08-REZ-06 Piney Plains Offices Datasheet
Rezoning Datasheet
08-REZ-06 Piney Plains Offices
The applicant is requesting the Town Council approve an Ordinance to amend the official zoning map of the Town of
The purpose of a rezoning is to evaluate the appropriateness of a proposed land use for the subject parcel(s) of land. Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not considered during the rezoning process. However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance with existing requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) when the site or subdivision plan is submitted. All such requirements can be found at http:vic.townofcary.org.
|
Applicant |
Gray Styers | ||
|
Agent |
Karen Kererait | ||
|
Acreage |
16.78± | ||
|
General Location |
Northwest of the intersection of | ||
|
Hearings / Meetings |
Public Hearing |
Planning & Zoning |
Town Council October 9 or 23, 2008 * |
|
Land Use Designation |
Medium to High-Density Residential (MDR to HDR) or Office/Institutional (OFC/INS) | ||
|
Town Limits |
The Subject Property is located within the corporate limits of the Town of | ||
|
Valid Protest |
To be determined by the time of the public hearing | ||
|
P&Z Recommendation |
To be provided after the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting | ||
|
Existing Use |
Vacant | ||
|
Proposed Use |
Office | ||
|
Staff Contact |
Debra Grannan, Senior Planner | ||
along the 470’ western property line adjacent to the Wellington Park Subdivision. (The collinear property line
separating these lots from subject Parcel No. 0773300117 is hereinafter referred to as the “Wellington Park
Subdivision boundary line”).
buffer within any area cleared of trees that is located less than 300 feet from the Wellington Park Subdivision
boundary line.
every two (2) feet of additional building setback over 250 feet from the Wellington Park Subdivision boundary line,
not to exceed a maximum building height of 70 feet.
5. The impervious area shall not exceed fifty-six percent (56%).
6. There shall be no net increase in peak stormwater runoff leaving the Site from pre-development conditions for the ten-year design storm.
7. The minimum building setback from the ultimate right of way, based on the current approved Comprehensive Transportation Plan along
planted, with plant types and spacing consistent with a Type C buffer, along Stephens Road.
shall be provided along the entire length of the property line separating the subject property from PIN No.
077206392503. An additional ten-foot (10’) wide evergreen landscaped area will be planted, with plant types and
spacing consistent with a Type A buffer, for a linear distance of two hundred (200) feet running north from the
Stephens Road right-of-way along this buffer.
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
The subject parcels are located within the adopted Southeast Area Plan, which calls for land uses of Medium- to High-Density Residential (MDR to HDR) or Office/Institutional (OFC/INS). This rezoning request is for OFC/INS, thus it conforms to the adopted plan.
development.
2. L1 Guiding Principle: Concentrate growth near existing and planned employment centers and available and
planned infrastructure to minimize costly service-area extensions.
C. Affordable Housing Plan: Based upon the proposed use, the Affordable Housing Plan is not applicable.
Piney Plains
Existing Section: 5-lanes, approximately 90’ ROW
Future Section: 4-lane median divided, 100’ ROW
Road Improvements: None scheduled
Sidewalks Requirements: required on both sides (existing)
Bicycle Requirements: 14’ wide outside lanes
Transit Requirements: None
Existing Section: 2-lanes, approximately 60’ ROW
Future Section: N/A
Road Improvements: None scheduled
Sidewalks Requirements: Required on at least one side
Bicycle Requirements: N/A
Transit Requirements: None
According to the approved Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan, a greenway is proposed across the site, between the
F. Environmental:
According to the Town of
According to Chapter 7 of the Land Development Ordinance, the applicant will be required to provide a 40’ wide Type A (opaque) Buffer adjacent to the existing single family residential uses to the east of the subject property. A 20 Type B buffer is required between the subject property and the O&I zoned property to the east of the site.
According to Chapter 7 of the Land Development Ordinance, the applicant will be required to provide a 15’ Type A (opaque) Streetscape along
A traffic study (08-TAR-270) was performed by Martin/Alexiou Bryson. The traffic study analyzed a total of 450,000 sf of office use with a build out year of 2014. Using land use code 710 for general office, the proposed development is projected to generate 4,284 trips on a typical weekday with 625 occurring in the AM peak hour and 583 occurring in the PM peak hour. The following mitigations are required to meet our Adequate Public Facilities for Roads Ordinance and are in addition to Comprehensive Transportation Plan requirements:
1.
a. Construct the planned site access #1 to provide one inbound lane and one right-turn lane only outbound lane with necessary channelization on this approach and concrete median on
b. Construct a left-turn lane into the site on northbound
c. Widen the southbound
2.
a. Construct the planned site access #2 to provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane.
b. Provide an exclusive right-turn lane with at least 100’ of storage and appropriate taper on the westbound approach and one through lane.
c. Restripe the eastbound approach to be a shared through/left-turn lane.
3.
a. Widen the eastbound
b. Widen the southbound
c. Install a three-phase signal that provides coordination with the
4. Piney Plains and
a. Restripe the southbound
Existing and Requested Zoning District Comparison:
|
District Regulations |
Existing Zoning (R-40 ) |
Requested Zoning (O&I CU) |
|
Maximum Gross Density (du/ac) |
1.08 |
Not Specified * |
|
Minimum |
40,000 |
N/A |
|
Minimum Width at Building Line |
With septic tank/well: 150’ (160’ corner lot) With public sewer: 125’ (135’ for corner lot) |
N/A |
|
Side Yard Setback |
20’ |
N/A |
|
Front Setback |
From thoroughfare: 50’ From collector: 30’ From other streets: 20’ |
From From Private Streets: 15’ |
|
Rear Yard Setback |
30’ |
N/A |
|
|
35’ ** |
35’/50’ *** |
* In the OI district, residential uses may be permitted in non-residential buildings, provided:
(1) A site plan is approved
(2) At least 50% of the building footprint is reserved for office use
(3) Up to 50% of the building footprint may be utilized for residential uses
(4) No more than 20% of the building footprint may be utilized for retail or personal services uses;
(5) The development shall include sufficient open space and recreational facilities to meet the needs of its residents; and
(6) All residential and non-residential uses must be integrated into the same structure. And stand-alone residential structures are prohibited.
**Height may be increased one foot for every foot provided in addition to the minimum setbacks.
***If a structure is within 100 feet of a residential zoning district boundary the maximum height is 35’. If the structure is more than 100 feet from a residential zoning district boundary the maximum height is 50’. The maximum height limits may be increased by one foot for every foot provided in addition to the minimum setbacks.
Section 3.4.1(E) of the Land Development Ordinance sets forth the following criteria that Town Council should consider in reviewing rezonings:
2. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan set forth in Section 1.3 (LDO);
3. The Town and other service providers will be able to provide sufficient public safety, educational, recreational, transportation and utility facilities and services to the subject property while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing development;
4. The proposed rezoning is unlikely to have significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and vegetation;
5. The proposed rezoning will not have significant adverse impacts on property in the vicinity of the subject tract;
6. The proposed zoning classification is suitable for the subject property;
Schools
The school information is being provided for your review; however, the Wake County
Board of Education controls capital projects for school capacities.
|
School Information | ||||
|
Assigned Schools |
20th Day Enrollment* |
Permanent Seat |
Average |
Projected Range of Additional |
|
Dillard Elementary |
677 |
577 |
117% |
** |
|
Dillard Middle |
1167 |
963 |
121% |
** |
|
|
1909 |
1747 |
109% |
** |
|
Total Projected range of additional students |
** | |||
* Current Enrollment and Building Capacity is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2007-2008 as supplied by the Wake County Public School System. School assignment will be determined at the time of development.
** Within O&I Zoning, the potential exists for residential use in a non-residential building. The area allowed for residential is determined based on the size of the building and may not exceed 50% of the size of the building footprint. In the event residential use is proposed on the subject property, the number of projected students would also depend on number of bedrooms and dwelling size. Calculations are based on multipliers provided from Wake County Schools Office of Student Assignment. Based on the information available at the time of this rezoning request, potential student yield can not be accurately determined due to unknown variables.
The following statements are provided by the applicant (shown below in italics) in response to the criteria established in the application (shown below in bold) and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town of
The size of the tract (approximately 30.3 acres) is appropriate and conducive to the office use being proposed. The tract is of ample size to accommodate the requested office development, preserve sensitive natural resources, and achieve the Town of
The proposed rezoning from R-40 to O&I CU is compatible with the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan, the land use plan and the Southeast Area Plan. Specifically, the request for office is in accordance with the long-range vision and recommendations for future land uses in the Southeast Area Plan as it provides that office is an appropriate use for both parcels. The transportation upgrades in the area – both for cars and pedestrians – are designed to accommodate such an office use at this location. The extensive buffers and lower impervious surface percentages established by the conditions ensure the preservation of open space on the parcels.
The proposed rezoning will provide many benefits to the owners of the property, the neighbors and the community. An office development under the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Town’s comprehensive plan, is needed in the Town for economic development and employment location objectives, and is a desirable component to the live / work / shop balance of uses in the Crossroads / Southeast Area. The addition of Class A offices in the area provides residents with close proximity to employment centers, thereby reducing the length of automobile trips and even enabling some neighbors the possibility of walking or biking to work. Those working in the offices will be able to walk or bike to the retail centers and restaurants in the Crossroads area. The proposed office use will not have an adverse impact on the neighbors, the schools or the traffic conditions in the area. There will be no problems with noise from a Class A office development, as demonstrated by numerous other office parks next to residential areas throughout the Triangle. Moreover, In the evenings and on weekends, offices are typically unused. Additionally, the proposed development will be an attractive Class A office park, and significant buffers and landscaping will separate the office buildings from the residences. The setbacks, buffering and height conditions will ensure that the office buildings will not be visible from the homes of almost all of the neighbors. This use will not result in additional children for the schools, and, as noted above, the transportation network in the area is already in place for this use.
4. How are the allowable uses with the proposed rezoning compatible with, or how do they relate to, the uses currently present on adjacent tracts?
The site is located in the
