|
H.
COMMITTEE REPORTS (discussion
items)
1.
Planning and Development Committee,
March
18, 2004
a.
Town Hall Campus Gateway Public Art Project (PR04-31)
Committee unanimously recommended approval of items 2-4 of staff’s
recommendation and recommended forwarding items 1 and 5 to Council for
discussion.
In August 2002 Council
designated the corner of
Chapel Hill Road
and
Academy Street
as the location for a gateway sculpture for the Town Hall campus and
directed staff to work with Cary Visual Art on developing a plan for this
project.
In January 2003, Council
authorized a partnership with Cary Visual Art to contract with an artist
for the planning phase of this project.
Council agreed to fund 50% of this $30,000 planning costs with CVA
providing the other 50%. At
the same time, Council endorsed the concept of integrating public art with
other components of the Town Hall expansion.
Subsequently, Catherine Widgery was selected as the artist to
develop a plan for both the gateway piece and other opportunities for
integrated art on the campus.
In October 2003, staff
provided an update to Council on the progress of this project including
the results of Ms. Widgery’s initial meetings with staff, CVA and the
public. Total cost for the project was estimated to be in the range of
$250,000 to $300,000 with CVA continuing to partner with the Town to
provide 50% of the funding for the project.
Throughout the course of
the planning process, Ms. Widgery has made six visits to
Cary
and conducted 3 Public Meetings to obtain citizen input into the
development of the design concept (September 25,
November 19, 2003
and
March 2, 2004
). Public notice announcements and advertisements for the public meetings
appeared in Cary News, The News & Observer and The Independent Weekly.
The three meetings were attended by over 100 citizens with positive
feedback.
With each visit to
Cary
, the artist met with Town Staff (Planning, Engineering, PRCR, and Public
Works), Public Art Advisory Board members, Town Hall Campus Gateway
Committee members, and Cary Visual Art Board and members.
The Public Art Advisory
Board established a list of priorities for public art opportunities at
Town Hall campus and these were shared with the artist. Some of the
opportunities were considered but because of the need not to delay the
construction schedule they were eliminated from final consideration.
The artist focused on the priorities that were possible and
presented the design concept for the project at the public meeting on
March 2, 2004
.
As a result of the
planning process and with input from the public meetings, encouragement
from the Public Art Advisory Board and CVA, the artist has proposed four
major components for this project.
The proposed four public
art components are listed below as areas A, B, C and D.
Each area is a component of the project titled, “Gates of
Light.” For an understanding
of Ms. Widgery’s approach to the design please, see the attached
Artist’s Design Summary.
Area
A: Monumental sculpture
at the corner of Academy Street and Chapel Hill Road
This
is the main component of “Gates of Light.”
It is made up of 100 perforated stainless steel columns set out in
an overlapping spiral pattern. Red
brick paths lead to the central area emphasizing the formal pattern.
At the center, a stainless steel cutout of the base of a loblolly
pine cone is embedded into the concrete circle.
At night each column is individually illuminated. The artist is
working with staff to identify locations for benches at the site that will
complement the design.
The designated site for the
sculpture is at the rear of the
Herb
Young
Community Center
and is currently bisected by a large drainage swale.
Originally the sculpture was planned for the area between the swale
and
Chapel Hill Road
. Upon further study much of
this area would be affected by potential road widening so staff began
investigating the possibility of filling the swale.
In consultation with Engineering and Planning it has been
determined that it is feasible to fill the swale. Preliminary cost
estimate for this work is $35,190. There are additional advantages to this
approach. The original plans
for the community center had anticipated a patio behind the building.
Doors still lead from the main lobby of the community center to
this location but the area is blocked by hedges and not used.
By filling the swale, the gateway sculpture will be readily
accessible from the HYCC and the entire area will become more inviting to
the Town Hall campus.
Art and installation costs: $344,065
(includes costs for filling the swale)
Area
B: Stone Seating
In
response to input from the public meetings and from the Public Art
Advisory Board, Ms. Widgery recommended a complementary sculptural element
at the other main corner of the Town Hall Campus near the intersection of
Ambassador Loop and
Academy Street
. This area has been designed
as a seating component made up of massive local granite stones set beneath
the trees near the pedestrian path to provide a shady location for
visitors to the campus. The
stones are shaped like the spaces in between the design of the columns
found at the other corner.
Art and installation costs: $37,087
Area
C: Glass Walled Bridge
This
area is a prime opportunity to integrate art into an already planned
architectural component. This is the glass walled bridge that links
the parking area behind building D and the main entrance to the Town Hall
complex. The
glass for the bridge is already a part of the project and the artists has
proposed to etch the main design element to significantly enhance this
prominent feature of the new building. Each of the two walls is
approximately 39” high and 99’ long.
The railings of the bridge contain lighting which illuminates the
patterns in the glass.
Art and installation costs: $31,498.80
Due
to the construction schedule for installation of this glass on the bridge
this aspect of the project must be considered ahead of the other
components. Once the glass is
installed, there will not be the opportunity to include the new design.
Because
of the time sensitive nature of this aspect of the project, staff was
asked to obtain costs for etching all glass railing components inside the
Town Hall complex which could be etched at the same time as the outside
railing. Additional cost for
this work would be $41,360.80. Because
of these additional cost considerations, staff does not recommend
extending the etching inside the building.
Area
D: Bluestone floor paving
pattern
This
area located inside the entrance corridor of the new main building, is
another opportunity for integrated art.
The blue stone paving is already part of the project and the artist
has proposed to introduce a subtle echo of the patterns found elsewhere.
The arcs are cut into the existing paving and the colors are
exchanged so that the pattern of the arcs is visible.
Staff is continuing to work with the project architects on project
costs which will be considered at the time that this component of the
construction project is ready to proceed.
Project
Summary
The
artist has taken a comprehensive approach to the Town Hall Campus Gateway
project to produce an overall design concept that provides for both
individual sculptural elements and integrated opportunities incorporated
into new materials proposed as part of the existing construction plans for
the new Town Hall. In order to
accomplish all that is outlined above the total budget projection is
$412,651. Recognizing that his
total significantly exceeds the original budget projections, staff has
begun conversations with CVA regarding developing additional targeted fund
raising opportunities with business partners and the general public to
provide additional revenue.
Staff
has been working with Public Works to determine long-range maintenance
costs for the new work. Those
costs will be available when staff presents this report to the committee.
Discussions
have also developed with the artist regarding opportunities to incorporate
the main design component into anticipated signage throughout the Town
Hall Campus. In addition, the
artist is prepared to provide additional design components for the council
chamber in coordination with final construction documents for that area.
Public comment at the March 2 public meeting suggested further uses
of the design into various elements (including signage) of the Town Center
and throughout Cary (e.g. greenway connections and other wayfinding/identifying
signs).
Summary
of discussion and recommendations from the Public Art Advisory Board
The Public Art Advisory
Board met on March 8 to consider the Town Hall Campus Gateway Project
Design Proposal and make its recommendations to Council.
It was reported that the Town Hall Campus Gateway Committee and
CVA’s Discovery Committee both endorsed the design of “Gates of
Light” and that there be further refinements to the gateway piece at the
corner of
Chapel Hill Road
and
Academy Street
.
The Board was reminded
that the Public Art Master Plan called for the board to prioritize
potential public art projects for inclusion in the Capital Improvement
Budget and/or Plan. Also the
board was reminded that the Public Art Master Plan places a higher
priority on projects where there is a private funding partner.
The board had prioritized projects at its December 2003 meeting.
At the March 8th meeting, the board confirmed that this
project was still its #1 priority.
The Board reviewed and
discussed all aspects of the proposed design.
It was reported that the project is over the original budget.
Staff indicated that the board should still act on the overall
design and staff was prepared to recommend phasing the project.
The Board was receptive to this approach and requested the
opportunity to review each phase of the overall project as funding became
available.
There was a motion to
accept the overall approval of the design, which unanimously passed.
There was a motion that
the board review the project phases as they progress, which unanimously
passed.
Discussion continued
about the etching of the glass walled bridge and recognition that this was
a time sensitive area. Although
the board also recognized the potential opportunities for additional
etching of glass railings inside the building, due to budget
considerations it felt that any potential additional funding should be
reserved for other elements of the project.
There was a motion to
recommend that Council immediately appropriate funding for the etching of
the outside glass walled bridge as proposed by Catherine Widgery, which
unanimously passed.
There
was a motion to support consideration of phased funding for the main
gateway sculpture at the corner of
Chapel Hill Road
and
Academy Street
; the bluestone paving of the floor in Building D; and the stone seating
area near the corner of
Academy Street
and Ambassador Loop. The
motion passed unanimously.
Summary
of action from CVA regarding continuing its partnership with the Town on
this project
At the March 10 meeting
of the CVA Board of Directors, the board took the following action:
CVA endorses the design
of “Gates of Light” subject to further refinement of the gateway piece
at the corner of
Chapel Hill Road
and
Academy Street
with the understanding that the project would come before the board for
funding approval at each phase.
In addition the board
approved the allocation of 50% of the funding for the outside etched glass
bridge component as designed by Catherine Widgery.
CVA continues to view the project as a 50-50 partnership between it
and the Town. The board also
discussed working with Town staff toward developing additional fund
raising strategies to continue to move the project forward.
|
Staff
Recommendation:
1.
Approve the overall design
concept of “Gates of Light” presented by Catherine Widgery.
Staff and CVA will continue to work with the artist to refine
the gateway component at
Chapel Hill Road
and
Academy Street
. Such
refinements will be reviewed by both CVA and the Public Art Advisory
Board prior to presentation to Council.
2.
Authorize the etching of
the design proposed by Catherine Widgery into the outside glass
bridge as provided for in the Town Hall expansion plan.
This authorization would include funding with an
appropriation of $15,750 from General Capital Reserve Unrestricted
Fund Balance as well as the recognition of $15,750 in revenue from
Cary Visual Art to fund $31,500 in contracted services within the
Town Hall Gateway Project PR1079.
3.
Consider phased funding for
other components of the project during the FY05 Capital Budget
discussions.
4.
Direct staff to work with
CVA to develop additional fundraising strategies to reduce
additional Town appropriation.
5.
Consider opportunities for
incorporating the design into other elements of the
Town
Center
and other areas including signage
opportunities.
|
Area
A:
Monumental sculpture at the corner of
Academy Street
and
Chapel Hill Road
Placement
of column design
Area
A:
Monumental sculpture at the corner of
Academy Street
and
Chapel Hill Road
Placement
of column design with paths
Area
A:
Monumental sculpture at the corner of
Academy Street
and
Chapel Hill Road
Colored
drawing for placement of columns with green grass, red brick pavers as
paths, dark grey pavers as square in plaza, stainless steel cut out pine
cone design to be placed in the center circle.
Pine
cone image
Area
A:
To be used in the center of the columns.
Image will be cut from stainless steel and embedded into the concrete.
Area
C:
Image will be used as the center area of each spiral etched design on the
glass walled bridge.
Area
B:
Stone Seating
Area
D:
Bluestone floor paving pattern
Catherine Widgery
Artist
Summary:
Gates of Light
The Research:
The creation of Gates of
Light has been the product of a unique, in my experience, collaboration
between the people of
Cary
and me as the artist. During a
total of six visits to
Cary
I learned about the place from talking with people I met and in dialogue
during three public meetings. I
traveled around and visited its different neighborhoods, read Around
and About Cary which describes in detail the history of this town, saw
Caryosity, a film about Cary created by students, even subscribed
to Our State, North Carolina’s magazine.
I got topographical maps, old plans of the road systems, geological
maps, took walks in the parks, collecting specimens of local plants, even
bought the botanical guide to North Carolina.
From my first meetings with residents of
Cary
, I felt an exceptional openness to ideas, a warmth and positive energy.
It inspired me to stretch myself to come up with a design worthy of
this place and people.
My Mandate:
From my discussions with
the public and the staff of Cary Visual Arts and the Town of
Cary
, the goals of the Town Hall Gateway Project were to create a work which
reflected the past, the present and future of this town.
“We want you to make a work that people come to
Cary
to see.” So the gesture
needed to both bold and universal, a vision that goes beyond a history
lesson and speaks to the dynamic and highly sophisticated people who have
come to live and work here.
There was also a sense
that
Cary
is on the threshold of important changes.
The new town hall is an expression of a dynamic community. Yet to
date, there has been no image that can be associated uniquely with
Cary
; there is no consistency in the town signage in terms of graphic imagery
that would indicate that “Now we are in
Cary
”. I found this an exciting
opportunity to try to find an image that might be able to be used in many
different ways and could become associated with
Cary
perhaps beyond the town campus. Though
I have limited my current proposal to the Town Hall Campus, I felt I could
provide a vision that could be considered in a more comprehensive way.
My goal, which I
expressed before being selected as the artist to work on this project, was
to create several artistic interventions around the campus as part of a
single work that would create a cohesive image for the whole campus with
its collection of buildings.
The Concept:
Gates of Light
was inspired by
Cary
’s link with nature so evident from the moment I arrived, by the past
when there had been a loblolly pine forest where the town hall now stands
and by the expansive warmth and energy of the people that embraces those
who come here. The growth
pattern found throughout nature that appears in the loblolly pine cone is
of two spirals that intersect; they both expand outward and embrace.
This simple pattern can be interpreted in so many ways both
graphically and in three dimensions; I felt it was an ideal image for
Cary
.
Area
A: Monumental sculpture at the
corner of
Academy Street
and
Chapel Hill Road
Area
A, at the corner of
Academy Road
and
Chapel Hill Road
, is the main component of “Gates of
Light.” It is made up of 100
perforated stainless steel columns set out in an overlapping spiral
pattern like the one found in the pine cone of the loblolly trees that
were once on this site. Stainless
steel square plate “leaves” in spiral lines are welded around the
column, catching the light. These
spiral ribbons change in relationship with each other and are seen through
the layers of columns. Red
brick paths lead to the central area emphasizing the formal pattern.
At the center, a stainless steel cutout of a loblolly pine cone is
embedded into the concrete circle. It,
too, catches the light and will be seen shimmering through the columns as
one approaches.
At night each column is
illuminated so it becomes a column of light, a gateway to the town that is
both embracing and expanding energy.
Area B:
Stone Seating
Area
B is located at the other end of the Town Hall Campus on
Academy near the corner of Ambassador Loop.
The massive local granite stones are set beneath the trees near the
pedestrian path to provide a shady seating area for visitors to the
campus. The stones are shaped
like the spaces in between the lines of the growth pattern found in Area
A. The final surface of the
large rocks will have the rough texture of the natural stone on the sides
and a “flame finish” smooth surface for sitting on top.
This area is both a sculpture and a seating area and suggests the
ordered growth of both nature and the town.
Its weight, mass and organic material is a contrast to the light,
tall, airy man-made material at the other corner.
Area C:
Glass Walled Bridge
Area
C is the outside portion of the glass walled bridge that links the
parking area behind building D to the main entrance to the Town Hall
complex. Each of the two walls
is approximately 39” high and 99’ long.
The growth pattern here is dynamic, rolling, dissolving and
reforming to suggest the energy and dynamic nature of
Cary
. The pine cone is at the
center of each of the swirling forms.
There is a syncopated rhythm to the sequence of spinning forms to
make the experience of walking up the pathway animated.
The railings of the bridge contain lighting which illuminates the
patterns in the glass making the experience of walking up this bridge
(especially at night) exciting and energizing.
Area D:
Bluestone floor paving pattern
Area
D inside the entrance corridor of building D is a subtle echo of
the patterns found elsewhere. The
arcs are cut into the existing paving and the colors are exchanged so that
the ghost of the arcs are visible. The
energy has been brought indoors.
Mr. Joyce is not
concerned with the design; instead, it is with filling in the drainage
area behind the building, as well as the price of the art.
Mr. Collins stated the
artwork is wire mesh circular columns that are 10 feet high by 10 inches.
Mr. Joyce stated he
cannot visualize what this will look like from a streetscape standpoint.
Mr. Collins stated the council is only approving the concept tonight, and
the council and the community will have an opportunity to get a better
understanding of what it is as the process moves forward. He stated that
action tonight will allow staff to work more with the artist and bring it
back to council for further review. He showed council a photo depiction of
the art work (refer to Attachment C,
which is attached to and incorporated in these minutes).
Mr. Joyce stated he
disagrees with the concept.
Mayor Pro Tem Smith
stated he is opposed to the cost overrun, and he feels that private
contributions should cover the difference. He stated he personally
believes that art on a town hall campus should be more traditional, but he
is trying to keep these personal thoughts out of the discussion.
Mrs. Robison stated the
cost estimate is higher now than it was a year ago when it was first
proposed. She stated some of this is due to unanticipated issues with the
site. She stated Ms. Harrar of Cary Visual Arts provided comments at the
committee meeting, and she has personally encouraged that organization to
meet and match and preferably exceed the Town’s contribution. She stated
she was satisfied that they are committed to continue to work on
fundraising efforts. She stated there has been a lot of public input in
formulating the current proposal.
Mr. Collins stated the
project was originally expected to cost $300,000, with Cary Visual Art (CVA)
sharing the cost 50/50. He stated of the $300,000, $30,000 was originally
allocated to the design phase. He stated the design phase is coming to and
end, and the Town and CVA have both invested $15,000 each into the design
phase. He stated the current total projected cost, including filling the
swale and the integrated areas is $412,651.
Mr. Roseland suggested
scaling back the concept to stay within the original budget. Mr. Collins
stated staff can work with the artist on this idea.
Mrs. Robinson concurred
with Mayor Pro Tem Smith’s comments about the cost overruns. She stated
the stonework and glass does not add significant cost but does provide a
lot of art value. She feels it should be phased, even beyond the 2005
budget. She is concerned about incorporating the art design into other
elements, including signage, before people have the opportunity to respond
to the art work.
Ms. Dorrel stated the
community has shown positive reaction to the preliminary design. She
stated the artist set up a column so people could actually see it. She
concurred with the phasing of the art work. She stated it costs about
$35,000 to fill in the swale, and this was an unexpected cost. She stated
this art work will add benefits to the community by providing more usable
space where doors are now blocked and an anticipated patio is unusable.
She suggested that corporate donors sponsor the columns. She does not feel
there is an urgency to make a decision now to incorporate the art work in
other design elements. She agrees with giving the public exposure to the
art work before this decision is made.
Mr. Collins stated there
will be a sign program put together for town hall, and there may be an
opportunity for wayfinding signage on the campus. He stated staff would
need direction on this particular signage issue very soon; however, other
decisions could wait until the art has been tested.
Mr. Roseland stated the
council is not voting on a design element, rather the requested council
action is to pursue more information about a design element. He is in
favor of doing this.
Mrs. Robinson stated she
is fine with moving forward as long as it is clear that council is not
pursuing a particular design element and making it a component of the
downtown revitalization.
Ms. Dorrel suggested that
the staff prepare another staff report to address the town hall signage.
Mr. Joyce asked if he
would be allowed to put a lighted column in his yard. Mr. Coleman stated
it would be allowed on residential property (not withstanding
homeowners’ association private covenants).
Mr. Joyce is opposed to
spending Town money on this project.
Ms. Dorrel stated this is
a discovery art experience. Mrs. Robison stated she sees this as a great
opportunity for families and children to experience art in a different
way.
Mrs. Robinson stated it
is difficult to spend municipal money on art that is subjective. She
wished the artist had left the column and model for the council members to
see. Mr. Collins stated the column and model are both in
Cary
and he will share these with the council. Mrs. Robinson added that she is
concerned about having metal and brick in the hot summer with no shade.
Mr. Roseland stated he
sees this project as good for downtown. He stated if
Cary
decides not to invest
Cary
money in this public art in the downtown area, then we lose the matching
funds from CVA. He stated in other cities, it is a straightforward
exercise to incorporate public art in the urban areas. He stated
Cary
is currently going through a transition period, and this is a new issue
for
Cary
. He feels that tasteful public art that compliments the architecture is a
solid investment.
Mr. Roseland stressed the
importance of staying within the original budget.
ACTION:
Mr. Roseland made a motion to approve staff recommendation #1 – the
overall design concept of “Gates of Light” as presented by Ms.
Widgery, contingent upon staying within the initial budget of $300,000.
Ms. Dorrel provided the second.
Mrs. Robinson stated she
will support the motion, but she wants the council to have the opportunity
to see the model before council approves the actual project.
Mayor Pro Tem Smith wants
to continue to seek public input.
ACTION:
Vote was called for on Mr. Roseland’s motion. Mayor Pro Tem Smith and
Mr. Joyce voted “no.” All others voted “aye.” The motion carried
by majority vote.
ACTION:
Mr. Joyce made a motion to not approve staff recommendation #5 (consider
opportunities for incorporating the design into other elements of the Town
Center and other areas including signage opportunities), and let it be an
opportunity that comes forward when needed on a case by case basis.
Ms. Dorrel asked if Mr.
Joyce does not want staff to bring back suggested signage for the town
campus. Mr. Joyce fears he will start seeing this type of signage without
council knowing about it in advance. Mrs. Robinson and Ms. Dorrel stated
this will not occur.
Mayor McAlister noted
that there is a motion on the table, which needs to be addressed prior to
continuing with discussion.
ACTION:
Mr. Joyce withdrew his motion.
Mayor Pro Tem Smith
stated he does not think that the council needs to address the 5th
staff recommendation at this time. He would prefer to deny or table this
issue at this time and have it come back in the future.
ACTION:
Mayor Pro Tem Smith made a motion to deny item 5 (consider
opportunities for incorporating the design into other elements of the
Town
Center
and
other areas including signage opportunities). Mr. Joyce provided the
second.
Ms. Dorrel would prefer a
motion to consider opportunities to incorporate design into other elements
of the town hall campus signage so staff has that direction and it gives
something to see.
ACTION:
Vote was called for on Mayor Pro Tem Smith’s motion. Mayor Pro Tem Smith
and Mr. Joyce voted “aye.” All others voted “no.” The motion
failed for lack of majority vote.
ACTION:
Ms. Dorrel made a motion to consider opportunities for incorporating the
design into other elements of the town hall campus signage. Mrs. Robison
provided the second. Mayor Pro Tem Smith and Mr. Joyce voted “no.” All
others voted “aye.” The motion passed by majority vote.
ACTION:
Mayor Pro Tem Smith made a motion and Ms. Dorrel provided the second to
approve staff recommendations 2, 3 and 4 as follows:
2.
Authorize the etching of the design proposed by Catherine Widgery
into the outside glass bridge as provided for in the Town Hall expansion
plan. This authorization would
include funding with an appropriation of $15,750 from General Capital
Reserve Unrestricted Fund Balance as well as the recognition of $15,750 in
revenue from Cary Visual Art to fund $31,500 in contracted services within
the Town Hall Gateway Project PR1079.
3.
Consider phased funding for other components of the project during
the FY05 Capital Budget discussions.
4.
Direct staff to work with CVA to develop additional fundraising
strategies to reduce additional Town appropriation.
Mrs. Robinson does not
want to commit to budgeting through only the FY 2005 budget, and instead
she wants to be open to going beyond the FY 2005 budget.
Mrs. Robison stated the
word consider to her means that
this is open to discussion during the budget process. Mr. Collins
concurred. He added that staff recommends that this issue be considered
during the FY 2005 budget discussion, but there is no commitment of funds
other than the 15,000.
ACTION:
Vote was called for on the motion to approve items 2, 3, and 4. Council
granted unanimous approval.
_________________________
|