2.
Land Development Consent Agenda
(any land development consent agenda item
pulled for discussion will be discussed at the beginning of the land development
discussion portion of the agenda, which is item F on this agenda)
a.
Rezoning 05-REZ-05 (Dellinger Planned Development Amendment)
Property is located north of
|
Meeting |
Date |
Staff Recommendation |
Action |
|
Town
Council Public Hearing |
|
Forward
to the |
Forwarded
to |
|
Planning
and Zoning Board |
|
Staff
recommends approval of the request |
The
Planning and Zoning Board unanimously recommended approval of the request. |
|
Town
Council |
|
Staff
recommends approval of the request |
|
|
TOWN
OF |
|
|
Bob
Benfield, Senior Planner |
Phone:
(919) 469-4045 E-mail:
bob.benfield@townofcary.org |
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION
Staff
believes that this request adequately meets the rezoning criteria set forth in
the Land Development Ordinance (3.4.1 (E)) and recommends approval.
PLANNING AND
ZONING BOARD ACTION
The
Planning and Zoning Board voted 9 to 0 to recommend approval of the request.
CHANGES SINCE
PUBLIC HEARING
There
have been no changes since the public hearing.
|
APPLICANT |
OWNERS |
|
Glenda
Toppe Jerry
Turner and Associates, Inc. (919)
851-7150 FAX:
(919) 851-7547 E-mail:
gtoppe@jerryturnerassoc.com |
Dellinger
Family LLC |
LOCATION
North
of Dillard Drive between Piney Plains and
|
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION |
|
The
following modifications are proposed within the Dellinger PDD: |
|
|
Current
Requirement |
Proposed
Modification |
|
Dellinger
PDD was approved with a Table of Building Setbacks and Streetscape Buffers
along |
The
Table of Building Setbacks and Landscape Buffer widths for the Dellinger
PDD would be eliminated and replaced with language stating that all
development would comply with |
|
CURRENT
SETBACKS, STREETSCAPES AND BUFFERS |
PROPOSED
SETBACKS, STREETSCAPES AND BUFFERS |
|||
|
Parcel |
Frontage |
|
AC
Guidelines |
|
|
1 |
|
40 |
Building
setbacks and streetscapes can vary from 10 to 30 depending on
location of parking. (See note below for further explanation.) |
|
|
1 |
Piney
Plains |
30 |
||
|
2 |
|
40 |
||
|
2 |
Meeting
St. |
30 |
||
|
3 |
|
40 |
||
|
3 |
N/S
Connector |
30 |
||
|
4 |
|
20 |
||
|
4 |
N/S
Connector |
30 |
||
|
5 |
N/S
Connector |
20 |
||
|
4 |
South
Property line |
50 |
Buffer
would be required. Buffer to
remain as previously approved |
|
|
5 |
South
Property Line |
30 |
Buffer
would be required. Buffer to
remain as previously approved |
|
The
Guidelines also recognize there may be instances where parking would be located
between a building and an adjoining roadway.
The Guidelines limit the amount of parking between the building and
roadway to no more than one double-loaded bay.
All other parking would be located to the side or to the rear of the
building. A sufficient streetscape
area would be required where parking would adjoin a roadway so that adequate
screening of the parking area could be provided.
The intent is to properly screen parking areas and parked vehicles from
off-site views.
The
Guidelines provide flexibility in building setbacks and streetscape widths to
encourage optimal building placement for pedestrian interaction along adjoining
roadways and from building to building, and to encourage parking to the side or
to the rear of buildings to lessen visual impact.
APPLICANTS
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
When
the Town of
CURRENT
USE & ZONING
|
|
|
|
Proposed
Land Use:
Commercial (COM), Office /Institutional (OFC/INS), and Medium
Density Residential (MDR) |
|
Current
Zoning:
Planned Development District (PDD) |
Proposed
Zoning:
Planned Development District (PDD) |
|
ADJACENT
ZONING & LAND USES |
|||
|
|
Existing
Use |
Existing
Land Use Designation |
|
|
North: |
Progress
Energy Electrical Substation Site |
Residential-40
(R-40) |
Office/Institutional
(OFC/INS) |
|
East: |
Commercial
(COM) with portions of the property undeveloped |
General
Commercial Conditional Use (COM CU) |
Commercial
(COM), and Medium Density Residential (MDR) |
|
South: |
Multi-family |
Planned
Development District (PDD) |
High
Density Residential (HRD) |
|
West: |
Shopping
Center (Commercial) |
General
Commercial Conditional Use (GC CU) and Office/Institutional (OFC/INS) |
Commercial
(COM) and High Density Residential (HRD) |
PARCEL
& OWNER INFORMATION
|
|||
|
Property
Owner(s) |
|
Real
Estate ID(s) |
Area (Acres) |
|
Dellking
Family LLC |
0772497599 |
0037061 |
32.17 |
|
Total
Acreage |
32.17 |
||
ACTION:
Mayor Pro Tem Smith moved to approve the consent agenda; Ms. Dorrel provided the
second; council granted unanimous approval.
(NOTE:
There is no planned development document associated with this request.)
_________________________
b.
Site Plan 05-SP-044 (Frantz Automotive Service Center)
The plan proposes the addition of a one-story customer waiting room to the front
of the existing building, the addition of a one-story two-bay garage building to
the rear of the existing building, the renovation of the existing front building
elevation, the installation of sidewalk, and the dedication of 2.5 feet of
right-of-way along the property frontage. The amount of parking required and
proposed is 34 spaces. Staff and the Town Center Review Commission recommend
unanimous approval, including the following variances: (1) that sidewalk be
located back of curb along the roadway frontage of the site; (2) that a variable
width travel aisle (23 to 18) be allowed within the western parking lot;
and (3) that an offset alignment of the western drive/on-site travel aisle be
retained.
(Mr. Bob Benfield)
|
APPLICANT
|
OWNER
|
|
Gontram
Architecture, Inc. |
Lisa
and Donald Frantz |
|
TOWN
OF |
|
||
|
Bob
Benfield , Senior Planner |
Phone:
469-4045 |
|
|
|
Location:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSED
SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS |
|
|
|
|
|
Town
Council: |
|
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION
Staff
recommends approval of the plan with the following deviations to Town Standards:
The
Town Center Review Commission unanimously recommended approval of the plan as
presented by staff. The
recommendation included:
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
The
plans propose the addition of a one-story customer waiting room to the front of
the existing building, the addition of a one-story two-bay garage building to
the rear of the existing building, the renovation of the existing front building
elevation, the installation of sidewalk, and the dedication of 2.5 of
right-of-way along the property frontage. The
amount of parking required and proposed is 34 spaces.
|
PARCEL
INFORMATION |
||
|
Parcel
# |
Real
id # |
Area
|
|
0764216402
|
0.35
acres |
|
|
0764215430
|
0.25
acres |
|
|
Total
Acreage |
0.60
acres |
|
ZONING AND LAND
USE PLAN COMPLIANCE
Current
Zoning:
Sub
District: Mixed Use Development (MXD)
Town
Limits:
The property is inside
Land
Use Compliance:
The Land Use Plan allows for Mixed Use Development (commercial, office,
and/or residential development).
LANDSCAPE
The
plan complies with all landscape requirements.
In addition to existing landscaping around the building and along the
western side of the site, the plans would also provide for street trees, shade
trees within the parking area, screening of the parking area along
BUILDING
ELEVATION
Building
Height:
24 (maximum height)
Building Size:
Existing building: 3,787 sq. ft.
Proposed waiting room and garage additions: 1,630 sq. ft.
Building Materials and Colors:
Existing building faηade alteration: Burgundy brick; gray mortar; light
beige cast stone, E.I.F.S.; metal wall panels and coping; black canopy decking,
canopy supports, front overhead doors and aluminum storefront.
All other building sides would be painted light beige to match the
secondary faηade color.
No
Traffic Impact Study is required.
The
Towns Comprehensive Transportation Plan requires an ultimate 53
back-to-back cross section for this segment of
Items
deviating from Town Standards requiring Town Council approval:
Sidewalk
adjacent to back-of-curb
-
Town
Standards specify that sidewalk shall typically be a minimum distance of five
(5) feet off the back of curb. Due
to existing site improvements, to the limited site area, and to the
Comprehensive
Transportation Plan proposal for future on-street parallel parking for
Street,
staff supports the proposal of sidewalk construction adjacent to the
back-of-curb.
Reduced
on-site travel aisle width
-
Town
Standards require a minimum twenty-three (23) foot travel aisle for two-way
traffic on-site. The western
parking travel aisle meets the minimum 23-foot width required at the beginning
of the aisle. The
existing retaining wall and the building are not parallel to the western
property line and the two converge moving from the front to the rear of the
property, thereby narrowing the drive to approximately 18 in width at two
proposed landscape planters. The
proposed planters are the required minimum size and are configured to be 18
in width to match the depth of adjoining parking spaces.
The 23-foot dimension cannot be met, therefore, without reducing the
planter sizes, reducing the minimum parking stall depth, or rebuilding both the
existing retaining wall and the building to construct them parallel to the
western property line.
According
to the owner, the site currently functions adequately and has in the past.
Since there is no change in use of this property, the owner anticipates
that the current configuration will continue to function adequately.
Although
staff would prefer that our minimum standard be met, because this is an existing
developed
site, because the use is remaining the same, and because the owner has stated
that the existing site configuration has and will continue to function
adequately, staff supports the request to allow the western parking lot travel
isle width to remain at a reduced-variable width.
Offset
driveway/on-site travel aisle -
According
to the owner, the existing western drive entrance has to date functioned
adequately without incident. The
current location allows plantings between the handicap-accessible path from the
parking space to the sidewalk along
Although
staff feels that aligning the drive and the on-site travel aisle would provide
safer vehicular movement, because this is an existing developed site, because
the use is remaining the same, and because the owner has stated that the
existing configuration has and would function adequately for the use, staff
supports the request to leave the configuration as-is with an offset
driveway/travel aisle alignment.
This
development has access to
The
project complies with
Adjoining
property owners were notified during staff's initial review of this plan.
Staff has received no inquiries objecting to the request regarding this
proposed development.
ACTION:
Mayor Pro Tem Smith moved to approve the consent agenda; Ms. Dorrel provided the
second; council granted unanimous approval.