10-REZ-18 Old Apex Investments
Rezoning Staff Report
10-REZ-
Town Council Meeting
May 12, 2011
REQUEST
To Amend the Town of Cary Official Zoning Map to rezone a portion of a parcel located at 1405 Old Apex Road from Residential 40 (R-40) and General Commercial (GC), to General Commercial Conditional Use (GC-CU) and apply zoning conditions related to land use and building height to the portion of the parcel located outside of the railroad right-of-way.
NOTE: The purpose of the rezoning is to determine whether or not the land uses and densities allowed in the proposed zoning district are appropriate for the site. Technical design standards of the Land Development Ordinance are addressed during review of the site or subdivision plan and can be found at http://www.amlegal.com/library/nc/cary.shtml.
SUBJECT PARCELS
|
Property Owner(s) |
|
Real Estate ID(s) |
Acreage |
|
Old Apex Investments, LLC |
0753741749 Portion* |
0087282 Portion* |
± 3.25 |
|
* portion outside of |
± 3.25 | ||
PROJECT SUMMARY
The subject property is the site of the former Cary Inn/Knotty Pine Motor Court, which was demolished in 2008.
According to a 2007 survey provided by the applicant, the total parcel size is approximately 4.48 acres, 1.23 acres of which is located in the right-of-way of the
The applicant is requesting that the southern portion of the parcel be rezoned from R-40 to GC-CU. The northern portion of the property is currently zoned GC, and is also proposed to be rezoned to GC-CU. Proposed zoning conditions would: limit land use on site to one or more single-story office buildings totaling no more than 25,000 square feet; limit building height to one story (35 feet); and provide an opaque buffer adjacent to the railroad right-of-way.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
|
Applicant |
Rodulfo Salman Old Apex Investments, LLC | ||
|
Agent |
Rusty Long, | ||
|
Acreage |
± 3.25 | ||
|
| |||
|
Tentative Schedule |
Public Hearing |
Planning & Zoning Board |
Town Council Decision |
|
Land Use Plan Designation |
Commercial Low Intensity ( | ||
|
Existing Zoning District |
General Commercial (GC) Residential 40 (R-40) | ||
|
Proposed Zoning District |
General Commercial Conditional Use (GC-CU) | ||
|
Proposed Zoning Conditions |
1. Land use shall be limited to a maximum of 25,000 square feet of office space 2. Buildings shall be limited to 1 story, with height not to exceed 35 feet. 3. An evergreen hedge consisting of material such as arborvitae or cryptomeria japonica shall be provided adjacent to the railroad right-of-way along the portion of the lot adjacent to new construction. | ||
|
Town Limits |
Yes | ||
|
Valid Protest Petition |
To be determined prior to the public hearing. | ||
|
Staff Contact |
Mary Beerman | ||
Streams: The Town of Cary
Floodplain and Wetlands: None shown on the Town of
Surrounding Land Uses:
North - Town of
South - Garden Supply Company (ORD-CU zoning district)
East -
West – Vacant and single-family residential (R-40 zoning)
CONSISTENCY WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
Land Use Office use is a permitted use in the General Commercial zoning district.
Density and Dimensional Standards
|
|
Existing Zoning District - R-40 |
Existing Zoning District |
Proposed Zoning District |
|
Min. Lot Size |
40,000 sq. ft. |
None | |
|
Min. Lot Width (with public sewer) |
125 ft. (corner lot:135 ft). |
Not Applicable | |
|
Front Yard Setback |
50 ft. |
No parking spaces between building & right-of-way:30 ft. | |
|
Side Yard Setback |
15 ft. |
None | |
|
Rear Yard Setback |
30 ft. |
None | |
|
Max. Building Height |
35 ft. (NOTE: Height may be increased by one foot for every foot provided in addition to the minimum setbacks) |
Within 100 feet of a residential district: 35 feet plus one foot for every foot provided in addition to minimum setback |
Proposed Zoning Condition: Buildings shall be limited to 1 story, with height not to exceed 35 feet. |
Perimeter Buffer
A 20-foot Type C aesthetic buffer is required adjacent to the north and south property boundaries and adjacent to the railroad right-of-way. The applicant has proposed a zoning condition to plant native evergreen vegetation where needed to provide an opaque buffer adjacent to the railroad along the portion of the lot adjacent to new construction.
Streetscape
A 30-foot streetscape is required along
Traffic
The parcel currently has two zonings. The 2.13-acre portion of the parcel is zoned general commercial and the 1.13-acre portion of the parcel is zoned R-40. Using the ITE Trip Generation Guidelines, it would appear that the 2.12-acre portion could generate 62 am and 225 pm peak hour trips if it was developed with a 21,200 SF shopping center using ITE Code – 820 – Shopping Center. Using the ITE Trip Generation Guidelines, it would appear that the 1.13 acre portion could generate
SUMMARY OF PROCESS AND ACTIONS TO DATE
Notification
On
Neighborhood Meeting
Based on materials supplied by the applicant, the required neighborhood meeting was held on
Town Council Public Hearing
The public hearing was held on February 24, 2010. One speaker representing the applicant spoke in support of the request. There were no questions or comments from council members.
Planning and Zoning Board Meeting
The Planning and Zoning Board considered the proposed rezoning request at its April 11, 2011 meeting and recommended approval by a vote of 8-0. Staff answered questions and provided clarification concerning building height, the protest petition (invalid) that was submitted, required road improvements, public transit, and clearing within the railroad right-of-way.
Criteria for Consideration in Reviewing Rezonings
Section 3.4.1(E) of the Land Development Ordinance sets forth the following criteria that should be considered in reviewing rezonings:
1. The proposed rezoning corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing condition, trend or fact;
2. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan set forth in Section 1.3 (LDO);
3. The Town and other service providers will be able to provide sufficient public safety, educational, recreational, transportation and utility facilities and services to the subject property while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing development;
4. The proposed rezoning is unlikely to have significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and vegetation;
5. The proposed rezoning will not have significant adverse impacts on property in the vicinity of the subject tract;
6. The proposed zoning classification is suitable for the subject property.
Applicable Comprehensive or
|
Comprehensive Plan Element |
Consistent |
Not Consistent |
Not Applicable |
|
Land Use Plan |
X |
|
|
|
Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Facility Master Plan |
X |
|
|
|
Growth Management Plan |
X |
|
|
|
Affordable Housing Plan |
|
|
X |
|
Comprehensive Transportation Plan |
X |
|
|
|
Open Space Plan |
X |
|
|
|
Historic Preservation Master Plan |
|
|
X |
The Land Use Plan, a volume of the Town of
Growth Management Plan
The Growth Management Plan includes the following Guiding Principles which may be relevant to this case:
1. R1 Guiding Principle: Ensure that adequate infrastructure and services are available concurrently with new development.
2. A2 Guiding Principle: Ensure that the overall amount of development in
3. Q1 Guiding Principle: Continue
Affordable Housing Plan
The Affordable Housing Plan is not relevant to this case.
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Old Apex Road is designated as a Major Thoroughfare
Existing Section: 24-foot, two-lane, undivided, shoulder section on approximately 60-foot
Future Section: Five-lane, undivided section with curb & gutter (69’ roadway, 91’
Sidewalks: Existing – None
Future – Both sides (Pedestrian Plan priority corridor)
Bicycle Lanes: Existing – None
Future – Wide outside lanes per Standard Specifications
Transit: No transit requirements
Status of Planned Improvements: No improvements planned currently
Parks & Greenways Master Plan
According to the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan there are no issues related to this site.
Open Space Plan
The open space inventory associated with the Open Space Plan does not identify any significant natural resources for the subject parcel.
Historic Preservation Master Plan
The Historic Preservation Master Plan is not relevant to this case.
APPLICANT’S JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
The following statements are provided by the applicant (shown below in italics) in response to the criteria established in the application (shown below in bold) and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town of
1. Any issues with the size of the tract?
Response: The unusual shape of the parcel, being pinned in between
2. How is the request compatible with the comprehensive plan (i.e., Land Use, Transportation, Open Space and Historic Resources)?
Response: The town’s Land Use Plan makes no specific provision for the site, which lies south of
3. What are the benefits and detriments to the owner, neighbors and the community?
Response: By rezoning the southern portion of the property from R40 to GC (to match the northern portion of the property) the entire property can now be developed, maximizing the usable land on the north portion, and utilizing the south portion as both green space and for stormwater requirements. Required buffers between zonings would make any development to the north portion of the lot (with the split-zoning) unfeasible. On the other hand, a single GC zoning throughout the site will allow the owner to provide ample pervious area and filtration for a small commercial property. The neighbors will benefit from both the services and businesses which occupy the new commercial spaces, as well as the infilling of the lot, which was previously occupied by the derelict, and eventually condemned, Cary Inn.
4. How are the allowable uses with the proposed rezoning compatible with, or how do they relate to, the uses currently present on adjacent tracts?
Response: Our proposed GC zoning is compatible with the directly adjacent Office / Institutional Properties and Commercial properties to the North, and Office / Industrial property to the south. It is buffered by the railroad property to the east, and by
5. What reductions/amendments and/or modifications to the development standards of the LDO are being requested and how are they justified? (PDD, new or amended) Applicants must list these items and/or clearly highlight them within the Planned Development document.
Response: N/A
ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION
10-REZ-18 1405 Old Apex Road (Old Apex Investments)
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
Section 1: The Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning the area described as follows:
PARCEL & OWNER INFORMATION
|
Property Owner(s) |
|
Real Estate ID(s) |
Acreage |
|
Old Apex Investments, LLC 1208 Crabtree Crossing |
0753741749 Portion* |
0087282 Portion* |
± 3.25 |
|
* portion outside of Total Area |
± 3.25 | ||
Section 2: That this Property is rezoned from R-40
Section 3: The conditions mutually approved by the Town and the applicant for promoting public health, safety and the general welfare are:
1. Land use shall be limited to a maximum of 25,000 square feet of office space
2. Buildings shall be limited to one story, with height not to exceed 35 feet.
3. An evergreen hedge consisting of material such as arborvitae or cryptomeria japonica shall be provided adjacent to the railroad right-of-way along the portion of the lot adjacent to new construction.
These conditions address conformance of the development and use of the Property to ordinances and officially adopted plans and address impacts reasonably expected to be generated by the development and use of the Property.
Section 4: This ordinance shall be effective on the date of adoption.
Adopted and effective: May 12, 2011
________________________________________
Harold Weinbrecht, Jr.
Mayor
______________________________
Date
