM peak hour, and the intersection is anticipated to operate poorly in the PM peak hour as well. The intersection of NC 55 at Edgemore Avenue is anticipated to operate poorly during the AM peak hour under Build conditions. The intersection of Green Hope School Road at Green Level Church Road is anticipated to operate acceptably during both peak periods as it did under Existing and No-Build conditions. MITIGATION Proposed Roadway Connections and Site Access As part of the proposed development plan, new roadways will be constructed to provide access to/from the development. The key link accessing the development will be a new section of roadway currently referred to as the "Reserve Connector" that will traverse through the site in primarily a north/south direction. This roadway will connect the existing Reserve development (at Briardale Avenue) to Green Hope School Road. It should be noted that the Reserve Connector is planned to intersect at Green Hope School Road directly opposite a proposed access drive for future development north of Green Hope School Road (Fryar Tract). Sears Farm Road will be extended from its current termini to intersect with the new Reserve Connector. Local roadways will be provided off of the Reserve Connector to provide access to residences within the PUD. As currently proposed, two access drives will be provided for the proposed elementary school off of the new Reserve Connector. While these locations have not been finalized, emphasis should be given to properly aligning drives/roadways on opposite sides of the street, hence preventing undesirable offsetting situations. Due to the presence of the elementary school, a 3-lane section should be provided on the Reserve Connector for the school frontage to allow for separate left-turn lanes into the school. Furthermore, separate left and right-turn lanes should be provided for the northbound approach of the Reserve Connector at Green Hope School Road. A separate left-turn lane should also be provided for the westbound approach of Green Hope School Road at the intersection with the Reserve Connector. Off Site Review of the intersection analyses indicates that the
proposed project has an impact on two of the study area intersections as
compared to 2004 No-Build conditions. The most notable impact is at the
intersection of NC 55 at Green Hope School Road where the intersection is
anticipated to operate with excessive delays under Build conditions. It
should be noted that the intersection currently meets Warrant 3 (Peak Hour
Volumes) under Existing Conditions during the AM peak hour. The addition
of normal traffic growth, background development (Cary Park), and
anticipated site traffic will further justify the need for traffic
signalization. While the intersection of NC 55 at Edgemore Avenue is shown
to operate poorly during the AM peak hour under Build conditions, the
delays are not considered extremely high, and the widening of NC 55 as
already planned in the TIP is anticipated to improve operating conditions
for this intersection. Specific recommendations deemed necessary to
mitigate the impact of the project are provided below:
Note: While preparations are being made for traffic signal installation at the intersection, a minor striping change to the southbound left-turn lane of NC 55 is recommended. This left-turn lane is currently striped as a standard left-turn lane. However, this left-turn movement is essentially nonexistent due to the fact that the receiving roadway is closed off at the railroad tracks and currently serves a very limited volume of traffic. Restriping this existing left-turn lane to a striped median should encourage eastbound left-turns from Green Hope School Road to store here prior to entering the northbound traffic stream (two step left-turn). It should be noted that currently, some motorists were observed to utilize this space as a storage area under Existing conditions with the current markings. NC 55 at Edgemore Avenue
Thoroughfare Plan Requirements: 1.) Green Hope School Road – Improvements will be required along the property frontage in conjunction with site development. Widening to a two lane collector road (three lanes where left turns are needed) will be required. 2.) Sears Farm Road and proposed streets interior to the project – Construction of full back-to-back widths in accordance with Town Standards will be required (27’ back-to-back for residential streets, 35’- 45’ back-to-back for collector streets). |
Table 6
STUDY AREA LEVEL-OF-SERVICE SUMMARY
|
Existing |
2004 No-Build |
2004 Build |
|||||||||||
|
Unsignalized Intersections |
Time Period |
Delaya |
LOSb |
Delay |
LOS |
Delay |
LOS |
||||||
|
NC 55 at Green Hope School Road |
AM PM |
108.6 23.8 |
F C |
262.1 30.1 |
F D |
>500.0 263.5 |
F F |
||||||
|
NC 55 at Edgemore Avenue |
AM PM |
14.7 12.8 |
B B |
24.0 14.9 |
C B |
56.2 15.6 |
F C |
||||||
|
Green Hope School Road at Green Level Church Road |
AM PM |
10.3 10.7 |
B B |
10.8 11.5 |
B B |
11.2 11.7 |
B B |
||||||
a. Delay in seconds-per-vehicle.
b. Level-of-Service
GENERAL NOTES:
|
Table 7 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LEVEL-OF-SERVICE SUMMARY |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2004 No-Build |
2004 Build |
2004 Build Mitigated |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Time |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Intersections |
Period |
Delaya |
LOSb |
Delay |
LOS |
V/Cc |
Delay |
LOS |
||||||||||||||
|
NC 55 at Green Hope |
AM |
262.1 |
F |
>500.0 |
F |
0.79 |
13.9 |
B |
||||||||||||||
|
School Road 2 |
PM |
30.1 |
D |
263.5 |
F |
0.62 |
7.3 |
A |
||||||||||||||
|
NC 55 at Edgemore |
AM |
24.0 |
C |
56.2 |
F |
- |
13.8 |
B |
||||||||||||||
|
Avenue 1 |
PM |
14.9 |
B |
15.6 |
C |
- |
11.5 |
B |
||||||||||||||
|
a. Delay in seconds-per-vehicle. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
b. Level-of-Service. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
c. Volume-to-Capacity ratio. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GENERAL NOTES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. For unsignalized intersections, Delay is representative of critical movement/approach. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2. For signalized intersections, Delay is representative of overall intersection. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS: |
||||
|
Current Enrollment Area Schools |
Building Capacity |
Percent occupied |
Projected Number of Additional Students |
|
|
Elementary |
14,909 |
13,127 |
113.6% |
45*
|
|
Middle |
7,596 |
6,456 |
117.7% |
23*
|
|
High |
5,629 |
5,100 |
110.4% |
32*
|
|
Total for all Area Schools |
28,134 |
24,683 |
114% |
100* |
|
Preschool |
52* |
|||
Current Enrollment
and Building Capacity is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2001. School assignment will be determined at the time of development. A list of individual area schools can be found for review: School Data*Reflects a slight decrease in enrollment from Public Hearing due to decrease in number of dwelling units.
|
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS |
|
The property is located in the Jordan Lake Watershed and will be required to address the Reservoir Watershed Protection Ordinance of the Town of Cary. The project will also be required to address the Nitrogen Removal Ordinance of the Town of Cary. According to the information available to me there are stream buffers associated with the property. All site plans within the PUD area must comply with additional environmental regulations including the Jordan Lake Watershed Protection ordinance and the Stormwater Management Plan For New Development which includes Nitrogen control and peak flow control. If development contributes Nitrogen in excess of 6 lbs/ac/yr, approved BMPs must be installed to reach a target of 3.6 lbs/ac year. Stormwater Comments for Highcroft PUD submittal. Riparian Buffers - stream buffers for USGS streams are shown on the map; 50-foot buffers are also shown for streams as indicated on the Wake County Soil Survey. The applicant has agreed to supply stream determination verifications from their consultants. The applicant has agreed to reword Paragraph A under Riparian buffers on the Conceptual Stormwater Management Plan to reflect High density development will have 100 foot buffers on the USGS streams only according to the Town of Cary watershed ordinance. All site plans within the PUD area must comply with additional environmental regulations including the Jordan Lake Watershed Protection ordinance and the Stormwater Management Plan For New Development which includes Nitrogen control and peak flow control. If development contributes Nitrogen in excess of 6 lbs./ac/yr. for residential or 10 lbs./ac/yr. for commercial, approved BMPs must be installed to reach a target of 3.6-lbs/ac year. |
|
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USES |
||
|
Zoning: |
Land Use: |
|
|
North: |
Residential-40 |
Residential |
|
South: |
Residential-8 (CU) |
Residential |
|
East: |
Residential-8 (CU) |
Residential (The Reserve) |
|
West: |
Residential-40 |
Thomas Brooks Park |
|
TOWN OF CARY FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DATA |
||
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
|
Plan Designation: |
Low Density Residential |
Low Density Residential over gross site area (Parts Medium Density Residential), Parks and Open Space, and Office Institutional (school) |
|
Alternate Designation: |
Traditional Neighborhood Development |
None |
|
Activity Center: |
None |
No Change |
|
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS |
|
Land Use Plan Element LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT HISTORY: None The Land Use Plan identifies the site for Low Density Residential (LDR) or Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND). Conventional LDR development should be 1-3 units per acre, single family detached. Lot sizes range from 12,000sq.ft. to 1 acre. Lot size reductions are possible if the development layout is clustered. However, the overall density should still be less than 3 units per acre. A clustered layout is an alternative to a conventional suburban layout; its objective is to concentrate development on less sensitive parts of a site and to protect greater amounts of land as open space in an undisturbed natural state. In lieu of this protection density can be increased on the less sensitive land. The total number of units remains the same as might be developed in a conventional layout. In this case a clustered layout approach has been taken. Excluding the 22-acre school site the layout allows for approximately 2 dwelling units per gross acre on 123 acres. Parcels SF2 & SF4 allow for 4.25 dwelling units per acre and SF1 allows for 5 dwelling units per acre. A total of 33.9 acres of open undeveloped space is being provided in the form of perimeter buffer, stream buffer, wetland, landscape strip, streetscape and thoroughfare buffer, including 11 acres for recreation land dedication. On this basis it is considered that the proposal is in compliance with the spirit and intent of the land use plan cluster concept. Comprehensive Transportation Plan Element The adopted Comprehensive Transportation Plan identifies a north-south collector road that traverses through the subject property eventually connecting from Louis Stephens Drive into Apex (south of High House Road. This connection provides alternatives for residents to using larger roadways with higher congestion levels. The applicant's proposed PUD incorporates the collector road. The Transportation Plan and Town's connectivity ordinance have provided the applicant with direction regarding neighborhood connectivity. For this project, the applicant's illustrative plan shows a street connectivity index consistent with the Town Ordinance. In addition, the proposal provides required stub streets to existing development and adjacent vacant properties. One of the goals of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan is to improve pedestrian and bicycle systems. The applicant's proposal provides sidewalks or a multi-purpose trail (8 feet in width) along the proposed streets in the project. In addition, greenways and potential linkages to the proposed school site have been incorporated into the PUD plan. From a bicycle perspective, the north-south collector would be designed to accommodate bicycles and would connect into a greenway leading into Thomas Brooks Park. Open Space and Historic Resources Plan Element
There are three significant resources: bottomland hardwood trees along the stream that is adjacent to the school, there is mixed hardwoods on the southeast side of the potential school property, and there is a stream buffer.
The stream buffers and bottomland hardwoods are being protected by the project. The mixed hardwoods may not be protected. The ability to protect the mixed hardwoods is dependent on the site design of the school facility. During the review of the site plan for the elementary school, staff will work with the site designers to develop a project that works toward protecting this area.
The viewshed is seen as another resource, much like upland hardwoods. Once staff receives a potential project, we review the viewshed information. In this case, there is a potential resource (viewshed) on the property. Once we have determined this through the initial screening, staff looks at any physical conditions that may impact the viewshed. With this project, the viewshed area is impacted by distance (it is over 1/2 mile from the historic area, it is blocked by future I-540, and is separated by significant vegetation that is likely to stay in the future. For these reasons, there is not a viewshed to protect on the Highcroft property. In conclusion, the valuable open space areas in this PUD is either being protected with the stream buffers and open space or potentially can be preserved through the site plan for the school. The open space resources are being protected through current ordinance regulations and PUD requirements. |
|
PARKS, GREENWAYS AND BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN |
|
The proposed Batchelor Branch Greenway crosses the southern edge of the Evans parcel. There will be a required dedication of a greenway easement. Also, there will be required parkland dedication given the number of single family homes recommended in this development. |
|
STAFF ANALYSIS |
|
At the public hearing concerns were raised regarding open space, traffic, stormwater, density and school impact. Since the public hearing the developer has met with town staff and adjacent property owners numerous times to alleviate these issues and concerns. Open space and buffers are currently 31.1 acres, significantly higher than the required 14.4 acres. A twenty-foot undisturbed Common Open Space (COS) has been added adjacent to the Reserve. Additionally, greenway connections and sidewalks on both sides of all streets in the PUD have been added. The open space resources are being protected through the PUD and current regulations and processes. A north-south residential collector street south of the SF-3 tract has been added at the request of the Town. This north-south residential collector street is shown on the Town’s Transportation Plan and is required by the Town. This collector roadway does not significant modify the plan. The future construction of this roadway to Green Level Road should relieve cut through traffic in the Reserve subdivision by providing another north-south roadway. The road will be constructed to the northern edge of the Batchelor Branch stream buffer. The roadway connection from Highcroft to Briardale Road stub-out within the Reserve subdivision is required by staff to address the town’s connectivity ordinance and emergency service response times issues. To reduce construction traffic using this roadway, this Briardale Road connection will be constructed but barricaded until 90% of the single-family homes receive CO’s. Overall dwelling units have decreased from 289 dwelling units to 261
dwelling units. This is a decrease in units per acre from 2 to 1.91 units
per acre. The MR-1 tract has been deleted and attached units are no longer
part of this proposal. A new SF-4 parcel was added in the place of the
MR-1 parcel. The number of units for this parcel has decreased from a
maximum of 50 units for the old MR-1 tract to a maximum of 23 units for
the new SF-4 tract. With these changes, the proposed PUD is consistent
with the Land Use Plan. The project will maintain a 22 -acre school site. There has been a
slight decrease in the projected number of students based on a decrease in
the overall density of the project. |
|
STAFF RECOMMENDATION |
|
Staff recommends approval. |
|
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION 2/18/02 |
| Mr. Broderick made a motion to forward to Council for approval with the inclusion of a developer’s agreement to provide a greenway easement south of and adjacent to parcel SF-3, which was seconded by Mr. Zaccardo. The Board voted (5-4) in favor of the motion with Mr. Portman, Ms. Sadtler, Ms. Perrin, and Mr. Yerha having the dissenting votes. |
TOWN COUNCIL 3/14/02 |
| Council voted to approve. |
|
Information regarding this rezoning case will be on the Internet one week prior to the public hearing. Our Internet address for this case is http://www.townofcary.org/depts/dsdept/P&Z/rezonings/2001cases/2001index.htm. |