|
TOWN
OF CARY Thursday, October 7, 2004, 5:33 p.m. Temporary Council Chambers, Herb Young Community Center |
|
I. |
Introduction
of Members: Members
present: Kelly Commiskey, Michelle Hillison Jamie Cuticchia, Robert Keely,
Dean Smith, and John Fitzpatrick. Members absent: Jo Rathgeber, Eugene
Murray, Dana Ellington, and Fred Woolard. Council Member Julie Robison was present. Staff members Susan Moran, Karen Gray, and Roger May were present. |
|
II. |
Approval
of Minutes: The
board unanimously approved the minutes of the |
|
III. |
Citizen
Comments: |
|
IV. |
Old/New
Business: 1.
How ISAB interacts with Council and types of projects they want to be
involved with (i.e. Celebrate Cary, Focus on Cary, Envision Cary). Ms.
Moran gave the Board a historical overview of interactions between Council
and boards/ commissions. Ms. Moran noted that the level of interaction
varies depending on a wide variety of factors. Deputy Town Clerk Karen
Gray addressed the Board and providing more specific examples of
Council’s interaction with other Town boards and commissions. Ms. Gray
specifically noted the three boards and commissions charged with reporting
to Council per the Town’s ordinances: Zoning Board of Adjustment,
Planning and Zoning Board, and the Town Center Review Commission. Following
is a list of questions Mr. Keely emailed Board members prior to the
meeting to help prepare their comments and discussion for the meeting: -
How does our mission compare with what Council asks us to do versus what
we decide to do? -
How should the board’s agenda/work be set/generated—that is, should
the board only be looking at issues sent to them by the Council, or should
the board be generating independent ideas and sending them to Council
without Council’s asking, or should it be some combination of the two? -
Given everything that’s been done, is the board still necessary? -
Does it make sense from a cost-benefit standpoint for the board to
continue exactly as it is? -
Should the board meet more or less often, in the same or a different way? -
Should the board be more like Board of Adjustment and Mr. Keely synopsized the
thoughts of Mr. Murray, who though absent, provided comments via email. Mr.
Murray conveyed that he felt the ISAB fulfills its mission by advising
offering input and guidance; however he felt that the Board's agenda should generally be more reactive to Council/staff
requests than proactively setting its own direction.
Mr.
Smith voiced his concerns about the lack of clear and structured direction
from Council regarding the ISAB’s mission. Ms. Hillison stated that she
strongly favored the Board assuming a proactive approach to issues rather
than a reactive approach. She also stated that the ISAB has worked very
hard over the last eight months on several important issues and that she
felt the Board’s existence was absolutely justified. Mr.
Keely stated that the drive of the conversation was to inspire
conversation about the Board’s mission and the delineation between
Council-directed initiatives and Board-driven discussions. Council
Member Robison addressed the Board and conveyed her thoughts on the issue.
She noted that she has been a member of the Economic Development
Commission since its inception and that its mission and focus is an
ever-changing one due to the economy, political climates, and
personalities. She also noted her involvement with the Sister Cities
Commission, pointing out that most of their activities are self-directed
rather than Council-directed. She stated that perhaps a small group of
Council members should meet to discuss the ISAB’s mission and evaluate
its direction. She commended the Board for its initiative at the January
2004 planning meeting and their important work with Susan Moran. She
reminded the Board that the Town of Ms.
Commiskey suggested that rather than setting the Board’s goals a year in
advance, that they consider setting them for four or five month blocks to
keep the goals and objectives more aligned with changing technologies and
information. Acting
Chair Keely suggested to the Board that this issue be tabled until the
next meeting in order to provide absent members the opportunity to provide
their comments. The Board unanimously agreed and as a result, this issue
will be moved to the Old/New Business section of the |
|
V. |
Member
Comments: John
Fitzpatrick stated his concerns with the GIS test site and its lack of
cooperation with Web browsers other than Internet Explorer. He also
mentioned issues with rendering and changes to the toolbar. He noted that
he emailed his concerns to staff but hadn’t yet received a reply. Jamie
Cuticchia also stated his concerns with the GIS test site, specifically
regarding the ease of perceivably sensitive information on residents. He
stated that he thought it was too easily accessible. Robert
Keely stated the he felt that testing the GIS site was an excellent
project for the Board to advise and offer feedback on. Council
Member Julie Robison stated that she had trouble using the Town’s search
engine and could use some training on this function. Kelly
Commiskey asked Ms. Moran is if it were possible to add sample video
footage from the Safelight Cary program (specifically a vehicle running a
red light) to the Web site to give citizens more information. Ms. Moran
noted that she would research this issue and follow up with her. |
|
VI. |
Adjournment: The
meeting adjourned at |
|
VII. |
Next
ISAB Meeting: The
next ISAB meeting will be held on |
The Town of Cary is committed to providing all citizens with the opportunity to participate fully in the public meeting process. Any person with a disability who needs an auxiliary aid or service in order to participate in any meeting may contact the Town Clerk at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. The e-mail address is sue.rowland@townofcary.org; the phone number is (919) 469-4011; the TDD number is (919) 469-4012.
| Contact ISAB Members | ISAB Minute Archives | Boards/Commissions Page |
| Back to TOP | Home Page | FAQ's |