Town Of Cary
Reedy Creek
Activity
Center Concept Plan 05-AC-009
Staff Report to the Town Council
1. Background Information
History:
The application for this
request was submitted prior to the terminology change from Activity Center
Concept Plans to Mixed Use Sketch Plans.
Current:
Zoning Map
Base zoning district:
The subject property is within the Northwoods PDD and also includes an Office
and Institutional (O&I) zoning district. Properties owned by the applicant
and fronting NE Maynard Road are part of the Northwoods Planned Development District. The Northwoods Master
Land Use Plan allows for office & institutional uses on these properties.
The two lots fronting Reedy Creek road are zoned Office &
Institutional (O&I).
Overlay zoning district: Reedy Creek
Neighborhood Mixed Use Overlay
Proposed:
The proposed Activity Center Concept Plan
(ACCP) consists of a mixture of high density residential, office, commercial
development. The underlying zoning
classification cannot be changed within an Activity Center. Through the submittal and approval
of an ACCP, however, various uses may be considered.
The subject ACCP proposes 245
residential multi-family units, a 64 room hotel, a maximum of 63,200 square feet
of commercial space, and a maximum
of 73,600 square feet of office space. The
residential multi-family buildings and the proposed office buildings would be a
maximum of three (3) or four (4) stories. One
mixed use building with a height range of four (4) to five (5) stories is
proposed in the south east corner of the site near the intersection of Reedy
Creek Road and NE Maynard Road. This building would contain retail
uses, indoor recreation, office space and residential units.
The sketch plan also shows two swimming pools and neighborhood community
centers which provide active recreation for the residents. Concept
Plan
Acreage: 17.66 acres+
Location:
707 & 801 NE Maynard Road
and 771 and 803 Reedy
Creek Road
Applicant:
Al Hashemi
PO Box
97772
Raleigh, NC 27624
Town
of Cary
Case Manager:
Debra
Grannan, Senior Planner
316 N. Academy Street, Cary, NC
27513
(919) 460-4980
Debra.grannan@townofcary.org
A.
Transportation:
Existing
NE Maynard Road
Section: 5 lanes undivided, 100’
Right-of-Way (ROW)
Future Roadway Section: 6 lanes median divided, 124’ROW
CIP Schedule: N/A
Sidewalk Requirements: both sides
Bicycle Requirements: Wide outside lanes
Transit
Requirements:
A bus stop shelter with concrete pad is required in the right-of-way between Reedy Creek Road
and the westernmost entrance into the
development on NE Maynard Road
. The
shelter must be a minimum 5’ wide by 12’ long with a light green metal
fabricated roof. Sides must be made
of materials that can be easily seen through for safety purposes.
Frame will be made of metal or cast aluminum material in dark brown
color. The shelter must also have
solar lighting.
Existing
Reedy Creek Road Section: 2-3 lanes, 60’ ROW
Future Roadway Section: 3 lanes, 67’ ROW
CIP Schedule: 2007 (this project is NOT budgeted)
Sidewalk Requirements: both sides
Bicycle Requirements: Wide Outside Lanes
Transit Requirements: None
B.
Traffic Impact Analysis:
A
traffic impact study is not required at the concept plan stage, however, a
traffic impact study will be required prior to site plan approval.
C.
Parks & Greenways:
Greenways Map
D.
Riparian buffer impacts:
The riparian buffers on this property will be addressed in the following
manner: Pursuant
to a Release and Settlement Agreement entered into by and between the
Town of Cary and ARH International Co. and Al Hashemi, the Town has agreed that
property located at 707 and 801 N.E. Maynard Road, Cary, NC may be developed
without regard to the Town of Cary Riparian Buffer Requirements provided such
development is in accord with a State (buffer) variance or in accord with all
applicable State Riparian Buffer Requirements.
The proposed Reedy Creek Activity Center Concept Plan (ACCP) presently
encompasses detailed plans for 707 and 801 N.E. Maynard Road, therefore, the provisions of the Settlement
Agreement would apply to this Application.
3.
Reference Information
Meeting
Schedule:
Town
Council Public Hearing
Date:
Action:
Forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board
Planning
& Zoning Board:
Date:
Action:
Postponed to: June 14, 2007 Town Council Meeting
Town
Council Action:
Date:
PARCEL &
OWNER INFORMATION
|
|||
|
Property
Owner |
|
Real
Estate ID(s) |
Area
(Acres) |
|
Ali R. Hashemi-Nejad |
0764775445 |
0294672 |
3.89
ac. |
|
Group of Five Concepts |
0764877564 |
0081883 |
0.97
ac. |
|
B.T.D. Corp |
0764877385 |
0147777 |
2.06
ac. |
|
Total Acreage |
|
|
17.66
ac. |
Feedback at the Public Hearing
Staff presented the Activity Center
Concept Plan and reported that there was a valid protest petition.
The applicant’s representative, Mr. Azad Atashi reported that
neighborhood meetings had been taking place.
He described aspects of the plan, stating that it was designed to provide
generous open space and buffers, and that a large amount of parking was
underground, resulting in less impervious area than other developments.
He emphasized the concept of new urbanism and that this site provided a
place for citizens to live and work in close proximity.
He addressed that the plan would take traffic concerns into account when
designing turn lanes and that the site would address stormwater management
issues through the use of bio retention areas.
George
Bailey spoke on behalf of Glen Ward and himself as the owners of the two
undeveloped parcels adjacent to this site within the same quadrant of this Mixed
Use Overlay District. Mr. Bailey indicated they are not part of the concept plan
submittal, and he encouraged more comprehensive planning to also include his
property and Mr. Ward’s property. He indicated his intent to work with Mr.
Atashi to facilitate this planning.
Several
property owners from the adjacent Royal Oaks subdivisions spoke during the
public hearing and focused their comments on the following concerns:
Water run off and how it would impact underground parking
Building height
Impact on area schools
Traffic on Reedy Creek Road
Site lighting and buffers
The overall density and intensity of the site
Loss of vegetation
Following
the Public Hearing, the Council raised concerns regarding:
The need for increased office space in this area
Whether or not this site was an appropriate location for a Town Park
If the buffers were adequate based on the building height proposed
If buffer reductions were appropriate or if enhancements could be
required
Building height and its appropriateness for this location
If the balance of uses, especially residential,
was appropriate for this site
How stormwater management would be addressed
Why the adjacent property was not included as part of the plan
Changes
since the Public Hearing
In
January 2007, the applicant met with staff to discuss a plan that reduced
building height and the number of residential dwelling units, but increased the
non-residential use by greater than 100,000 square feet above the current
proposal. Staff advised the
applicant to reduce the overall density of the proposal to lessen the impact on
the subject property, to create more area for recreational open space and to
allow room for future development on other quadrants of the Mixed Use Center . In addition, the applicant agreed to make further reductions to building
height, which are indicated on the current plan.
The
following table depicts the changes to the proposed ACCP since the Town Council
public hearing on June 8, 2006:
|
Use |
TC
Hearing Plan |
Current
Proposal |
Net |
|
Residential Multi Family
(units) |
368 |
245 |
- 123 |
|
Commercial (square feet)* |
54,000 |
63,200 |
+ 9,200 |
|
Hotel (square feet /
rooms) |
42,000 / 64 |
31,600 / 64 |
-10,400 |
|
Office (square feet) |
77,100 |
73,600 |
-3,500 |
|
Open Space &
Recreation Area (square
feet)** |
367,210 |
408,742 |
+41,532 |
|
Parking Structures
(square feet) |
Not specified |
0 |
Parking Structure removed from plan |
|
Maximum Building
Height (stories) |
Maximum |
||
|
Mixed
use (building 13 Section A) |
7 |
5 |
63’ |
|
Building
13 Sections B, C and D |
7 |
4 |
59’ |
|
Multi-family
(buildings 1, 4) |
4 |
3 |
39 -
47’ |
|
Multi-family
“town home style” buildings |
4 |
3 |
35-40’ |
|
Multi-family
residential 6 |
4 |
4 |
51’ |
|
|
2 |
2 |
27’ |
|
Multi-family/Commercial
(buildings 11 & 12) |
4 |
4 |
57’ |
*The commercial use presented at the original public hearing did not include
areas within the mixed use center that were intended for indoor recreation, and
this accounts for a portion of the increase.
When open to the public, such uses would be classified as commercial
rather than neighborhood recreation.
** Area includes all perimeter buffers, neighborhood recreation centers and pools, common open space and active and passive recreation areas.
Buffers and Open Space
The perimeter buffers have been
designated as Type “A” Opaque. The width of the buffer abutting the Royal
Oaks Subdivision to the north is 30’ as required by the Northwoods PDD.
Based on Staff’s recommendation, the applicant agreed to provide an
additional ten foot setback off that buffer to protect existing vegetation,
which is consistent with the present requirements of the Land Development
Ordinance. The plan was modified to show more open space and recreation sites
with swimming pools and neighborhood recreation centers to meet the Land
Development Ordinance requirement of 500 square feet of passive or active
recreational open space per dwelling unit.
Stormwater Management
The applicant is proposing to
construct three (3) wetlands to manage stormwater runoff.
The general location of two constructed wetlands has been identified on
the plan. Detailed location and
dimensions as well as other stormwater management requirements will be addressed
at the time of site plan review.
Administrative Changes
Use classifications and
descriptions on the plan were changed to be consistent with terms used in Cary’s Land Development Ordinance.
The applicant, Mr. Hashemi, is
no longer represented by Atashi and Associates, and is representing himself in
this application. The plan now
conceptually shows how the property owned by the applicant relates to the
adjacent, vacant parcels within the same quadrant.
In addition, the staff report has been modified to reflect the most
current school data provided by Wake County.
Planning
and Zoning Board Recommendation:
On March
19, 2007, the Planning and Zoning Board voted 7-2 to recommend approval of the
Reedy Creek ACCP as it pertained to the
following items:
The Board
asked for clarification and assurance on how Cary’s regulations would be
applied on the following:
During the
presentation, Staff emphasized that there were aspects of the plan that such as
stormwater management, road design and connection points that would be subjected
to more scrutiny and application of Cary’s ordinance regulations at the time
of site plan review.
Two members
who voted in favor of the concept plan questioned the appropriateness of the
five story building proposed on the site. Two board members voted against the
plan, stating that the proposed density was too intense for the site.
Changes
since the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting
The most
significant change was in the conversion of several four story multi-family
residential buildings to 12 groups of “town home” style units.
This yielded a reduction in dwelling units from 260 to 245.
The height
of a portion of building 13, section “D” along NE Maynard Road from
five-stories to four-stories. This is one building, but it is designed in
segments, which the applicant proposes will be “stepped” in height so that
the impact at the street is reduced. The plan sets the tallest point of the
building back approximately 80 feet from the roads. This reduction in height
does not result in a reduction to the overall square feet of non-residential use
on the subject property. The footprint of building 13 will be modified to
accommodate the shift in square feet from a vertical to horizontal placement.
The multi-family portion of building 13, section “A,” remains five-stories.
The data
provided by Wake County Public Schools has been updated to reflect the current
enrollment and school capacity statistics.
Planning
Analysis
Land
Use Plan Compliance
The
Town of Cary Land Use Plan outlines Neighborhood Activity Centers as mixed-use centers containing 250,000
+/- square feet of non-residential floor space.
The Reedy Creek ACCP increases the total non-residential floor area from
69,405 to 237,805. As a guide, the
Town strives to achieve roughly equal parts of commercial and
office/institutional uses in an Activity Center . The Reedy Creek ACCP increases the
total commercial floor area from 59,539 to 122,739 and increases the total
office/institutional floor area from 9,866 to 83,466. The
plan also shows that potential exists for future office development within this
same quadrant. The Reedy Creek ACCP improves the balance of non-residential
floor area within this activity center.
In addition, the Town of Cary Land Use Plan
strives to achieve at least 1 multi-family unit per 1,000 square feet of
non-residential floor space in a Neighborhood Activity Center . The Reedy Creek Mixed Use Overlay
District currently provides nearly 5 multi-family units per 1,000 square feet of
non-residential floor space. This result would provide support to existing and
proposed commercial use within the overlay district. With the addition of the
Reedy Creek ACCP, nearly 2.75 multi-family units per 1,000 square feet of
non-residential floor space would be provided as indicated in the table below:
|
|
|||
|
Use |
Existing
Development |
Proposed
Reedy Creek ACCCP |
Total |
|
Commercial
(square feet) |
59,539 |
63,200 |
122,739 |
|
Office
(square feet) |
0 |
73,600 |
83,466 |
|
Church
|
9,866 |
0 |
9,866 |
|
School |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Hospital |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Hotel |
0 |
31,600 |
31,600 |
|
Total |
69,405 |
168,400 |
237,805 |
|
Medium
Density (units) |
67 |
0 |
67 |
|
High
Density (units) |
328 |
245 |
588 |
|
Total |
395 |
245 |
640 |
|
Residential units per
non-residential square feet: |
2.75 |
||
Staff
Analysis of Cary
Design Principles
Within a Mixed Use Overlay
District, (formerly an Activity Center) the plan is evaluated to ensure that it meets the following Design Principles:
In applying these Design Guidelines to the Reedy Creek ACCP, Staff considered
the following positive aspects of the plan:
Create
Human Scale
The Buildings along NE Maynard Road create a sense of place along the street. Buildings
are proposed to have pedestrian access from the sidewalk. The
proposed “town home style” residential units adjacent to Royal Oaks serves
as a good proportional relationship between the buildings and pedestrian
activity on the site.
Create
a Sense of Place
There is an opportunity for
amenities such as fountains, clocks, or seating areas to be provided. A
gathering area is proposed in the plaza area at building 13.
Connect
Uses
Connections to adjacent parcels
are provided. The
plan proposes a pedestrian crossing over the stream buffer area.
Provide
Transitions
To lessen
the impact on existing residential property, the plan originally proposed a
“stepped-back” building style for the multi-family units adjacent to the
Royal Oaks Subdivision. This has
been improved by proposing town home style buildings that are three-stories
tall. The most intense use and
massing occur along the public roadways.
Reduce
Parking Impacts
Buildings appear to be more
prominent than parking areas.
The applicant has made an
effort to reduce the impact of parking by providing underground parking and
parking decks.
The plan requests a 10%
reduction to LDO required parking which staff supports within the mixed use,
provided spaces are located appropriately in relation to proposed uses. Parking
lots have been positioned behind buildings effectively along NE Maynard Road and Reedy Creek
Road so that parking areas are screened.
Plan
for Pedestrians, Bicyclists and Transit Users
Sidewalks are continuous along
public streets. A location is reserved for a transit stop.
Bicycle parking will be a site plan requirement.
Provide
Open Space
Passive and Active recreational
open space is provided on this plan. Residential
areas have recreation opportunities within a five minute walk of each home.
Pedestrian trails are proposed in the vicinity of a wooded buffer area.
The following areas were
identified where the plan did not meet Cary’s Design Guidelines:
Create
Human Scale
Not all buildings are not
arranged to enclose and define space within the site.
Create
a Sense of Place
The area at the corner of NE Maynard Road
and Reedy Creek road presents an excellent opportunity for creating a sense of
place, however, this potential is diminished by the possible vehicular
circulation route dividing the corner space with the mixed use building and
plaza. This vehicular route, however, is conceptual and is subject to DOT
approval.
Connect
Uses
A connection to the off-site
parcel to the west will be required to function. The proposed connection to the
northeast parcel functions awkwardly due to its mid-point location into the
possible parking area. Also,
multiple vehicular flow patterns are shown converging at this connection point,
creating areas for potential conflict.
Plan
for Pedestrians, Bicyclists and Transit Users
On the eastern portion of the
site the pool/recreation area is located such that most
of the residents pedestrians must cross
vehicular circulation routes to reach this destination.
Pedestrian circulation within
this site is unclear and does not provide a consistent, intuitive pattern for
users.
Provide
Open Space
While the plan meets the
requirement for 500 square feet of passive or recreational open space for each
residential unit, the open spaces appear to be left over from the desired
building arrangement. Open spaces
may be improved in conjunction with clarifying pedestrian circulation.
Compliance
with Cary’s Community Appearance Manual
Building architecture and
landscaping features can not be evaluated until a full site plan has been
submitted. The applicant has
provided a note on the plan which states “Unless exceptions are granted by the
Town Council through the approval of this plan the final site plan will be
required to meet all Town of Cary Land Development Ordinance Regulations and design requirements.” This offers assurance that the Town’s Community
Appearance Manual and Design Guidelines will ensure a high quality appearance of
the site.
During the review process
several members of the Cary’s Development Review Committee expressed concerns about traffic and
pedestrian flow on the site. Also, the vehicular flow through parking areas
appears challenging. As currently
proposed, approval of this plan would not grant exceptions to Town standards for
travel lanes, connectivity requirements or pedestrian circulation.
At this conceptual stage of
planning for the site, the focus is more centered on use type and allowable
square footage. The plan provides a balanced mix of uses within this site and
overcomes the shortage of office use in the overall Mixed Use District.
In discussions with the
applicant, Staff has stated that some reductions to building square footage may
be required during site plan review process in order to meet LDO requirements
for road design, utility easements, vehicular and pedestrian connectivity, as
well as other design guidelines that can not be fully evaluated due to the
conceptual nature of the plan.
Additional
Reference Information
Schools:
The
school information is being provided for your review; however, the Wake County
Board of Education controls capital projects for school capacities.
|
School
Information |
||||
|
Assigned
School |
Enrollment |
Permanent
Seat
Capacity |
Average
Percent Occupied |
Projected
Number of Additional Students* |
|
Reedy
Creek Elementary |
576 |
816 |
71% |
38 |
|
Reedy
Creek Middle |
796 |
876 |
91
% |
21 |
|
Cary
High
School |
2095 |
2,458 |
85
% |
17 |
|
Total
Projected new Students |
|
|
|
76 |
Current
Enrollment and Building Capacity
is based on the 20th day of the school year for
2005-2006 supplied by the Wake County Public School
System. School assignment will be
determined at the time of development.
The
Projected Number of Additional Students
is only a rough approximation. The
actual number of students will vary depending on several variables, such as
dwelling unit type, number of bedrooms, dwelling size, and other factors.
Staff
Recommendation
To foster a better relationship with adjacent property owners, the applicant has agreed to apply the following conditions to his plan:
· A 10’ setback is required
off the 30’ opaque buffer along the northern edge of the property line
adjacent to lot one.
· The
exterior walls, with the exception of doors and windows, will be a minimum of
70% masonry.
Based on consistency with the
Town of Cary Comprehensive Plan, Staff recommends approval of the Reedy Creek Activity Center Concept Plan for
the following items:
This recommendation for
approval comes with the understanding that the Town of Cary Land Development Ordinance
requirements for vehicular and pedestrian connectivity may not be waived at
this time. Furthermore, the plan
presented is conceptual and does not contain the information needed to fully evaluate
the site in terms of meeting Cary’s design guidelines.