08-REZ-14 Tryon Greens
Rezoning Staff Report for the Town Council
Case # 08-REZ-14 Tryon Greens
Request
The applicant is requesting that Town Council approve an Ordinance to amend the official zoning map of the Town of
The purpose of a rezoning is to evaluate the appropriateness of a proposed land use for the subject parcel(s) of land. Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not considered during the rezoning process. However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance with existing requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) when the site or subdivision plan is submitted. All such requirements can be found at http://www.amlegal.com/library/nc/cary.shtml.
Background Information
|
| |||
|
Applicant |
Barbara Mulkey | ||
|
Harvest Davalland, LLC | |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
(919) 851-1912 | |||
|
Agent |
Bill Hood | ||
|
Mulkey Engineers and Consultants | |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
(919) 673-4933 | |||
|
bhood@nc.rr.com | |||
|
Acreage |
7.85 ± | ||
|
General Location |
North side of | ||
|
Hearings / Meetings |
Public Hearing |
Planning & Zoning |
Town Council* February 26, 2009 |
|
Land Use Plan Designation |
Office/Institutional (OFC/INS) | ||
|
Town Limits |
The subject property is located within the corporate limits of the Town of | ||
|
Valid Protest |
No | ||
|
Surrounding Land Uses |
North and East – The single-family lots in the Summerwinds III Subdivision ( | ||
|
South – The single-family lots in the Summerwinds II Subdivision (south side of | |||
|
West - The single-family lots in the Thornewood Subdivision ( | |||
|
P&Z Recommendation |
Recommended for approval 6-3 | ||
|
Existing Use |
Existing 17,500 sf single-story office building | ||
|
Proposed Use |
Uses allowed in OI District with exclusions as listed in the proposed zoning conditions | ||
|
Final Council Action |
To be provided after the Town Council Meeting | ||
|
Staff Contact |
Mary W. Beerman, AICP | ||
|
(919) 469-4342 | |||
|
mary.beerman@townofcary.org | |||
Public commentary is available for this request by clicking here. Results from Public Commentary available by clicking link at the bottom of this datasheet.
PROJECT SUMMARY AND HISTORY
|
Current Use |
The 7.85-acre property, located at the northwest corner of |
|
· Parcel “A” contains a 17,500 square-foot single-story office building currently occupied by Mulkey Engineers and Consultants. The existing building was originally a church, built by | |
|
· Parcel “B” previously contained the parking lot for the church. The parking lot and associated lighting was removed by the current owner and the parcel is now vacant. | |
|
Rezoning History |
In 1998, the property was rezoned from R-40 to OI-CU (Case # 98-REZ-32). It was then purchased by the current owner and the use of the building was converted from religious institution to office. The approved rezoning included a number of conditions, including several pertaining to use, building size and appearance, setbacks and buffers. |
|
In 2003, zoning conditions were modified (Case # 03-REZ-08) to: | |
|
· reduce the building setback along | |
|
· prohibit parking on the east side of any building to be constructed on Parcel “B”; and | |
|
· increase the maximum combined building square footage allowed for the two parcels from 35,000 sf to 55,000 sf. | |
|
Summary of Proposed Changes |
The purpose of this rezoning request is to modify the existing zoning conditions. Some of the modifications would eliminate obsolete conditions or conditions that repeat requirements found in the LDO. Others could have an effect on the future development of the site, as indicated below. |
|
Conditions proposed to be deleted (reason for request in italics): | |
|
· Delete conditions requiring removal of gravel parking lot, parking lot lighting and on-site trailers used by church when property was purchased from church in 1998. (Conditions satisfied). | |
|
· Delete conditions pertaining to prior TIA and road improvements. (Conditions satisfied). | |
|
· Delete condition addressing screening of dumpster. (Required by LDO). | |
|
· Remove the portions of Condition 2 requiring 40-foot Type A buffer adjacent to the rear of lots on | |
|
· Delete the statement that existing vegetation will remain in the buffers. (Required by LDO). | |
|
Proposed revisions that could affect future site development: | |
|
· Delete the condition requiring any new buildings to be residential in character and architecturally compatible with the existing building | |
|
|
· Increase the maximum building height from one story to three stories |
|
|
· Increase the maximum building floor area from 55,000 sf to 80,000 sf. |
|
|
· Delete the condition prohibiting connection to |
Notification
On
Feedback at the Town Council Public Hearing
Staff presented the request and noted there were no valid protest petitions. The applicant was present and provided a summary of the project. One citizen spoke in opposition to the request, citing concerns with lighting, parking, traffic, building height, buffers, access to
Discussion by the Town Council included concern with building height and design and removal of the requirement that buildings be residential in character. Council asked for additional information on the width of buffers adjacent to residential use in other areas, and for the location of the nearest three-story building. (The nearest three-story building is
Similar concerns relating to building height, residential character and buffers were expressed during the rezoning process for other developments in the vicinity. A summary of how these concerns were addressed elsewhere is provided below:
· Similar architectural styles for all buildings
· 30-foot height limit and residential style for buildings in OI-CU district within 200 feet of Summerwinds III
· No direct access to
· Buildings in OI-CU district that are more than 200 feet from Summerwinds must have aggregate side yards, and aggregate front and rear yards of at least twice the building height.
The site plan for the
South Side of
· Compliance with any watershed protection regulations in effect at the time of site plan approval; and
· Building height limit of five stories
1n 1994, most of the area at the southeast quadrant was rezoned again, from OI-CU to Residential-8
(18 acres, developed with 54 single-family lots as part of
Changes Prior To The Planning And Zoning Board Public Hearing
The existing zoning condition prohibiting connection to
Feedback at Planning and Zoning Board Public Hearing
Staff reviewed the background information and presented the facts associated with the rezoning request. The applicant was present and provided a summary of the project. There were no citizen comments.
There was considerable discussion by the Planning and Zoning Board related to building height and setbacks, perimeter buffers, the size and style of the building, and the potential for a connection to
Planning and Zoning Board Recommendation
The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of the request by a vote of 6-3. Board members voting against the request expressed the following concerns:
- Greater protection of the adjoining neighborhood could be provided with a buffer that will remain opaque as the existing pine trees grow taller.
- Increasing the building height and square footage would not be a benefit to the general public.
- Maintaining the residential character of the area is important and some of the zoning conditions may not achieve the intended goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
Changes Since the Planning and Zoning Board Public Hearing
In response to concerns and questions raised at the Planning and Zoning Board public hearing, the applicant has revised the proposed zoning conditions to limit the height of any building with a flat roof to 50 feet, regardless of the building setback. (The Land Development Ordinance allows the 50-foot height limit in the OI district to be increased by one foot for every foot of additional building setback above the minimum required).
The applicant has submitted the following proposed changes to the existing zoning conditions:
(The specific changes to the existing zoning conditions are shown below. Text showing strikethrough is being deleted, and text showing bold underline is being added.)
1. Any new buildings would be architecturally compatible with the existing church building and be residential in character.
· Buildings would be primarily brick, similar in appearance and quality to the existing church building and the residential structures on surrounding lots.
· All roofs would be pitched (residential in character). Asphalt shingle roof material will closely match the existing building.
2. 1 Relative to Parcel B, a 40-foot Type A buffers will be applied to and to the rear of lots fronting on Larkwood Lane. Evergreen trees installed in Type A buffer (10 feet on center or recommended spacing for species) shall grow to a maturity of at least 20 feet in height and be of at least 8 feet in height at time of planting. Existing vegetation would remain in the buffers. Building setbacks of at least 90 feet will be applied to the east boundary of Parcel B (
3. The existing gravel parking lot (on Lot B) will be grassed upon church's vacating the property. Topsoil will be spread over the entire lot and a grass lawn established.
4. 2. Light pole height will be limited to 20 feet. Also, shoebox type light fixtures will be used to add attractiveness to the site and limit spillover lighting. Lot B lighting will be removed upon church vacating property.
5. 3. Building height will not exceed 36 feet from finished grade to mean height between eaves and peak. Building height will not exceed 36 feet be limited to two three stories for any building, with a 50-foot maximum height for any building with a flat roof.
6. 4 Access to Parcel B from (This condition was included in the original application.) No vehicular access off Frostwood Drive.
7. 5. The total number of buildings on the entire site (parcels A & B) shall be limited to two buildings including the existing building) with a maximum building square footage for the entire site (parcels A & B) shall be limited to 80,000 55,000 square feet. This 80,000 55,000 square foot limitation applies to the existing building (June 1999) as well as any additional building.Any expansion of the existing structure or new structures constructed will be limited to a single story structure.
8. 6 The following uses will be removed as permitted uses under the conditional rezoning:
· Child day care centers
· Parking lots, as the principal use of the property
· Funeral homes
· Public utility facilities
· Utility substations
· Communications, radio, TV microwave or other telecommunications towers.
· Outdoor amphitheater, government
· Package delivery/messenger services
· Kennels indoor/outdoor (outdoor walking, exercising, training, etc.)
· Hospitals
· Nightclubs and bars
· Farm market
· Banks
· Restaurants
9. The property owner or the assignee shall complete the required thoroughfare plan improvements to Tryon Rd prior to January 1, 2000 for the entire property frontage on Tryon Road (parcels A & B)
10 A traffic impact analysis report as per the Interim Planned Development Ordinance provisions will be required with the initial site plan application for the subject property.
11 Dumpster and pads will be screened with material matching the building exterior.
12 7. No temporary or permanent mobile trailers will be allowed (construction trailers not included).
13. Existing on-site trailers will be removed upon church vacating property.
THE FINAL PROPOSED CONDITIONS READ AS FOLLOWS:
1. Relative to Parcel B, a 40-foot Type A buffer will be applied to
2. Light pole height will be limited to 20 feet. Also, shoebox type light fixtures will be used to add attractiveness to the site and limit spillover lighting.
3. Building height will be limited to three stories.
4. Access to Parcel B from
5. The maximum building square footage for the entire site (parcels A & B) shall be 80,000 square feet. This 80,000 square foot limitation applies to the existing building (June 1999) as well as any additional building.
6. The following uses will be removed as permitted uses under the conditional rezoning:
· Child day care centers
· Parking lots, as the principal use of the property
· Funeral homes
· Public utility facilities
· Utility substations
· Communications, radio, TV microwave or other telecommunications towers.
· Outdoor amphitheater, government
· Package delivery/messenger services
· Kennels indoor/outdoor (outdoor walking, exercising, training, etc.)
· Hospitals
· Nightclubs and bars
· Farm market
· Banks
· Restaurants
7. No temporary or permanent mobile trailers will be allowed (construction trailers not included).
STAFF OBSERVATION
As described below in the Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and Consistency with the Land Development Ordinance sections, staff has reviewed the application and information provided prior to this meeting, and the analysis by staff is that the application is consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, the Land Development Ordinance, and is reasonable and in the public interest.
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
A. Land Use Plan: The
B. Growth Management Plan:
The Growth Management Plan includes the following two Guiding Principles which are relevant to this case:
1. R1 Guiding Principle: Ensure that adequate infrastructure and services are available concurrently with new development.
Staff Analysis: Infrastructure and services are already available at this site.
2. L1 Guiding Principle: Concentrate growth near existing and planned employment centers and available and planned infrastructure to minimize costly service-area extensions.
Staff Analysis: This site is currently an employment center.
C. Affordable Housing Plan: This site is zoned for office and institutional use and as such the Affordable Housing Plan is not applicable.
D. Comprehensive Transportation Plan:
Existing Section: 4 lane major thoroughfare with landscaped median, 100’ R/W
Future Section: 4 lane major thoroughfare with landscaped median, 100’ R/W
Road Improvements: The
Sidewalk Requirements: Sidewalks are required on both sides
Bicycle Requirements: 14’ wide outside lanes
Transit Requirements: Concrete pad and bench for transit stop to be provided in accordance with Chapter 7 of the LDO to serve passengers utilizing the Triangle Transit Route 305 that serves Apex and
E. Parks & Greenways Master Plan: Greenway Map
According to the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan there are no issues related to this site. According to the Open Space and Historic Resources Plan (OSHRP) there were, at one time, hardwood and mixed conifer forests on the western half of the site. However, the western half of the site has already developed and no significant natural resources were identified on the eastern half. No significant historic resources exist on the site.
Consistency with the Land Development Ordinance
F. Environmental:
According to the Town of
G. Buffers:
According to Table 7.2-1 of the Land Development Ordinance, the applicant will be required to provide a 40-foot Type “A” Buffer along the north property line adjacent to the existing residential development.
H. Streetscape:
According to LDO Section 7.2.4(C)(5), a 30’ streetscape, or a 15’ streetscape planted to meet Type “A” (opaque) buffer standards, is required along
I. Traffic Analysis:
A traffic study (08-TAR-303) was performed by SEPI Engineering Group. The traffic study analyzed two office buildings constructed over two phases.
· Phase One includes the construction of a single 40,000 sf office building adjacent to the existing 17,500 sf office building and is scheduled to be completed by 2010. Using land use code 720 for Medical/Dental Office, Phase One is projected to generate 1420 trips on a typical weekday with 145 occurring in the AM peak hour and 178 occurring in the PM peak hour.
· Phase Two includes the removal of the existing 17,500 sf office building and the construction of a second 40,000 sf office building. It is scheduled to be completed by 2013. Using land use code 720 for Medical/Dental Office, Phase Two is projected to generate a net 1070 trips on a typical weekday with 98 occurring in the AM peak hour and 79 occurring in the PM peak hour.
The following mitigations are required to meet the Adequate Public Facilities for Roads Ordinance for construction of Phase One and are in addition to Comprehensive Transportation Plan requirements:
Phase One Improvements;
1.
a. Construct a 100 ft minimum right-turn lane with appropriate taper on
b. This intersection requires improvements to meet the APF requirements. A signal would reduce delay, however, currently the intersection does not meet signal warrants. With the recent roadway improvements in the area, the warrants may be met in the future. A financial guarantee of two times the cost of a future signal can be made in order to meet the APF requirements. As an option, the intersection can be modified to prohibit the north and southbound through and left-turning movements through the construction of a paired left-over design in the median and restriction of right-in/right-out only on site access #1 and
2.
a. Construct the planned site access #2 to be a right-in/right-out access only.
b. Construct a 100 ft minimum right-turn lane with appropriate taper on
3.
Construction an additional westbound through lane. The lane should stretch from
Phase Two Improvements:
Phase Two would not require any additional mitigations to meet the APF requirements.
The report is currently in draft form and therefore the Town of
The proposed project is in the rezoning stage and therefore preliminary engineering of the site has not been provided to staff. Prior to Site Plan or Subdivision Plan approval, the application will be required to demonstrate consistency with the Land Development Ordinance with respect to specific development requirements, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings.
Comparison OF Existing and REQUESTED Zoning DistrictS:
|
District Regulations* |
Base OI District |
Existing OICU District |
Requested OICU District | |
|
Minimum |
None Specified |
None Specified |
None Specified | |
|
|
None Specified |
55,000 sf |
80,000 sf | |
|
Streetscape |
|
30’ |
30’ |
30’ |
|
|
30’ streetscape or |
40’ Type A buffer |
40’ Type A buffer | |
|
15’ Type A buffer | ||||
|
Perimeter Buffer |
Applies to north and west property boundary |
40’ Type A |
40’ Type A |
40’ Type A |
|
Side Yard Buffer |
Applies to boundary between Parcels A & B |
20’ Type C |
20’ Type C |
20’ Type C |
|
Setback from Street |
|
30’ |
30’ |
30’ |
|
Frostwood Drive |
30’ |
90’ |
90’ | |
|
Building Setback from north property boundary |
40’ (per buffer) |
120’ |
120’ | |
|
Building Setback from west property boundary |
40’ (per buffer) |
40’ |
40’ | |
|
Building Height** |
35/50 *** |
1 story/ 36’ max. |
3 stories | |
* In the OI district, residential uses may be permitted in non-residential buildings, provided:
(1) A site plan is approved
(2) At least 50% of the building footprint is reserved for office use
(3) Up to 50% of the building footprint may be utilized for residential uses
(4) No more than 20% of the building footprint may be utilized for retail or personal services uses;
(5) The development shall include sufficient open space and recreational facilities to meet the needs of its residents; and
(6) All residential and non-residential uses must be integrated into the same structure and stand-alone residential structures are prohibited.
** Height may be increased one foot for every foot provided in addition to the minimum setbacks.
*** If a structure is within 100 feet of a residential zoning district boundary the maximum height is 35 feet. If the structure is more than 100 feet from a residential zoning district boundary the maximum height is 50 feet. The maximum height limits may be increased by one foot for every foot provided in addition to the minimum setbacks.
Criteria for Consideration in Reviewing Rezonings:
Section 3.4.1(E) of the Land Development Ordinance sets forth the following criteria that should be considered in reviewing rezonings:
1. The proposed rezoning corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing condition, trend or fact;
2. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan set forth in Section 1.3 (LDO);
3. The Town and other service providers will be able to provide sufficient public safety, educational, recreational, transportation and utility facilities and services to the subject property while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing development;
4. The proposed rezoning is unlikely to have significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and vegetation;
5. The proposed rezoning will not have significant adverse impacts on property in the vicinity of the subject tract;
6. The proposed zoning classification is suitable for the subject property;
Other Reference Information
Schools
The school information is being provided for review; however, the Wake County Board of Education controls capital projects for school capacities.
|
School Information | ||||
|
Assigned Schools |
20th Day Enrollment* |
Permanent Seat |
Average |
Projected Range of Additional |
|
Dillard Elementary |
677 |
577 |
117% |
0 or 1 |
|
Dillard Middle |
1167 |
1084 |
121% |
0 to 1 |
|
|
1909 |
1747 |
109% |
0 |
|
Total Projected range of additional students |
0 to 2 | |||
* Current Enrollment and Building Capacity is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2007-2008 as supplied by the Wake County Public School System. School assignment will be determined at the time of development.
* *The Projected Range of Additional Students is only a rough approximation assuming that a portion of the office building is used for residential purposes as allowed in the OI district. The actual number of students will vary depending on several variables, such as dwelling unit type, number of bedrooms, dwelling size, and other factors. The assumptions used in calculating the maximum number of additional students are: 1) residential use of 50% of a 3-story building footprint (13,333 sf); 2) an average unit size of 1200 sf; and 3) and all units (11) containing 2 bedrooms. The basis for making this calculation is based on multipliers provide from Wake County Schools Office of Student Assignment. At rezoning, student yield can not be accurately determined due to unknown variables.
Applicant’s Justification Statement:
The following statements are provided by the applicant (shown below in italics) in response to the criteria established in the application (shown below in bold) and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town of
1. Any issues with the size of the tract?
The property is located along
2. How is the request compatible with the comprehensive plan (i.e. Land Use, Transportation, Open Space and Historic Resources)?
The adopted comprehensive plan calls for this property to be used for office and industrial uses. The proposed land use is for office/medical office and industrial use with conditions to be placed or retained on the parcel to enhance the development and to meet the desires of the adjoining neighbors.
3. What are the benefits and detriments to the owner, neighbors and the community?
First of all, this proposed development allows for the master plan development of the site combining both Parcel A and Parcel B; thus, the development potential for the site will no longer have to be in question. Based on
4. How are the allowable uses with the proposed rezoning compatible with, or how do they relate to, the uses currently present on adjacent tracts?
The current use of the development is Office, which is located on Parcel A of the proposed development. The proposed development of Parcel B, and proposed future redevelopment of Parcel A maintain the Office development plan. Providing additional Office development along
On-Line Public Feedback
In keeping with Town Council policy regarding citizen involvement in the planning & development process, we have created a new opportunity for interested citizens to provide comments on this case. In addition to speaking at community meetings and public hearings, you can also use the associated "Public Comment" page to share your opinions and concerns. Your feedback will be made available to other residents, the Town Council, the Planning & Zoning Board, and the applicant as this item is evaluated and considered over the next few months.
While this capability is still in the "test stage," we hope you find this new feature useful!
Click here to view comments received so far.
Ordinance for Consideration
08-REZ-14 Tryon Greens
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING
Section 1: The Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning the area described as follows:
|
PARCEL & OWNER INFORMATION | |||
|
Property Owner(s) |
|
Real Estate ID(s) |
(Acres) |
|
Harvest Davalland, LLC |
0762851222 |
0174261 |
7.85 ± |
Section 2: That this Property is rezoned from Office and Institutional Conditional Use to Office and Institutional Conditional Use subject to the individualized development conditions set forth herein, and all the requirements of the Cary Land Development Ordinance (LDO) and other applicable laws, standards, polices and guidelines.
Section 3: The conditions mutually approved by the Town and the applicant for promoting public health, safety and the general welfare are:
1. Relative to Parcel B, a 40-foot Type A buffer will be applied to
2. Light pole height will be limited to 20 feet. Also, shoebox type light fixtures will be used to add attractiveness to the site and limit spillover lighting.
3. Building height will be limited to three stories for any building, with a 50-foot maximum height for any building with a flat roof.
4. Access to Parcel B from
5. The maximum building square footage for the entire site (parcels A & B) shall be 80,000 square feet. This 80,000 square foot limitation applies to the existing building (June 1999) as well as any additional building.
6. The following uses will be removed as permitted uses under the conditional rezoning:
· Child day care centers
· Parking lots, as the principal use of the property
· Funeral homes
· Public utility facilities
· Utility substations
· Communications, radio, TV microwave or other telecommunications towers.
· Outdoor amphitheater, government
· Package delivery/messenger services
· Kennels indoor/outdoor (outdoor walking, exercising, training, etc.)
· Hospitals
· Nightclubs and bars
· Farm market
· Banks
· Restaurants
7. No temporary or permanent mobile trailers will be allowed (construction trailers not included).
These conditions address conformance of the development and use of the Property to ordinances and officially adopted plans and address impacts reasonably expected to be generated by the development and use of the Property.
Section 4: This ordinance shall be effective on the date of adoption.
Adopted and effective: February 26, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Harold Weinbrecht, Jr. |
|
Date |
