TOWN OF CARY
REQUEST FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

TOWN COUNCIL IMPACT STATEMENT (11-08-01)
01-REZ-15

APPLICANT(S)

CONTACT PERSON

Property Owners

DHIC, Inc.
113 South Wilmington Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
(919) 832-4345
Fax: (919) 832-2206

Gregory Warren
113 South Wilmington Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
(919) 832-4345
Fax: (919) 832-2206

Cary Park, A North Carolina General Partnership
Mr. Thomas Falcone
400 Clinton Street
Fayetteville, NY 13066
(315) 637-9881

LOCATION:

520 High House Road

MAPS:

Vicinity Map - Small
Vicinity Map - Large
Zoning Map
Aerial Map
Land Use Plan Map
Stream Buffers
Master Land Use Plan
Conceptual Plan
Park Facility Plan

In Town Limits [X] Cary Planning Jurisdiction (ETJ) Only [ ] Annexation Pending [ ]

SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS

TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING:

September 13, 2001

PLANNING & ZONING BOARD:

October 15, 2001

TOWN COUNCIL:

November 8, 2001

PARCEL INFORMATION

Parcel #

Realid #

Area

076417005643 (part of)

0086980

17.71 acres

REZONING DATA

 

CURRENT

PROPOSED

Zoning:

Industrial-1 (I1)

Planned Unit Development (PUD)

Overlay District:

Swift Creek

Swift Creek

Land Use:

Vacant

Mixed residential development composed of town homes, condominiums, apartments and senior living units with a total maximum for all three tracts of 366 units.

REZONING CONDITIONS

CURRENT

PROPOSED

None

Neighborhood Development with a mix of residential uses. Proposed are town home units, condominium units, and apartments. See Master Plan for details

 

SITE DATA

WATER/SEWER SERVICE

Staff Remarks: Both public water and sewer from Town of Cary are available to the site. No pump station will be required for sanitary sewer system serving this property.

TRANSPORTATION

Traffic Impact Analysis Required: Yes [ ] No [X]

The Highland Village proposal 198-unit elderly housing - detached, and 62 Residential Condo/Townhouse units will generate an AM peak hour 69 trips and a PM peak hour of 79 trips. Since the traffic volume does not exceed 100 peak hour trips, a Traffic Impact Study is no longer required.

Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared by HNTB for this site dated August 2001. This study is based on a more dense development. The results of that study are presented for information only.

2001 Existing

2005 No-Build

2005 Build

Intersections

Time Period

Delayb

LOSc

Delay

LOS

Delay

LOS

Old Apex Road at

AM

11.5

B

13.7

B

13.9

B

High House Road (Signal)

PM

14.3

B

21.7

C

23.1

C

Old Apex Road at

AM

21.4

C

26.8

D

29.3

D

Chatham Street

PM

52.4(26.0)

F

84.9

F

97.2

F

High House Road at

AM

13.8

B

15.6

C

16.1

C

Chatham Street

PM

20.0

C

28.0

D

30.8

D

 

This study analyzed seven intersections and concluded that no intersection will require improvements caused by the Highland Park PUD.

The Highland Village proposal 198-unit elderly housing - detached, and 62 Residential Condo/Townhouse units will generate an AM peak hour 69 trips and a PM peak hour of 79 trips. This traffic volume does not require a Traffic Impact Study.

The Traffic Impact Study prepared by HNTB considered 84 multi-family apartment units, a maximum 72-unit elderly housing - detached, 76 Residential Condo/Townhouse units and 30,000 sq.ft. Office as proposed. The AM peak hour will generate 122 trips and the PM peak hour will generate 222 trips.

The existing Industrial zoning (17.7 acres), developed as an Industrial Park, similar to the Woodwinds Industrial Park, would generate 162 AM peak hour trips and 146 PM peak hour trips. As general office development, the site would generate 207 AM peak hour trips and 198 PM peak hour trips.

AM Peak PM Peak

Existing Proposal 69 79

Traffic Study Proposal 122 222

Industrial(like Woodwinds) 162 146

General Office 207 198

High House - East of Old Apex Road, in front of Highland Village, has a daily 2001 traffic volume of 4,216. The existing level of service at High House & Old Apex Road is "B" for both the morning and afternoon peak hour.

All three development choices will cause the existing intersection to operate at level of service "B/C" with development and no road improvements.

As a result, the Highland Village proposal of 198-unit elderly housing - detached, and 62 Residential Condo/Townhouse units will generate less traffic than the existing Industrial zoning.

As a result of the Highland Village traffic count, the daily weekday traffic is estimated at:

2001

Old Apex Road – South of High House 5,611

Old Apex Road – North of High House 10,581

Old Apex Road – West of Chatham Street 11,378

Chatham Street – East of Chatham Street 17,429

Chatham Street – South of Chatham Street 6,399

Chatham Street – South of High House 6,196

High House – West of Old Apex Road 9,348

High House – East of Old Apex Road 4,216

High House – West of Chatham Street 3,172

Transportation:

Road widening is not required as part of this PUD. High House Road is currently constructed to a 65’ back-to-back street section (5 lanes – 2 lanes each direction with a center turn lane). The recently adopted Comprehensive Transportation Plan has reduced this section of High House Road from a major to a minor thoroughfare, but does specify that the road have a center landscaped median. The applicant has provided a schematic for this section of High House Road that includes the center landscaped median, parallel parking on both sides and associated striping. Engineering Staff supports the concept shown, with the understanding that the drawing in the PUD booklet is schematic only and a detailed design must be reviewed and approved at time of development plan review.

 

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

The project is in the Swift Creek watershed and would have to meet the requirements of the Town of Cary reservoir watershed protection ordinance. Stream buffers are indicated on the property and would have to be investigated to show where they lay on the project. The PUD would have to meet the nitrogen removal requirements of the Town.

 

WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS:

Current Enrollment

Area Schools

Building Capacity

Percent occupied

Projected Number of Additional Students

Elementary

14,909

13,127

113.6%

62

Middle

7,596

6,456

117.7%

 

32

High

5,629

5,100

110.4%

44

 

Total for all Area Schools

28,134

24,683

114%

138

Preschool

73

Current Enrollment is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2001. Building capacity is based on current enrollment on the 20th day of the school year for 2000.

School assignment will be determined at the time of development. A list of individual area schools can be found for review: area school data.

 

ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USES

 

Zoning:

Land Use:

North:

Industrial 1
Old Apex Road

Commercial

South:

High House Road
Business 2 CU

Commercial, Vacant Land

East:

Residential 30
Business 2 CU

Residential, Vacant Land
Vacant Land

West:

Planned Employment Center (PEC)

Vacant Land

TOWN OF CARY FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DATA

 

CURRENT

PROPOSED

Town Center Area Plan Designation:

Mixed Density Residential

No Change

Alternate Designation:

None

No Change

Activity Center:

Neighborhood Activity Center

No Change

 

LAND USE PLAN

Highland PUD

Comprehensive Plan Context:

Town Center Area Plan (TCAP)

On 9th August the Town Council adopted the TCAP. The TCAP was developed in cooperation with a citizen-based committee. The plan envisions the following for the property subject to the requested rezoning:

  • The development of this property for a mix of residential uses from medium density to high-density housing. This includes products ranging from single family, duplex, townhouses, to multi family condos/apartments of 3-story garden apartments mid-rise style housing.
  • Increased residential densities to support the commercial office and institutional mixed-use vision for a vital multifunction downtown. Development with a minimum overall average density of 15 units per acre.
  • High standards of design, layout and landscaped setting to create a positive impression of having arrived downtown. Careful siting of buildings and trees to create a residential community in a park like setting, using central common open spaces or community greens. The design of the project should also include provision for bus transit.
  • The property is also within a neighborhood activity center (NAC). A NAC is a mixed-use, focused pedestrian friendly form of development alternative to unattractive, inefficient strip development and sprawling subdivisions. Activity centers are made up of a focus area (mainly commercial with some office and institutional uses) and of a support area (mainly residential of varying densities). For example, the proposal would not only support the Town Center Area but also support the function of the existing shopping center which forms the focus area of the Neighborhood Activity Center located on the southeast quadrant at the intersection of High House Road and Old Road Apex. The proposal site lies in a quadrant across an arterial road from the focus area. In this context it should form part of the centers support area. In such support areas within 1/8th of a mile from the focus areas the plan encourages pedestrian accessibility and higher residential densities to support the connectivity of activities and uses and the services offered also to reduce dependency on the automobile. (8 –16 units per acre appropriate for townhouses and low rise apartments.)

The dwelling types, mixes and density proposed fall within both the range indicated by the TCAP. A minimum of 270 units is encouraged by the TCAP provided that specific development impacts are addressed in the development proposal. The site also lies approximately ¾ miles from the heart of the town center area and the proposed regional rail station. It could be easily served by a transit bus link. The proposal represents an opportunity to meet the plan(s) goals of facilitating higher densities where there is good access to services.

Growth Management Plan

The adopted Growth Management Plan encourages the principle of locating development where existing infrastructure is in place or can be adapted, connectivity of uses and services, locating growth where it will not adversely impact sensitive natural or cultural resources or open space or existing neighborhoods. The Plan supports concentrating new development on infill parcels within the downtown, providing for higher densities and a range of housing types.

The proposal meets these broad objectives, provided that the development is designed to mitigate impacts to the existing neighborhoods.

Open Space and Historic Resources Plan

The Open Space and Historic Resources Plan identifies significant resources, which should be preserved or would contribute to a town system of open space. The subject site has previously been cleared and consists of regrown woodland. It does not contain any significant resources or contribute to the town’s system of open space.

Parks, Greenways and Bikeways Master Plan

Parks, Greenways and Bikeways Master Plan does not identify a park nor greenway at this site, although the site is in very close proximity to the Higgins Greenway.

Affordable Housing Plan:

The adopted Affordable Housing Plan includes the following goals:

  • Provide for a full range of housing choices for all income groups, families of various sizes, seniors, and persons with special challenges.
  • Facilitate the affordable housing activities of other entities within the Town of Cary…
  • Encourage the location of high density housing within walking and convenient commuting distance of employment, shopping, and other activities….
  • The applicant's proposal is consistent with these goals. It should also be noted that the Town Council voted to provide $600,000 for second mortgages to help 40 buyers become owners of the units to be built. All of the funds would be paid back to the Town over time.

The proposal provides a good opportunity to meet the smart growth and housing principles of the Comprehensive plan.

 

CHANGES SINCE PUBLIC HEARING: Yes [X] No [ ]

 

PROTEST PETITION FILED: Valid [] Invalid [ X] None Filed [ ]

 

REZONING REQUEST

 

Analysis: Since the public hearing the applicant has made a number of changes as follows:

  • A 30 foot Type A buffer has been increased to a 40 foot Type A buffer next to the CSX railroad.
  • The bus stop has been removed, with a statement added that the location of a future bus stop would be determined at time of site plan review.
  • A revised phasing schedule has been submitted reducing the total residential units from the original 366 to 260 total.
  • Has submitted conceptual Landscape sections for public and private drives, and landscape buffers next to the railroad to include an earth berm and fence.

At the public hearing there were a number of comments made in support and against this request. Staff review of this project generated a number of comments that the applicant has reviewed and made changes within the PUD document. The Town Center Area Plan, the Growth Management Plan and the Town’s Affordable Housing initiatives are supported by this project, however there are a number of important issues the applicant should give further consideration. They are as follows:

  • A schedule (table) showing the minimum and maximum number of units by each dwelling unit type, type of ownership and occupant group for each phase should be agreed as part of the PUD document. A minimum of 25% of the total units should be for senior living. We would encourage the applicant to consider a higher percentage of senior living units to reflect a need for this region.
  • A description of the accommodation typically provided for each dwelling unit type and living facility.
  • A minimum 50-foot Type A buffer should be provided to the railroad to provide noise attenuation. The applicant’s stated reasons for a reduction to a 40-foot buffer are noted. However, staff considers noise attenuation to the railroad to be a chief objective for quality of life. The concern is valid, as the applicant has not provided performance statistics for the noise reduction effects of their proposed buffer. Staff would prefer to see the provision of a deeper buffer and greater amounts of open space. The number of units could be provided with a greater proportion of 3 story units.
  • Details of sound reduction measures to the buildings adjacent to the railroad should be submitted and agreed as part of and site plan approval.
  • 15-foot streetscape and building setbacks on Falcone Parkway are shown on the street sections and the conceptual landscape plan. The plans indicate street trees in these set backs and in the grass utility strip. Sufficient room needs to be allowed for the growth of street trees.
  • Provision of a minimum of 10% usable open space. 5% for play space and 5%, which should be a primary focus of the layout design in the form of community green(s) or square(s). Adequate open/recreation space should be provided on site for the future occupants. This is because the site is more than 1.5 miles from Bond Park and ½ mile from Lexie Lane. Access to these facilities is neither safe nor convenient. To reach Lexie Lane children would need to cross the railroad and Old Apex. There is currently no sidewalk on the north side of Old Apex Road or N. Dixon Avenue to the park. Given the potential multi family population, a greater proportion of the site should be open space. Further the space should be usable, not space left over. Space should be integral to the layout design. This would also help achieve a more sensitive design.
  • The PUD should be reworded to make it clear that sidewalks from the building entrances to the sidewalk network along public and private streets will be provided with the development. This is important in ensuring the walkability for the project. The current language is vague about this aspect.
  • High House Road details and design will be reviewed and approved at the time of site plan review.
  • Page 2 of 2 Adendum1 states that sidewalks will be located on both sides of all streets. Drawing # 4 of 15 needs to be amended to reflect this.
  • There is an opportunity to link Highland Village PUD to the Higgins Greenway across West Chatham Street. This project should explore options to connect this site to the greenway in order to provide additional recreational opportunities for the future residents of this community.

Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of this rezoning request subject to the applicant’s consideration of the above listed items.

 

PLANNING & ZONING BOARD 10/15/01 RECOMMENDATION

Board voted (7-3) to forward to Council for approval at their November 8, 2001 meeting with the following conditions: a) that Council accept staff considerations, b) that any site plans be returned to P&Z Board for approval, c) that Mr. Yerha note the neighbors’ concerns in his report to Council.

TOWN COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

Council voted unanimously to approve.

Information regarding this rezoning case will be on the Internet prior to the public hearing. Our Internet address for this case is http://www.townofcary.org/depts/dsdept/P&Z/rezonings/2001cases/2001index.htm.