STAFF
REPORT
Town Council,
Art
Enhancements to the
Consideration of art enhancements for the proposed
Speaker:
Tim Bailey
From:
Tim Bailey, P.E., Engineering Director
Prepared by: Russ Overton, P.E.,
Senior Engineer
Approved by: William B. Coleman,
Jr., Town Manager
Approved by: Benjamin T. Shivar,
Assistant Town Manager
Staff presented several options for including
art enhancements to the proposed
As
described in the previous staff report the
Morrisville Parkway bridge is a new bridge required to span over a floodway
between Louis Stephens Drive and the Preston Village North subdivision, located
adjacent to the proposed Western Wake County Regional Library, and is one of
several phases of Morrisville Parkway that is currently being
designed/constructed to ultimately provide a continuous link from NC 54/Chapel
Hill Road to western Cary. A
greenway under the
Attached below are renderings of the
originally proposed bridge as well as of potentially less expensive options to
enhance the aesthetics of the proposed bridge.
(These renderings were provided by the Town’s consultant, URS, out of
their Tampa Bay, FL office at an additional cost of $2,000.)
Originally
Proposed Bridge

Original
Proposed Plan
The
Option
1a

This
option would keep the proposed bridge as a proposed concrete column and girder
bridge, but the standard 3-bar metal railings and concrete bridge abutments
would be replaced with a decorative concrete railing to give the appearance of
stone. The stone could be stained
with a gray coloring to blend with the other concrete bridge features as well as
with the rip-rap on the bridge slopes. These
changes would increase the design and construction costs by approximately
$75,000. No delay to the current bridge project would be expected with the use of
these features as they can be incorporated into the existing engineering design
contract.
Option
1b

This
option is the same as option 1a but would have a brick appearance instead of
stone and would keep the proposed bridge as a proposed concrete column and
girder bridge, but the standard 3-bar metal railings and concrete bridge
abutments would be replaced with a decorative concrete railing to give the
appearance of brick. These changes would increase the design and construction
costs by approximately $75,000. Again,
no delay to the current bridge project would be expected with the use of
these features as they can be incorporated into the existing engineering design
contract.
Option
1a-a

This option illustrates additional work that could be done in conjunction with Option 1a or as standalone projects to decorate the concrete median on the bridge deck and/or the piers as part of the bridge substructure to give the appearance of stone.
The bridge median, shown as a concrete island in Option 1a, could be stamped and stained to give the appearance of stone to match the decorative concrete railing in Option 1a. This change would increase the construction costs by approximately $40,000.
The bridge piers, shown as columns in Option 1a, could be redesigned to give the appearance of a solid stone wall. This change would increase the design and construction costs by approximately $150,000.
No delay to the current bridge project would
be expected with the implementation of either of these features as they could be
incorporated into the existing engineering design contract.
Again, the stone could be
stained with a gray coloring to blend with the other concrete bridge features as
well as with the rip-rap on the bridge slopes.
Option
1b-b

This option is the same as option 1a-a but would have a brick appearance instead of stone. This option illustrates additional work that could be done in conjunction with Option 1b or as standalone projects to decorate the concrete median on the bridge deck and/or the piers as part of the bridge substructure to give the appearance of brick.
The bridge median, shown as a concrete island in Option 1b, could be stamped and stained to give the appearance of brick to match the decorative concrete railing in Option 1b. This change would increase the construction costs by approximately $40,000.
The bridge piers, shown as columns in Option 1b, could be redesigned to give the appearance of a solid brick wall. This change would increase the design and construction costs by approximately $150,000.
Again no delay to the current bridge project
would be expected with the implementation of either of these features as they
could be incorporated into the existing engineering design contract.
Staff
Recommendation:
Staff requests that Town Council review these revised bridge enhancement
options and provide direction to staff for the proposed