|
DRAFT Contact the town clerk at 919-469-4011 for official minutes
Cary Town Council Minutes Thursday, April 7, 2008 6:30 PM Council Chambers 316 N. Academy Street, Cary, N.C.
Click on the links herein for full text minutes.
PRESENT: Mayor Harold Weinbrecht, Mayor Pro Tem Julie Robison, Council Members Gale Adcock, Don Frantz, Ervin Portman, Jennifer Robinson and Jack Smith
A. COMMENCEMENT
1. Call to Order (Mayor Weinbrecht)
Mayor Weinbrecht called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
________________________
2. Ceremonial Opening (Mrs. Adcock)
Gale Adcock provided the ceremonial opening.
________________________
3. Adoption of agenda (Town Council)
ACTION: Mr. Frantz moved to adopt the agenda; Mrs. Adcock provided the second; council granted unanimous approval.
________________________
B. CONSENT AGENDA (click on this link for the full text minutes of the consent agenda)
1. Regular Consent Agenda (any regular consent agenda item pulled for discussion will be discussed at the end of the old/new business portion of the agenda, which is item H on this agenda)
a. Consideration of approval of the minutes of the regular town council meeting held on March 27, 2008; and the minutes of the financial policy work session held on March 25, 2008.
b. Consideration of the following appointments to the Zoning Board of Adjustment: move current alternate Robert Evans into regular member seat for the remainder of the term; appoint Madrica Lowery as regular member; appoint Barry Shuster to fill the alternate position vacated by Mr. Evans; and appoint Charles McDarris as Chair.
c. Consideration of correction and ratification of annexation ordinance 07-A-28 to correct typographical errors in the property owners’ names.
2. Land Development Consent Agenda (any land development consent agenda item pulled for discussion will be discussed at the end of the land development discussion portion of the agenda, which is item F on this agenda)
a.
REZONING
07-REZ-34, Evans Estate Phase II
b. REZONING
07-REZ-37,
Cary Park
Planned Development Amendment 3. Operations Committee, April 3, 2008 (any committee consent agenda item pulled for discussion will be discussed at the end of the committee discussion portion of the agenda, which is item G on this agenda)
a. Land Project Adjustments (FN08-06) (1) Appropriation of $261,569 from the Water Projects Fund Fund Balance to be transferred to the Parks Project Fund to cover previous land purchases in the land acquisition account. (2) Recognition of $217,760 in PARTF grant funds and appropriating to the open space project within the Water Project Fund to cover previous land purchases in that project. (3) Recognition of $62,510 in funds received from the sale of property and appropriating to the Parks Land Acquisition project within the Parks Project Fund to cover previous land purchases in that project. (4) Appropriation of $16,985,117 from the Open Space Project in the Water Project Fund and $359,348 from the land acquisition project in the Parks Project Fund (based on the unspent sources listed above.
b.
Additional Appropriation to Self-Insurance Fund (FN08-07)
c.
Town Center Park PARTF Grant Conversion (PR08-23)
d.
Budget Adjustment for Skate
Cary Park
(PR08-25)
e.
Chatham County Water Intake
Agreement (PWUT08-25)
f.
Sale of Rain Barrels
(PWUT08-26)
g.
Litter Enforcement Pilot Program (PD08-016)
h.
Sponsorship Policy for Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources (PR08-24)
i.
Bid Award and Budget Adjustment Request for a Sprayground at
Bartley Park
(PR08-26)
j.
Council Staff Retreat Priorities and Action Items (AD08-015)
_________________________
C. RECOGNITIONS, REPORTS, AND PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of a proclamation designating April 16, 2008 as Healthcare Decisions Day in the Town of Cary.
DESIGNATING APRIL 16, 2008 AS “HEALTHCARE DECISIONS DAY” IN CARY
WHEREAS, Healthcare Decisions Day is designed to raise public awareness of the need to plan ahead for healthcare decisions related to end of life care and medical decision-making whenever patients are unable to speak for themselves and to encourage the specific use of advance directives to communicate these important healthcare decisions; and WHEREAS, it is estimated that less than 50 percent of severely or terminally ill patients have an advance directive. It is likely that a significant reason for this low percentage is that there is both a lack of knowledge and considerable confusion in the public about advance directives; and WHEREAS, one of the principle goals of Healthcare Decisions Day is to encourage hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, hospices, businesses, organizations, and spiritual communities to participate in a statewide effort to provide clear and consistent information to the public about advance directives, as well as to encourage citizens to enhance their knowledge related to advance directives; and WHEREAS, the Life Decisions Coalition and other organizations throughout North Carolina have endorsed this event and are committed to educating the public about the importance of discussing healthcare choices and executing advance directives; and WHEREAS, as a result of April 16, 2008, being recognized as Healthcare Decisions Day in North Carolina, more citizens will have conversations about their healthcare decisions and execute advance directives to make their wishes known. Fewer families and healthcare providers will have to struggle with making difficult healthcare decisions in the absence of guidance from their loved ones and patients. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Harold Weinbrecht, Jr., Mayor of the Town of Cary, North Carolina, on behalf of the Cary Town Council, do hereby recognize April 16, 2008, as “HEALTHCARE DECISIONS DAY” in Cary, North Carolina, and I call this observance to the attention of all our citizens.
PROCLAIMED this 7th day of April, 2008.
Mrs. Adcock presented the proclamation.
________________________
2. Presentation of a proclamation designating April 2008 as Donate Life Month in the Town of Cary.
Designating APRIL 2008 as “DONATE LIFE MONTH” IN CARY
WHEREAS, April has been designated as National Donate Life Month, in honor of the generosity of the American people who have donated organs, tissue, marrow and blood; and
WHEREAS, more than 95,000 people in the United States are currently awaiting organ transplant surgery, and approximately 16 people die each day because organs do not become available; and
WHEREAS, organ and tissue donors truly bestow the “gift of life”, as one donor can save or enhance the lives of as many as 50 people; and
WHEREAS, greater awareness and education about the need for organ and tissue donations is crucial in order to increase the number of names on the organ donor registry.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Harold Weinbrecht, Jr., Mayor of the Town of Cary, North Carolina, on behalf of the Cary Town Council and in support of National Donate Life Month, do hereby proclaim April 2008 as Donate Life Month in the Town of Cary, North Carolina.
FURTHERMORE, I encourage Cary citizens to consider registering with the State's donor registry and to share this decision with family and friends.
PROCLAIMED this 7th day of April, 2008.
Mr. Smith presented the proclamation.
________________________
3. Recognition of Le Touquet visiting culinary arts students.
Mr. Smith recognized the culinary students.
________________________
4. Report on the results of the 2008 Biennial Survey.
STAFF REPORT Town Council, April 7, 2008
2008 Biennial Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report (AD08-014) A presentation of the findings of the 2008 survey Speaker: Ms. Susan Moran
From: Susan Moran, Public Information Officer Prepared by: Susan Moran, Public Information Officer, and Dr. Kevin Baker, Research Consultant Approved by: William B. Coleman, Jr., Town Manager Approved by: Benjamin T. Shivar, Assistant Town Manager
As part of the Town of Cary’s comprehensive communications program, consultants with BKL Research of Salem, Virginia collected data for Biennial 2008 – the sixth Town-sponsored citizen satisfaction survey focusing on the operations and services handled each day by the Town. Since its inception in 1998, the Town of Cary has been using its biennial survey to help provide guidance or where it can make improvements in its service to and services for citizens.
A total of 405 Cary households were randomly selected for the survey and interviewed by telephone from February 1-23, 2008. Just like Gallop, Nielsen, and other national and international pollsters, BKL utilized scientifically developed sampling techniques and statistical analysis that allow the survey results to be generalized over the entire population even though not everyone in Cary is called. The margin of error for the 2008 survey was +/- 5 percent.
At Council’s April 7th meeting, Dr. Kevin Baker of BKL Research will make a short presentation on the survey’s key findings. The full report is attached to and incorporated herein as Exhibit.
As a follow-up to the survey, BKL will conduct several focus groups in April. These focus groups will probe specific issues from the survey in greater detail using citizen volunteers from the pool of the 2008 survey respondents. The Council will be provided with a Focus Group Report that includes the sessions’ findings as well as transcripts of the sessions.
Fiscal Impact: None
Staff Recommendation: No Council action is needed.
Dr. Baker’s PowerPoint presentation is attached to and incorporated herein as Exhibit. He noted that this survey contains Cary’s highest marks in the 10-year history of this survey.
Mrs. Adcock asked about C-Tran improvement specificity. Dr. Baker stated there was no feedback. Public Information Officer Susan Moran stated she will add a question for the focus group.
No council action was required.
________________________
D. PUBLIC SPEAKS OUT
No one spoke.
________________________
E. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1.
REZONING
08-REZ-04, HATLEY REZONING Request
The applicant is requesting Town Council approve an Ordinance to amend the official zoning map of the Town of Cary for approximately 10 acres, located at 805 Rochelle Road and 1139 Evans Road, from Residential 40 (R40) to Transitional Residential-Conditional Use (TR-CU).
The purpose of a rezoning is to evaluate the appropriateness of a proposed land use for the subject parcel(s) of land. Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not considered during the rezoning process. However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance with existing requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) when the site or subdivision plan is submitted.
Background Information
The applicant has submitted the following proposed zoning conditions:
1. Maximum density shall be limited to three (3) dwelling units per acre. 2. Use shall be limited to single-family detached.
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
A. Land Use Plan: This rezoning request conforms to the adopted Land Use Plan. As per the Town’s Comprehensive Plan, the land use designation for the subject parcels is Low Density Residential (LDR). Low Density Residential (LDR) development typically describes single family detached housing at 1 to 3 units per acre.
B. Growth Management Plan: The Growth Management Plan includes the following Guiding Principles which are relevant to this case: 1. R1 Guiding Principle: Ensure that adequate infrastructure and services are available concurrently with new development. 2. L1 Guiding Principle: Concentrate growth near existing and planned employment centers and available and planned infrastructure to minimize costly service-area extensions. 3. L2 Guiding Principle: Ensure that future growth protects sensitive natural resources and protects open space.
C. Affordable Housing Plan: Provide for a full range of housing choices for all income groups, families of various sizes, seniors, and persons with special challenges. 1. Facilitate the creation of a reasonable proportion of the Town of Cary’s housing as affordable units through additional homeownership opportunities for individuals and families earning between 60% and 80% of area median income and affordable apartments for individuals and families earning up to 60% of the area median income. 2. Assure a quality living environment and access to public amenities for all residents, present and future, of the Town of Cary, regardless of income.
D. Comprehensive Transportation Plan: Rochelle Rd. Existing Section: Approximately 60’ ROW, 2-lane collector Future Section: Residential collector road, 70’ ROW Road Improvements: None scheduled by the Town Sidewalks Requirements: Sidewalks required on both sides Bicycle Requirements: 14’ wide outside lanes Transit Requirements: None Traffic Analysis: The current R-40 zoning would generate 11 PM trips. The proposed CU zoning of 3 du/acre would generate would generate 31 PM trips, a 20 trips increase. Under our current LDO of 50 peak hour trips, no traffic study would be required for rezoning or site plan.
E. Parks & Greenways Master Plan: According to the approved Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan, there are no issues related to this site. A recreation payment-in-lieu will be required for residential development in accordance with the Land Development Ordinance. According to the Open Space and Historic Resources Plan (OSHRP), this site has mixed hardwood and conifer forests on site, and was proposed for conservation as open space.
Consistency with the Land Development Ordinance
The proposed project is in the rezoning stage and therefore preliminary engineering of the site has not been provided to staff for review. Prior to Site Plan or Subdivision Plan approval, the application will be required to demonstrate consistency with the Land Development Ordinance with respect to specific development requirements, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings.
F. Environmental: According to the Town of Cary GIS maps, the subject property is impacted by an urban transition buffer. Field determination of the exact buffer location will be required at the time of site plan review. The project will be required to comply with all buffer requirements of the Land Development Ordinance during the site plan review process.
G. Buffers: According to Chapter 7 of the Land Development Ordinance, the applicant will be required to provide a 30’ Type “B” Buffer along the adjacent properties to the south and west of the subject property. This is based on the proposed Class 3 land use for single-family detached dwellings on lots less than 8,000 square feet proposed adjacent to existing Class two land Uses (single family detached lots on lots 8,000 square feet or larger.)
H. Streetscape: According to Chapter 7 of the Land Development Ordinance, the applicant will be required to provide a 50’ Streetscape along Evans Road. Rochelle Road is a minor collector road, and will not require a Streetscape.
Existing and Requested Zoning District Comparison:
*Density Limit based on proposed zoning condition. Density limit for TR zoning per the Land Development Ordinance is 6 dwelling units per acre.
Town Council Criteria for Consideration in Reviewing Rezonings:
Section 3.4.1(E) of the Land Development Ordinance sets forth the following criteria that Council should consider in reviewing rezonings:
1. The proposed rezoning corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing condition, trend or fact; 2. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan set forth in Section 1.3 (LDO); 3. The Town and other service providers will be able to provide sufficient public safety, educational, recreational, transportation and utility facilities and services to the subject property while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing development; 4. The proposed rezoning is unlikely to have significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and vegetation; 5. The proposed rezoning will not have significant adverse impacts on property in the vicinity of the subject tract; 6. The proposed zoning classification is suitable for the subject property.
Other Reference Information
Schools The school information is being provided for your review; however, the Wake County Board of Education controls capital projects for school capacities.
* Current Enrollment and Building Capacity is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2007-2008 as supplied by the Wake County Public School System. School assignment will be determined at the time of development.
** The Projected Number of Additional Students is a rough approximation. The actual number of students will vary depending on several variables, such as dwelling unit type, number of bedrooms, dwelling size, and other factors. For example: A site with 30 three-bedroom homes could yield 14 additional students, while 30 homes with greater than three bedroom units could yield 24. The basis for making this calculation is based on multipliers provide from Wake County Schools Office of Student Assignment. At rezoning, student yield can not be accurately determined due to unknown variables.
Applicant’s Justification Statement Submitted (February 28, 2008) Part 6A:
The following statements are provided by the applicant (shown below in italics) in response to the criteria established in the application (shown below in bold) and does not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town of Cary. Any statements as to the type, quality or physical features are at the direction of the applicant and may be formulated into a condition:
1. Any issues with the size of the tract? The size of the tract is conducive to the use being proposed
2. How is the request compatible with the comprehensive plan (i.e. Land Use, Transportation, Open Space and Historic Resources)? The Comprehensive Plan designates this tract for low density residential. The proposed rezoning is for low density residential. The conditions of the rezoning ensures low density residential development.
3. What are the benefits and detriments to the owner, neighbors and the community? The proposed rezoning is in conformance with the comprehensive plan. The proposed development will be similar to the surrounding development. The infrastructure is in place to support the proposed development.
4. How are the allowable uses with the proposed rezoning compatible with, or how do they relate to, the uses currently present on adjacent tracts? The allowable uses are compatible with the uses on adjacent tracts.
5. What reductions/amendments and/or modifications to the development standards of the LDO are being requested and how are they justified? (PDD, new or amended) Applicants must list these items and/or clearly highlight them within the Planned Development document.
Ordinance for Consideration 08-REZ-04 Hatley Rezoning
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF CARY TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES LOCATED AT 805 ROCHELLE ROAD AND 1139 EVANS ROAD OWNED BY LUCY A. ROCHELLE & LUDELLE ROCHELLE HATLEY, FROM RESIDENTIAL 40 (R40) TO TRANSITIONAL RESIDENTIAL CONDITIONAL USE (TR-CU).
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF CARY:
Section 1: The Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning the area described as follows:
Section 2: That this Property is rezoned from Residential 40 (R40) to Transitional Residential Conditional Use (TR-CU) subject to the individualized development conditions set forth herein, and all the requirements of the Cary Land Development Ordinance (LDO) and other applicable laws, standards, polices and guidelines.
Section 3: The conditions mutually approved by the Town and the applicant for promoting public health, safety and the general welfare are: 1) Maximum density shall be limited to three (3) dwelling units per acre and 2) use shall be limited to single-family detached dwelling units. These conditions address conformance of the development and use of the Property to ordinances and officially adopted plans and address impacts reasonably expected to be generated by the development and use of the Property.
Section 4: This ordinance shall be effective on the date of adoption.
Adopted and effective: At time of final council action
Staff’s PowerPoint presentation is attached to and incorporated herein as Exhibit.
Mrs. Glenda Toppe, the applicant on behalf of the property owner, stated the conditions ensure the use will be single family, which is compatible with the comprehensive plan. She stated they met with surrounding property owners, and the request was well received. She stated information was also posted on the Silverton Web Site. She believes this is in keeping with vision of the area.
Mr. Tom Hemrick, a Silverton resident, stated Jerry Turner and Associates has historically done a great job with development, and they listen to and act on the concerns of the adjacent residents. He stated they have ensured compatibility with this well thought out plan. He supports this proposal.
Mr. Jeff Cox, a Silverton resident, stated he supports this proposal. He asked that the 30-foot Type B buffer remain. He stated stormwater retention is an issue along New Rail Drive near the Silverton Lake, and he wants to ensure that this development does not adversely impact these homeowners. He stated the developer intends to clear-cut the areas for roads, stormwater management, etc., and they have indicated they will not clear-cut the entire parcel. He asked that the developer improve Rochelle Drive with sidewalk instead of doing this in two different phases, which will minimize the impact to homeowners.
Ms. Liz Adams, a Silverton resident, stated she supports the plan and wants to ensure the buffers are preserved as much as possible. She stated a watershed study was commissioned by the Town for this area, and she asked the Town and the developer to come up with stormwater measures so downstream properties are not impacted by this development.
ACTION: Referred to the June 16, 2008 planning and zoning board meeting
________________________ F. LAND DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION ITEMS (any item pulled from the land development consent agenda for discussion [item B.2. on this agenda] will be discussed during this portion of the agenda)
N/A
________________________
G. COMMITTEE REPORTS (discussion items)
Operations Committee, April 3, 2008 (any item pulled from the committee consent agenda for discussion [agenda item B.3.] will be discussed during this portion of the agenda)
1. U.S. Mayors
Climate Protection Agreement
(AD08-012)
STAFF REPORT Operations Committee, April 3, 2008
U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement (AD08-012) Consideration of becoming a signatory to the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement Speaker: Ms. Lana Hygh
From: Bill Coleman, Town Manager Prepared by: Lana Hygh, Assistant Town Manager Approved by: William B. Coleman, Jr., Town Manager Approved by: Benjamin T. Shivar, Assistant Town Manager
At its March 3 meeting, the Operations Committee requested that staff provide additional information about the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement.
Under the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, participating cities commit to take the following actions: 1. Urge the U.S. Congress to pass greenhouse gas reduction legislation 2. Urge their state governments, and the federal government, to enact policies and programs to meet or beat the greenhouse gas emission reduction target suggested for the United States in the Kyoto Protocol -- 7% reduction from 1990 levels by 2012; and 3. Strive to meet or beat the Kyoto Protocol targets in their own communities, through actions such as:
Across the country, over 800 local governments have signed onto this agreement, including 32 in North Carolina.
It should be noted that the Town is already active in a number of these areas, particularly land use regulations, open space, transportation options, pump efficiency, recycling and tree planting. Signing the agreement does not require any specific actions but commits the Town to striving toward the goal of greenhouse gas emission reductions.
Fiscal Impact: There is no direct cost to signing the agreement. There will be costs associated with specific action items that take place as a result of the agreement. Those costs will be assessed as proposed actions are brought forward for Council approval.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that Cary become a signatory to the | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||