Town of Cary, North Carolina
07-CPA-02 Chapel Hill Road Planned Development
District
Staff Report to the Town Council
Request
The applicant is requesting Council approve an amendment to the Land Use Plan Map of the Comprehensive Plan for approximately 3.1 acres located at 7331 (a portion of) and 7425 Chapel Hill Road from Office/Industrial (OFC/IND), Office/Institutional (OFC/INS), and Commercial (COM) to Commercial (COM) and Office/Industrial (OFC/IND).
The purpose of a comprehensive plan amendment is to evaluate the appropriateness of a proposed land use and/or other issue, need, or opportunity for the subject parcel(s) of land. Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not considered during the comprehensive plan amendment process. However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance with existing requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) when the site or subdivision plan is submitted. All such requirements can be found at http:vic.townofcary.org.
Background Information
|
Applicant |
Ernie Rhymer Quality Oil Company LLC |
||
|
Agent |
Terry Boylan ESP Associates PA 14001 Weston Parkway, Suite 100 Cary, NC 27513 919-678-1070 |
||
|
Acreage |
3.1+/- |
||
|
General Location |
7331 (a portion of) and 7425 Chapel Hill Road |
||
|
Hearings / Meetings |
Public Hearing April 12, 2007 |
Planning & Zoning June 18, 2007 |
Town Council July 26, 2007 |
|
Land Use
Designation |
Office/Industrial (OFC/IND), Office/Institutional (OFC/INS), and Commercial (COM) |
||
|
Requested Land Use Plan Designation |
Commercial (COM) and Office/Industrial (OFC/IND) |
||
|
P&Z Recommendation |
Unanimous recommendation of approval |
||
|
Town of Cary Case Manager |
Meredith Chandler 919-460-4983 |
||
Subject Parcels
|
PARCEL & OWNER INFORMATION |
|||
|
Property Owner(s) |
County Parcel Numbers (10 digit) |
Real Estate ID(s) |
Deeded Acres |
|
Quality Oil Company LLC 1540 Silas Creek Parkway Winston-Salem, NC 27102 |
0774430810 |
0224358 |
6.02+/- (portion) |
|
N & B Company LLC P.O. Box 2589 Fayetteville, NC 28304 |
0774349046 |
0001280 |
0.64+/- |
|
Total Acres |
3.1+/- |
||
Applicable Comprehensive or Area Plan Requirements:
A. Land Use Plan: This case proposes to modify the existing Land Use Plan designation.
B. Transportation
Road 1: Chapel Hill Road
Existing Section: 150’ ROW, currently 4-lanes
Future Section: 124’ ROW and 6-lane median divided
Road Improvements: None scheduled
Road 2: Trinity Road
Existing Section: 70’ ROW, currently 2 lanes
Future Section: 124’ ROW and 6-lane median divided
Road Improvements: None scheduled
C. Parks & Greenways:
Greenways Map
The adopted Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan
recommends the provision of a multi-use trail along Trinity Road in this
location, as part of the regional greenways and trails system.
D. Open Space and Historic Resources: The multi-use trail noted in item C above is supported by the goals of the Open Space and Historic Resources Plan.
E. Affordable Housing: N/A
F. Growth Management:
Analysis: The subject parcels are surrounded by existing development.
Analysis: Water, sewer, and storm lines are located within or near the subject parcels.
Comparison of Existing and Requested Land Use Designations
|
Comparison of Existing Land Use Plan Designation and Requested Land Use Plan Designation |
|||
|
|
Existing Land Use Plan Designation |
Requested Land Use Plan Designation |
Change |
|
Office/Industrial (OFC/IND) |
0.64+/- acres |
0.97+/- acres |
Increase of 0.33+/- acres |
|
Office/Institutional (OFC/INS) |
2.15+/- acres |
0 acres |
Decrease of 2.15+/- acres |
|
Commercial (COM) |
0.33+/- acres |
2.15+/- acres |
Increase of 1.82+/- acres |
Town Council Public Hearing April 12, 2007
A. Public Hearing Comments
No one
came forward to speak at the Town Council public hearing on
April 12, 2007.
B. Town Council Questions and Comments
Town Council comments were related to details associated with the rezoning and not with the broad land use request of this comprehensive plan amendment.
C. Changes Since the Public Hearing
There were no changes made to the case between the Town Council Public Hearing on April 12, 2007 and the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting on June 18, 2007.
Planning and Zoning Board Meeting June 18, 2007
A. Public Hearing Comments
No one came forward to speak at the public hearing.
B. Planning and Zoning Board Actions and Analysis
The Board made a unanimous recommendation to approve this request.
C. Changes Since the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting
There have been no changes to this case since the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting on June 18, 2007.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation
The current land use designation of the subject parcels includes Office/Industrial (OFC/IND), Office/Institutional (OFC/INS), and Commercial (COM). The applicant proposes to change the land use designation to Commercial (COM) and Office/Industrial (OFC/IND). The proposed amendment to the Town’s Land Use Plan moves the Office/Industrial portion from the corner of Chapel Hill Road and Trinity Road south with frontage on Trinity Road only. This aligns the Office/Industrial (OFC/IND) use with other Office/Industrial (OFC/IND) parcels south of the subject parcels. This proposed amendment also includes Commercial (COM) land use at the corner of Chapel Hill and Trinity Roads. A commercial use at this corner is compatible with and may provide support to the existing Hampton Inn Hotel to the immediate east of the site.
Staff recommends approval of this request.
Town Council Criteria for Consideration in Reviewing Comprehensive Plan Amendments:
Section 3.2.2(B) of the Land Development Ordinance states that “Proposals to amend the Comprehensive Plan shall be evaluated based upon whether the amendment is necessary in order to address conditions including, but not limited to, the following:”
Analysis: This statement is not applicable.
Analysis: The applicant proposes to revise the land use plan designations to create a situation that is more compatible with the existing development.
Analysis: This statement is not applicable.
Analysis: This statement is not applicable.