TOWN OF CARY
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
CASE NO.  04-A-002
February 9, 2004
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL
WORKSHEET

STAFF CONTACT:

Beth Lewis
Planner
(919) 462-3944
e-mail:
beth.lewis@townofcary.org

APPLICANT:

Jerry and Anne Hailey

OWNER:

Jerry and Anne Hailey

LOCATION:

922 W. Chatham Street , Cary , NC   27511  

PRESENT ZONING:

OICU, Office and Institutional Conditional Use

REQUEST:

An administrative appeal from the November 10, 2003 letter of Charles Brown denying zoning verification.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL WORKSHEET

FACTORS RELEVANT TO THE DETERMINATION OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL:

Appeals to the Zoning Board of Adjustment from decisions of the Town’s administrative staff are allowed under the Land Development Ordinance (LDO).  Decisions which may be appealed to the Zoning Board of Adjustment include any order, requirement, permit, decision, determination, refusal, or interpretation made by any administrative officer in interpreting and/or enforcing the provisions of the LDO.  An appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment may be brought by any person, firm, corporation, office, department, board, bureau or commission aggrieved by the order, requirement, permit, decision, or determination which is the subject of the appeal.  At a public hearing or a subsequent meeting, the Zoning Board of Adjustment shall adopt a resolution reversing, affirming, or modifying the contested action.  In reversing, affirming, or modifying the contested action, the Zoning Board of Adjustment shall have all relevant powers of the administrative officer from whom the appeal is taken.  The Zoning Board of Adjustment shall not reverse or modify the contested action unless it finds that the administrative officer erred in the application or interpretation of the terms of the LDO or related policies adopted by the Town.  The Zoning Board of Adjustment shall not reverse or modify the contested action unless there is a concurring vote of at least eight members.

CHRONOLOGY

September 25, 1986 – Property was rezoned, at a previous owner’s request, from R-8, Residential, to OICU, Office and Institutional Conditional Use.  That rezoning information is attached.

October 22, 2003 – Jerry Hailey, current owner, requested a zoning verification letter from Zoning Compliance Officer Charles Brown for the property.  In that request, Mr. Hailey asked for permission to lease the building to Phyllis Helms so that she could operate a group home.

November 10, 2003 – Officer Charles Brown responded with a zoning compliance letter (attached).  In that letter, Mr. Brown stated that group homes are not permitted in the Office and Institutional Zoning District, and that group homes are permitted in residential zoning districts. 

December 10, 2003 – Jerry and Anne Hailey submitted a Zoning Board of Adjustment application requesting an appeal of that decision.

STAFF’S POSITION SUMMARY

This property contains a duplex, or two-family, dwelling that are in use as residences.  This fact is supported by both Wake County Real Estate data (attached) and Town of Cary utility billing records (attached).  The LDO sets out a number of different “use classifications” (Sec. 12.3).  There are five main types of use classifications:  (1) Residential, (2) Public/Institutional, (3) Commercial, (4) Industrial, and (5) Accessory.  There is also  Unlisted Uses.  Within each of the 5 main types of classification, there are subcategories.  For instance, within the “Public/Institutional” use category, there are ten subcategories, including “Aviation,” “Cemetery,” Cultural Facilities”, “Day Care”, Government Services”, “Hospital”, “Park and Open Space”, “Religious Assembly”, “Educational Use” and “Non-Governmental Utility”  (A copy of Sec 12.3.3 setting forth Public/Institutional uses is attached).  LDO Sec. 12.3.2 sets forth the “Residential Uses” classification.  In “Residential Uses” there are two subcategories:  “Group Living” and “Household Living”.  Under “Group Living” there are further sub-classifications, including Dormitory, Group Home, Live Care Community and Nursing Home.  Under “Household Living” there are Accessory Dwelling Unit, Boarding House, Caretaker’s Residence, Detached Dwelling, Duplex Dwelling, Live/Work Unit, Manufactured Home, Manufactured Home Park and several more.  In the LDO (Sec. 12.3.2(B)(5)), a duplex dwelling is considered to be a subcategory of  “Household Living” “Residential Use” and is defined as

“(B)  Household living

This use category is characterized by residential occupancy of a dwelling unit by a household.  Tenancy is arranged on a month-to-month or longer basis (lodging where a tenancy may be arranged for a period of less than 30 days is classified under the “Visitor Accommodation” category).  Common accessory uses include recreational activities, raising of pets, gardens, personal storage buildings, hobbies, and parking of the occupants’ vehicles.  Home Occupations and Accessory Dwelling Units are accessory uses that are subject to additional regulations (see Section 5.3.4).  Specific use types include, but are not limited to:

      [omitted material]

(5)     Duplex Dwelling

A building on one lot that has open yards on all sides and contains two dwelling units that share a common wall or ceiling/floor and have separate access from the outside.”

Group homes are considered to be a subcategory of “Group Living” “Residential Use” (Sec. 12.3.2(A)(2):

“(A)  Group Living

This category is characterized by residential occupancy of a structure by a group of people who do not meet the definition of “Household Living”.  Tenancy is arranged on a monthly or longer basis, and the size of the group may be larger than a family.  Generally, Group Living structures have a common eating area for residents.  The residents may receive care, training, or treatment, and the caregivers may or may not reside at the site.  Accessory uses commonly include recreational facilities and vehicle parking for occupants and staff.  Specific use types include:

[omitted material]

(2)     Group Home

A dwelling unit in which unrelated persons with handicaps, as such term is defined in the Fair Housing Amendments Act, 42 U.S.C. 3602 and Chapter 168, Article 3 of the North Carolina General Statues, live together as a single housekeeping unit.  Supervisory and support personnel who assist in rehabilitation and personal care for the residents with disabilities may, but are not required to, reside in the dwelling.  All group homes must comply with all applicable federal, state, and local licensing requirements and health regulations.  A group home may house up to ten residents.  The term “group home” does not include a facility that provides the full range of medical services found in health care institutions or dependent living facilities, and the term “handicapped” does not include mentally ill persons who are dangerous to others as defined in N.C.G.S. 122C-3(11)b.  A group home may not serve the purpose of, or as an alternative to, incarceration.”

Wake County and Cary records indicate the building is a “Duplex Dwelling” use, a “Household Living” sub-classification under “Residential Use”.  “Duplex Dwellings uses are not permitted under the existing OICU zoning classification, however, this “Duplex Dwelling” use has been in existence since before the zoning change.  It is therefore an existing non-conforming use.  As to nonconforming uses, the LDO provides:

Sec. 10.3.4 of the LDO provides as follows:

“Change of Use

(A)        Any nonconforming use may be changed to a conforming use by securing all approvals and permits that this Ordinance requires for the intended or resulting use.  No nonconforming use may be changed to another nonconforming use.

(B)        However, the establishment or replacement of residentially used structures on land zoned for non-residential use shall be prohibited unless a rezoning to an appropriate residential district is approved first.”

The applicants wish to change the use from “Duplex Dwelling” use sub-classification of “Household Living”  Residential Use to a “Group Home” use, sub-classification under  “Group Living” Residential Use.  Since “Group Living” is not a permitted use in the OICU zoning classification, a change of use from Duplex Dwelling to Group Home use is not permitted.  This would be similar to changing an “Aviation” subcategory use under  the “Public/Institutional” Use category to a “Cemetery” subcategory use.   The LDO does not permit the use of a structure to change from one non-conforming use to another non-conforming use.  If the non-conforming use is to be changed, it must be changed to a conforming use.  The only way to permit a “Group Home” use to be instituted in this building is to change the zoning classification to a Residential Use that permits “Group Living” uses such as “Group Homes”. 
 

APPLICANT’S POSITION SUMMARY

The applicants’ claim that the structure at 924 W. Chatham St. has been used for residential purposes from the time it was built up to the present. The residential use of the House is grandfathered in and is lawful.  The House can lawfully be used for residential purposes as a lawful nonconforming use.  Cary ’s ordinances allow us (the applicant) to lease the House for a group home because a group home would be a continuation of the residential use.  Changes in tenants for lawful nonconforming uses are specifically allowed in Section 10.1.4 of Cary ’s LDO, which reads:

10.1.4.  Change of Ownership or Tenancy

Changes of ownership, tenancy, or management of an existing nonconformity are permitted but such nonconformities shall continue to be subject to the provisions of this chapter.  

I am proposing to lease my house to be occupied as a residential group home.  Specifically, six disabled residents would live in the hose with one resident head of household.  The residents are disabled, but are lawful and functional citizens.  This is a residential use. 

Additionally, no extension or expansion of my house is needed or planned in order for me to lease for occupancy as a group home.

My proposed lease to Phyllis would not be a change of use because her occupancy of the House for a group home will still be for a residential use.  Therefore, occupancy of the House as a group home would not violate Section 10.3.4. (Change of Use) of the LDO, but a continuation of the residential use.  Occupancy as a group home would be within the scope of the grandfathering that applies to the House.   Additionally, under applicable federal law and regulations, group homes are entitled to reasonable accommodation and to allow the group home in my house would be a reasonable accommodation.

UNDISPUTED FINDING OF FACTS:

1.   The applicants are Jerry and Anne Hailey, who own the Property.

2.       The property is developed with a “Duplex Dwelling”.

3.       The property is zoned OICU, Office and Institutional Conditional Use. 

4.       No Residential use is permitted in OICU, except legal nonconforming Residential uses.

IF YOU CHOOSE TO AFFIRM STAFF DECISION:

If you believe that Staff did not err in determining that the present Duplex Dwelling use is permitted (as a nonconforming use) but “Group Homes” are not allowed and the zoning compliance letter is correct:

MOTION TO UPHOLD THE DECISION OF THE TOWN OFFICIAL

After conducting a duly advertised public hearing and reviewing the application, testimony and evidence and the general purposes of the LDO, we find the following:

FACTS:  We find facts 1-4 above and find:  The Property currently has a  Duplex Dwelling (alternative, if the evidence shows it:  The Property currently has a “Detached Dwelling”).  Occupancy of the Duplex Dwelling as a residence is a legal non-conforming use.   “Duplex Dwelling is a subcategory of “Household Living Use” a “Residential Use” classification.  A “Group Home” is a subcategory of “Group Living Use” another type of “Residential Use” classification.  “Household Living Use” and “Group Living Use” are different uses.  The change in use from “Detached Dwelling/Household Living Use” to to “Group Home/Group Living Use” is a change in use.  Neither use is presently permitted in the OICU classification.   Such a change would be from one “non-conforming use” to another “non-conforming use”, and is not permitted by Sec. 10.3.4 of the LDO.

CONCLUSION:

1.       Based on the application, testimony and evidence, the general purposes of the LDO, and the above findings, the Board concludes that the decision of the Town official was correct, and the Staff decision is affirmed.

 

IF YOU BELIEVE STAFF ERRED AND CHOOSE TO REVERSE OR MODIFY THE CONTESTED ACTION:

If you believe that Staff  erred in determining that the present Duplex Dwelling use is permitted (as a nonconforming use) but “Group Homes” are not allowed as a continuation of the present use:

MOTION TO OVERTURN THE DECISION OF THE TOWN OFFICIAL

After conducting a duly advertised public hearing and reviewing the application, testimony, and evidence and the general purpose of the LDO, we find the administrative officer erred in the application or interpretation of the terms of the LDO or related policies because of the following:

FACTS:  Facts 1- 4 above and ___________.

CONCLUSION:

1.       Based on the application, testimony and evidence, the general purposes of the LDO, and the above findings, the Board concludes that a “Duplex Dwelling” and a “Group Home” are both Residential uses, and to change from one Residential nonconforming use to another type of Residential Use is permitted by the LDO. The decision of the Town official was incorrect, and the zoning compliance letter is incorrect.

 

 

Large Vicinity Map

Small Vicinity Map