TOWN COUNCIL
REQUEST FOR REZONING/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
APPLICANT(S) |
OWNER(S) |
| Tillett
Development Company, Inc. 6729 Falls of Neuse Road Raleigh, NC 27615 676-1857 (phone) 676-9296 (fax) tilletdev@earthlink.net |
Hubert
E. Hatcher Sidney M. Hatcher C/o J.K. Sherron 4021 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 510-5000 (phone) 510-5721 (fax) |
| LOCATION: | South side of Morrisville Parkway Extension, west of Davis Drive |
| MAPS: | Vicinity Zoning Land Use |
In Town Limits [ ] Cary ETJ [X] Cary Planning Jurisdiction Only [ ]
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS |
|
| TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING: | May 13, 1999 |
| PLANNING & ZONING BOARD: | June 21, 1999 |
| TOWN COUNCIL: | July 22, 1999 |
PARCEL INFORMATION |
||
Parcel # |
Realid # |
Area |
074503415264 |
0179895 |
1.0 Acre |
074503415377 |
0065737 |
0.2 Acre |
REZONING DATA |
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
| Zoning: | Residential 30 |
Office and Institutional Conditional Use |
| Overlay District: | N/A |
N/A |
| Land Use: | Vacant |
Office and Institutional |
REZONING CONDITIONS |
CURRENT |
| No Current Conditions |
PROPOSED |
| 2.
Architecture: The buildings on the subject property will:
(I) be of a residential character, (ii) be no greater
than three stories in height, (iii) be constructed of
non-painted brick, (iv) have pitched roofs with asphalt
shingles of a neutral color, (v) have decorative accents
on building exterior (e.g. brick accents), (vi) have
individual windows with no more than 3 windows adjoining
in any one grouping of windows, (vii) windows shall have |
3. Buffers:
|
| 4. Dumpster: Any dumpster on the property would be screened so that the dumpster is not visible to any adjoining property located west or southwest of the property. Dumpster enclosure shall be made of brick to match the buildings (except for the gate) and screened with plants per Town of Cary landscaping requirements. |
| 5. Storm Drain: A storm drain study shall be performed at the time of site plan approval for the subject property to examine the amount of run-off and the best, feasible way to handled the run-off relative to the subject property and the adjoining property to west and southwest. Particular attention shall be paid to directing as much storm drain as reasonably possible to the storm drain systems which will be located in Morrisville Parkway and Davis Drive. |
| 6. Square
Footage: The Property shall be limited to |
| 7. Common Site Plan: The property described and subject to 98 REZ 30 and the property described and subject to this Application will be developed pursuant to a common site plan, so that the required improvements to Morrisville Parkway for both tracts will be accommodated. |
| 8. Traffic Study: A traffic study will be performed at the time of site plan approval. |
| 9. Cross
Access: The Property described and subject to 98 REZ 30,
the property described and subject to this Application,
and the property lying immediately south of and adjoining
the property described in 98 REZ 30 will provide for a
cross access easement or |
| 10. The uses of the Property shall be restricted to:
|
| Revised
6/10/99. Revised 6/21/99. |
REZONING HISTORY |
| Case 97rez46 |
| From Residential 30 Zoning To Residential Multi Family 8 Zoning |
| Approved by Town Council on: August 13, 1998 |
SITE DATA |
WATER/SEWER SERVICE |
| Staff
Remarks: A 16" waterline exists within the Davis Drive right-of-way. An extension of the waterline will be required with the development of the property. In addition, an extension of the Town's sanitary sewer system will be required to develop the property. |
TRANSPORTATION |
| Traffic Impact Analysis Required: Yes [ ] No [ X ] |
| Staff
Remarks: The proposed rezoning application does not require a Traffic Impact Analysis report per the Interim Planned Development Ordinance. It should be noted that a Traffic Impact Analysis report may be required at the time of the initial site plan application for the subject property. |
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS |
| Staff
Remarks: The subject property is not within a Watershed Reservoir Protection District. |
WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL CAPACITY |
| There shall be no additional impact to the Wake County School System. |
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USES |
||
Zoning: |
Land Use: |
|
| North: | RMF-8 CU | Vacant |
| South: | R-30 | Vacant and Single Family Residential (Preston Village) |
| East: | RM-Morrisville | School (Morrisville Elementary) |
| West: | R-30CU | Single Family Residential (Preston Village) |
TOWN OF CARY FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DATA |
CURRENT |
PROPOSED |
|
| Plan Designation: | Low Density Residential | Office/Institutional |
| Alternate Designation: | None | No Change |
| Activity Center: | None | No Change |
EXISTING LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT HISTORY |
| None |
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION |
| CHANGES SINCE PUBLIC HEARING: *Yes [ X ] No [ ] |
| *See revised rezoning conditions on page # of this document. |
| PROTEST PETITION FILED: Valid [ ] Invalid [ ] None Filed [ X ] |
LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT |
| Analysis:
According to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, this property is designated for Low Density Residential or Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND). The Land Use Plan allows for nonresidential uses at arterial intersections that are not designated as an activity center provided that residential uses have become unviable at that location and that nonresidential uses on any of the four quadrants of the intersection occupy no more than a few acres on each quadrant. The proposed rezoning does not meet these criteria, due to the location of the requested rezoning and the continued viability of single-family residential uses along Morrisville Parkway in Cary. Hence, the rezoning is generally not in conformance with the Land Use Plan. Recommendation: Since the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment cannot be supported by the intent of the Plan, staff recommends denial of the amendment. |
REZONING REQUEST |
| The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as low density residential or traditional neighborhood development (TND), therefore this request is not consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Also, Staff has concerns that 12,500 square feet maximum for this site may be excessive. |
| STAFF
RECOMMENDATION: Because this request is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, staff cannot support this request. |
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION |
| At their meeting of June 21, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Board voted to forward this request, along with 98-REZ-30, to Town Council with a recommendation of approval. |