Comprehensive Plan Amendment Data Sheet
07-CPA-10 Oxxford Hunt
Request
The applicant is requesting
Council approve an amendment to the Land Use Plan, an element of the Town’s
Comprehensive
Plan. The request is to change the land use designation of the approximately
2.57 acres located at Oceana Place and West Chatham Street from
Office/Institutional (OFC/INS) to Medium Density Residential (MDR).
The purpose of a comprehensive plan amendment is
to evaluate the appropriateness of a proposed land use and/or other issue, need,
or opportunity for the subject parcel(s) of land.
Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of
land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements,
utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not
considered during the comprehensive plan amendment process.
However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance
with existing requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO)
when the site or subdivision plan is submitted.
All such requirements can be found at
http:vic.townofcary.org.
Background
Information
|
Applicant |
Jerry Turner |
||
|
Agent |
Glenda Toppe Jerry Turner &
Associates, Inc. (919)851-7150 |
||
|
Acreage |
2.57+/- |
||
|
General
Location |
|
||
|
Hearings /
Meetings |
Public Hearing |
Planning & Zoning |
Town Council February 14 or
28, 2008 |
|
Existing Land
Use Plan Designation
|
Office/Institutional (OFC/INS) |
||
|
Requested Land
Use Plan Designation |
Medium Density Residential (MDR) |
||
|
P&Z
Recommendation |
To Be Provided After P&Z Meeting |
||
|
Town of |
Anna Readling
336-469-4084 |
||
Subject
Parcels
|
PARCEL & OWNER
INFORMATION |
|||
|
Property Owner(s) |
Numbers
(10 digit) |
Real Estate ID(s) |
Deeded Acres |
|
Louis Smith &
James R Weaver |
0753656205 |
0174116 |
2.57 |
|
Total Acres |
2.57 |
||
Applicable
Comprehensive or Area Plan Requirements:
A. Land Use Plan:
The adopted town-wide
Land Use Plan designates the parcel as Office/Institutional (OFC/INS),
reflecting the uses from the Oxxford Hunt PDD in 1996.
Road
Existing Section:
approx. 80’ ROW, 2-lane road w/ landscaped median
Future Section:
approx. 86’ ROW, 2-lane w/ landscaped median and wide outside lanes
Road Improvements:
N/A
C. Parks & Greenways Facilities Master Plan: Greenways Map
According to the approved
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan there are no
issues related to this site. A
payment in lieu of park land dedication may be required for residential
development, in accordance with the Town’s Land Development Ordinance.
D. Open Space and Historic Resources Plan:
Based on the Open Space and
Historic Resources Plan (OSHRP) this site was designated as significant open
space given the mixed hardwoods and conifers on site, and proximity to riparian
buffers.
At the level of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, it is difficult to ascertain
whether or not future development will occur in a manner that protects some
measure of those resources. Greater
clarity may be possible at the time of a rezoning.
No historic resources have
been identified.
E.
Growth Management Plan:
The
Growth Management Plan includes the following Guiding Principles which are
relevant to this case:
Criteria for
Consideration in Reviewing Comprehensive Plan Amendments:
Section 3.2.2(B) of the
Land Development Ordinance states that “Proposals to amend the Comprehensive
Plan shall be evaluated based upon whether the amendment is necessary in order
to address conditions including, but not limited to, the following:”
Staff Comment:
There
have been no changes in this regard.
Staff Comment:
No
new issues have been identified.
Staff Comment:
There have been no changes in this regard.
Staff Comment:
No errors or omissions have been identified.
Applicant’s
Justification Statement Submitted September 28, 2007
Provided below are the applicant’s responses to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Justification Questions contained in the application form.
(The application questions are repeated below.)
Please note that the statements below are those of the applicant and do
not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town of Cary:
How is the proposed request reasonable?
In explaining how it is reasonable, please address the following, if
applicable:
1.
Describe how the requested amendment is warranted due to changes in
conditions, forecasts, or assumptions since the original Comprehensive Plan
recommendations were developed?
Response: There is a
similar development adjacent to the proposed land use plan amendment.
2.
Describe how the requested amendment is warranted due to new issues,
needs, or opportunities that have arisen in this geographic area since the
original Comprehensive Plan recommendations were developed?
Response:
The proposed use is compatible with existing development in the area.
The parcel is not located within a Mixed Use Overlay District.
This proposed amendment does not jeopardize the intent of the
Comprehensive Plan.
3.
Describe how the requested amendment is warranted due to changes in Town
policies, objectives, or standards since the original Comprehensive Plan
recommendations were developed?
Response:
Given development patterns in the area, the proposed CPA is appropriate.
4.
Describe how the requested amendment is warranted due to errors or
omissions in the current Comprehensive Plan?
Response:
The proposed CPA fits in with the general character of the area.