Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning
Board
Request
The applicant is requesting
Council approve an amendment to the Land Use Plan Map of the
Comprehensive
Plan for the Town of
The purpose of a comprehensive plan amendment is
to evaluate the appropriateness of a proposed land use and/or other issue, need,
or opportunity for the subject parcel(s) of land.
Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of
land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements,
utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not
considered during the comprehensive plan amendment process.
However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance
with existing requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO)
when the site or subdivision plan is submitted.
All such requirements can be found at
http:vic.townofcary.org.
Background
Information
|
Applicant |
Dan LeClair
DHS Investment Group, LLC
248-921-3942 |
||
|
Agent |
Brad Rhinehalt
ANC Engineering
919-677-7996 |
||
|
Acreage |
5.74+/- |
||
|
General
Location |
|
||
|
Hearings /
Meetings |
Public Hearing |
Planning & Zoning
|
Town Council N/A |
|
Existing Land
Use Plan Designation |
High Density Residential ( |
||
|
Requested Land
Use Plan Designation |
Office/Institutional (OFC/INS) and
Commercial (COM) |
||
|
P&Z
Recommendation |
to be provided
after P&Z meeting |
||
|
Town of |
Meredith Chandler, RLA, AICP
Urban Designer/Senior Planner
Email:
meredith.chandler@townofcary.org
Phone:
919-460-4983
Mailing Address:
|
||
Subject
Parcels
|
PARCEL & OWNER
INFORMATION |
|||
|
Property Owner(s) |
Numbers
(10 digit) |
Real Estate ID(s) |
Calculated Acres |
|
Hubert and
Sidney Hatcher 1609
Morrisville Carpenter |
0745513970 |
0029355 |
5.74 |
|
Total Acres |
5.74 |
||
Applicable
Comprehensive or Area Plan Requirements:
A.
Land Use Plan:
This case proposes to modify the
existing Land Use Plan designation from High Density Residential (HDR) to 3.56
acres of Office/Institutional (OFC/INS) and 2.18 acres of Commercial (COM).
B. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
The Town’s
Transportation Plan identifies one thoroughfare or collector roadway in the
vicinity of the subject parcel:
Existing
Section:
110’ ROW, 4-lane median divided
Future Section: 4-lane median divided
Road Improvements: N/A
Sidewalks
Requirements: sidewalk on
east side, multi-use path on west side
Bicycle
Requirements: 14’ wide
outside lanes
C.
Parks &
Greenways Facilities Master Plan:
Greenway Map
The Town of
D.
Open Space and Historic Resources Plan:
The Open Space Plan and its
priority open space inventory does identify portions of the case area as having
some significant natural resources associated with the two stream buffers
located on the northern half of the property.
E.
Affordable Housing Plan:
Applicable goals of the
Affordable Housing Plan which may be relevant to this case include:
Analysis:
The current
land use designation for this parcel is High Density Residential (HDR) which is
defined as residential densities over 8 units per acre.
This type of development would add another housing option in this area.
that would be a short walk to shopping and services at the corner of
Analysis:
Another housing option in this area could
offer more people a short walk to shopping, services, and some employment at the
corner of
F.
Growth Management Plan:
The
Growth Management Plan includes four Guiding Principles which are relevant
to this case:
Analysis:
Water and sewer infrastructure is available,
and the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance for Transportation will ensure
concurrency for roadway capacity.
Analysis:
The subject parcel is adjacent to
Analysis:
The subject parcel includes approximately 3.5 acres of stream buffer and
floodplain. Also, a Town of
Town Council Public
Hearing on
A.
Public Hearing Comments
The director of community
services for the Town of
B.
Town Council Questions and Comments
Mr. Portman asked why the
comprehensive plan amendment and the rezoning public hearings were occurring at
two different Council meetings.
Staff responded that the traffic study required for the rezoning case was not
ready, and the applicant desired to move ahead with the comprehensive plan
amendment.
C.
Changes Since the Town Council Public Hearing
There have been no
changes to this case since the Town Council Public Hearing.
Staff Analysis and
Recommendation
A.
Physical Conditions Affecting Request
According to the Town’s
geographic information system data, more than half of the subject parcel is
covered with stream buffers and floodplains.
The current land use designation, High Density Residential (HDR), is not
feasible to develop with only a little over 2 acres of buildable area on the
subject parcel. The portion of the
subject parcel requested to be amended to a Commercial (COM) land use is
entirely covered with stream buffers and floodplains, and about one-third of the
portion of the property requested to be amended to an Office/Institutional
(OFC/INS) land use is covered by stream buffers and floodplains.
A land use designation of
Commercial (COM) is difficult to justify on the subject parcel.
Staff believes that the applicant or owner of this property should have
the burden of proving there is developable area on the northern portion of the
site before staff could consider a Commercial (COM) land use there.
There is no compelling reason to designate land use as commercial if the
information available at this time shows the northern portion of the subject
parcel as unbuildable.
B.
Land Use Compatibility and Transitions
The current land use
designation for the subject parcel is High Density Residential (HDR) which
typically describes either attached single family or multi-family housing over 8
units per acre.
This parcel’s western
boundary is
The applicant proposes to
change the land use designation from High Density Residential (HDR) to
approximately 3.56 acres of Office/Institutional (OFC/INS) on the southern part
of the property, and approximately 2.18 acres of Commercial (COM) on the
northern part.
A land use designation of
Office/Institutional (OFC/INS) would create a contiguous area of office and
institutional use from
Amending the land use of
the subject parcel from High Density Residential (HDR) to Office/Institutional
(OFC/INS) would provide a reasonable transition of land use from
C. Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends amending
the land use designation for the entire parcel from High Density Residential
(HDR) to Office/Institutional (OFC/INS).
Staff does not recommend amending the northern portion of the parcel to
Commercial (COM), but rather recommends that the entire parcel be designated as
Office/Institutional (OFC/INS).
Criteria for
Consideration in Reviewing Comprehensive Plan Amendments:
Section 3.2.2(B) of the
Land Development Ordinance states that “Proposals to amend the Comprehensive
Plan shall be evaluated based upon whether the amendment is necessary in order
to address conditions including, but not limited to, the following:”
Staff Comment:
No
changes have been identified.
Staff Comment:
Stream buffer and floodplain
regulations have been updated since the adoption of the 1996 Land Use Plan.
High Density Residential (HDR) is no longer a feasible land use on the
subject parcel due to the limited amount of buildable area.
Staff Comment:
None
have been identified.
Staff Comment:
None
have been identified.
Planning and Zoning
Board Motion Options
Approval Motion for
Applicant’s Request:
The Planning and Zoning
Board recommends Town Council amend the Land Use Plan Map as proposed by the
applicant.
Approval Motion as per
Staff’s Recommendation:
The Planning and Zoning
Board recommends Town Council amend the Land Use Plan Map as recommended by Town
Staff.
Other Approval Motion:
The Planning and Zoning
Board recommends Town Council amend the Land Use Plan Map as proposed by the
applicant, but with the following modifications:________________.
Denial Motion:
The Planning and Zoning
Board recommends Town Council deny the proposed amendment because it is not
necessary in order to address conditions.