Comprehensive Plan Amendment Datasheet
Request
This is a request to amend
the land use map of the Town’s
Southeast Area Plan, an element of the Town’s
Comprehensive
Plan. The request is to change
the land use designation of approximately 7.94 acres, located at the
intersection of
The purpose of a comprehensive plan amendment is
to evaluate the appropriateness of a proposed land use and/or other issue, need,
or opportunity for the subject parcel(s) of land.
Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of
land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements,
utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not
considered during the comprehensive plan amendment process.
However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance
with existing requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO)
when the site or subdivision plan is submitted.
All such requirements can be found at
http:vic.townofcary.org.
Background
Information
|
Applicant |
Steve Vinson |
||
|
Agent |
Bob Zumwalt |
||
|
Acreage |
7.94
± |
||
|
General
Location |
South side of the intersection of
|
||
|
Hearings /
Meetings |
Public Hearing |
Planning & Zoning |
Town Council
August 14 or 28, 2008** |
|
Existing Land
Use Plan Designation |
Medium to High Density Residential
(MDR to HDR) |
||
|
Requested Land
Use Plan Designation |
Mixed Use (MXD) |
||
|
P&Z
Recommendation |
To be provided after the Planning
and Zoning Board Meeting |
||
|
Staff Contact |
Anna Readling
919-469-4084
Cary, NC
27513 |
||
Subject Parcels
|
PARCEL & OWNER INFORMATION |
|||
|
Property Owner(s)
and Parcel Addresses |
Numbers
(10 digit) |
Real Estate ID(s) |
Deeded Acres |
|
Midland Tryon
|
0772770966 |
0331947 |
1.12 |
|
J. Harold
Tharrington |
0772771515 |
0143469 |
4.44 |
|
2718 |
0772772667 |
0079093 |
0.55 |
|
James Rogers &
Kattie Brown |
0772773652 |
0009052 |
0.87 |
|
Lonnie Charles
and Kathryn W. Beck |
0772773450
(partial) |
0079305 |
0.68 |
|
Marie H.
Woodall c/o Donna Jones |
0772775471
(partial) |
0079297 |
0.29 |
|
Total Acres |
7.94 |
||
Applicable
Comprehensive or Area Plan Requirements:
A. Land Use Plan:
The Southeast Area Plan
recommends these parcels for Medium to High Density Residential (MDR to HDR).
This designation was intended to complement the planned residential uses
on the north side of Macedonia Road, as well as the planned residential uses on
the west side of Walnut Street, opposite the subject parcels.
The Plan’s current recommendations are intended to establish
double-loaded residential uses along this stretch of the
The applicant is requesting
that the parcels be changed from Medium to High Density Residential to Mixed Use
(MXD). (See
Mixed Use Sketch Plan (MUSP) case 08-MU-001.) The Mixed Use
classification typically indicates that a site should ideally contain a mix of
at least two major use types from among Residential, Commercial, and
Office/Institutional, with a preference that one of the uses present include
residential.
B.
Comprehensive Transportation Plan:
Existing Section: 2-3 lane collector Rd.,
approximately 60’ ROW
Future Section:
2-3 lane major collector, 78’ ROW
Road Improvements:
None scheduled
Walnut St.
Existing Section: 6-lane, 120’ ROW
Future Section:
6-lane, 124’ ROW
Road Improvements:
None scheduled
C.
Parks & Greenways Master Plan:
Greenways Map
According to the approved
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan a public
greenway trail is proposed around the existing pond on the site with a
connection to the multi-use trail proposed along the northeast side of
D.
Open Space and Historic Resources Plan:
The Plan does not identify any
significant natural resources or priority open space on the subject parcels.
No historic resources have been identified.
E.
Affordable Housing Plan:
When parcels designated for mixed use
include a residential component, the following Affordable Housing goals may
apply:
F.
Growth Management Plan:
The
Growth Management Plan includes the following Guiding Principles which are
relevant to this case:
1.
Guiding Principle
R1: Ensure that adequate infrastructure and services are available concurrently
with new development.
2.
Guiding Principle
L1: Concentrate growth near existing and planned employment centers and
available and planned infrastructure to minimize costly service-area extensions.
3.
Guiding Principle
A1: Increase permitted densities in preferred growth areas to encourage desired
forms of development.
Criteria for
Consideration in Reviewing Comprehensive Plan Amendments:
Section 3.2.2(B) of the Land Development Ordinance states that “Proposals to amend the Comprehensive Plan shall be evaluated based upon whether the amendment is necessary in order to address conditions including, but not limited to, the following:”
Staff Comment:
There have been no changes in this regard.
Staff Comment:
No new issues have been identified.
Staff Comment: There have been no changes in this regard.
Staff Comment:
No errors or omissions have been identified.
Applicant’s
Justification Statement Submitted (
Applicant’s Justification Statement for
Comprehensive Plan Amendment:
How is the proposed request
reasonable? In explaining how it is
reasonable, please address the following, if applicable.
1.
Describe how the requested amendment is warranted due to changes in conditions,
forecasts, or assumptions since the original Comprehensive Plan recommendations
were developed.
This tract
is one of the few remaining undeveloped areas along Walnut Street.
As a result of the existing and approved developments in the area,
including
2. Describe how the requested amendment is
warranted due to new issues, needs, or opportunities that have arise in this
geographic area since the original Comprehensive Plan recommendations were
developed.
3. Describe how the requested amendment is
warranted due to changes in Town policies, objectives or standards since the
original Comprehensive Plan recommendations were developed.
4. Describe how the requested amendment is
warranted due to errors or omissions in the current Comprehensive Plan.
Limiting the use of the subject property
given its location along the corridor connecting the Crossroads and Swift Creek
commercial cores and its location relative to both
The Southeast Area Plan designates another area
for Medium to High Density residential use to the west of the Crossroads area
and along
Likewise, there is area designated for Medium
and High Density Residential use to the east of this site, on the opposite side
of
The proposed amendment, affecting a relatively
small but strategically located area, will meet the overall goals of the plan
that call for a clear distinction between the Crossroads and Swift Creek
commercial cores. Sufficient area
for medium and high density residential development would be maintained in areas
more peripheral to the central core.