TOWN OF CARY
REQUEST FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
TOWN COUNCIL IMPACT STATEMENT (11-08-01)
01-REZ-15
|
APPLICANT(S) |
CONTACT PERSON |
Property Owners |
|
DHIC, Inc. |
Gregory Warren |
Cary Park, A North Carolina General Partnership |
|
LOCATION: |
520 High House Road |
|
MAPS: |
Vicinity
Map - Small |
In Town Limits [X] Cary Planning Jurisdiction (ETJ) Only [ ] Annexation Pending [ ]
|
SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS |
|
|
TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING: |
September 13, 2001 |
|
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD: |
October 15, 2001 |
|
TOWN COUNCIL: |
November 8, 2001 |
|
PARCEL INFORMATION |
||
|
Parcel # |
Realid # |
Area |
|
076417005643 (part of) |
0086980 |
17.71 acres |
|
REZONING DATA |
||
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
|
Zoning: |
Industrial-1 (I1) |
Planned Unit Development (PUD) |
|
Overlay District: |
Swift Creek |
Swift Creek |
|
Land Use: |
Vacant |
Mixed residential development composed of town homes, condominiums, apartments and senior living units with a total maximum for all three tracts of 366 units. |
|
REZONING CONDITIONS |
|
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
None |
Neighborhood Development with a mix of residential uses. Proposed are town home units, condominium units, and apartments. See Master Plan for details |
|
SITE DATA |
|
WATER/SEWER SERVICE |
|
Staff Remarks: Both public water and sewer from Town of Cary are available to the site. No pump station will be required for sanitary sewer system serving this property. |
|
TRANSPORTATION |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Traffic Impact Analysis Required: Yes [ ] No [X] The Highland Village proposal 198-unit elderly housing - detached, and 62 Residential Condo/Townhouse units will generate an AM peak hour 69 trips and a PM peak hour of 79 trips. Since the traffic volume does not exceed 100 peak hour trips, a Traffic Impact Study is no longer required. Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared by HNTB for this site dated August 2001. This study is based on a more dense development. The results of that study are presented for information only. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
2001 Existing |
2005 No-Build |
2005 Build |
|||||||||||||||
|
Intersections |
Time Period |
Delayb |
LOSc |
Delay |
LOS |
Delay |
LOS |
||||||||||
|
Old Apex Road at |
AM |
11.5 |
B |
13.7 |
B |
13.9 |
B |
||||||||||
|
High House Road (Signal) |
PM |
14.3 |
B |
21.7 |
C |
23.1 |
C |
||||||||||
|
Old Apex Road at |
AM |
21.4 |
C |
26.8 |
D |
29.3 |
D |
||||||||||
|
Chatham Street |
PM |
52.4(26.0) |
F |
84.9 |
F |
97.2 |
F |
||||||||||
|
High House Road at |
AM |
13.8 |
B |
15.6 |
C |
16.1 |
C |
||||||||||
|
Chatham Street |
PM |
20.0 |
C |
28.0 |
D |
30.8 |
D |
||||||||||
|
This study analyzed seven intersections and concluded that no intersection will require improvements caused by the Highland Park PUD. The Highland Village proposal 198-unit elderly housing - detached, and 62 Residential Condo/Townhouse units will generate an AM peak hour 69 trips and a PM peak hour of 79 trips. This traffic volume does not require a Traffic Impact Study. The Traffic Impact Study prepared by HNTB considered 84 multi-family apartment units, a maximum 72-unit elderly housing - detached, 76 Residential Condo/Townhouse units and 30,000 sq.ft. Office as proposed. The AM peak hour will generate 122 trips and the PM peak hour will generate 222 trips. The existing Industrial zoning (17.7 acres), developed as an Industrial Park, similar to the Woodwinds Industrial Park, would generate 162 AM peak hour trips and 146 PM peak hour trips. As general office development, the site would generate 207 AM peak hour trips and 198 PM peak hour trips. AM Peak PM Peak Existing Proposal 69 79 Traffic Study Proposal 122 222 Industrial(like Woodwinds) 162 146 General Office 207 198 High House - East of Old Apex Road, in front of Highland Village, has a daily 2001 traffic volume of 4,216. The existing level of service at High House & Old Apex Road is "B" for both the morning and afternoon peak hour. All three development choices will cause the existing intersection to operate at level of service "B/C" with development and no road improvements. As a result, the Highland Village proposal of 198-unit elderly housing - detached, and 62 Residential Condo/Townhouse units will generate less traffic than the existing Industrial zoning. As a result of the Highland Village traffic count, the daily weekday traffic is estimated at: 2001 Old Apex Road – South of High House 5,611 Old Apex Road – North of High House 10,581 Old Apex Road – West of Chatham Street 11,378 Chatham Street – East of Chatham Street 17,429 Chatham Street – South of Chatham Street 6,399 Chatham Street – South of High House 6,196 High House – West of Old Apex Road 9,348 High House – East of Old Apex Road 4,216 High House – West of Chatham Street 3,172 Transportation: Road widening is not required as part of this PUD. High House Road is currently constructed to a 65’ back-to-back street section (5 lanes – 2 lanes each direction with a center turn lane). The recently adopted Comprehensive Transportation Plan has reduced this section of High House Road from a major to a minor thoroughfare, but does specify that the road have a center landscaped median. The applicant has provided a schematic for this section of High House Road that includes the center landscaped median, parallel parking on both sides and associated striping. Engineering Staff supports the concept shown, with the understanding that the drawing in the PUD booklet is schematic only and a detailed design must be reviewed and approved at time of development plan review. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS |
|
The project is in the Swift Creek watershed and would have to meet the requirements of the Town of Cary reservoir watershed protection ordinance. Stream buffers are indicated on the property and would have to be investigated to show where they lay on the project. The PUD would have to meet the nitrogen removal requirements of the Town. |
|
WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS: |
||||
|
Current Enrollment Area Schools |
Building Capacity |
Percent occupied |
Projected Number of Additional Students |
|
|
Elementary |
14,909 |
13,127 |
113.6% |
62 |
|
Middle |
7,596 |
6,456 |
117.7% |
32 |
|
High |
5,629 |
5,100 |
110.4% |
44
|
|
Total for all Area Schools |
28,134 |
24,683 |
114% |
138 |
|
Preschool |
73 |
|||
Current Enrollment is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2001. Building capacity is based on current enrollment on the 20th day of the school year for 2000.
School assignment will be determined at the time of development. A list of individual area schools can be found for review: area school data.
|
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USES |
||
|
Zoning: |
Land Use: |
|
|
North: |
Industrial 1 |
Commercial |
|
South: |
High House Road |
Commercial, Vacant Land |
|
East: |
Residential 30 |
Residential, Vacant Land |
|
West: |
Planned Employment Center (PEC) |
Vacant Land |
|
TOWN OF CARY FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DATA |
||
|
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
|
Town Center Area Plan Designation: |
Mixed Density Residential |
No Change |
|
Alternate Designation: |
None |
No Change |
|
Activity Center: |
Neighborhood Activity Center |
No Change |
|
LAND USE PLAN |
|
Highland PUD Comprehensive Plan Context: Town Center Area Plan (TCAP) On 9th August the Town Council adopted the TCAP. The TCAP was developed in cooperation with a citizen-based committee. The plan envisions the following for the property subject to the requested rezoning: The dwelling types, mixes and density proposed fall within both the range indicated by the TCAP. A minimum of 270 units is encouraged by the TCAP provided that specific development impacts are addressed in the development proposal. The site also lies approximately ¾ miles from the heart of the town center area and the proposed regional rail station. It could be easily served by a transit bus link. The proposal represents an opportunity to meet the plan(s) goals of facilitating higher densities where there is good access to services. Growth Management Plan The adopted Growth Management Plan encourages the principle of locating development where existing infrastructure is in place or can be adapted, connectivity of uses and services, locating growth where it will not adversely impact sensitive natural or cultural resources or open space or existing neighborhoods. The Plan supports concentrating new development on infill parcels within the downtown, providing for higher densities and a range of housing types. The proposal meets these broad objectives, provided that the development is designed to mitigate impacts to the existing neighborhoods. Open Space and Historic Resources Plan The Open Space and Historic Resources Plan identifies significant resources, which should be preserved or would contribute to a town system of open space. The subject site has previously been cleared and consists of regrown woodland. It does not contain any significant resources or contribute to the town’s system of open space. Parks, Greenways and Bikeways Master Plan Parks, Greenways and Bikeways Master Plan does not identify a park nor greenway at this site, although the site is in very close proximity to the Higgins Greenway. Affordable Housing Plan: The adopted Affordable Housing Plan includes the following goals:
The proposal provides a good opportunity to meet the smart growth and housing principles of the Comprehensive plan. |
|
CHANGES SINCE PUBLIC HEARING: Yes [X] No [ ] |
|
PROTEST PETITION FILED: Valid [] Invalid [ X] None Filed [ ] |
|
REZONING REQUEST |
|
Analysis: Since the public hearing the applicant has made a number of changes as follows:
At the public hearing there were a number of comments made in support and against this request. Staff review of this project generated a number of comments that the applicant has reviewed and made changes within the PUD document. The Town Center Area Plan, the Growth Management Plan and the Town’s Affordable Housing initiatives are supported by this project, however there are a number of important issues the applicant should give further consideration. They are as follows:
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of this rezoning request subject to the applicant’s consideration of the above listed items. |
|
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD 10/15/01 RECOMMENDATION |
Board voted (7-3) to forward to Council for approval
at their November 8, 2001 meeting with the following conditions: a) that Council
accept staff considerations, b) that any site plans be returned to P&Z Board
for approval, c) that Mr. Yerha note the neighbors’ concerns in his report to
Council.
|
TOWN COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION |
Council voted unanimously to approve.
|
Information regarding this rezoning case will be on the Internet prior to the public hearing. Our Internet address for this case is http://www.townofcary.org/depts/dsdept/P&Z/rezonings/2001cases/2001index.htm. |