08-REZ-03 TC
Rezoning Staff Report to the Town Council
08-REZ-03
Request
The applicant is requesting Town Council approve an Ordinance to amend the official zoning map of the Town of
The purpose of a rezoning is to evaluate the appropriateness of a proposed land use for the subject parcel(s) of land. Specific development requirements related to the technical aspects of land development, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings, are not considered during the rezoning process. However, all of these development issues must be addressed for compliance with existing requirements specified in the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) when the site or subdivision plan is submitted. All such requirements can be found at http://www.amlegal.com/library/nc/cary.shtml.
Background Information
|
Applicant |
Jerry Turner and Associates, Inc. | ||
|
Agent |
Glenda Toppe Jerry Turner and Associates, Inc. | ||
|
Acreage |
49.38 ± | ||
|
General Location |
North of Green Hope School Road, east of Fryars Frontier Trail and west of NC 55 Highway | ||
|
Hearings / Meetings |
Public Hearing |
Planning & Zoning |
Town Council |
|
Land Use Designation |
Medium Density Residential (MDR) | ||
|
Town Limits |
In the Town of | ||
|
Annexation |
Not required since it is already within the Town Limits | ||
|
Valid Protest |
No protests were received regarding this case; therefore, no supermajority vote is required. | ||
|
P&Z Recommendation |
Recommended 9-0 for approval. | ||
|
Existing Use |
Vacant | ||
|
Proposed Use |
Residential | ||
|
Final Council Action |
To be provided after the Town Council Meeting | ||
|
Staff Contact |
Debra Grannan, Senior Planner E-mail: debra.grannan@townofcary.org Phone: (919) 460-4980 Mailing Address: | ||
The applicant has proposed to remove approximately 4.28 acres from the Fryar PDD and add it to the Highcroft Village PDD. This request increases the density in Tract 4 and reduces the density in Tract 5 of the Highcroft Village PDD. There would be a reduction of dwelling units in Tract R-2 of the Fryar PDD from 268 dwelling units to 251 dwelling units so that the density of that tract will remain as previously approved. The applicant is not proposing any conditions outside the proposed
Public Notification:
On
Feedback at the Town Council Public Hearing: The applicant, Mrs. Glenda Toppe of Jerry Turner and Associates, stated the request is to remove 4.2 acres from the Fryar PDD and include it in the Highcroft Village PDD, and this swap is proposed to utilize an existing stream buffer as a physical boundary between the two approved PDDs. She stated the parcel in question is best suited for development within
No one spoke at the public hearing.
A Council member stated the particular area in the Fryar PDD with a 30 foot streetscape was due to the fairly low density and that there is a higher density in the area where they propose to reduce the streetscape to 30 feet. The Council member stated that a higher density calls for a larger streetscape. Council also wanted to make sure that both neighborhoods have access to the greenway trail. Clarification as to the net effect on the open space calculations between the two projects was requested before the issues comes back to Council.
Changes Since the Town Council Public Hearing: The applicant has increased the proposed streetscape along
The Highcroft Village PDD master plan in the PDD amendment application only proposed a total of 32.34 acres of open space. Since the public hearing, the applicant has increased the total acreage of open space provided to 33.87 acres through removing the request to reduce the streetscape buffer and increasing the amount of open space provided.
|
| ||||
|
|
Current PDD |
PDD Amendment Application |
April Revised PDD Amendment |
Net Gain/Loss From Current PDD |
|
Streetscape |
3.04 ± |
2.72 ± |
3.49 ± |
+0.45 ± |
|
Stream Buffer |
21.25 ± |
21.06 ± |
21.06 ± |
-0.19 ± |
|
Open Space |
2.97 ± |
3.65 ± |
4.44 ± |
+1.47 ± |
|
Buffers |
5.08 ± |
4.91 ± |
4.88 ± |
-0.20 ± |
|
Total |
32.34 ± |
32.34 ± |
33.87± |
+1.53 ± |
* Also, there are 2.73 acres of Urban Transition Buffers not included in the overall total open space acreage. This 2.73 acres of UTB is located within the Highcroft Village PDD, but was recently used as land for off-site mitigation in associate with the Parkside Variance approval.
The open space in the Fryar PDD amendment has also been increased since the public hearing from 22.86 acres to 23.86 acres.
|
Fryar PDD Total Open Space Acreage Calculations* | ||||
|
|
Current PDD |
PDD Amendment Application |
April Revised PDD Amendment |
Net Gain/Loss From Current PDD |
|
Pond & Stream Buffer |
21.41 ± |
18.88 ± |
19.88 ± |
-1.53 ± |
|
Streetscape & Landscape Strips |
3.98 ± |
3.98 ± |
3.98 ± |
0 |
|
Total |
25.39 ± |
22.86 ± |
23.86 ± |
-1.53 ± |
Since the public hearing, there are now no net gains or losses in open space totals between the original Fryar and Highcroft Village PDD approvals and what is currently being proposed by the applicants.
Feedback at the Planning and Zoning Board
The Board confirmed with the applicant that the total amount of open space was not being reduced.
Changes Since the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting
The Fryar PDD Document has been amended to show a reduction in the number of dwelling units proposed in Tract R-2 from 268 to 251, so that the density of this tract is consistent with the previously approved limit of 4.1 dwelling units per acre. The use table in the Highcroft Village PDD was modified to require a Special Use Permit for Large Day Care Homes and Religious Assembly which is consistent with current LDO standards. The Highcroft Village PDD document has been amended to reflect that Tracts 4 and 5 will comply with current LDO standards for Urban Transition Buffers.
Planning and Zoning Board Recommendation
The Planning and Zoning Board recommended the PDD Amendment unanimously for approval, with the understanding that the amended documents be revised prior to Town Council action to reflect current Urban Transition Buffer regulations for the portions of the PDDs that are proposed to be modified.
summary
As described below in the Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and Consistency with the Land Development Ordinance sections, Staff has reviewed the application and information provided prior to this meeting, and the analysis by Staff is that the application is generally consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, the Land Development Ordinance, and is reasonable and in the public interest.
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
A. Land Use Plan: This rezoning request conforms to the adopted Land Use Plan. This rezoning request involves the swap of land between the Fryar PDD and the Highcroft Village PDD to utilize an existing stream buffer as the physical boundary between the two planned developments. The designated land use on the portion of land being swapped is mostly Medium Density Residential (MDR) with some High Density Residential (HDR), and the proposed use of the parcels matches the existing land use. Thus, the proposal is in conformance with the Land Use Plan.
B. Growth Management Plan:
The Growth Management Plan includes the following Guiding Principles which are relevant to this case:
1. L2 Guiding Principle: Ensure that future growth protects sensitive natural resources and protects open space. The transfer of land between the Fryar PDD and the Highcroft Village PDD allows better utilization of this land with less impact to an intervening stream buffer.
C. Affordable Housing Plan:
The Affordable Housing Plan includes the following Guiding Principles which are relevant to this case:
1. Provide for a full range of housing choices for all income groups, families of various sizes, seniors, and persons with special challenges.
2. Encourage the location of high density housing within walking and convenient commuting distance of employment, shopping, and other activities, or within a short walk of a bus or transit stop, through "mixed use" developments, residences created on the upper floors of nonresidential downtown buildings, and other creative strategies.
3. Assure a quality living environment and access to public amenities for all residents, present and future, of the Town of
D. Comprehensive Transportation Plan:
Existing Section: Not built
Future Section: 100’ right-of-way 4-lane median divided
Road Improvements: Design completed by the Town
Sidewalks Requirements: Required on both sides of the road
Bicycle Requirements: 14’ wide outside lane required
Transit Requirements: None
E. Parks & Greenways Master Plan: Greenways Map
According to the approved Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan there are no issues associated with the proposed relocation of the approximately 4.28 acres from the Fryar PDD to the Highcroft Village PDD. All PRCR conditions previously approved for each of these PDDs shall remain in place. According to the Open Space and Historic Resources Plan (OSHRP) these 4.28 ± acres were originally proposed for conservation as part of a larger parcel due to the riparian buffers on site.
Consistency with the Land Development Ordinance
The proposed project is in the rezoning stage and therefore preliminary engineering of the site has not been provided to Staff for review. Prior to site plan or subdivision plan approval, the application will be required to demonstrate consistency with the Land Development Ordinance with respect to specific development requirements, such as access, stormwater management, road improvements, utility line placement, road connectivity and landscape plantings.
F. Environmental:
According to the Town of
G. Buffers:
The approximate 4.28 acres, proposed to be removed from the Fryar PDD and added to the Highcroft Village PDD, utilizes an existing stream buffer as the physical boundary between the two planned developments. In Highcroft Village Tract 4, a 30-foot buffer is proposed to the east and a stream buffer provides separation with Tract 3 to the south and with Tract 5 to the north. Highcroft Village Tract 5 is divided by
H. Streetscape:
According to Chapter 7 (LDO), a 50’ Streetscape would be required along the future portion of
I. Traffic Analysis:
Originally, for the Highcroft Village Property residential portion, a traffic study (05-TAR-182) was conducted by HNTB which analyzed 350 single-family homes and 80,000 SF of office. This development generated 391 AM and 477 PM Peak hour trips. At a later time, the office portion of the development was dropped and the single-family home units were increased to 427 units. For the Highcroft Village PDD amendment, the only two tracts affected are Tracts 4 and 5. Both Tract 4 and Tract 5 are approved for mixed-residential. Tract 4 currently is approved for 97 units. The amendment proposes 116 units. Tract 5 is currently approved for 80 units. The amendment proposes 61 units. So, in theory, 19 units are being shifted from Tract 5 to Tract 4 which would not yield an increase in traffic. The built out year for this traffic study is 2009.
The Fryar PUD traffic study (06-TAR-202) was completed by HNTB and analyzed 332 single-family homes and 30,000 SF of retail. This proposal simply decreases the acreage of 268 of the single-family homes of the 332 single-family homes by 4 acres. The built out year for this traffic study is 2010.
Therefore, neither of the Highcroft Village PDD or Fryar PDD traffic studies will need to be updated at this time to reflect these changes.
Existing PDD and Requested PDD Amendment Comparison:
The applicant is requesting to amend the previously approved
The R-2 Tract in the Fryar PDD was previously approved for 268 dwelling units with a maximum overall density of 4.1 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is proposing to reduce the maximum number of units from 268 to 251 so that the overall density will remain as previously approved.
The approved open space consisted of a pond, stream buffer, streetscapes and landscape strips. With the proposed removal of the 4.28 acres, which includes a portion of a stream buffer, the total open space provided will be reduced to 23.86 acres with the amendment.
The request proposes changes to the densities and unit counts in the Highcroft Village PDD as indicated in the chart below. There is no proposed overall increase in unit count. In the Highcroft Village PDD Amendment request, the applicant is proposing to permit BMPs in open space if they become a feature that will enhance the development as an amenity.
A total of 32.34 acres of open space were approved in the Highcroft Village PDD. The Highcroft Village PDD Amendment proposes 33.87 acres of open space as well. Although the acreage of streetscapes, perimeter buffers and stream buffers decreases slightly with the amendment, the non-regulatory open space acreage increases from 2.97 acres in the approved Highcroft Village PDD to 4.44 acres in the proposed amendment. Also, there are 2.73 acres of Urban Transition Buffers not included in the overall total open space acreage. This 2.73 acres of UTB is located within the Highcroft Village PDD, but was recently used as land for off-site mitigation in associate with the Parkside Variance approval.
|
Fryar PDD Proposed Amendment | ||||
|
|
Approved PDD |
Proposed at Public Hearing |
Current Proposal |
Net Gain/Loss |
|
Tract R-2 Maximum Dwelling Units |
268 |
268 |
251 |
-17 dwelling units |
|
Tract R-2 Area (Acres) |
65.4± |
61.12± |
61.12 |
-4.28 |
|
Tract R-2 Density |
4.1 du/ac |
4.4 du/ac |
4.1 du/ac |
No change |
|
Overall PDD Open Space |
25.39± |
22.86± |
23.86± |
-1.53 |
|
| ||||
|
|
Approved PDD |
Proposed at Public Hearing |
Current Proposal |
Net Gain/Loss |
|
Tract 4 Maximum Dwelling Units |
97 |
116 |
116 |
+19 |
|
Tract 4 Area (Acres) |
22.42 |
23.63 |
23.63 |
-1.21 |
|
Tract 4 Density |
4.33 du/ac |
4.91 du/ac |
4.91 |
+0.58 |
|
Tract 5 Dwelling Units |
80 |
61 |
61 |
-19 |
|
Tract 5 Area (Acres) |
3.86 ± |
5.30± |
5.30± |
+1.44 |
|
Tract 5 Density |
20.72 |
11.51 |
12.68 |
-8.04 |
|
Overall PDD Open Space |
32.34 |
33.87 |
33.87 |
+1.53 |
Town council Criteria for Consideration in Reviewing Rezonings and PDD’s:
Section 3.4.1(E) of the Land Development Ordinance sets forth the following criteria that the Town Council shall consider in reviewing rezonings:
1. The proposed rezoning corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing condition, trend or fact;
2. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan set forth in Section 1.3 (LDO);
3. The Town and other service providers will be able to provide sufficient public safety, educational, recreational, transportation and utility facilities and services to the subject property while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing development;
4. The proposed rezoning is unlikely to have significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and vegetation;
5. The proposed rezoning will not have significant adverse impacts on property in the vicinity of the subject tract;
6. The proposed zoning classification is suitable for the subject property;
7. The PDD designation is necessary to address a unique situation or represents a substantial benefit to the Town, compared to what could have been accomplished through strict application of otherwise applicable zoning district standards; and
8. The request complies with the standards and intent of a PDD, as outlined is Section 4.2.3 (LDO).
Other Reference Information
Schools
The proposed PDD amendments for Fryar and
|
School Information | ||||
|
Assigned Schools |
20th Day Enrollment* |
Permanent Seat |
Average |
Projected Range of Additional |
|
|
964 |
1072 |
90% |
128-185 9-155 |
|
|
1101 |
1206 |
91% |
25-69 0-100 |
|
|
1496 |
1663 |
90% |
32-82 0-82 |
|
Total Projected range of additional students |
185-336 9-337 | |||
* Current Enrollment and Building Capacity is based on the 20th day of the school year for 2007-2008 as supplied by the Wake County Public School System. School assignment will be determined at the time of development.
** The Projected Number of Additional Students is only a rough approximation. The actual number of students will vary depending on several variables, such as dwelling unit type, number of bedrooms, dwelling size, and other factors. The basis for making this calculation is based on multipliers provide from Wake County Schools Office of Student Assignment. At rezoning, student yield can not be accurately determined due to unknown variables.
*** The first numerical range listed is if the maximum number of units permitted in Highcroft Village Tracts 4 and 5 and Fryar Tract R-2 developed solely as single-family. The second numerical range provided is if the maximum number of units permitted in Highcroft Village Tracts 4 and 5 and Fryar Tract R-2 developed completely as Townhouses, etc.
Applicant’s Justification Statement Submitted (
The following statements are provided by the applicant (shown below in italics) in response to the criteria established in the application (shown below in bold) and does not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Town of
1. Any issues with the size of the tract?
Response from
Response from Fryar PDD Amendment Application: The size of the tract is conducive to the use being proposed.
2. How is the request compatible with the comprehensive plan (i.e. Land Use, Transportation, Open Space and Historic Resources)?
Response from
Response from Fryar PDD Amendment Application: The proposed PDD amendment is compatible with the comprehensive plan. The Fryar PDD identified the R-2 parcel for medium density residential. With the removal of the acreage the parcel will still be
3. What are the benefits and detriments to the owner, neighbors and the community?
Response from Highcroft Village PDD Amendment Application: Given the location of the parcel within the Fryar PDD, the parcel is best suited to be located within the Highcroft Village PDD. The parcel is cut off from the majority of the R-2 Tract in the Fryar PDD because of the existing stream buffer thereby making it difficult to access the property. BY locating the parcel in the Highcroft Village PDD, the property can be integrated into Tract 4 of Highcroft Village and the existing stream buffer can act as the buffer between the Fryar PDD and Highcroft Village PDD. We do not see any detriments to the owners, neighbors or community since the uses are not changing. The center of the stream becomes the boundary between the two PDDs. Additional units are being added to tract 4 in
Response from Fryar PDD Amendment Application: Given the locations of the parcel within the Fryar PDD, the parcel is best suited to be located within the Highcroft Village PDD. The parcel is cut off from the majority of the R-2 Tract in the Fryar PDD because of the existing stream buffer thereby making it difficult to access the property. By locating the parcel in the Highcroft Village PDD, the property can be integrated into the Tract 4 of Highcroft Village and the existing stream buffer can act as the buffer between the Fryar PDD and Highcroft Village PDD. We do not see any detriments to the owners, neighbors or community since the uses are not changing. The center of the stream becomes the boundary between the two PDDs.
4. How are the allowable uses with the proposed rezoning compatible with, or how do they relate to, the uses currently present on adjacent tracts?
Response from Highcroft Village PDD Amendment Application: All uses are compatible with the proposed zoning and can be found currently on neighboring parcels.
Response from Fryar PDD Amendment Application: All uses are compatible with the proposed zoning and can be found currently on neighboring parcels.
5. What reductions/amendments and/or modifications to the development standards of the LDO are being requested and how are they justified? (PDD, new or amended) Applicants must list these items and/or clearly highlight them within the Planned Development document.
Response from
Response from Fryar PDD Amendment Application: None listed.
Ordinance for Consideration
08-REZ-03
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF CARY TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 49.38 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF GREEN HOPE SCHOOL ROAD, EAST OF FRYARS FRONTIER TRAIL AND WEST OF NC 55 HIGHWAY OWNED BY D. ROSCOE FRYAR AND HIGHCROFT INVESTORS LLC BY AMENDING THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED HIGHCROFT VILLAGE AND FRYAR PDDS (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS) BY: REMOVING APPROXIMATELY 4.28 ACRES FROM THE FRYAR PDD AND INCLUDING IT IN THE HIGHCROFT VILLAGE PDD; INCREASING DENSITY IN TRACT 4 AND DECREASING DENSITY IN TRACT 5 OF THE HIGHCROFT VILLAGE PDD, REDUCING THE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS IN TRACT R-2 OF THE FRYAR PDD AND REVISING THE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS IN TRACT 4 AND 5 OF THE HIGHCROFT VILLAGE PDD, AND BY APPLYING CARY’S LDO STANDARDS FOR URBAN TRANSITON BUFFERS TO TRACTS 4 AND 5 OF THE HIGHCROFT VILLAGE PDD.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
Section 1: The Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning the area described as follows:
|
PARCEL & OWNER INFORMATION | |||
|
Property Owner(s) |
|
Real Estate ID(s) |
(Acres) |
|
Highcroft Investors LLC |
0735501486 (portion) 0734681762 (portion) |
0084273 (portion) 0185234 (portion) |
12.70 ± (portion) 32.40 ± (portion) |
|
D Roscoe Fryar |
0734497294 (portion) |
0030966 (portion) |
4.28 ± (portion) |
|
Total Acres |
49.38 ± | ||
Section 2: That this Property is rezoned from Highcroft Village and Fryar PDDs to Highcroft Village and Fryar PDD Amendments subject to the individualized development conditions set forth within the Highcroft Village and Fryar PDD Amendments, which includes removing approximately 4.28 acres from the Fryar PDD and adding it to the Highcroft Village PDD; increasing density in Tract 4 and decreasing density in Tract 5 of the Highcroft Village PDD, reducing the number of dwelling units in Tract R-2 of the Fryar PDD, revising the number of dwelling units in Tract 4 and 5 of the Highcroft Village PDD, applying Cary’s LDO standards for Urban Transition Buffers to Tracts 4 and 5 of the Highcroft Village PDD, and all the requirements of the Cary Land Development Ordinance (LDO) and other applicable laws, standards, polices and guidelines.
Section 3: The conditions mutually approved by the Town and the applicant for promoting public health, safety and the general welfare are set forth within the Highcroft Village and Fryar PDD Amendments. These conditions address conformance of the development and use of the Property to ordinances and officially adopted plans and address impacts reasonably expected to be generated by the development and use of the Property.
Section 4: This ordinance shall be effective on the date of adoption.
Adopted and effective:
|
|
|
|
|
Harold Weinbrecht, Jr. |
|
Date |
