Staff Report to
the Town Council
Background Information
Base
Zoning District: Zoning
Map
Planned Development District Major (PDD)
Requested
Use:
Mixed Use Sketch Plan to allow 278 multi-family residential units and a
recreation facility. (There is an
associated rezoning request which is 06-REZ-26.
The request is to amend Tract 1 of the PDD to increase the number of
apartments from 45 units to 278 units.)
Zoning
Overlay District:
Neighborhood Mixed Use Overlay District, Village at the Park
Land
Use Plan Designation: Land
Use Map
The recommended future land use for the parcel is Mixed Use (MXD).
The parcel is also located within a larger mixed-use Neighborhood
Activity Center (NAC), where a focused mix of commercial, office, and
residential uses are recommended across the entire activity center; therefore, no Comprehensive
Plan Amendment (CPA) is required.
Acreage: Approximately
15.17± acres
Location:
Vicinity
Map
2932 Alston Avenue, NW corner of Kit Creek Road and NC 55 Highway
Applicant:
Mike Underwood,
Woodfield Investments
11425 Horseman’s Trail
Raleigh,
NC 27613
(919) 341-3034
munderwood@woodfieldinvestments.com
Applicant’s
Contact Person:
JW Shearin,
Elam, Todd, d’Ambrosi (ETd)
2880 Slater Road
Morrisville,
NC 27560
(919) 481-2021
jwshearin@etdpa.com
Town
of Cary Case Manager:
Debra
Grannan, Senior Planner
316 N Academy Street
Cary,
NC 27513
(919)
460-4980
debra.grannan@townofcary.org
Summary of Request
A.
Transportation
Alston Avenue
:
Existing
Roadway Section: 2 lanes, 60’
Right-of-way (ROW)
Future
Roadway Section: 4 lanes
median-divided, 100’ ROW
Schedule: Proposed 2009/2010 CIB
Alston project
Sidewalk Requirements: Required on
both sides
Bicycle Requirements: 14’ wide
outside lanes required
Transit
Requirements: None
required
NC
55 HWY:
Existing
Roadway Section: 4-lane median
divided under construction, 100’ Right-of-way (ROW)
Future
Roadway Section: 6-lane median
divided, 124’ ROW
Schedule: 4-lane improvements under
construction
Sidewalk Requirements: Required on
both sides
Bicycle Requirements: 14’ wide
outside lanes required
Transit
Requirements: None
required
Kit Creek
Road
:
Existing
Roadway Section: 2-lane, 100’
Right-of-way (ROW)
Future Roadway Section: 6-lane
median divided, 124’ ROW
Schedule: N/A
Sidewalk Requirements: Required on
both sides
Bicycle Requirements: 14’ wide
outside lanes required
Transit
Requirements: None
required
B.
Traffic Impact Analysis:
This proposal is a reduction in trips from previously approved Village at the
Park PDD. Traffic Impact Study
(01-TAR-125) remains valid.
C.
Parks & Greenways: Greenways
Map
Per the approved rezoning, the construction of a 10’ wide multi-use trail is
required along NC Highway 55. In
addition, PRCR requests that the applicant consider continuing the 10’ wide, Alston
Avenue multi-use trail along the
west side of the property.
Reference
Information
Meeting
Schedule:
Town
Council Public Hearing
Date:
December 14, 2006
Action:
Forwarded to the April 16, 2007 Planning and Zoning Board Meeting
Planning
& Zoning Board
Date:
April 16, 2007
Action:
Tabled to the May 21, 2007 Meeting.
Planning
& Zoning Board
Date: May 21, 2007
Action: Recommended unanimously for approval
Town
Council
Date: June 28, 2007
Parcel and Owner Information
|
|||
|
Property
Owner(s) |
|
Real
Estate ID(s) |
Area/Acres |
|
Harold
G Bagwell & Alston 55 LLC |
0736088344
(portion) |
0302129
(portion) |
15.17±
(portion) |
|
Total
Acreage |
|
|
15.17±
(portion) |
Applicant’s
Justification Statement Submitted September 25, 2006
Please
note that the following statement is that of the applicant and does not
necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town of Cary:
How is the
proposed request reasonable? In
explaining how it is reasonable, please address the following, if applicable:
1.
Any issues with the size of the tract?
The tract is of sufficient size to handle proposed buildings, parking, buffers and other required elements per Town of Cary ordinances.
2.
How is the request compatible with the comprehensive plan (i.e. Land Use,
Transportation, Open Space and
Historic Resources)?
The Comprehensive Plan includes a neighborhood activity center at this location and the uses proposed are within the guidelines established for activity centers. The proposed land uses have already been approved for inclusion in the Village at the Park development. The only change is where some of those uses are to be distributed to different parcels than originally listed.
3.
What are the benefits and detriments to the owner, neighbors and the
community?
The Village
at the Park will be a significant asset to West Cary, and one that will
demonstrate the excellence that can be achieved through mixed-use development.
Its location is convenient to Research Triangle Park and will not only
reduce trips to the Park for those that live within the development, but also
benefiting the entire community by reducing the impact of traffic on surrounding
areas. The proposed plan will help
implement the Northwest Cary Area Plan by providing complementary high and
medium density housing adjacent to RTP, to minimize commute distances and to
support multiple travel modes (auto, bicycle, transit, and pedestrian).
4.
How are all the allowable uses with the proposed rezoning compatible
with, or how do they relate to, the uses currently present on adjacent tracts?
This
proposal fulfills the needs of having a mix of uses, specifically office and
retail components, within the activity center as called for in the Town of Cary
Comprehensive Plan. The uses
proposed are in keeping with previously approved plans for the Village at the
Park Neighborhood Activity Center.
Schools:
The
school information is being provided for your review; however, the Wake County
Board of Education controls capital projects for school capacities.
|
School
Information |
||||
|
Assigned
Schools |
20th
Day Enrollment |
Permanent |
Average |
Projected
Range of Additional |
|
Cedar
Fork Elementary |
434 |
761 |
57% |
5
to 96 |
|
West
Cary Middle |
992 |
988 |
100% |
5
to 62 |
|
Panther
Creek (9th grade) |
893 |
1690 |
53% |
5
to 51 |
|
Green
Hope High (10th – 12th Grade) |
2263 |
2335 |
97% |
5
to 51 |
|
Total
projected range of additional students |
15
to 209* |
|||
Current
Enrollment and Building Capacity
is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2006-2007 as supplied
by the Wake County Public School System. School
assignment will be determined at the time of development.
*The
Projected Number of Additional Students
is only a rough approximation. The total number of projected students only
includes the High School numbers one time. The actual number of students will
vary depending on several variables, such as dwelling unit type, number of
bedrooms, dwelling size, and other factors.
For example, a site with 278
one- bedroom apartments could yield 15 additional students, while 278 three
bedroom units could yield 209 additional students.
The basis for making this calculation is based on multipliers provided by
the Wake County Schools Office of Student Assignment.
Feedback
at the Public Hearing
Staff
presented the case and noted that there were no protest petitions. J.W.Shearin
spoke on behalf of the owner of the subject property and stated that placement
of high density residential dwellings in the vicinity of Research Triangle Park was an objective
of the NW Area Plan. He emphasized the market demand for the residential use.
No
one came forward to speak, and Mayor McAlister closed the public hearing.
One
Council Member asked for staff to study the proposed plan to determine if it
complies with the NW Area Plan objectives. The
question was also raised about whether or not the demand for this amount of
multi-family residential use in this close proximity to Research
Triangle Park was valid.
Feedback from RTP was requested.
Council
also raised concerns about the change in the overall concept for this location
and questioned if the Town was meeting the objective of a mixed use center in
terms of getting a development that exceeded the quality of a typical apartment
complex.
A
comparison was made by one Council member to the Alston plan which was carefully
balanced with residential, office and commercial uses, and the request to change
the designation of such a large parcel should be evaluated.
Feedback
at the April
16, 2007 Planning and Zoning Board Meeting
Staff noted
that the plan had improved substantially in terms of layout and providing more
buffering since the original submittal, but was still a work in progress.
Discussion
took place about the ultimate right of way requirement on Kit Creek Road.
Staff
reported that the applicant understands that setbacks and buffers for future
development must be based of the ultimate width required by the Town.
On the day
of the meeting, the applicant submitted various proposed modifications to the
plan some of which had been shared with the Planning and Zoning Board prior to
the meeting. Since staff had not had
time to evaluate these changes, the Board voted unanimously to table the case
until the May 21, 2007 meeting.
Feedback
at the
Staff
presented a revised version of the proposal and reported that changes to the
plan continued to meet Mixed Use Center Design Guidelines.
Staff pointed out increases to the buffer on the northern property line
and the relocation of building five.
One Board
member asked if a waiver to road improvements was still proposed by the
applicant. Staff reported that a
waiver was no longer necessary.
Changes
since the Public Hearing
The
applicant provided a written statement from Rick Weddle with Research Triangle
Foundation showing support for residential use in the of the subject property.
Unit
Count
The
applicant has reduced the number of multi-family dwelling units from 300 to 278.
Of these units, 15 have been designed as a two-story townhome style, and
are placed along the road and entrance on the southern portion of the subject
property. The school data chart has
been updated to reflect the new unit count.
Overall
Layout
Streetscapes
and Buffers
Stormwater
Management
The
applicant has provided a greater degree of detail for how to manage stormwater
runoff. The general locations of
constructed wetlands, bio-retention areas and sand filters have been identified
on the plan. Detailed location and
dimensions as well as other stormwater management requirements will be addressed
at the time of site plan review.
Staff
Analysis of Cary
Design Principles
Within
a Mixed Use Overlay District, the plan is evaluated to ensure that it meets the
following Design Principles:
In applying
these Design Guidelines to the Village at the Park MUSP, Staff considered the
following aspects of the plan:
Human
Scale: Architectural features such as balconies, window arches and varied
rooflines are used to break up the building mass.
The network of pedestrian paths establishes a comfortable realm for
people to move and interact within the property.
Create
a Sense of Place: Outdoor
spaces are defined by the combination of the U-shaped building arrangement
around the recreation area and site elements such as brick walls and entry
features.
Connect
Uses: The network of walking trails with connections to public multi-purpose
trails and sidewalks effectively provides pedestrian connectivity throughout the
site. A
street stub is provided to the adjacent property to the north. More
pedestrian connectivity was provided for the Townhome style buildings.
Provide
Transitions: Open spaces and recreation
areas are used to provide attractive transitions between the dwelling units and
gathering places. The screening walls on HWY 55 separate high levels of human
activity from a busy roadway. Similar screening was
provided along Alston
Avenue and Kit Creek Road.
Reduce
Parking Impacts: Parking
is positioned to not be a prominent view from off site views and screening will
be required during the site plan review.
Plan
for Pedestrians, Bicyclists and Transit Users: Sidewalks
are continuous along public streets. A transit stop is not required for this
location. Bicycle parking will be a
site plan requirement.
Provide
Open Space: Open
space is provided with both active and passive recreation areas and the sidewalk
network within the site ensures accessibility to each residence. The plan is
within the Village at the Park Planned Development District which met open space
requirements by designated 11.6 acres for a town park. Because of the proposed
change to residential use, on the subject property, the applicant has provided
an additional 1.41 acre area for active recreation.
Staff
Recommendation
Because the
plan implements Cary’s design principles within a Mixed Use Center, offers
enhanced landscaping and walls to
improve the performance of perimeter buffers
and streetscapes, and because of its consistency with the Comprehensive Plan,
Staff recommends the Village at the Park MUSP for approval.