06-CPA-10 Modern Woodmen of America Comprehensive Plan Amendment Staff Report to Town Council
1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Current
Comprehensive Plan Designation:
Current land use map
High Density Residential (HDR)
Requested Comprehensive Plan Designation:
Proposed
land use map
Office and Institutional (OFC/INS)
Note:
The applicants’ request was amended to “Office and Institutional or
Medium-to-High Density Residential (OFC/INS or MDR-to-HDR)” on
Acreage: 1.22 ±
Location:
Vicinity map
2009, 2011, and 2013 Piney
(Note: The applicant is only
requesting the CPA for 2011 and
Applicant
(for 2011 and 2013 Piney
Doug Polk
Modern Woodmen of
(919) 467-5444
dpolkmwa@earthlink.net
Applicant’s
Contact:
Tom Wells
Doug Polk Agency of MWA
312 Hunters Crossing
(919) 233-8298
tawells@bellsouth.net
Applicant (for 2009
Piney
Town of
Town
of
Scott Ramage, Principal Planner
(919) 462-3882
scott.ramage@townofcary.org
2. SUMMARY OF REQUESTED
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
A.
Land Use Plan and Area Plans
Current
Plan Recommendations: The Southeast
Area Plan (adopted 2004) is the governing element of the Comprehensive Plan
for the subject properties. The
Southeast Area Plan recommends that the subject parcels – along with most of
the other nearby existing single family lots on the east side of Piney Plains
Road, south of the Dellinger PDD – be developed or redeveloped as High Density
Residential (HDR). High Density
Residential includes multifamily and attached housing at densities of about 8
dwellings or more per acre.
Proposed
Plan Amendments: The applicants
request that the future land use designation for the two single family lots at
2011 and
B.
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Current
Plan Recommendations:
Existing & Future
Roadway Section: 5 lanes, 90’
Right-of-way (ROW) - complete
Sidewalk
Requirements: Exists on both sides
Bicycle
Requirements: Construction complete
Transit
Requirements: Transit stop not
required
Proposed
Transportation Plan Amendments: No
requested changes
C.
Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Master Plan
Greenways and Trails map
Current
Plan Recommendations: The
subject parcels are not affected by any elements of the Master Plan.
Proposed
Parks Plan Amendments: No
requested changes
D.
Other Comprehensive Plan Volumes
No requested changes
3.
REFERENCE INFORMATION
A.
Meeting Schedule:
Town
Council Public Hearing
Date:
Action:
Forwarded to the February 19 P&Z Board meeting
Planning
& Zoning Board:
Date:
Action:
The Board recommended approval 8-0 of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, but
with the staff-proposed modification to include “Medium-to-High Density
Residential” as well as the requested “Office/Institutional” use as the
recommended uses for the parcels.
Town
Council Action
Date: March 8, 2007
Action: Approved
|
Property
Owner(s) |
|
Real
Estate ID(s) |
Area
in Acres |
|
Doug Polk, John Welch,
and |
0772491305 0772490267 |
0025785 0025787 |
0.39 0.58 |
|
Town of |
0772491412 |
0058603 |
0.25 |
|
Total
Acreage |
|
|
1.22 |
Provided
below are the applicant’s responses to the CPA Justification Questions
contained in the application form. (The
application questions are repeated in boldface.)
Please note that the statements below are that of the applicant and does
not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town of Cary
:
How is the proposed request reasonable?
In explaining how it is reasonable, please address the following, if
applicable:
1.
Describe how the requested amendment is warranted due to changes in
conditions, forecasts, or assumptions since the original Comprehensive Plan
recommendations were developed?
“Initially,
Piney Plains Road
was a rural two-lane residential street with single family homes.
It is reasonable to assume that the existing single family homes will be
redeveloped into uses compatible with the O/I zoning.
This amendment is warranted due to the widening of the roadway, the
development of PDDs and other O/I zoning on
4. PUBLIC
HEARING COMMENTS AND STAFF ANALYSIS
A.
Feedback at the Public Hearing
Staff
presented the case and the applicant concurred with the statements.
No one spoke in favor of or opposed to the request.
B.
Changes since the Public Hearings
There were no changes made to the case prior to the Planning Board action, however following the Planning Board meeting the applicants revised their requested Plan Amendment to conform with the recommendation of both staff and the Board, namely that the subject parcels be designated as “Office/Institutional or Medium-to-High Density Residential” in the Southeast Area Plan, rather than just as “Office/Institutional.”
C. Staff Analysis of the Amendment Request
As
noted in 2.A., above, the Southeast Area Plan (2004) currently recommends the
subject parcels for High Density Residential development.
This recommendation was based on several considerations during the course
of Plan development in 2003-2004. First,
it was recognized that – over time – these single family lots along
Second,
it was felt that nonresidential uses should be avoided for these single family
lots facing
Third,
it was thought that these lots, along with about six other nearby single family
lots along the east side of Piney Plains Road, might have an opportunity to
develop as high density housing in conjunction with The Lodge at Crossroads.
(The adjacent phase of The Lodge was in its early construction planning
phases at that time.) Alternatively,
it was felt that the lots were also of ample size for small-scale townhome
development, independent of The Lodge at Crossroads.
Section 3.2.2(B) of the LDO
states that:
“Proposals
to amend the Comprehensive Plan shall be evaluated based upon whether the
amendment is necessary in order to address conditions including, but not limited
to, the following:
In
the case of the subject lots, the only new information since the SE Plan was
adopted is that none of the single family lots along
However,
the new opportunity presented by the proposed Plan Amendment is that it might be
possible to redevelop the subject parcels for office uses in a manner that
retains a residential character that is compatible with the remaining homes
along
The
subject parcels are also adjacent to a future office portion of the Dellinger
PDD. Thus, the requested office uses
would be contiguous with other office uses.
Thus,
a compatible transition along this section of
Lastly,
the requested amendment is supportive of the Town’s emerging goal of providing
additional sites for employment-based economic development.
D. Staff Recommendation on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Staff
feels that while the existing SE Area Plan designation for the subject parcels
is still valid, the range of uses could be expanded to include both
medium-density residential uses and office uses having a residential scale and
appearance. Such a designation would
be compatible with the Cary Comprehensive Plan, and foster a compatible
relationship with adjacent land uses.
Therefore,
staff recommends adoption of the requested amendment to the SE Area Plan, as
recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board and as similarly revised by the
applicants on
Note
that any future office development on the site should conform with the
Comprehensive Plan’s policy that between adjacent properties having different
uses, there should be a gradual
transition in development intensities, building scale, architecture, and site
design. Thus, any office rezoning
for the subject site would ideally include conditions that ensure appropriate
and compatible transitions.
E.
Planning and Zoning Board Recommendation
At
their
The Planning and Zoning Board
recommends that Town Council adopt an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan
as requested by the applicant, but with the staff-proposed modification to
include “Medium-to-High Density Residential” as well as the requested
“Office/Institutional” use as the recommended uses for the parcels.
The Board finds that this amendment is consistent with the spirit,
intent, policies, and goals of the current Town of
·
The office
land uses are adjacent to the office section of an adjacent PDD;
·
The requested
amendment supports the economic development goals of the Town;
·
The requested
amendment provides a reasonable transition to adjacent land uses.
F.
Town Council Motion Options:
Approval Motion:
MOTION TO ADOPT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT
MOVE
TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND mAP 1 OF THE southeast area plan, AN ELEMENT OF
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE TOWN OF CARY, TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF
APPROXIMATELY 1.22 ACRES LOCATED at 2009, 2011, and 2013 Piney plains road fROM
“HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (HDR)” TO “OFFICE/INSTITUTIONAL OR
MEDIUM-TO-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (OFC/INS OR MDR-TO-HDR).”
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN
COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
Section
1: The Comprehensive Plan of the
Town of
|
Property
Owner(s) |
|
Real
Estate ID(s) |
Area
in Acres |
|
Doug Polk, John Welch,
and |
0772491305 0772490267 |
0025785 0025787 |
0.39 0.58 |
|
Town of |
0772491412 |
0058603 |
0.25 |
|
Total
Acreage |
|
|
1.22 |
[Vote]
Denial Motion:
MOTION
TO DENY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
This
proposed amendment (06-CPA-10 Modern Woodmen of America Comprehensive Plan
Amendment) to change the future land use designation for these properties from
“High Density Residential (HDR)” to “Office/Institutional or Medium-to-High Density Residential
(OFC/INS or MDR-to-HDR)” has
been evaluated by staff and the Planning & Zoning Board, and cannot be
supported because
and
is hereby denied.
[Vote]