11-SP-016 Austin Foods Redevelopment
Town of Cary, North Carolina
Development Plan Staff Report
11-SP-016 Austin Foods Redevelopment
Town Council Public Hearing
December 15, 2011
REQUEST
The applicant, Chris Clayton, on behalf of the property owner, Reland Developments, LLC, has requested approval of a redevelopment plan for 2.01 acres located north of East Durham Road, northwest of the intersection of East Chatham Street and East Durham Road. The plans propose to refurbish two existing buildings and redefine vehicular use areas on the site. Due to the existence of subsurface soil contamination from the previous pesticide manufacturing and drum cleaning business, the property owner is negotiating a Brownfields Agreement with the NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) in regards to remediation and to mitigate the contaminants.
SUBJECT PARCELS
|
Property Owner |
Parcel Identification Number (PIN) (10-digit) |
Real Estate ID Number |
Deeded Acreage |
|
Reland Development, LLC |
0764723720 |
0062357 |
0.82 |
|
Reland Development, LLC |
0764724756 |
0025945 |
1.19 |
|
Total Area |
2.01 | ||
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
|
Applicant & Agent |
Chris Clayton |
|
General Location |
North of East Durham Road, northwest of the splitting of East Chatham Street and East Durham Road |
|
Land Use Plan Designation |
Office/Industrial (OFC/IND) in the Town Center Area Plan |
|
Zoning Districts |
Town Center (TC) in the OFC/IND sub-district |
|
Within Town Limits |
Both parcels are within the Town’s corporate limits. |
|
Staff Contact |
Kevin A. Hales, Senior Planner |
LIST OF EXHIBITS
The following documents incorporated into this staff report are to be entered into the record for the development plan application:
Exhibit A: 11-SU-016 Application (3 pages)
Exhibit B: 11-SP-016 Plan Set (17 pages)
Exhibit C: 11-SP-016 Draft Brownfields Agreement (27 pages)
SITE CHARACTERISTICS
Streams: There are no streams that impact the site.
Floodplain: There are no floodplains, flood hazard areas, or floodways indicated on the site.
Wetlands: There are no wetlands indicated on the site.
Topography: The site slopes gradually upward from the street toward the railroad track with steeper grades adjacent to the eastern property line.
Surrounding Land Uses:
North – Single-family residential and public water tank on opposite side of 200-foot railroad right-of-way
South – Convenience store/filling station on opposite side of East Durham Road
East – Warehousing and distribution of architectural products
West – Automotive repair facility
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The plans propose to retain the two existing buildings on the eastern half of the site, and make only minor façade improvements and repairs. The current gravel vehicular use area would be covered with asphalt pavement to enhance vehicular circulation on the site. Sidewalk would be provided to access the site and to facilitate pedestrian circulation between the buildings. Overhead utilities on the site would be removed and would be placed underground.
The western half of the site would be cleared of existing vegetation, and a proposed stormwater bio-retention basin would be located in the southwest area of the site. Unlike most bio-retention basins in the Town, this particular stormwater device would not be planted with trees or shrubs due to the increased infiltration opportunities such plantings would introduce. Instead, the bio-retention area would contain only turfgrass. The remaining area in the northwestern portion of the site would be graveled to aid in minimizing stormwater infiltration.
Property containing subsurface contaminants may be developed, or redeveloped through the Brownfields Act. The Brownfields Act provides for controlled development on contaminated sites and establishes incentives for such redevelopment through a Brownfields Agreement that sets restrictions with regard to remediation and mitigation of the subsurface contaminants. Brownfields Agreements are administered by the NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). A Brownfields site creates unique challenges to the redevelopment of the property. In this instance, existing contaminated soil would be removed to a certain depth and would be replaced with uncontaminated material. The site would then be capped with impervious surface material to reduce the opportunity for stormwater infiltration into contaminated soils left below the cap. The desire to limit to the extent possible infiltration opportunities has caused the applicant to limit plantings on the site and to propose alternative buffering methods to those typically seen in the Town.
SUMMARY OF PROCESS AND ACTIONS TO DATE
Pre-application Conference
The applicant attended a pre-application conference with the Town of Cary Development Review Committee (DRC) on July 28, 2010, regarding the development plan.
Town Center Review Commission
The plan was presented to the Town Center Review Commission (TCRC) at their November 16, 2011 meeting. The plan was forwarded to Town Council with a unanimous recommendation for approval. Topics of discussion during the meeting included the waiver for road improvements across the frontage, the fencing on the site, and the reasons behind the sodding of the bio-retention area.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SUMMARY
|
Comprehensive Plan Element |
Consistent |
Not Consistent |
Not Applicable |
|
A. Land Use Plan |
X |
||
|
B. Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Facility Master Plan |
X |
||
|
C. Growth Management Plan |
X | ||
|
D. Affordable Housing Plan |
X | ||
|
E. Comprehensive Transportation Plan |
X |
||
|
F. Open Space and Historic Resources Plan |
X |
||
|
G. Historic Preservation Master Plan |
X |
A. Land Use Plan
The site is designated for Office/Industrial (OFC/IND) land uses in the Town Center Area Plan, which is a sub-component of the Town of Cary Comprehensive Plan. The draft Brownfields Agreement would limit re-use of the site to office and to warehousing uses, which are consistent with the OFC/IND land use designation.
B. Parks & Greenways Master Plan
The Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources (PRCR) Facilities Master Plan indicates no requirements on the subject properties or in the immediate vicinity.
C. Growth Management Plan
The proposed development does not propose either to make changes to the existing buildings or to provide additional impacts to the surrounding infrastructure. Both buildings would be served with existing utilities along the development’s street frontage.
D. Affordable Housing Plan
The Affordable Housing Plan does not apply to non-residential development proposals.
E. Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP)
The site is located on the northern side of East Durham Road, northwest of the intersection of East Chatham Street and East Durham Road. The property has approximately 330 feet of street frontage.
East Durham Road:
Classification: Major Thoroughfare
Existing Section: 2-lane thoroughfare within approximately 60 feet of right-of-way
Required Section: 3-lane thoroughfare within 75 feet of right-of-way
Sidewalks: Required on both sides; none existing
Bicycle Lanes: 14-foot-wide outside lanes
Transit: No transit service is planned along this corridor.
Status of Planned Improvements: No improvements are currently scheduled by the Town. Town Council granted a waiver to road improvements for this development, including sidewalk installation, at their August 9, 2011, meeting.
F. Open Space Plan
The Open Space and Historic Resources Plan indicates no priority open space on the site.
G. Historic Preservation Master Plan
The subject properties are vacant; therefore, the Historic Preservation Master Plan is not applicable.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (LDO)
Traffic
A 6,256-square-foot warehouse (ITE Code 150 – Warehousing) and a 1,727-square-foot office (ITE Code 710 – General Office Building) would be expected to generate less than the 50 vehicular trips in either peak hour that would require a traffic study for the proposed development.
Buffers and Streetscapes
Section 7.2.3 of the LDO exempts properties located within the Town Center (TC) zoning district from the strict application of the perimeter buffer requirements found in the majority of the Town. Since it is still desirable, in most cases, to provide a buffer between different but compatible land uses, the installation of a perimeter buffer that meets the performance criteria of the LDO is often provided.
The Brownfields Agreement restricts the installation of larger trees due to the increased likelihood of infiltration into the groundwater. In-lieu of the typical buffer plantings consisting of trees and shrubs, the proposed development plan would provide a solid row of evergreen trees to provide a solid visual break between the development and the neighboring properties. This buffer would be planted along the western, northern, and eastern property lines.
Limited tree plantings would be installed in support of the vehicular use screening and evergreen trees would be installed along the project’s street frontage.
Architectural
The development plan proposes to retain the two existing buildings on the site. The development would make repairs as necessary to improve the habitability of the structures. The exteriors would be repainted in a brown/tan color scheme to improve their appearance.
Utilities
The proposed buildings would be served by a private sewer system and by water services connected to the public utility lines located in the East Durham Road right-of-way. The stormwater associated with the proposed improvements would be treated through a bio-retention area located on the western portion of the site adjacent to East Durham Road. Unlike most bio-retention areas, the proposed bio-retention area would be planted only with grass to minimize root infiltration into the soil.
CARY
SUGGESTED MOTIONS
Land Development Ordinance Section 3.9.2(I), Approval Criteria, requires that the following five (5) criteria (in bold text below) be met in order for the Town Council to grant approval of the proposed site plan revisions:
(1) The plan complies with all applicable requirements of this Ordinance, including the development and design standards of Chapters 7 and 8 as well as the dedication and improvements provisions of Chapter 8 as well as all applicable Town specifications.
Staff Comments: As discussed in the attached staff report, the proposed site plan is consistent with the requirements of the LDO.
TEST SATISFIED? __ YES __ NO
(2) The plan adequately protects other property, or residential uses located on the same property, from the potential adverse effects of the proposed development.
Staff Comments: The proposed development provides buffer performance in excess of the buffers that would typically be required for this development. The plan proposes this increase in performance to compensate for the inability to plant the required trees in the perimeter buffers.
TEST SATISFIED? __ YES __ NO
(3) The plan provides harmony and unity with the development of nearby properties.
Staff Comments: The proposed development is consistent with the character and density proposed in the Land Use plan, with the zoning designation of the property, and with the surrounding development. The existing structures would be retained, but with minor repairs and improvements to the exterior appearance.
TEST SATISFIED? __ YES __ NO
(4) The plan provides safe conditions for pedestrians or for motorists and prevents a dangerous arrangement of pedestrian and vehicular ways.
Staff Comments: The proposed plan would include construction of sidewalks into the site and between the buildings on the site for pedestrian circulation. Improvements to the vehicular use area would include paving the gravel parking areas to improve vehicular circulation. Access to the site would be consolidated into the driveway farthest from the split in the road, thereby improving safety for vehicular access.
TEST SATISFIED? __ YES __ NO
(5) The plan provides safe ingress and egress for emergency services to the site.
Staff Comments: The proposed development plan would create no unsafe situations in regards to providing emergency services to the site.
TEST SATISFIED? __ YES __ NO
SUGGESTED MOTIONS for
MOTION TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION
Upon conducting a duly-advertised public hearing and considering the application materials, the testimony, and the evidence presented at the hearing or otherwise appearing in the record and upon considering the approval criteria of Section 3.9.2(I), I move that we adopt the staff comments shown on the worksheet as our findings to
[
[
OR
MOTION TO DENY THE APPLICATION
Upon conducting a duly-advertised public hearing and upon considering the application materials, the testimony, and the evidence presented at the hearing or otherwise appearing in the record and upon considering the approval criteria of Section 3.9.2(I), I move that we DENY the proposed
· The plan does not comply with all applicable requirements of this Ordinance, including the development and the design standards of Chapters 7 and 8, as well as the dedication and the improvement provisions of Chapter 8, and as well as all applicable Town specifications. (Note: Plans within Planned Developments may be subject to different requirements based on the approval.) ___________;
· The plan does not adequately protect other property or residential uses located on the same property from the potential adverse effects of the proposed development, because the ______________;
· The plan does not provide either harmony or unity with the development of nearby properties, because the ____________;
· The plan does not provide safe conditions for pedestrians or for motorists and prevents a dangerous arrangement of both pedestrian and vehicular ways, because the ______________;
· The plan does not provide both safe ingress and safe egress for emergency services to the site, because the ____________;
